1,725,150 research outputs found
IGR J17453-2853 = Granat 1741.9-2853?
The position of the recently found source IGR J17453-2853 as derived by INTEGRAL IBIS/ISGRI (see ATel #1005) is about 4 arcmin from that of Granat 1741.9-2853 (see ATel #1006; Muno et al. 2003, ApJ 598, 474). Formally, given the statistical 90% error regions of both sources (IGR J17453-2853: about 2 arcmin; Granat 1741.9-2853: about 1 arcsec), they can be regarded as two different sources. However, Granat 1741.9-2853 was found to be the only X-ray transient active in the near vicinity of IGR J17453-2853 by the Swift/XRT, about a day after the INTEGRAL observations (ATel #1006). Moreover, combining our Galactic bulge monitoring observations obtained on UT 2007, February 15 18:35-22:17, February 17 14:52-18:34, and February 20 00:51-04:32, with JEM-X we find a source at RA, Dec (degrees, J2000.0) = 266.265, -28.92, with a positional error of about 2 arcmin. This is consistent with the X-ray emission being also due to Granat 1741.9-2853. It was detected at the 10 sigma level with an average JEM-X 3-10 keV flux of 7.5+/-1 mCrab; it was just at the detection limit in the JEM-X 10-25 keV band (about 5 mCrab). In addition, the quoted Swift/XRT 2-10 keV flux and X-ray spectrum of Granat 1741.9-2853 (ATel #1006) are consistent with the quoted 20-60 keV IBIS/ISGRI flux of IGR J17453-2853 and its inferred high absorption column density, a day earlier (ATel #1005). Note that in April 2005 both sources were also reported to be active in the same time period with similar fluxes (Kuulkers et al. 2007, A&A, in press, astro-ph/0701244). Although we cannot exclude that two different sources were active at the same time, we regard this as unlikely. We, therefore, suggest that IGR J17453-2853 and Granat 1741.9-2853 are one and the same source. We note that the other source active in the Galactic Center region, Swift J174535.5-290135.6 (ATels #1005, #1006), was still seen during our observations on February 17 (about 13 mCrab, 8 sigma, JEM-X 3-10 keV) and February 20 (about 15 mCrab, 9 sigma, JEM-X 3-10 keV). </p
2853. Geoffroi de Paris
2853. Geoffroi de Paris. In: Molinier Auguste. Les Sources de l'histoire de France - Des origines aux guerres d'Italie (1494). III. Les Capétiens, 1180-1328. Paris : A. Picard et fils, 1903. pp. 192-193
Astronomische Nachrichten, n°s 2853-2860
Radau Rodolphe. Astronomische Nachrichten, n°s 2853-2860. In: Bulletin astronomique, tome 5, 1888. pp. 504-511
La nuova disciplina europea della responsabilità per danno da prodotti difettosi (dir. 2024/2853/UE)
Directive 2024/2853/EU is largely inspired by the previous regime. The main differences lie in the updating of the provisions on digital products and on the introduction of new evidentiary facilitations. Overall, the new provisions, which the Author reviews, are equipped with a more analytical approach
Block Card 2853 Elm Street
This image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Gable front houses | Folk House Style | dwelling | 2853 Elm Street (Toledo, Ohio) | Ravenswood Addition | North Toledo (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 2853 Albion Street
This image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Gable front houses | Folk House Style | Dwelling | Central Avenue Addition | Auburndale Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | 2853 Albion Street (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 2853 West Central Avenue
This image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Gulf Oil Company (Toledo, Ohio) | Moderne Style | 2853 West Central Avenue (Toledo, Ohio) | service stations | Old Orchard Area (Toledo, Ohio) | Westgate Area (Toledo, Ohio) | Haughton Place Addition (Toledo, Ohio
Studi Putusan Nomor 2853/Pid.B/2018/PN.MDN
91 HalamanHukum pidana merupakan salah satu bagian dari keseluruhan hukum yang berlaku di masyarakat atau dalam suatu negara yang mengadakan dasar-dasar dan aturan-aturan untuk menentukan perbuatan-perbuatan mana yang dilarang yang disertai ancaman berupa nestapa atau penderitaan bagi barangsiapa yang melanggar larangan tersebut,aturan-aturan tersebut mengatur tentang pelaggaran dan kejahatan terhadap kepentingan umum, pelanggaran dan kejahatan tersebut disertai dengan ancaman berupa pidana penderitaan bagi mereka yang melanggar aturan tersebut.
