Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM BERDIFERENSIASI MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SMA UNTUK SISWA CERDAS ISTIMEWA DAN BERBAKAT ISTIMEWA DI KELAS AKSELERASI
Get PDFAbstract: The research was aimed at: (1) formulating the needs of mathematics curriculum for gifted and talented students in acceleration class; (2) developing model prototype of differentiated mathematics curriculum of senior high school in acceleration class; (3) finding out the appropriateness of the differentiated mathematics curriculum that was developed.Research and development method was used to produce the model of mathematics curriculum. This method consisted of some steps, namely: (1) the preliminary step including field observation and literary research; (2) the development step including mathematics curriculum analysis and prototype design to be model differentiated mathematics curriculum; and (3) evaluation step to examine the final design of differentiated mathematics curriculum.Findings of the results were: 1) the need of the mathematics is concerned with: (a) the repetition of material minimum, (b) the effectiveness of the compacting of time (c) encourage gifted and talented students to think at a high level, (d) in accordance with the national curriculum tailored to the guidelines for the implementation of accelerated learning program (e) relative ready to use on the condition that a minimum school, 2) to develop a prototype model of differentiated curriculum in high school math class acceleration is done by: (a) analytical standards of competence and competence elementary school and high school mathematics, (b) identify standards and basic competencies based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy, (c) mapping standards and basic competencies essential, (d) the escalation of basic competence, (e) develop an indicator based on the escalation of basic competence, ( f) determine the allocation of time on each indicator, (g) organize competency standards, basic competency and escalated of indicators into structure of the semester (h) determine the allocation of time in each half, and 3) the results of the evaluation showed: (a) from in terms of the feasibility of the content of the prospective users of the respondent, the result that differentiated curriculum is good since was responded very good and good as big as 95%, (b) in terms of linguistic, with the result that differentiated curriculum is good since was responded good as big as 100%, (c) the presentation of the curriculum in terms the result that differentiated curriculum was developed is good since was responded very good and good as big as 95%, and (d) in terms of the potential users of the product from graphic, the result that differentiated curriculum is good since was responded very good and good as big as 100%. Besides the evaluation of the design is also made evaluation of differentiated mathematics curriculum content that includes seven components: (a) an accelerated rate of learning by repetition at least 75% of respondents gave very appropriate responses, 25% responded accordingly, (b) control the national curriculum (KTSP) in a shorter time 100% of respondents responded very appropriate, (c) material that is abstract, complex and deep 100% of respondents responded accordingly, (d) the use of skills learned in applying problem-solving strategies 75% of respondents said the suit, 25% of respondents said quite appropriate, (e) oriented learners 100% of respondents said that accordingly, (f) to apply research skills appropriate 75% of respondents said that, 25% said quite appropriate, and (g) motivate students to learn independent is responsed appropriate by the respondent of 100%.Key words: Differentiated Mathematics Curriculum, Gifted, Acceleration
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN IRINGAN MUSIK INSTRUMENTAL PADA MATERI GARIS DAN SUDUT DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN HITUNG ALJABAR PESERTA DIDIK SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MAGELANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013
Get PDFAbstract:The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from student’s algebra count ability. The learning models compared were cooperative learning (Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with instrumental musical accompaniment & NHT) and direct learning. The research typewasaquasi-experimental research.The research’s population wasthe 7th-grade students of the State Junior High Schools in Magelang Regency.It’s sampleswere takenby using stratified cluster random sampling techniquewhichconsisted of 97 students in the first experiment group, 99 students in the second experiment group, and 96 students in the control group.The datawas analyzed by using the unbalanced two-ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0.05.The results of this research are as follows: (1) the both cooperative learningmodels result in the same goodlearning achievement, but its resultin a better learning achievement than the direct learning model; (2) the learning achievement of the students with the high level of algebra count ability is better than that of those with the medium and the low levels of it, the learning achievement of the students with the medium level of algebra count ability is better than that of those with the low level of it; (3) in each levelsof algebra count ability shows thatthe both cooperative learningmodels result in the same good learning achievement, but its result in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model; (4) in each learning model shows that the learning achievement of the students with the high level of algebra count ability is better than that of those with the medium and the low levels of it, the learning achievement of the students with the medium level of algebra count ability is better than that of those with the low levelof it. Keywords: NHT,instrumental music, algebra count ability, learning achievement
ANALISIS PROSES PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI KELAS VIII AKSELERASI SMP NEGERI 1 BOYOLALI
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to describe planning and implementation of the learning process performed by mathematics teacher in the class VIII acceleration of SMPN 1 Boyolali. It was a qualitative research casestudy.The subject of this research were taken by using the purposive sampling. The subject of the research were mathematics teacher class VIII acceleration fisrt grade and second grade. The techniques of collecting the data in this research were documentation, interview and observation. The techniques of validating the data were source triangulation and time triangulation. The technique of analyzing the data was Miles and Huberman concept, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings of the research show that planning of the learning process performed mathematics teacher in the class VIII acceleration of SMPN 1 Boyolali equal to the planning process of mathematics learning in the regular classroom, the difference lies in the allocation of time. The process of preparation of instructional time allocation in accelerated classes every basic competence with respect to the number of weeks was effective as seen from accelerated academic calendar, the number of basic competencies, depth, complexity, and level of interest of a basic competence. Implementation of the learning process performed mathematics teacher in the class VIII acceleration of SMPN 1 Boyolali, approaches, strategiesandmethods, is student-oriented activities. The approachused by teachersis the approach behaviour (behaviour therapy). Learning strategies are instructional strategies that emphasize learning out comes in intellectual abilities and learning strategies student-oriented activities. The method is applied teacher combines several methods such as lectures, question and answer, discussion and drill that emphasize student activity. Keywords: planning of the learning process, implementation of the learning process, syllabus, lesson plan, learning approaches, learning strategies, learning methods, acceleratio
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PESERTA DIDIK SMA SE – KAB. MAGELANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013
Get PDFABSTRACT: The objectives of this research are to investigate: 1) which of the cooperative learning model of the Jigsaw type, the cooperative learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and the direct learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics, 2) which of the students with the high self-regulated learning, the students with the medium self-regulated learning, and the students with the low self-regulated learning have a better learning achievement in mathematics, 3) in each of the learning models which of the students with the high self-regulated learning, the students with the medium self-regulated learning, and the students with the low self-regulated learning have a better learning achievement in mathematics, 4) in each of the self-regulated learning, which on the cooperative learning model of the Jigsaw type, the cooperative learning model of the NHT type, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement in mathematics. The research used the experimental quasi research method with the factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research was all of the students in Grade XI of Senior High School in Magelang regency in academic year 2012/2013. The samples of research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The samples of the research were the students of Taruna Nusantara senior high school, state senior high school 1 of Bandongan, and state senior high school 1 of Dukun. The hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of a = 0,05. The results of the research are as follows: 1) Jigsaw better than NHT and direct learning, whereas NHT equal to direct learning in mathematics achievement, 2) the high self-regulated learning better than medium and low, whereas the medium better than low in mathematics achievement, 3) Jigsaw with the high self-regulated learning better than the medium and low, whereas the medium better than the low in mathematics achievement. NHT with the high self-regulated learning better than the medium and low, whereas the medium equal to the low in mathematics achievement. Direct learning with the high self-regulated learning better than the medium and low, whereas the medium equal to the low in mathematics achievement. 4) The high self-regulated learning with the cooperative learning model of NHT type better than Jigsaw and direct learning, whereas Jigsaw better than direct learning. The medium self-regulated learning with the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type better than NHT and direct learning, whereas NHT equal to direct learning. The Low self-regulated learning with NHT better than Jigsaw and direct learning in mathematics achievement. Keywords : Jigsaw, NHT, and self-regulated learning
EKSPRIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN TPS DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA MATERI POKOK SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of research was to find out: (1) which ones having better achievement, the students using TPS (Think Pair Share) learning with CTL approach or STAD (Students Teams Achievement Divisions) cooperative learning model with CTL approach or direct learning, (2) which ones having better learning achievement, the students with kinesthetic or visual or auditory learning style, (3) in each learning style, which ones having better achievement, the students using TPS (Think Pair Share) learning with CTL approach or STAD (Students Teams Achievement Divisions) cooperative learning model with CTL approach or direct learning, and (4) in each learning model, which ones having better learning achievement, the students with kinesthetic or visual or auditory learning style. The population of research was all VIII graders of Public Junior High schools in Bojonegoro Regency consisting of 55 schools. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 304 students divided into experiment I, experiment II, and control groups. The conclusions of research were: (1) TPS CTL learning provided learning achievement better than STAD CTL and direct, but STAD CTL learning provided learning achievement as same as the direct learning did. (2) The students with kinesthetic learning style had learning achievement better than those with visual and auditory learning styles. But, the students with visual and those with auditory learning styles had equal learning achievement. (3) a. In kinesthetic learning style, all learning models provided the same learning achievement. b. In visual learning style, TPS CTL learning provided learning achievement better than STAD CTL. Meanwhile, direct learning provided the learning achievement as same as the TPS CTL and STAD CTL learning models did. c. In auditory learning style, all learning models provided the same learning achievement. (4) a. In TPS CTL learning model, the students with kinesthetic learning style had better achievement than those with auditory learning style. The students with visual learning style had learning achievement equal to those having kinesthetic and auditory learning styles, b. In STAD CTL learning model, the students with kinesthetic learning style had better achievement than those with visual and auditory learning styles. However, the students with visual learning style had learning achievement equal to those with auditory learning style, c. In direct learning, the three learning styles had the equal learning achievement.Keywords:TPS-CTL, STAD-CTL, Learning Style, learning achievemen
EKSPERIMENTASI PENDEKATAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DENGAN METODE DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this research was to reveal the effect of PMR approach with discovery learning method, PMR approach, and directed instruction approach to the mathematics achievement in Algebra Expression viewed from mathematics communication ability. The type of this research was a quasi experimental by 3x3 factorial design. The population in this research was the seventh grade students of junior high school in Pontianak in the academic year 2012/2013. The total of sample was 9 classes and it was taken using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instrument of research using mathematics achievement test and mathematics communication ability test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusion of this research shows that PMR approach with discovery learning method, PMR approach and directed instruction approach give the same mathematics achievement and it shows the same result in each level of mathematics communication ability. Other conclusion also shows that the students who have high mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students who have middle or low mathematics communication ability, the students who have middle mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students who have low mathematics communication ability, and it shows the same result in each learning approach categories.Key words: PMR Approach, Discovery Learning Method, Directed Instruction Approach, Mathematics Communication Ability, Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) PADA POKOK BAHASAN LIMIT FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA (Penelitian Dilaksanakan di SMA
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this study were to know: (1) which one gives student better learning achievement, Numbered Heads Together learning process, Think Pair Share one with Contextual Teaching and Learning, or conventional one, (2) which one having better learning achievement in mathematics, students who have the level of low anxiety, medium one, or high one, (3) which level of anxiety in learning mathematics gives better learning achievements with Numbered Heads Together learning model, Think Pair Share one with Contextual Teaching and Learning approach one, or conventional one, (4) which learning model (Numbered Heads together, think pair share with contextual Teaching and Learning approach, or conventional) gives better learning achievement in mathematics toward the level of low anxiety, medium one , or high one.It was aquasi-experimentalstudy using twoindependent variables(model of learning andthe anxiety of learning mathematics) andonedependent variable(learning achievement of mathematics). The instruments used to collect the data were documentation,testing, andquestionnaires. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The sample-taking was done using Sratified Cluster Random Sampling.The results of theresearchare. (1) the learning achievement in Conventional learning model andNumberedHeads Together one areequally well, Think Pair Sharemodelis better thanconventionalone,whileNumberedHeads Togetherandthinkpair share are equally well, (2) the learning achievement in mathematics toward low anxiety and medium one are equally well, low-anxiety learning is better than highanxiety, medium anxiety and highoneareequally well, (3) in NumberedHeads Together, Think Pair Share, andconventional model, the learning achievement in mathematics toward low anxiety and medium one are equally well, low-anxiety is better than highanxiety, medium anxiety and highoneareequally well, and (4) the learning achievement inlow, medium, andhigh anxietyat the learning achievement in Conventional learning model andNumberedHeads Together one areequally well, Think Pair Sharemodelis better thanconventionalone,whileNumberedHeads TogetherandThinkPair Share are equally well. Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Think Pair Share,Conventional
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA
Get PDFmodels of SNH type, NHT type with realistic Mathematics approach, and conventional type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students; (2) which of the high, the medium, and the low independence of learning of the students results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) for each category of independence of learning of the students, which one results in better achievement in Mathematics, cooperative learning model of SNH type, NHT type with realistic Mathematics approach, and conventional type; and (4) for each learning model, which one results in better achievement in Mathematics, students who have high, middle, or low independence of learning. This research used quasi-experimental research method. The population of this research was the eleventh (8th) grade students of the state junior high schools in Mataram in the first semester of the academic year of 2012/2013. This research used stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP Negeri 15 Mataram, SMP Negeri 8 Mataram, SMP Negeri 9 Mataram. The data of the research were collected through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The data were then analyzed by using the unbalanced Two-Way Analysis of Variance at the significance level of 0.05. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the SNH type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than cooperative learning model of NHT type and conventional type, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than conventional type; (2) the learning achievement of the students with the high independence of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the middle and low independence of learning and the learning achievement of the students with the middle independence of learning give the same mathematics achievement as the low independence of learning; (3) for each category of independence of learning of the students, cooperative learning model of SNH type results in better achievement in Mathematics than cooperative model NHT type and conventional type, and cooperative learning model NHT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than conventional type; and (4) for each learning model, the learning achievement of the students with the high independence of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the middle and low independence of learning and the learning achievement of the students with the middle independence of learning results as good as in the low independence of learning.Keywords: Cooperative learning model of SNH type, NHT type, realistic Mathematics approach, and independence of learning of the student
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN ROUNDTABLE TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI AKTUALISASI DIRI SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MAGELANG
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effects of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the students’ self-actualization. The learning models compared were conventional model, cooperative learning model NHT type and RoundTable type. The type of this research was quasi-experimental research. The population was the 8th grader students of the state junior high school in Magelang regency on academic year 2012/2013. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two way ANOVA. The research conclude as follows. (1) Students’ mathematics achievement using cooperative learning model with Roundtable type, have better students’ mathematics achievement than the ones who use both cooperative learning model with NHT type and conventional learning model, while students mathematics achievement using either NHT or conventional learning model showed similar good result.(2) Students’ mathematics achievement of students who have a high self-actualization is better than students who have both medium and low self-actualization while students who have either medium and low self-actualization have similar good mathematics achievement. (3) In the conventional learning models and cooperative learning model with NHT type, students who have high, medium and low self-actualization have similar mathematics achievement. While in the RoundTable cooperative learning model, students who have high self-actualization produce better mathematics achievement than students who have medium and low self-actualization while either students who have medium self-actualization or students who have low self-actualization have similar good mathematics achievement. (4) On students with high levels of self-actualization, the students’ mathematics achievement using RoundTable type of cooperative learning have better students’ mathematics achievement than by using conventional learning models while by using either NHT type of cooperative learning or conventional learning models produce the similar good mathematics achievement. However, the students who have medium and low self-actualization by using conventional learning model, cooperative learning model NHT and RoundTable have similar good mathematics achievement. Keywords: Self-actualization, Cooperative Learning, NHT, RoundTable
EKPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA
Get PDFAbstractThe aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student creativity. The learning model compared were discovery, group investigation and conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of Junior High School in Surakarta city on academic year 2012/2013. The samples of this research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consist of 281 students who were divided into 94 students in the first experiment class, 94 students in the second experiment class, and 93 students in the control class. The results of this research are as follows: (1) the discovery learning model results in better learning achievement than the group investigation and conventional learning model. The group investigation learning model results in an equal learning achievement to the conventional learning model, (2) the students having high level of creativity have better learning achievement than those having medium and low levels of creativity. The students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low level of creativity, (3) on the discovery learning model, students having high creativity have better learning achievement than those having medium and low levels of creativity and students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low creativity. On the group investigation model, students in each level of creativity have the same learning achievement, (4) the students who were tought with the discovery learning model have better learning achievement than those taught with the group investigation and conventional learning model in the category of having high level of creativity. The students who were tought group investigation and conventional model results in an equal learning achievement in the category of having high level of creativity. The students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low level of creativity in each learning model.Key words: discovery, group investigation, learning achievement, and creativit