Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION DAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN WONOGIRI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between problem based instruction, reciprocal teaching, or conventional, (2) which one of the students with types of learning style had a better achievement between students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) at each learning style types, which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between problem based instruction, reciprocal teaching, or conventional, (4) at each the learning models, which one of the students with types of learning style had a better achievement between students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. The population of the research was the eighth class students of Junior High School at Wonogiri regency on academic year 2013/2014 and the sample was students from SMP Negeri 1 Slogohimo, SMP Negeri 1 Jatipurno and SMP Negeri 4 Jatisrono which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. This was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) Problem based instruction gave better achievement than reciprocal teaching, conventional gave the same achievement as problem based instruction and reciprocal teaching, 2) The students with visual had better achievement than the students with auditory and kinesthetic, the students with auditory had better achievement than students with kinesthetic, 3) At the students with visual, reciprocal teaching gave the same achievement as problem based instruction and conventional, problem based instruction gave better achievement than conventional. At the students with auditory, problem based instruction gave better achievement than reciprocal teaching, conventional gave better achievement than reciprocal teaching and gave the same achievement as problem based instruction. At the students with kinesthetic, problem based instruction gave the same achievement as reciprocal teaching and conventional, 4) In reciprocal teaching, the students with visual had better achievement than the students with auditory, the students with kinesthetic had the same achievement as the students with visual and auditory. In problem based instruction, the students with visual had the same achievement as the students with auditory and had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic, the students with auditory had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic. In conventional model, the students with visual had the same achievement as the students with auditory and kinesthetic.Keywords: Problem Based Instruction, Reciprocal Teaching, Learning Style, Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SQUARE DENGAN METODE QUESTION STUDENT HAVE DAN THINK TALK WRITE PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SLEMAN TP 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The objektive of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from learning independence of the students. The learning models compared were the TPSq learning model with the question student have method, the TTW learning model, and the conventional learning model. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3×3 factorial design. The study population was all of grade VIII students of State Junior Secondary School in Sleman regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this study amounted to 262 students with the details of 87 students for experiment 1 and 87 for experiments 2 and 88 for the control class. The data collected instrument used mathematics achievement tests and a questionnaire of student’s learning independence. Based on the hypothesis testing can be concluded as follows. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with TPSq learning model with the question student have method was as good as that of those with the TTW learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by TPSq model with question student have method and TTW better than students treated by conventional learning model. (2) Students’ learning achievement which has high learning independence had better achievement than students who have moderate and low independence. In addition, students who have moderate learning independence had better achievement than students who have low learning independence. (3) In the TPSq learning model with the question student have method, TTW and conventional learning model, the students’ learning achievement who have high learning independence had better achievement than moderate and low learning independence, in addition the students’ learning achievement who have moderate learning independence had better achievement than students who have low learning independence. (4) In the learning independence category of high, moderate or low, the learning achievement of the students treated with TPSq learning model with the question student have method and TTW learning model was equally good. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by TPSq learning model with the question student have method and TTW learning model had better achievement than students treated by conventional learning model.Keywords: Think Pair Square (TPSq), Question Student Have, Think Talk Write (TTW), and Student’s Learning Independence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN JIGSAW II PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement, (2) which students among the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have a better learning achievement, (3) in each of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning which students among the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have a better learning achievement, and (4) in each of the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities which learning model of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of . Its population was all of the students of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 285 students, and they were divided into three classes, namely: 96 in Experimental Class I, 95 in Experimental Class II, and 94 in Control Class. The data of the research were gathered through test of spatial ability and test of learning achievement in Mathematics. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the GI type results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model, but results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the Jigsaw II learning model, and the Jigsaw II learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2). The students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low spatial ability, but the students with the high spatial ability have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate spatial ability. (3) in each of the Cooperative learning model of the GI type, the Jigsaw II learning model, and the direct learning, students with the high spatial ability have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate spatial ability, and both the students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low spatial ability. 4) in each of the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities, the Cooperative learning model of the GI type and the Jigsaw II learning model result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, but the cooperative learning model of the GI type results in the same good learning achievement as the Jigsaw II learning model.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Jigsaw II, learning achievement, and spatial ability