Dalam penulisan skripsi ini penulis lakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan hukum pidana materil oleh hakim terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan biasa studi kasus putusan nomor : 2853/Pid.B/2016/PN.Mdn, Untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan biasa studi kasus putusan nomor: 2853/Pid.B/2018/PN.Mdn.
Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif yang didukung dengan penelitian lapangan, Penulis juga menggunakan penelitian lapangan. Penelitian lapangan disini tidak seperti penelitian hukum empiris, namun penelitian hukum dalam hal ini adalahpenelitian yang dilakukan secara langsung dengan pihak atau instansi yang terkait dengan permasalahan yang diteliti, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan di Pengadilan Negeri Medan dengan mengambil putusanperkara nomor: 2853/Pid.B/2016/PN.Mdn.
Adapun hasil dari penelitian penulis ialah pengaturan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan ialah setiap tindak pidana yang umum sudah di atur oleh KUHP Indonesia yang lama mulai dari kejahatan yang ringan sampai dengan kejahatan yang berat, serta pelanggaran yang ringan sampai dengan pelanggaran yang berat. Semua tindak pidana yang dicantumkan di dalam KUHP itu juga memiliki stelsel pemidanaan/ancaman yang berbeda-beda pula sesuai dengan kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh si pembuat tindak pidana. Dan aspek kriminologi dalam putusan PN Medan No.: 2853Pid.B/2018/PN.MDN tentang pembunuhan ialah meliputi penganiayaan yang terlebih dahulu dilakukan dalam aksinya tersebut. Kemudian adanya bukti yang ditemukan sandal, jaket, tas sandan korban Terdakwa buang ke sungai deli di Titi Papan setelah itu Terdakwa pulang, kemudian bukti lain yang menguatkan tentang kasus tersebut meliputi keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli (dalam surat keterangan atau Visum et Repertum), serta keterangan terdakwa sendiri dalam pemeriksaan di persidangan. Criminal law is one part of the overall law that applies in society or in a country that establishes the bases and rules for determining which actions are prohibited, accompanied by threats in the form of grief or suffering for anyone who violates these prohibitions, The regulation regulates violations and crimes against the public interest, these violations and crimes are accompanied by threats of criminal suffering for those who violate these rules.
In writing this thesis the author did it with the aim of knowing the application of material criminal law by judges against perpetrators of ordinary murder case study decision number: 2853 / Pid.B / 2016 / PN.Mdn, To find out the legal considerations of judges in making decisions against perpetrators ordinary murder crime case study decision number: 2853 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.Mdn.
This research was conducted using normative legal research supported by field research. The author also used field research. Field research here is not like empirical legal research, but legal research in this case is research conducted directly with parties or agencies related to the problem being studied, namely legal research conducted at the Medan District Court by taking a case number: 2853 / Pid.B /2016/PN.Mdn
The results of the author's research are that the legal arrangements for the perpetrators of the crime of murder are every general crime that has been regulated by the old Indonesian Criminal Code, ranging from minor crimes to serious crimes, as well as minor offenses to serious offenses. All criminal acts included in the Criminal Code also have different sentencing / threat systems according to the crime committed by the perpetrator of the crime. And the criminological aspect in the Medan District Court decision No .: 2853Pid.B / 2018 / PN.MDN regarding murder includes persecution that was first carried out in the action. Then there was evidence that the defendant's sandals, jacket, sandbag and sandals were thrown into the Deli river at Titi Papan after that the Defendant returned home, then other corroborating evidence about the case includes witness testimony, expert testimony (in a certificate or Visum et Repertum), and the defendant's own testimony during examination at trial
Block Card 2853 Isha-Laye Drive
This image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch Style | 2853 Isha-Laye Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | attached garage | Dwelling | McKondin Heights Addition | Westgate Are
- …
