Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN STUDENT ACTIVE LEARNING BERBANTUAN MEDIA VISUAL MATH PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG KELAS XI IPA SMA NEGERI 2 PURWOKERTO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract. The aims of the research were: (1) to find a proper Mathematics-teaching learning-kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with Media Visual Math on Probability, (2) to know which one resulting in better students' achievement, Student Active Learning (SAL) with visual math media or direct teaching in improving the students' achievement. This research was conducted in two stages. The first stage was developing and deciding teaching learning kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with media visual math involved in the research and development. In this stage, information collecting, planning, developing, trying out the teaching learning kit, and treating teaching learning kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with media visual math were done. The try out was held in three teaching learning processes. The second stage was testing the effectiveness of the teaching learning kit in quasi experimental research. The population was XI Science program students of SMA N 2 Purwokerto in the first semester year of 2013/2014. The sample was split in 2 groups, they were experiment group and control group. The technique of data analysis used here was student’s t analysis. From the analysis, we find that: (1) teaching learning kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with Media Visual Math was a valid device based on validator’s scoring, activity observation, skill and response of students, so it can be applied in SMA Negeri 2 Purwokerto; (2) the students taught using SAL with visual math media had better mathematics achievement than students taught using direct teaching. Keywords: Teaching learning kit, Student Active Learning (SAL), Visual Math Medi
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TTW DAN NHT PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student mathematics communications ability. The learning model compared were TTW (Think Talk Write), NHT (Numbered Head Together) and conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3 12×"> 3 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Magelang regency on academic year 2013/2014. The sampling tecnique was stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 298 students consisted of 100 students in the first experimental group, 99 students in second experimental group and 99 students in control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and mathematics communication ability test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TTW learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT and conventional learning model, and NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than conventional learning model. (2) The students with high mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students with middle or low mathematics communication ability, the students with middle mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students with low mathematics communication ability, (3) a. In the students with high and middle mathematics communication ability, TTW, NHT and conventional learning model give the same mathematics achievement, b. In the students with low mathematics communication ability, TTW and NHT learning model give the same mathematics achievement, but give better mathematics achievement than conventional learning model, also NHT and conventional learning model give the same mathematics achievement, (4) a. In the TTW and NHT learning model, students with high, middle and low mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement, b. In the conventional learning model, students with high and middle mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement, but have better mathematics achievement than students with low mathematics communication ability, and students with middle and low mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TTW, NHT, mathematics communication ability, mathematics achievemen
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) MELALUI STRATEGI PEMBERIAN BALIKAN DAN AfL MELALUI TEKNIK BERTANYA YANG EFEKTIF DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL PADA SISWA SMP/MTs KELAS VII SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/201
Get PDFachievement, students are given Assessment for Learning (AfL) through providing feedback, Assessment for Learning (AfL) through asking effective questions or direct learning model, (2) which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate or low, (3) which has better learning achievement, students are given Assessment for Learning (AfL) through providing feedback, Assessment for Learning (AfL) through asking effective questions or direct learning model in each intrapersonal intelligence, (4) which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate or low on each learning model. The research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The populations were the students of SMP/MTs in Surakarta on academic year 2013/2014 which consisted of 79 SMP/MTs. The size of the sample was 224 students. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and a questionnaire of student’s intrapersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using two ways ANOVA. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) AfL model through providing feedback had better mathematics achievement than AfL through asking effective questions and direct learning model, whole AfL through asking effective questions had better mathematics achievement than direct learning model, (2) the high intrapersonal intelligence students had better mathematics achievement than the moderate and low intrapersonal intelligence students, while the moderate intrapersonal intelligence students had better mathematics achievement than the low intrapersonal intelligence students, (3) for high and moderate intrapersonal intelligence, the students’ mathematics achievement treated by AfL through providing feedback better than students treated by direct learning model; for low intrapersonal intelligence, all the three models had the same mathematics achievement, (4) for AfL model through providing feedback, the students’ mathematics achievement which have high intrapersonal intelligence better than low intrapersonal intelligence; for AfL model through asking effective questions, the students’ mathematics achievement which have high intrapersonal intelligence better than moderate intrapersonal intelligence, the students’ mathematics achievement which have moderate intrapersonal intelligence better than low intrapersonal intelligence; for direct learning model, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate and low had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Assessment for Learning (AfL), providing feedback, asking effective questions, intrapersonal intelligence, learning achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DAN TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR KOLB PADA SISWA SMA NEGERI KELAS X
Get PDFAbstract:The objectives of this research were to determine: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, instructed with TAI, GI, or direct instruction; (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with the converger, diverger, assimilator, or accommodator learning style; (3) in each learning style, which students had better mathematics learning achievement, instructed with TAI, GI, or direct instruction; (4) in each learning model, which students had a better mathematics learning achievement, those with the converger, diverger, assimilator, or accommodator learning style. This study was aquasi-experimental study with 3 x 4 factorial designs. Data analysis used unbalanced two-way ANAVA with a significance level of 5%. The study population was a tenth grade student of State SMA in Ponorogo in academic year of 2013/2014. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The study sample consisted of students in 3 schools namely SMA Negeri 3 Ponorogo, SMA Negeri 1 Kauman, and SMA Negeri 1 Balong with a sample size of 275 students.. The results of the research are as follows. (1) The students instructed with TAI had learning achievement as good as GI, those with TAI had learning achievement better than those with direct instruction, while those GI had learning achievement as good as those with direct instruction. (2)The students with the converger learning style had learning achievement as good as those with the diverger learning style, the students with the converger learning style had learning achievement better than those with the assimilator and accommodator learning style, the students with the diverger, assimilator, and accommodator learning style had a same learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students mathematics learning achievement was in consistency with the result (1); (4) In each learning model, the students mathematics learning achievement was in consistency with the result (2). Keywords: TAI, GI, Direct Instruction, learning styles, and learning achievemen
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN DIMENSI MYER-BRIGGS SISWA KELAS VIII MTs NW SURALAGA LOMBOK TIMUR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: This study aimed at describing the process of creative thinking of the eight grade students of MTs NW Suralaga East Lombok in the academic year of 2013/2014, who had personality type based on the Myer-Briggs personality dimensions, namely rational personality type (STR) and guardian personality type (STG) in the mathematics problems solving on Wallas steps, namely preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. The approach used descriptive qualitative approach in a case study. The data collection technique was conducted by using task based interview. The result showed that the procces of creative thingking on: (1) the STR students, namely: (a) the preparation, the students read APS (assignment problem solving) silently, observed the instructions and information carefully, and mentioned the known and the asked things in reading once APS; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent for a moment, the students do a contemplation activities, planned the problem solving, and took a long time to bring up the idea; (c) illumination, the students started by identifying the contained information in the APS, wrote how to solve the problem and continued by explaining the procedure of problem solving, the students established the steps to resolve the problem and got the idea by developing the idea of the previous answers; (d) verification, the students expressed orally the re-examination procedure of the answer, wrote the re-examination procedure, explained the re-examination procedure and explained the procedure again orally. (2) The STG students, namely: (a) the preparation, the students read the APS silently, and in a loud voice, mentioned the current issues in the APS, wrote the problems on the answer sheet, mentioned the known and the asked things of APS after a given follow-up questions; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent, the students do a contemplation activities and arranged the plan of problem-solving when they were calm; (c) illumination, the students identified the information on APS and determined the attributes that were used to solve the problem, established the steps to resolve the problem, described the problem solving procedures, solved the problems by developing the idea from the previous idea; (d) verification, the students revealed and explained the re-examine procedure of the answer orally, wrote the re-examination procedure of the answer, observed and re-checked the problem solving that had been done.Keywords: Creative Thinking, Problem Solving, and Personality Typ
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN PROBLEM POSING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWAKELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the reasoning ability of the students. The learning models compared were the problem based learning model, the problem posing learning model, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were the students of State Junior Secondary School 4 of Purwokerto, State Junior Secondary School 2 of Sokaraja, and State Junior Secondary School 2 of Baturraden. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of reasoning abilities. The data were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The problem-based learning model results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the problem posing learning model but results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, and the problem posing learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low reasoning ability. 3) In the students with the high reasoning ability, the problem-based learning results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the problem posing model but results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, and the problem posing model results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the direct learning model. In the students with the moderate and low reasoning abilities, the problem-based learning, the problem posing learning model, and the direct learning model result in the same learning achievement in Mathematics. 4) In the problem-based learning, the students with the high reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate an low reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate reasoning ability have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the low reasoning ability. In the problem posing learning model, the students with the high reasoning ability have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate reasoning ability, but the students both with the high and moderate reasoning abilities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low reasoning ability. In the direct learning model, the students with the high, moderate, and low reasoning abilities have the same learning achievement in Mathematics.Key words: Problem Based Learning, Problem Posing, and Reasoning ability
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS LOGIS SISWA
Get PDFAbstyact:The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the mathematical logical quotient of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type, the Cooperative Learning Model of the GI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Cirebon regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 364 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 123 in Experimental Class 1, 117 in Experimental Class 2, and 124 in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement in Mathematics on the learning material of Quadrangle, and test of mathematical logical quotient. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the TSTS type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the GI type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate mathematical logical quotient and those with the low mathematical logical quotient, the students with the moderate mathematical logical quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low mathematical logical quotient. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the mathematical logical quotient on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.Keywords:TSTS, GI, and mathematical logical quotient
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH PADA POKOK BAHASAN TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMA SE-KOTA SALATIGA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The purposes of the research were to know: (1) which learning models - discovery learning, problem based learning and direct learning model - that will give the best learning mathematics result; (2) which level of students creativity- high, medium, or low- that will give te best mathematics learning result; (3) which learning models - discovery learning, problem based learning and direct learning model - that will give the best learning mathematics result in each creativity categories; (4) which level of students creativity- high, medium, or low- that will give the best mathematics learning result in each learning models. The research used a quasi-experimental designed by using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell sizes. The population of this research are all X grade students of Senior High School in Salatiga 2013/2014. The sampling technique being used in this research was stratified cluster random sampling. The results show as follows. (1) Mathematics learning achievement using guided discovery model and problem based model show similar result which is better than using direct learning model. (2) Students with high level of creativity show better learning achievement than those of low level creativity. Students with high and medium level of creativity show the same learning achievement. Students with medium and low level of creativity show the same learning achievement. (3) On students with high level of creativity, guided discovery and problem based learning models show the same result, and guided discovery learning model results in better achievement compares to direct learning model. Problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. On students with medium level of creativity, guided discovery, problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. On students with low level of creativity, guided discovery, problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. (4) In guided discovery model, students with high and medium level of creativity show the same learning achievement, however students with high level of creativity have better achievement than students with low level of creativity. Students with medium and low level of creativity show the same learning achievement. Using problem based learning model, students with high, medium and low level of creativity show the same achievement. In direct learning model, the result of the three creativity categories also show the same learning achievement.Keywords: guided discovery model, problem based learning model, creativit
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI E-KABUPATEN BLORA
Get PDFAbstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ levels of self concept, students having high, medium or low self concept in giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ levels of self concept in having mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each level of self concept, which one is better among Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional model in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Blora. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 309 students; consist of 105 students in the first experimental class, 105 in the second experimental class, and 99 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self concept. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had better achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had the same mathematics achievement, (2) the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model: the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each level of self concept: Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model better learning achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model had the same good mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT), mathematics learning achievement, and self concept
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BEKERJA SAMA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP/MTs NEGERI DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which of the TPS-GNT learning model, the TPS learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, mediun, and low team work have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of team work of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models; and (4) which of the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of team work of the students.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Surakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of this research consisted of 288 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. Both of group 1 and group 2 consisted of 193 students whereas group 3 consisted of 95 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in mathematics, questionnaire, and documentation. The data were then analyzed by using umbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) the learning model of Modified TPS was better than that of the TPS and direct learning models while the learning model of TPS was better than the direct learning model; (2) the students with high team work had a better learning achievement than those with medium and low team work while the students with medium team work was better than the low team work; and (3) in each team work, student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, and direct learning model was as good as that of those; (4) in each learning model, the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, was as good as that of those.Keywords: TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, direct learning model, team work and learning achievement