PENGARUH MODEL PROBLEM POSING SETTING KOOPERATIF TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN MINAT BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA DI KABUPATEN MERAUKE DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement and learning interest viewed from the student cognitive style. The learning models compared were conventional model, the setting cooperative learning model of Problem posing, and Problem Posing model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were the students of Senior High School in Merauke regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 213 students consisted of 71 students in control group, 71 students in the first experimental group and 71 students in the second experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test, quesioner, and Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). The data was analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Both the setting cooperative learning model of Problem Posing and Problem Posing learning model result in a better learning achievement than the conventional learning model, and the setting cooperative learning model of Problem Posing result in a better learning achievement than the Problem Posing learning model. (2) The conventional learning model, the setting cooperative learning model of Problem Posing, and Problem Posing learning model results in the same learning interest. (3) The field independent students have a better learning achievement than the field dependent students. (4) The field independent students have a better learning interest than the field dependent students. (5) For the field dependent students, the setting cooperatif learning model of Problem Posing gives better learning achievement than the Problem Posing model, and Problem Posing learning model gives better learning achievement than the conventional learning model, and the setting cooperative learning model of Problem Posing gives the same learning achievement with the Problem Posing model. For the field independent students, the setting cooperative learning model of Problem Posing and the Problem Posing model gives better learning achievement than the conventional learning model. (6) For the field dependent students, each learning models gives the same learning interest. For the field independent students, each learning models gives the same learning interest.Keywords: Problem Posing,Setting cooperative, Learning achievement, learning interest, cognitive style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION PADA MATERI POKOK PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINIER SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-K
Get PDFAbstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning models of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, Teams Games Tournament (TGT) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, the level of Adversity Quotient which one hve better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning models of TGT with RME approach, TGT or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Grobogan. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model TGT with RME approach provided better learning achievement than TGT and conventional, learning TGT provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers, campers, and quitters had equally mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers, campers, and quitters had equally mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model TGT with RME approach provided better learning achievement than TGT and conventional, learning TGT provided better learning achievement than conventional.Keywords: Teams Games Tournament (TGT), Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, and Adversity Quotient (AQ
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of research was to find out: (1) which learning models provided the better mathematics learning achievement, Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think Pair Share (TPS) or direct learning, (2) which category of thinking pattern characteristics provided the better mathematics learning achievement, concrete sequential (SK), abstract sequential (SA), random concrete (AK) or abstract concrete (AA), (3) in each learning model, which category provided the better mathematics learning achievement SK, SA, AK or AA thinking patterns, and (4) in each category of student thinking pattern characteristics, which learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement, TSTS, TPS or direct learning models. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x4 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Pacitan Regency. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 237 students 81 students for experimental class 1 and 77 students for experimental class 2 and 79 students for control class. Considering the hypothesis test, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The learning using TSTS model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the one using TPS, and the TSTS and TPS models provided learning achievement as good as the direct learning model did in one-variable equation and disequation material. (2) The learning achievement of the students with SK type of thinking pattern characteristics was better than that of those with SA and AK types, but that of those with SK type was as good as that of those with AA type, that of those with SA type as good as that of those with AK, and that of those with AA was better than that of those with SA and AK types of thinking pattern characteristics. (3) In TSTS, TPS and direct learning models, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with SK type was better than that of those with SA and AK types, but that of those with SK was as good as that of those with AA, that of those with SA was as same as that of those with AK, and that of those with AA was better than that of those with SA and AK types of thinking pattern characteristics. (4) In the thinking pattern characteristics of SK, SA, AA, and AK types, the TSTS learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the TPS model and the TSTS and TPS provided better learning achievement than direct learning model in one-variable linear equation and disequation material.Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Student’s Thinking Pattern Characteristics.
PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA TUNA GRAHITA PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN FORMAL DAN PENDEKATAN FORMAL DIVARIASI PENDEKATAN FUNGSIONAL
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) the profile of problem solving in mathematics of a deaf child in solving the geometrics problems with the learning using the formal approach; and (2) the profile of problem solving in mathematics of a deaf child in solving the geometrics problems with the learning using the formal approach varied with the functional approach. This research used the qualitative explorative research method. The subject of the research consisted of one deaf male student and was taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The subject was determined according to the following considerations: (1) the student had not too few and not too many incorrect answers; and (2) he could communicate well based on the information obtained from his teacher. The data of the profile of problem solving in mathematics were gathered through test and interview with the student on how to solve the test problems. The data were validated by using the time triangulation. They were analyzed by using the interactive model of analysis consisting of the following measures: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results of the research were as follows: 1) The problem solving in Mathematics of the deaf child with the learning using the formal approach results in the following findings: (a) recognizing some colors when they are the colors of flat structures; (b) being difficult to understand the meanings of questions if they contain more than one answer; (c) being unable to recognize some spatial structures well; (d) being unable to use ruler; and (e) unable to differentiate the letters well. 2) The problem solving in mathematics of the deaf child with the learning using the formal approach varied with the functional results in the following findings: (a) at the beginning the child is difficult to recognize some of the spatial structures, but after having practiced drawing with colors and then compared them with the ones in the spatial structure learning, that is the ones in the test problems and the ones in the learning instruments, he gradually recognizes the spatial structure; (b) principally he can recognize the spatial structures, but when the spatial structures are put vertically and horizontally, he feels difficult to recognize them; (c) the students is difficult to count the number of sides of quadrangle pyramid ; and (d) he is difficult to understand the meanings of questions so that the answers given are not synchronized with the questions.Keywords : Profile, problem solving, deaf, formal approach, and functional approac
