1,809,004 research outputs found
SamanthaB-321/Federal-Special-Ed-Law-Survey: First release
No full textThis is the first release (Zenodo
LIPIcs, Volume 321, IPEC 2024, Complete Volume
No full textLIPIcs, Volume 321, IPEC 2024, Complete Volum
Bulletin No. 321 - Alfalfa Pellets - Roughage or Concentrate?
No full textBulletin No. 321 - Alfalfa Pellets - Roughage or Concentrate
Participant 321 Community Conversations Drawing
No full textIn this drawing by Participant 321 from the group MLP Artists, titled "Grief from the Goal," the participant describes their work: "My piece relates to Covid and my personal experiences because I felt sad that the NFL had to cancel some games and move others around a lot. The missed field goal and the storm clouds in the backgorund represent my sadness that things were canceled. The empty stands represent how no one could come watch the games in the stadium, due to Covid."New Jersey Department of Healt
Business Research: BEC 321 & 321
No full textExamination on Business Research: BEC 321& 321- November 2009
Human body [Corbs humain] - CTH 321
No full textNotes related to the words used for human body found in the folder of the CTH 321. Emmanuel Laroche translated this text as "Combat contre le Dragon, ou "Illuyanka"," and classified the concordances in the category of Anatolian mythology in mythological texts (Catalogue des textes Hittites, No. 321).Paper (2 sheets
Resolución UNRN N° 321/2009. Designa docente interina.
No full textFil: Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (U). Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Río Negro, ArgentinaResolución UNRN N° 321/2009. Designa docente interina.fals
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
