Procter & Gamble (United Kingdom)

Roehampton University Research Repository
Not a member yet
    19200 research outputs found

    Diversity & cultural awareness in nursing practice

    No full text

    Land‐use intensification systematically alters the size structure of aquatic communities in the Neotropics

    Get PDF
    © 2023, John Wiley & Sons. The attached document (embargoed until 14/04/2024) is an author produced version of a paper published in Global Change Biology uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it

    Bubbling Up Conversations:London Bubble Theatre Company

    No full text

    Patient perspectives on working with preferences in psychotherapy:A consensual qualitative research study

    No full text
    ObjectiveAssessing and accommodating patient preferences is integral to evidence-based practice. This qualitative study sought to explore patient perspectives and experiences of preference work in psychotherapy.MethodsParticipants were 13 UK-based patients who had completed up to 24 sessions of a collaborative–integrative psychotherapy. Ten participants identified as female and three as male. Interviews were conducted at endpoint and analyzed using a team-based, consensual qualitative research approach.ResultsThree superordinate domains were developed: Preferences Themselves, Process of Working with Preferences in Psychotherapy, and Effect of Preference Work (or its Absence). Patients typically wanted leadership, challenge, and input from their psychotherapist, and an affirming style. Patients attributed the origin of their preferences to personal history, characteristics, or circumstances; the present psychotherapy; or past episodes of psychotherapy. Some preferences changed over time. Preference work was described as having positive effects on the therapeutic relationship and patients’ intrapersonal worlds; however, variantly, non-accommodation of preferences was also experienced as beneficial.ConclusionOur findings provide in-depth answers to a range of novel questions on preference work—potential mechanisms by which preference work impacts outcomes, factors that may facilitate preference work, and origins of preferences—as well as nuancing previously-established quantitative findings. Implications for clinical training and practice are discussed

    How to get started with Co-Production in Social Prescribing

    Get PDF

    4,381

    full texts

    19,200

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Roehampton University Research Repository is based in United Kingdom
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Roehampton University Research Repository? Access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard!