1,878,754 research outputs found

    خوباننامه (MS 174); زنان نامه (MS 175); رقاص نامه (MS 176)

    No full text
    Bu cilt, birbirinden farklı 3 yazmanın bir araya getirilmesiyle oluşturulmuştur (Yazma numaraları : MS 174, MS 175, MS 176). Üç eser de Osmanlıca yazılmıştır. MS 174, 1792 yılına tarihlenirken, diğer iki yazmanın kaleme alınma tarihi bilinmemektedir. MS 174 : Meşhur eserde farklı milletlerin erkek güzellerinin özellikleri anlatılmaktadır. MS 175 : Meşhur eserde farklı milletlerin kadın güzellerinin özellikleri anlatılmaktadır. MS 176 : Dörtlüklerle yazılmış olan eserde İstanbulun çengileri tanıtılır

    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANO

    No full text
    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANOC-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANOjp

    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANO

    No full text
    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANOC-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANOjp

    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANO

    No full text
    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANOC-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANOjp

    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANO

    No full text
    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERAN

    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANO

    No full text
    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERAN

    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERANO

    No full text
    C-176 INICIA IPN VACACIONES DE VERAN

    Bulletin No. 176 - The Mexican Bean Beetle

    No full text
    Bulletin No. 176 - The Mexican Bean Beetl

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore