56271 research outputs found
Sort by
An examination of Islamist discourse in the face of western challenge:the case of İsmet Özel
No full textTezin basılısı İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi'ndedir.This thesis examines İsmet Özel’s Islamist discourse on the Western challenge in the context of Islamic movement by using the textual analysis method. To this end, I analyze his three major books, including Üç Mesele (1978), Cuma Mektupları I, II, III, IV, V (1988-1992) and Tahrir Vazifeleri (1994). The main argument of the thesis is that the fundamental tension shaping Özel’s thinking as an Islamist intellectual emerges out of the distinction between the “political West” and the “philosophical West.” I examine his political project in Cuma Mektupları and his existentialist perspective in Tahrir Vazifeleri. Secondly, this study analyzes the transformation of his ideas from Üç Mesele (1978) to Cuma Mektupları (1988-1992) and Tahrir Vazifeleri (1994). By comparatively investigating his ideas with its political and philosophical aspects, this thesis provides insight into the thought of this important intellectual as well as contributing to the understanding the Islamist intellectual movement in Turkey.ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ iv
ÖZ ................................................................................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ vi
CHAPTERS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Setting the Problem ....................................................................................... 1
1.2. Sources and Methodology ............................................................................. 4
1.3. Literature Review .......................................................................................... 6
1.4. The Organization of the Dissertation .......................................................... 15
2. The Formation of An Islamic Thinker: İsmet Özel’s Intellectual Portrait ............. 17
2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 17
2.2. The Structure of Islamism in Turkey ........................................................... 17
2.3. The Rise of Islamism in Turkey: From 1970s to February 28 ..................... 19
2.4. A Brief Biography of İsmet Özel ................................................................ 25
2.5. İsmet Özel’s Intervention into the Intellectual Field: Üç Mesele ................ 28
2.6. The Importance and the Effect of Üç Mesele .............................................. 34
2.7. The Effect of İsmet Özel as an Islamist intellectual from 1980s to the 2000s ............................................................................................................................ 38
3. The Construction of Political and Philosophical West Within the Essays of İsmet Özel ........................................................................................................................... 43
3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 43
3.2. The Political Project of İsmet Özel .............................................................. 43
3.2.1. İsmet Özel’s Discourse of the World-System .................................... 45
3.2.2. Major Political Concepts in the Context of World-System ................ 51
3.2.3. The Limits of Özel’s Political Project ................................................ 59
3.2.4. The Construction of Political West .................................................... 63
3.3. Philosophical Discourse of İsmet Özel ........................................................ 64
3.3.1. Human, Religion and Existence ......................................................... 66
3.3.2. Modernity and Culture ....................................................................... 74
3.3.3. Science ............................................................................................... 77
3.3.4. The Construction of Philosophical West within Özel’s Essays ......... 81
3.4. The Evolution and Change of Özel’s Thought ............................................ 83
3.5. An Attempt to Frame on İsmet Özel’s Thought .......................................... 86
4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 91
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................... 9
Global south to the rescue:emerging humanitarian superpowers and globalizing rescue industries
No full textThe Turkish left and the Kurdish question
Get PDFThis essay examines Marxist Turkish left’s engagement with the Kurdish question in Turkey. It aims to portray, on the basis of some first-hand material, the theoretical inclinations and political attitudes of the main legal and illegal Marxist parties and organizations concerning the Kurdish question. It basically argues that the Turkish Marxists’ stressful engagement with the Kurdish question can be viewed in four periods corresponding to four conditions: encounter, union, separation, and divorce
Imagining the family:intergenerational cultural transmission in mixed families in Istanbul
No full textTezin basılısı İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi'ndedir.Accelerated and increasingly complex patterns of international migration are correlated with emergence of various types of transnational families and ever rising number of bi-national couples. Once a typical emigration country, Turkey has recently been established as a transit and receiving society, where numerous Europeans settled due to emotional ties with Turkish citizens. This thesis studies mixed European-Turkish families residing in Istanbul, as an “active and complex socio-cultural hybrid space” (Rodríguez García, 2006, 426). The self-definition is for each family open, fluid, and in a continual process of (re)construction. Although the creation of a new family always involves “imagining”, mixed couples necessarily answer more abstract questions than mono-cultural: a) Who are we as a family and where do we stand vis-à-vis our respective societies? b) Who are our children going to be? c) How we will raise them? Consequently, the thesis is divided into three main parts corresponding to the stated questions. First, I examine a) the social characteristics of the research participants, b) the reactions of family and friends to their relationship, and c) the adaptation strategies of non-Turkish partners to Turkish society. Second, I explore how these couples, as mothers and fathers, negotiate and pass specific aspects of their heritages to their children. Third, within the mixed families, mothers and fathers have at their disposal two distinctive sociocultural repertoires in regard to cultural transmission and parenting models, as they were raised and socialized in distinctive settings. Hence, I examine the non-Turkish participants’ perceptions of a role of extended family, a concept of a good mother and child-rearing practices. The thesis represents a qualitative micro study and derives from semistructured in-depth interviews.Abstract………………………………………………………………….…………iii
Öz………………………………………………………………………………..….iv
Dedication……………………………………………………………………………v
Acknowledgments……………………………………………………….………...vi
Table of contents……………………………………………………………………vii
List of tables………………………………………………………………..……….ix
CHAPTERS
1. Chapter I: Introduction
a. Turkish migratory field: Overview…………………………………..1
b. How to study cross-national families? The research question and thesis outline……………………..…………………………………4
c. Methodology………………………………………………………....6
2. Chapter II: Who are we? Social characteristics of research participants, reactions to cross-national marriage, and adaptation strategies to Turkish society
a. The research participants…………………………………………….9
b. The initial reactions and acceptance of the relationship …………...15
c. The adaptation strategies to Turkish society………………………..22
3. Chapter III: Who we want our children to be? Identity markers, competencies, and belonging
a. Approaches to diversity within the mixed family.............................36
b. Open individualized approach: Cosmopolitan children....................39
c. Mix collective approach: Bi-national children..................................42
d. Single collective approach: Mono-national children.........................45 e. Discussion..........................................................................................50
4. Chapter IV: How we raise our children? Setting symbolic boundaries
a. Context……………………………………………………………..55
b. The family models………………………………………………….58
c. The symbolic boundaries………………………………………...…61
d. Closeness between extended family members……………………...62
e. What is a good mother?.....................................................................68
f. Moral boundaries…………………………………………………...73
g. Socioeconomic boundaries…………………………………………77
h. Cultural boundaries…………………………………………………79
i. Discussion…………………………………………………………..81
5. Chapter V: Conclusion…………………………………………………84
References…………………………………………………………………………8
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of arts in cultural studies
Get PDFTezin basılısı İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi'ndedir.The main purpose of this study is to examine the borders of ethical justice and peace based on the confrontation with 1915 in Kurdish literature. The most significant point of this thesis is shaped by the fact that these texts were written after 2000. Consequently, in which point of view these texts were written or what could be intended construct the baseline of the study. Throughout the thesis, I will investigate the development or main problems of literature produced by Turkey centered Kurdish writers and later these writers‘ approach to the Catastrophe. These two chapters will help us to better understand the contents of Kurdish texts narrating 1915 incidents (the Catastrophe) and Armenians. The relation between prohibition of mourning and the appearance of trauma will determine the possibility of justice and confrontation in these texts.ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ iv
ÖZ ................................................................................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................... viii
INTRODUCTION. ...................................................................................................... 1
CHAPTERS 1. FORMALLY MİLLET-İ SADIKA, INFORMALLY KİRVE: A HISTORY OF PROUD OR SHAME ................................................................................................. 12
1.1. A General Portrait of the Relations between the State and Non-Muslim Groups in the Ottoman Empire ........................................................................................... 12
1.2. Kurdish-Armenian Relations in the first period of the 19th century (18391876) ....................................................................................................................... 14
1.3. A new Period: Kurdish-Armenian Relations in Hamidian Era (1878-1908) .. 19
1.4. Young Turks and the Effects of 1908 on the Kurdish-Armenian Relations and Its way onto 1915 (1908-1915) .............................................................................. 25
2. BELATED MODERNITY OR OVERDOSE BANS: KURDISH LITERATURE IN TURKEY .............................................................................................................. 32
2.1. Nation-Building through Newspapers and Journals (1898-1923) ................... 33
2.2. Exile, Political Movements and Its Relation with Literature (1923-1991) ..... 38
2.3. Blurred Borders of Bans against Kurdish Language and Its Comeback to Turkey (1991-2016) ............................................................................................... 43
3. AN ATTEMPT FOR PEACE: SPECTER-LIKE VICTIMS AND DEMAND FOR EXCUSING ............................................................................................................... 47
3.1. An Introduction: How to Approach the Texts ................................................. 47
3.2. Fact/Fiction, Monument/Document and Testimony/Novel dichotomies ........ 50
3.3. Mourning, Trauma and Silence: Mutated Identities ........................................ 58
3.4. The Borders of Penance, Price and Confrontation .......................................... 64
CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 71
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 7
Armenian literary studies in Turkey and new prospects
No full textDespite the silence which dominated the whole century, in the past few years, Turkish literary circles bore witness to a burgeoning interest in the Armenian literature produced in the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey. A group of Turkish academics and some intellectuals outside of the academia rediscovered the important role Armenian culture played in the Ottoman Empire. They were fascinated by the vast literary heritage, which was almost totally unknown to Turkish public. Armenian became a prefer- able academic language for young scholars and at the same time, some researchers began working on Turkish texts in the Armenian alphabet. In this process, first of all, the number of translations from Armenian increased and the Turkish audience became acquainted with Ottoman Armenian writers such as Hagop Baronyan, Krikor Zohrab, and Zabel Yesayan. Secondly, contemporary writers and poets who wrote in Armenian or both in Armenian and Turkish, such as Megerdich Margosyan, Zaven Biberyan, and Zahrad became popular.1 Thirdly, various books and articles by researchers and literary critics such as Marc Nichanian, Kevork Bardakjian, and Boghos Levon Zekiyan were translated into Turkish as a parallel pro- cess to the increasing number of literary works
Classification of word levels with usage frequency, expert opinions and machine learning
No full textMakale, İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü ile ortak üretilmiştir; ancak ilk yazarın bölümü olarak Bilgisayar Mühendisliği koleksiyonuna dahil edilmiştir.Educational applications for language teaching can utilize the language levels of words to target proficiency levels of students. This paper and the accompanying data provide a methodology for making educational standard-aligned language-level predictions for all English words. The methodology involves expert opinions on language levels and extending these opinions to other words using machine learning and data from a large corpus. Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR) level predictions for about 50 000 words, which can be readily used in educational applications, are also provided. For applications where the cost of misclassification varies, machine learning model parameters and algorithm selection must be adjusted. A large number of expert opinions taken from a survey with 30 practicing language teachers that can be used for this adjustment are also released. The overall methodology can be applied to low-resource languages, where CEFR-level classifications may not exist, by adding a comparable survey and corpus. The data are released with a Creative Commons Attribution license to enable free mixing, sharing and even use in commercial applications
Capacity planning in non-uniform depth anchorages
No full textCommercial vessels utilize anchorages on a regular basis for various reasons such as waiting for loading/unloading, supply, and bad weather conditions. Recent increase in demand for anchorage areas has mandated a review of current anchorage planning strategies. In particular, current state-of-the-art anchorage planning algorithms assume that the anchorage areas are of uniform depth, which is quite unrealistic in general. In this study, we introduce an algorithmic modification to current anchorage planning methods that takes into account non-uniformity of anchorages. By exploiting the depth non-uniformity, our algorithm significantly improves the number of vessels that can be accommodated in an anchorage and it can easily be incorporated into existing anchorage capacity planning decision support systems
A new partial key exposure attack on multi-power RSA
No full textAn important attack on multi-power RSA (N = prq) was introduced by Sarkar in 2014, by extending the small private exponent attack of Boneh and Durfee on classical RSA. In particular, he showed that N can be factored efficiently for r = 2 with private exponent d satisfying d < N0.395. In this paper, we generalize this work by introducing a new partial key exposure attack for finding small roots of polynomials using Coppersmith’s algorithm and Gro¨bner basis computation. Our attack works for all multi-power RSA exponents e (resp. d) when the exponent d (resp. e) has full size bit length. The attack requires prior knowledge of least significant bits (LSBs), and has the property that the required known part of LSB becomes smaller in the size of e. For practical validation of our attack, we demonstrate several computer algebra experiments
Objektif isnadiyet teorisi ve mağdurun kendisi için bir tehlike yarattığı durumlar
No full textTezin basılısı İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi'ndedir.Bu çalışma, mağdurun kendisi için bir tehlike yarattığı durumlarda katılan kişinin sorumluluğunun nasıl belirlenmesi gerektiği sorusuna hasredilmiştir. Mağdur, kendisi için bir tehlike yarattığında ve bunun sonucunda hukuka aykırı bir netice meydana geldiğinde failin ceza sorumluluğu etkilenir mi ve nasıl etkilenir? Dolayısıyla bu çalışmanın asıl hedefi, mağdurun kendisi için bir tehlike yarattığı durumlarda, bu tehlikenin yaratılmasına yardım ederek, destekleyerek, teşvik ederek katılan üçüncü kişinin ceza sorumluluğunun incelenmesidir. Ceza hukuku literatüründe ve mahkemelerde uzunca bir süredir tartışmalı bir konu olan mağdurun kendisi için bir tehlike yaratması, literatürde çoğunlukla objektif isnadiyet teorisi başlığı altında ele alındığından, bu çalışma dab u incelemeyi, objektif isnadiyet teorisi çerçevesinde yapmaktadır. Bu çalışmada basamaklı bir inceleme metodu izlenmiş; ilk olarak nedensellik konusu, özellikle şart teorisi incelenmiştir. şart teorisine, bu derece geniş bir yer ayrılmasının sebebi, şart teorisi ve objektif isnadiyet teorisi arasındaki ilişkidir. Objektif isnadiyet teorisi, şart teorisiyle nedenselliğe ilişkin ulaşılan sonuçların hukuki bir değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmasıdır. Çalışmamızda neticenin, failin fiilinin bir eseri olup olmadığını inceleyen objektif isnadiyet teorisi de kısaca ele alınıp ve sonuçta da mağdurun kendisini tehlikeye soktuğu durumlarda katılanın sorumluluğunun nasıl belirleneceği objektif isnadiyet teorisi kapsamında tartışılmıştır.ÖZ ............................................................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. v
İÇİNDEKİLER ........................................................................................................... vi
KISALTMALAR ........................................................................................................ ix
GİRİŞ ........................................................................................................................... 1
BÖLÜM 1. NEDENSELLİK BAĞI ............................................................................................ 4 1.1.
GENEL OLARAK ........................................................................................... 4
1.2. NEDENSELLĠĞĠN TANIMLANMASI ........................................................... 7
1.3. ŞART TEORİSİ ( DĠE AQUĠVALENZTHEORĠE ) ..................................... 12
1.3.1. CONDĠTĠO-SĠNE-QUA-NON FORMÜLÜ ........................................ 13
1.3.1.1. CONDĠTĠO-SĠNE-QUA-NON FORMÜLÜNÜN TEMEL BİÇİMİ VE ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI .................................................................................... 13
1.3.1.2. FORMÜLÜN KULLANIMINDA KARŞILAŞILAN ÖZEL DURUMLAR ................................................................................................. 21
1.3.1.2.1. Nedensellik Bağının Belirsiz Olduğu Haller.............................. 22
1.3.1.2.2. Varsayılan Nedensellik ............................................................. 25
1.3.1.2.3. Alternatif Nedensellik ............................................................... 29
1.3.1.2.4. Kümülatif Nedensellik .............................................................. 37
1.3.1.3 KANUNA UYGUN ŞART FORMÜLÜ .......................................... 38
1.3.1.4. ŞART TEORİSİNİN TEMEL FORMÜLÜNE YAPILAN DİĞER İLAVELER .................................................................................................... 48
1.3.1.4.1. Somut Biçimi İçinde Netice ...................................................... 48
1.3.1.4.2. Atipik Nedensellik Serileri ......................................................... 53
1.3.1.4.3. Araya Giren Üçüncü Kişi ve Rücu Yasağı ................................ 55
1.3.1.4.4. Nedensellik Zincirinin Sollanması (Öne Geçen Nedensellik) ... 59
2. OBJEKTİF İSNADİYET TEORİSİ ....................................................................... 63
2.1. HUKUKİ BİR FİGÜRÜN ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI VE GELİŞİMİ ....................... 63
2.2. TEMEL FORMÜL .......................................................................................... 69
2.3. BİR TEHLİKENİN YARATILMASI ............................................................ 73
2.3.1. RİSKİN AZALTILMASI YA DA RİSKİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ ............ 73
2.3.2. HUKUKEN ÖNEMLİ BİR TEHLİKENİN YARATILMASI ................ 77
2.3.3. HUKUKEN ÖNEMLİ BİR TEHLİKENİN YARATILMASI VE VARSAYILAN NEDENSELLİK ..................................................................... 81
2.3.4. İZİN VERİLEN RİSKİN BULUNDUĞU HALLER .............................. 84
2.4. BİR TEHLİKENİN GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMESİ ............................................ 88
2.4.1. BİR TEHLİKENİN GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMEDİĞİ DURUMLAR ......... 88
2.4.2. İZİN VERİLMEYEN BİR RİSKİN NETİCEDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMEDİĞİ DURUMLAR .................................................... 95
2.4.3. ÜÇÜNCÜ BİR KİŞİNİN OLAYLARIN GELİŞMİNE DAHİL OLDUĞU DURUMLAR ................................................................................... 97
2.4.4. NORMUN KORUMA AMACI BAĞLANTISI .................................... 105
2.4.5. ÖZEN YÜKÜMLÜLÜĞÜNE AYKIRILIK BAĞLANTISI ................ 107
3. MAĞDURUN KENDİSİ İÇİN BİR TEHLİKE YARATMASI .......................... 113
3.1. GENEL OLARAK ........................................................................................ 113
3.2. MAĞDURUN KENDİSİ İÇİN BİR TEHLİKE YARATTIĞI DURUMLARIN HUKUKİ BİR PROBLEM OLARAK ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI ...... 114 3.3. İSNADİYETİN ORTADAN KALKMASI İLKESİNİN TEMELLENDİRİLMESİ VE SUÇ SİSTEMATİĞİ İÇİNE YERLEŞTİRİLMESİ ...................
........................................................................................................... 116
3.3.1. İŞTİRAK ARGÜMANI ......................................................................... 117
3.3.2. ŞAHSİSORUMLULUK PRENSİBİ .................................................... 120
3.3.3. İZİN VERĠLEN RİSK, NORMUN KORUMA AMACI VE DİĞER AÇIKLAMALAR ............................................................................................ 123
3.3.4. BİR TEHLİKENİN YARATILIP YARATILMADIĞI SORUSU ........ 125
3.3.5. DEĞERLENDİRME ............................................................................. 126
3.4. MAĞDURUN ŞAHSİ SORUMLULUĞUNUN BELİRLENMESİ ............ 128
3.4.1. “RIZA” ÇÖZÜMÜ VE MAĞDURUN İSTEĞİNİN CİDDİYETİ ........ 129
3.4.2. MAĞDURUN KENDİSİNİ TEHLİKEYE SOKTUĞU DURUMLARDA KATILANIN HUSUSİ BİLGİ SAHİBİ OLMASI .......................................... 139
3.4.3. KUSURLULUĞU ETKİLEYEN HALLERE BAŞVURULMASI ....... 146
3.4.4. GARANTÖRÜN YÜKÜMLÜLÜĞÜ ................................................... 148
3.5. KURTARMA OLAYLARI .......................................................................... 151
SONUÇ .................................................................................................................... 155
KAYNAKÇA ........................................................................................................... 15