1,721,442 research outputs found
Gladiator, god of gek? : Keizer Commodus nader bekeken
Get PDFContains fulltext :
17204.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Analysis of recusal proceeding sentence No. 17204-2020-03039.
No full textLa imparcialidad es uno de los principios fundamentales que se deben aplicar para garantizar el debido proceso. Los jueces son los primeros responsables de velar por su adecuado cumplimiento, ya que están obligados a evitar cualquier circunstancia que los orille a tomar decisiones anticipadas respecto de una causa que estén conociendo. En el escenario de que su imparcialidad se vea comprometida, deben desvincularse del proceso por acción propia; si esto no sucede, cuando alguna de las partes perciba y pueda demostrar que se vulneran sus derechos, es posible recurrir a la figura de la recusación. El presente estudio analiza la sentencia de un caso particular de recusación No. 17204-2020-03039, interpuesto por la recusante en contra de una jueza de la Unidad de Familia de la parroquia Iñaquito, D.M. de Quito, quien avocó conocimiento de una causa de alimentos en 2010 y ocho años después, una de tenencia; donde los involucrados son los mismos. Se empleó la investigación descriptiva mediante el análisis documental para identificar los problemas jurídicos, hechos relevantes y normas que contextualizan la controversia. Se atiende con especial énfasis a la motivación ofrecida por el juzgador y su decisión adoptada, por la importancia y valor de su juicio, al determinar cómo las normas y principios se cumplieron o se vulneraron; demostrándolo a través de argumentos sólidos y finalmente compartir un criterio jurídico regido por la ley y justicia.Impartiality is one of the fundamental principles that must be applied to guarantee due process. Judges are primarily responsible for ensuring proper compliance, since they are obliged to avoid any circumstance that might lead them to make early decisions regarding a case they are hearing. In the event their impartiality is compromised, they must disassociate themselves from the process by their own action. If this does not happen, when any of the parties perceives and is able to demonstrate that their rights are being violated, it is possible to exercise recusal. This study analyzes the sentence of a particular case of recusal No. 17204-2020-03039, filed by Cecilia León against Judge Ana Hidalgo of the Family Unit in Iñaquito parish, M.D. of Quito, who had taken cognizance of a child support case in 2010 and eight years later, a custody case in which the involved parties are the same. Descriptive research was used through documentary analysis to identify the legal problems, relevant facts and norms that contextualize the controversy. Special emphasis is given to the motivation offered by the judge and the adopted decision, due to the importance and value of their judgment, considering how the norms and principles were fulfilled or violated. This is evidenced through solid arguments and finally, a legal criterion governed by law and justice is shared.PregradoAbogado(a
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