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF PEER TUTORING DAN MANDIRI DENGAN E-LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASAN ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one is providing bettermathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning peer tutoring, selfdirectedlearning by e-learning or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematicslearning achievement, students with interpersonal intelligence, students with intrapersonalintelligence or students with linguistic intelligence, (3) at each learning model, are there anydifference mathematics learning achievement between students with interpersonal intelligence,students with intrapersonal intelligence or students with linguistic intelligence, (4) at each type ofintelligence, are there any difference mathematics learning achievement between students taughtusing cooperative learning peer tutoring, self-directed learning by e-learning or direct learning.This was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing usedtwo ways ANOVA with unbalance cell. This research concludes that: (1) students who weretaught using cooperative learning peer tutoring have better mathematics learning achievementthan the students who were taught using self-directed learning by e-learning and students who aretaught using direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using self-directed learningby e-learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students who weretaught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the type of interpersonalintelligence are better than the students with the type of intrapersonal intelligence and linguisticintelligence type while the students with the type of linguistic intelligence have bettermathematics learning achievement than the students with the type of intrapersonal intelligence,(3) in the cooperative learning peer tutoring, students with interpersonal intelligence have bettermathematic learning achievement than students with interpersonal and linguistik intelligence,students with linguistic intelligence have better learning achievement than student withintrapersonal intelligence, in the self-directed learning by e-learning, there was no difference inlearning achievement in each type of intelligence, in the direct instruction, students withinterpersonal and linguistic intelligence have better mathematic learning achievement thanstudents with intrapersonal intelligence, (4) for the students who have interpersonal intelligence,cooperative learning peer tutoring produce better mathematics achievement than self-directedlearning by e-learning and direct instruction, for the students who have intrapersonal intelligence,self-directed learning by e-learning produce better mathematics achievement than directinstruction, for the students who have linguistic intelligence, there was no difference in learningachievement in each learning models.Keywords: E-Learning, Peer Tutoring, Intelligence, mathematics learning achievemen
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) DENGAN METODE DISCOVERY PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN ROKAN HULU TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The purpose of this study are to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with discovery method, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct instruction model. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Rokan Hulu Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and spatial intelligence test. Based on the hypothesis, the results could be concluded as follows. (1) Students who were treated with the Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method had better learning achievement than students treated by TGT models and direct instruction model. In addition, students who were treated with the TGT model gave the same achievement with students treated by direct instruction model. (2) Students with high spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with middle and low spatial intelligence. In addition, students who had middle spatial intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low spatial intelligence. (3) In the spatial intelligence category of high, middle and low, the students’ learning achievement treated Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method was better than the students treated by TGT and direct instruction models. In addition, students treated by TGT model gave the same learning achievement with students treated by direct instruction model. (4) In the Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method, TGT model and direct instruction model, the students who had high spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than middle and low spatial intelligence. In addition, the students who had middle spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than students who had low spatial intelligence.Keywords: Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Disccovery Method, Spatial Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) PADA MATERI ARITMATIKA SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SEKABUPATEN PACITAN
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which learning model provided better student learning achievement, Problem based Learning (PBL) or Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of Cooperative Learning or direct learning model, (2) which students had better mathematics learning achievement, those with auditory, or visual, or kinesthetic learning style, (3) in each learning model, which one had mathematics learning achievement better, whether the students with auditory, those with visual or those with kinesthetic learning style, (4) in each learning style, which one provided better mathematics learning achievement, Problem based Learning (PBL) or Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of Cooperative Learning or direct learning model. This study was a quasi experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Pacitan Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 242 students: 82 students for the experiment 1, 80 students for experiment 2 and 80 students for control classes. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The Problem Based Learning, the NHT type of cooperative learning, and direct learning models provided equal mathematics learning achievement. (2) The students with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one. Those with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with auditory one. Those with kinesthetic learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with auditory one. (3) In PBL learning model, the students with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with auditory one, but those with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one, and those with auditory learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one. In NHT type of cooperative learning model, the students with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with auditory one and those with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one, but those with auditory learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with kinesthetic one. In direct learning model, the results of the three learning style provided equal learning achievement. (4) In the students with visual learning style, PBL model provided learning achievement equal to the NHT type of cooperative learning one, PBL did better than the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. In auditory learning style, PBL model provided the learning achievement equal to the NHT type, while PBL did better than the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. In those with kinesthetic learning style, PBL model provided learning achievement equal to the NHT type of cooperative learning one, PBL did better than the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. In auditory learning style, PBL model provided the learning achievement equal to the NHT type, PBL provided learning achievement equal to the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. Keywords: Problem Based Learning (PBL), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), student learning style.