1,721,620 research outputs found
05. A Cognitive Analysis of the Trump Administration\u27s Implementation of Executive Order 13769
Issued on January 27, 2017, Executive Order 13769: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES caused mass panic and mass protests overnight. The executive order first introduced by Donald J. Trump during his candidacy for president in 2016 was a cornerstone of the future President’s campaign. The 21st century has introduced a broad range of American presidents and administrations who have introduced foreign policy initiatives ideal for analysis through the cognitive and the personified state perspectives. Initiatives that would have otherwise been deemed irrational or unsuccessful through other schools of thought have been explained by the cognitive perspective by focusing on the person or persons behind the policy. This research study analyzes the formulation and implementation/re-implementation of E.O. 13769 by focusing on the personified state through President Trump and the cognitive perspective to suggest the success of E.O. 13769 ratification was not based on the efficacy of the policy but rather persistence of the Trump administration.
Keywords: Executive Order 13769, travel ban, Muslim ban, Trump Administratio
Dampak Perubahan Kebijakan Migrasi Amerika Serikat Melalui Executive Order 13769 terhadap Penegakan HAM pada Masa Pemerintahan Donald Trump (2017)
Penelitian yang berjudul “Dampak Perubahan Kebijakan Migrasi Amerika Serikat Melalui Executive Order 13769 Terhadap Penegakan HAM Pada Masa Pemerintahan Donald Trump (2017)” ini memiliki focus penelitian untuk menganalisis tentang bagaimana kebijakan migrasi melalui Executive Order 13769 melanggar hak-hak kemanusiaan berdasarkan deklarasi maupun perjanjian internasional seperti dalam UDHR Pasal 13 mengenai hak-hak migran dan Pasal 14 mengenai hak-hak pencari suaka. Serta dalam ICERD Pasal 1(1) dan Pasal 4 mengenai penolakan atas segala bentuk diskriminasi. Executive Order 13769 dengan judul: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States dinilai tidak sesuai dengan UDHR dan ICERD karena memiliki unsur diskriminasi. Dimana, kebijakan ini atau yang biasa disebut Travel Ban 1.0 melarang masuknya migran dari tujuh negara mayoritas Muslim yaitu, Suriah, Iran, Irak, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, dan Yaman dengan bentuk visa apapun. Dengan segala bentuk pertentangan atas kebijakan ini, kemudian Executive Order 13769 direvisi dengan Executive Order 13780 atau Travel Ban 2.0 dengan judul yang sama. Namun, Executive Order 13780 masih dinilai memiliki unsur diskriminasi. Atas respon mengenai hal tersebut kebijakan migrasi mengenai pencegahan tindak terorisme di Amerika Serikat ini, terus direvisi dengan final yang direvisi dengan Presidential Proclamation 9754 :Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Exploring the Polarized Dialogue Surrounding Syrian Refugee Resettlement in the United States in Response to Executive Order 13769
Faculty advisor: Dr. Catherine SolheimThis research was supported by the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP).Farrington, Mackenzie. (2017). Exploring the Polarized Dialogue Surrounding Syrian Refugee Resettlement in the United States in Response to Executive Order 13769. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/190919
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
