Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING (RT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMA/MA NEGERIDI KABUPATEN KETAPANG PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) which learning model produces students’ better mathematics learning achievement, Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), or conventional learning model; (2) which students’ have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning creativity; (3) viewed from learning models, which students’ have better mathematich learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning cretivity; (4) viewed from their creativity level, which learning model produces better mathematich learning achievement RT, PBL, or conventional model. This study was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The population was the students of XI class, State SMA/MA in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Province in year academic 2013/2014. The samples were taken through stratified cluster random sampling technique. The entire samples were 312 students comprising 101 students for the first experimental group, 108 students for the second experimental group and 103 students for control group. The data were collected through the mathematical achievement tests and the learning creativity questionnaires. The hypothesis testing employed unbalanced two ways of ANOVA. The results of the study are as follows. (1) RT produced students’ better mathematics learning achievement than PBL and conventional models; PBL produced the same mathematical achievement as conventional model. (2) The students with high learning creativity had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low learning creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity. (3) Treated with RT, the students with high creativity learning had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; treated with PBL, the students with high, medium, and low learning creativity had the same achievement; treated with conventional model, students with high creativity had the same achievement as those with medium; the students with high creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; the students with medium creativity had the same achievement as those with low creativity; (4) Viewed from their high learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their medium learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their low learning creativity, students treated with RT, PBL and conventional had the same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: RT, PBL, learning creativity, the mathematical achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SMPN KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the self confidence of the students. The learning models compared were Think Pair Share (TPS) model, Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem (TAPPS) model, and conventional model. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Sukoharjo. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 302 students; consisted of 100 students in the first experimental class, 101 in the second experimental class, and 101 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self confidence. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) TPS model had better learning achievement than TAPPS model and conventional model, TAPPS model had better learning achievement than conventional model. (2) the students having high self confidence had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self confidence, the students having medium and low self confidence had equally mathematics learning achievement. (3) there was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the self confidence on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the student.Keywords:Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (TAPPS), mathematics learning achievement, and self confidence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI KPK DAN FPB DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT KECERDASAN LOGIKA MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS V SD NEGERI SE-KECAMATAN PURWODADI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student logical-mathematical intelligence in the topic of Smallest Common Multiple (SCM) and Greatest Common Factor (GCF) at fifth grade students of elementary schools in Purwodadi District. The learning models compared Teams Games Tournament (TGT), Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), and direct instruction model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students at fifth grade of Elementary School in Purwodadi District on academic year 2013/2014. The size of the samples were 192 students consisted of 87 students in the first experimental group by using cooperative learning model Teams Games Tournament (TGT), 53 students in the second experimental group by using cooperative learning model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), and 52 students in the control group by using direct instruction model. The instruments used mathematics achievement test and logical-mathematical intelligence test. The data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TGT model gives mathematics achievement as well as TAI, whereas TGT and TAI model gives better mathematics achievement than the direct instruction model. (2) The high logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than middle and low logical-mathematical intelligence students and the middle logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low logical-mathematical intelligence students. (3) For all types of logical-mathematical intelligence students, TGT model gives mathematics achievement as well as TAI, whereas TGT and TAI model gives better mathematics achievement than the direct instruction model. (4) For all types of learning model, the high logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than middle and low logical-mathematical intelligence students and the middle logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low logical-mathematical intelligence students.Key words: Teams Games Tournament (TGT), Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), logical-mathematical intelligence, learning achievement
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS V SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA
Get PDFAbstract: This study aim to describe the thinking process of elementary school fifth grade students in solving mathematics problem based on Krulik and Rudnick rule. This research was a qualitative research using the case study method. Sampling was done by a combination of purposive sampling and snowball sampling technique. The subject of research that used in this study was twelve subjects, that was: four high-ability students, four moderate-ability students and four low-ability students. The data was validated by using a time triangulation test. The results show: (1) At the step of reading and thinking, students do not directly identify all of the facts in writing. After identifying the facts, students identify questions from the given problem. Furthermore, students do not portray the problems encountered but directly process the needed information to answer the question; (2) At the step of exploring and planning, students organize the information on the matter. Students consider enough information on the matter because there is a relation between the known and the asked. On the other hand, students do not make tables, diagrams, charts, tables or images from a given problem, but directly chose a strategy to answer the question; (3) At the step of selecting the strategy, students use the making list of all possible answers strategy. Students write down all the possibilities answers in the answer sheet. However, there are students who also use the guessing and testing strategy, guess how the value of variable and test whether the variable value is correct. In addition there are also students who use simulation or experimental strategies, students try to experiments; (4) At the step of finding the answer, the student use estimation in finding the answer. On the other hand, there is one student who uses algebra ability to find the answers. Students are also assuming the third day as a variable. After obtaining the value of the variable, student examine whether the numbers are correct. (5) At the step of reflecting and extending, students can review the results of the calculation by return on the answer sheet. Then students find that the answer is correct. Furthermore, students assume no alternative other solutions. Then the students do not make a generalizations of matter and discover the concept of matter.Keywords: process thinking, mathematics and problem solving
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) BERBANTU VIDEO CAMTASIA PADA MATERI PELUANG UNTUK SISWA SMA/MA NEGERI KABUPATEN CILACAP TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract. The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) the process and result of the development of the GI learning model; (2) the effectiveness of the modified GI learning model toward the students’ learning achievement in Mathematics and character of social responsibility in the topic of discussion of Probability. This research used the Research and Development (R&D) method. It consisted of two phases, namely: (1) research and development phase and (2) effectiveness test phase of the modified GI learning model. The former, with some modifications, referred to the ones claimed by Borg and Gall. The latter used the quasi experimental research method. The results of the research were as follows: 1) The modified GI learning model assisted with Camtasia Video is a valid, effective, and practical learning model. In addition, it also matches 2013 curriculum so that it was applicable in Senior Secondary Schools/Islamic Senior Secondary Schools of Cilacap. 2) The modified GI learning model assisted with Camtasia Video is more effective than the GI learning model toward the students’ learning achievement in Mathematics and the character of social responsibility on the topic of discussion of Probability. Keywords: Learning model, GI, Camtasia Video, Learning achievement, and Social responsibilit
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAVI DAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING PADA MATERI OPERASI HITUNG BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN
Get PDFThe objective of research was to find out: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with SAVI, those with Reciprocal teaching or those with direct learning model in the topics of algebraic arithmetic operation l, (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with visual, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style, (3) in each learning model, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with visual, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style, and (4) in each learning style, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with SAVI, those with Reciprocal teaching or those with direct learning model in the topics of algebraic arithmetic operation.This study was a quasi experimental research with a 3 × 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Sleman Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample consisted of 285 students: 96 for the experiment 1 class, 94 for the experiment 2 class, and 95 for the control class. Considering the hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with SAVI learning model, Reciprocal Teaching learning model and direct learning model was equally good. (2) The learning achievement of the students with visual learning style was better than that of those with kinesthetic one. But, that of those with visual learning style was as good as that of those with auditory one, and that of those with auditory was as good as that of those with kinesthetic one. (3) In SAVI, reciprocal teaching, and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the students with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles was equally good. (4) In the categories of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, the learning achievement of the students treated with SAVI, reciprocal teaching and direct learning was equally good. Keywords: Somatic, Auditory, Visual and Intellectual (SAVI), Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Student Learning Style
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TPS BERBASIS AfL MELALUI PENILAIAN TEMAN SEJAWAT UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA POKOK BAHASAN SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DI SMP/MTS SE-KABUPATEN MAGELANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
No full textAbstract: The objectives of the research were to find out: (1) how the process and the product of an AfL-based TPS learning model development were through peer assessment, (2) which learning model provided better learning outcome, the AfL-based TPS through peer assessment or the TPS one, (3) which students had better learning outcome, those with high, those with moderate or those with low learning independency, (4) in each learning model, which students had better learning outcome, those with high, those with moderate or those with low learning independency, and (5) in each category of learning independency, which learning model provided better learning outcome, the AfL-based TPS through peer assessment or the TPS one. This research was divided into two stages. The first one was learning model development belonging to research and development research. This stage included material collection, model prototype designing, model tryout, and model establishment. The tryout was conducted in four learning. The second was model effectiveness test belonging to a quasi-experimental research with a 2x3 research design. The population was the first semester VIII graders of SMP/MTs (Junior High Schools/Islamic Junior High Schools) throughout Magelang Regency in the school year of 2013/2014. The sampling technique used in this research was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 138 students: 68 for the experiment 1 class and 70 for the experiment 2 class. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The AfL-based TPS learning model through peer assessment could be applied at SMP/MTs level in Magelang Regency. (2) The learning outcome of the students treated with AfL-based TPS learning model through peer assessment was better than that of those treated with the TPS one. (3) The learning outcome of students with high learning independency was better than that of those with moderate and low one. The learning outcome of the students with moderate learning independency was as good as that of those with low one. (4) In both the AfL-based TPS learning model through peer assessment and the TPS, the learning outcome of students with high learning independency was better than that of those with moderate and low one, but that of the students with moderate learning independency was as good as that of those with low one. (5) In high, moderate, and low categories of learning independency, the learning outcome of the students treated with AfL-based TPS learning model through peer assessment was better than that of those treated with the TPS one.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Assessment for Learning (AfL), Peer Assessment, Student Learning Independency
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GI DENGAN PENDEKATAN QL PADA PECAHAN TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR DAN KREATIVITAS SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: This research aims to know the different effect among learning used Group Investigation with Quantum Learning approach (GI-QL), Group Investigation (GI), and direct learning models. This research was quasi experimental research with factorial design of 3x3x2. The population of this research was the seventh grade students of State Junior High School of District Pringsewu in The Academic Year 2013/2014. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The data analysis used a three way analysis of variance with different cell at significance levels 0.05. The results of this research was as follows: (1) learning used GI-QL results better learning achievement than GI and direct learning models do, and GI results better learning achievement than direct learning models does, (2.a) at learning used GI-QL, kinesthetic, auditory, and visual learners have the same learning achievement; at learning used GI, visual learners have better learning achievement than auditory, and kinesthetic and auditory learners have the same learning achievement; whereas at learning used direct learning models, kinesthetic learners have better learning achievement than visual and kinesthetic learners, and visual and kinesthetic learners have the same learning achievement, (2.b) for kinesthetic and auditory learners, GI-QL results better learning achievement than GI and direct learning models do, and GI and direct learning models result the same learning achievement; and for visual learners, GI-QL and GI result the same learning achievement but better than direct learning models, and GI results better learning achievement than direct learning models does, (3.a) at each of learning models, students with high learning creativity have better learning achievement than low learning creativity, (3.b) at each of learning creativity categories, GI-QL results better learning achievement than GI and direct learning models do, and GI results better learning achievement than direct learning models does, (4.a) at each of learning models with each of learning styles, students with high learning creativity have better learning achievement than low learning creativity, (4.b) at each of learning models with each of learning creativity, visual learners have the same learning achievement with kinesthetic learners but it better than auditory learners, and auditory learners have better learning achievement than kinesthetic learners, (4.c) at each of learning styles with each of learning creativity, GI-QL results better learning achievement than GI and direct learning models, and GI results better learning achievement than direct learning models.Keywords: Group Investigation, Quantum Learning, Direct Learning, Learning Style, Learning Creativity.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) BERBANTUAN MEDIA INTERAKTIF PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA
Get PDFAbstract. The goals of the research were to discover: (1) which learning model has better academic achievements, the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning model aided by interactive media, TPS, or the direct learning model; (2) which has better academic achievements, students having a visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) which has better academic achievements, students having a visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style for each of the different learning models and (4) which has better academic achievements, the TPS learning model aided by interactive media, TPS, or the direct learning model for each of the different learning styles. The type of research was quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all class XI students in state high schools in the Sukoharjo district during the academic year 2013/2014. The number of sample members in the research was 306 students, with 205 students in the experimental class and 101 students in the control class. Samples were collected using a method of stratified cluster random sampling. The method used for analyzing data was a unbalanced two way analysis of variance, preceded by a prerequisite test analysis, namely a normality test using Lilliefors’ method and a homogeneity test using Bartlett’s method. Based on the results of the hypothetical testing, it could be concluded as follows. (1) The TPS learning model aided by interactive media is better than the TPS and direct learning models, while the TPS learning model is as good as the direct learning model. (2) The academic achievements of students studying mathematics having an auditory learning style were better than students having a visual and kinesthetic style, while the results of students having a visual style was as good as that of those having a kinesthetic style. (3) The differences of students academic achievement depended on the learning model. (4) The effectiveness of learning models depended on students learning style.Keywords: TPS Interactive Media, TPS, Direct Learning, Learning Style, Academic Achievements Studying Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TS-TS) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA
Get PDFAbstract: This research was aimed to find out: (1) which one gave better mathematics learning achievement, learning model TS-TS with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, TPS with RME approach or conventional learning; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement, students having high, medium or low mathematics learning activity; (3) in each students’ levels of mathematics learning activity which one gave better mathematics learning achievement, learning model TS-TS with RME approach, TPS with RME approach or conventional learning; (4) in each learning model, the levels of mathematics learning activity which one had better mathematics learning achievement, students having high, medium or low mathematics learning activity. The research was a quasi experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Karanganyar. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 288 students. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data was examined by using one-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. It showed that three populations had balance in prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research showed as follows. (1) Learning model TS-TS with RME approach provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS with RME approach and conventional learning, learning model TPS with RME provided better mathematics learning achievement than conventional learning. (2) The students having high mathematics learning activity had better mathematics learning achievement than the students having medium and low mathematics learning activity. The students having medium mathematics learning activity had better mathematics learning achievement than the students having low mathematics learning activity. (3) In each category of mathematics learning activity, learning model TS-TS with RME approach was better than learning model TPS with RME approach and conventional learning, learning model TPS with RME approach was better than conventional learning. (4) In each learning model, learning achievement of students with high mathematics learning activity was better than learning achievement of students with medium and low mathematics learning activity, learning achievement of students with medium mathematics learning activity was better than the learning achievement of students with low mathematics learning activity.Keywords: TS-TS with RME approach, TPS with RME approach, mathematics learning activity, mathematics learning achievement