1,736,052 research outputs found
Rush, T W, 2288
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/414714Surname: RUSH. Given Name(s) or Initials: T W. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 2288. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 21807.234297
Item: [2016.0049.46975] "Rush, T W, 2288
2288. Sicardus Cremonensis
No full text2288. Sicardus Cremonensis. In: Molinier Auguste. Les Sources de l'histoire de France - Des origines aux guerres d'Italie (1494). III. Les Capétiens, 1180-1328. Paris : A. Picard et fils, 1903. p. 21
2288. Sicardus Cremonensis
No full text2288. Sicardus Cremonensis. In: Molinier Auguste. Les Sources de l'histoire de France - Des origines aux guerres d'Italie (1494). III. Les Capétiens, 1180-1328. Paris : A. Picard et fils, 1903. p. 21
Block Card 2288 Auburn Avenue
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Carpenter Gothic Style | 2288 Auburn Avenue (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Auburndale Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | Auburndale Area (Toledo, Ohio
Phillips, Andrew Thomas, 1865-1937 (SC 2288)
Get PDFFinding aid only for Manuscripts Small Collection 2288. Records relating to business affairs of Andrew Thomas Phillips, of Hopkins County and Muhlenberg County, Kentucky. Includes invoices for store inventory, price lists, deed, note and mortgage
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Commento all'art. 2288 c.c.
No full textIl contributo rappresenta un commento all'art. 2288 del codice civile, in tema di esclusione di diritto del socio di società di persone. La norma, avente carattere inderogabile, prevede due ipotesi di esclusione automatica (: il fallimento del socio e l'ottenimento da parte del creditore particolare della liquidazione della quota del socio suo debitore), che vengono analizzate separatamente. Lo scritto poi affronta la questione della decorrenza degli effetti dell'esclusione di diritto. La parte conclusiva è dedicata alla valutazione della possibilità di estendere la disciplina in esame a tutte le società di persone
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy
Get PDFBackground: In 2004, a review of pilot studies published in seven major medical journals during 2000-01 recommended that the statistical analysis of such studies should be either mainly descriptive or focus on sample size estimation, while results from hypothesis testing must be interpreted with caution. We revisited these journals to see whether the subsequent recommendations have changed the practice of reporting pilot studies. We also conducted a survey to identify the methodological components in registered research studies which are described as 'pilot' or 'feasibility' studies. We extended this survey to grant-awarding bodies and editors of medical journals to discover their policies regarding the function and reporting of pilot studies.
Methods: Papers from 2007-08 in seven medical journals were screened to retrieve published pilot studies. Reports of registered and completed studies on the UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) Portfolio database were retrieved and scrutinized. Guidance on the conduct and reporting of pilot studies was retrieved from the websites of three grant giving bodies and seven journal editors were canvassed.
Results: 54 pilot or feasibility studies published in 2007-8 were found, of which 26 (48%) were pilot studies of interventions and the remainder feasibility studies. The majority incorporated hypothesis-testing (81%), a control arm (69%) and a randomization procedure (62%). Most (81%) pointed towards the need for further research. Only 8 out of 90 pilot studies identified by the earlier review led to subsequent main studies. Twelve studies which were interventional pilot/feasibility studies and which included testing of some component of the research process were identified through the UKCRN Portfolio database. There was no clear distinction in use of the terms 'pilot' and 'feasibility'. Five journal editors replied to our entreaty. In general they were loathe to publish studies described as 'pilot'.
Conclusion: Pilot studies are still poorly reported, with inappropriate emphasis on hypothesis-testing. Authors should be aware of the different requirements of pilot studies, feasibility studies and main studies and report them appropriately. Authors should be explicit as to the purpose of a pilot study. The definitions of feasibility and pilot studies vary and we make proposals here to clarify terminology
Corpora and Language Learners Amsterdam:Benjamins ,2004 90-272-2288-6
No full textItem does not contain fulltextGuy Aston Corpora and Language Learners Amsterdam:Benjamins ,2004 90-272-2288-
- …
