Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from anxiety mathematics learning. The learning models compared were direct, PBL with scientific approach, and DL with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and anxiety mathematics learning. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBL with scientific approach to DL with scientific approach achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBL with scientific approach and DL with scientific approach had the same learning outcome. (2) Students with lower levels of mathematics anxiety learning had better learning outcome than students with medium and high anxiety level. Students’ learning anxiety level on math was better in their learning outcome than students with high levels of learning anxiety mathematics. (3) In each group, the anxiety level of students learning mathematics, learning model PBL with scientific approach and learning model DL with scientific approach provides better performance than direct learning model, learning model PBL with scientific approach produces the same learning outcome with learning model DL with scientific approach. (4) In each of the learning model, students with lower levels of anxiety level of mathematics learning outcome had better math outcome than students with medium and high math anxiety level learning, students learn math anxiety levels were to have better learning outcome than students with high levels of anxiety learn mathematics.Keywords: Direct learning model, PBL learning model with scientific approach, DL learning model with scientific approach, Math Anxiety Learnin
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this research was to find out the different effects of Discovery Learning (DL), Problem Based Learning (PBL), and Think Pair Share (TPS) models with scientific approach towards students knowledge and social attitude competency viewed from the students learning styles. This study was a quasi-experimental research. The population of research was all of the 8th grade of the State Junior High School in Puworejo Regency on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The hypothesis testing of research were conducted using a two-ways multivariate analysis of variance with different cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, while PBL and TPS was same. (2) DL and TPS provided same social attitude competency, and both provided better social attitude competency than PBL. (3) The knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory and kinesthetic, and the knowledge competency of students in those types was same. (4) The social attitude competency of visual and auditory students was same, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (5) In DL, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the knowledge competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. In PBL and TPS, the knowledge competency of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students was same. (6) In DL and TPS, the social attitude competency of those three types was same. In PBL, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than auditory, the social attitude competency of visual and kinesthetic students was same, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (7) In visual, DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, PBL and TPS provided same knowledge competency. In auditory and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same knowledge competency. (8) In visual and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same social attitude competency. In auditory, DL and PBL provided same social attitude competency, DL and TPS was same, and TPS provided better social attitude competency than PBL.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, Scientific Approach, Knowledge Competency, Social Attitude Competency, Learning Styles
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA KEDIRI
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models of TAI Type with contextual approach, learning models of TAI and direct learning model on mathematics achievement viewed from learning style. The type of the research was quasi experimental research using design factorial 3x3. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in a city of Kediri. The samples of the research consisted of 321 students; 107 students belonged to experiment class one, 103 students belonged to experiment class two, and 111 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of learning style. Before giving the treatment, the population had to be in balanced condition. The balance test used one way analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test used Bartlett method. The hypothesis test used two ways analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies at the significance level of 0.05. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning, the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (2) Each of the learning styles of visual, auditory or kinesthetic does not have an influence on learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students who taught by the TAI with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning and the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (4) In each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: TAI learning models, contextual approaches, and learning style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION, THINK-PAIR-SHARE, DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI EKSPONEN DAN LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI KABUPATEN PACITAN
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this research was to know the influence of teaching and learning models with the scientific approach toward the students’ achievement in learning mathematics considered from the creativity of the students. Teaching and learning models to be compared were GI, TPS, and PBL. This research was chategorized as a quasi experimental research. The population was all students of grade X MIA public SMAs in Pacitan regency in the year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The method of data collection were documentation, questionaire, and test. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1. The students’ achievement in mathematics given GI-S model was better than those who were given TPS-S model, while the students’ achievement given GI-S was the same as those who were given PBL-S model, and the students’ achievement given TPS-S model was the same as those who were given PBL-S model; 2. The mathematics achievement of the students who had high level creativity was the same as those who had medium level creativity, while those who had high level creativity was better than those who had low level creativity, and the students with medium level gave the same achievement as those with low level creativity; 3. In high level creativity, the students’ achievement in learning mathematics using GI-S model was the same as those using TPS-S and PBL-S models. In medium level creativity, the students using GI-S model gave the same achievement as those using TPS-S and PBL-S models, but the students’ achievement using PBL-S model was better than using TPS-S model. In low level creativity, the students who learned mathematics using GI-S model gave the same achievement as those who used TPS-S and PBL-S models, and the students’ achievement using TPS-S model was the same as those using PBL-S model; 4. In learning mathematics using GI-S model, the students with high, medium, and low level creativity gave the same achivement. In using TPS-S model, the students with high, medium, and low level creativity gave the same achievement. In using PBL-S, the students with high level creativity had the same achievement as those who had medium and low level creativity, but the students with medium level creativity gave better achievement than those who had low level creativity.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Based Learning (PBL), Scientific approach, Creativit
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BANYUMAS
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from learning independency. The learning models compared were direct Learning, DL, and PBL. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples were the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and learning independency. The data were analyzed by two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students treated with DL and PBL learning models provided better learning achievement than those treated with Direct learning model. The students treated with DL had mathematics learning achievement equal to those treated with PBL. (2) The students treated with high learning independency and medium learning independency provided better learning achievement than those treated with low learning independency. The students with high learning independency had learning achievement equal to those with medium independency. (3) In each learning independency group of students, DL and PBL learning models provided better achievement than the Direct one, and DL learning model provided learning achievement equal to the PBL learning model did. (4) In each learning model, the students treated with high learning independency and medium learning independency provided better learning achievement than those treated with low learning independency. The students with high learning independency had learning achievement equal to those with medium independency.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Direct Learning, Learning Independency
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI Se-KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models viewed from the creativity of student. The learning models compared were PBL, TPS and direct learning. This research is a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x4. The research population was 8th Grade of Junior High School first semester of 2013/2014 at Pacitan regency. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 260 students with 84 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 84 students as control class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing were concluded that: (1) PBL learning model gave better achievement than TPS learning model and direct learning, while TPS learning model and direct learning gave the same achievement (2) The learning achievement of students with high creativity is better than the students with medium and low creativity, and the learning achievement of students with medium creativity is better than the students with low creativity (3) on each category of creativity, PBL learning model gave better achievement than TPS learning model and direct learning, while TPS learning model and direct learning gave the same achievement, (4) on each models of learning, learning achievement of students with high creativity is better than the students with medium and low creativity, and the learning achievement of students with medium creativity is better than the students with low creativityKeywords: Problem Based Learning (PBL), Think Pair Share (TPS), Creativity of studen
PROFIL SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN LITERASI MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ)
Get PDFAbstract: This research aims to describe the profile of junior high school students with climber’s, camper’s, and quitter’s type in problem solving from related with mathematics literacy using Polya steps. This research was a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were taken by using a combined technique of stratified sampling and Snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were seven 9th grade students of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta regency, which consisted of three students with climber’s type, two students with camper’s type, and two students with quitters’s type. The data were collected through questionnaire and task-based interview technique on subject matter of space and shape mathematics literacy third level. The data were analyzed using a Miles and Huberman’s concept, that was data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of this research are as follows: (1) climber’s students in understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects needed, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect; (2) camper’s students in understanding the problem, devising a plan, and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect, but in carrying out the plan, they have only reached reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling and connection aspects, not representation aspect; (3) quitter’s students understanding the problem and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect, but in devising a plan, they have only reached communication, modelling, and connection aspects, not reasoning, argumentation, and representation aspect. Whereas in carrying out the plan, they have only reached reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling and connection aspects, not representation aspect.Keywords: Profile, problem solving, mathematics literacy, Polya’s steps, Adversity Quotiont (AQ)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA POKOK BAHASAN DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI KESULITAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MAGETAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which learning model of the TTW, TPS or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (2) which students with learning difficulties (low, medium or high) have a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each students learning difficulties, which learning model of TTW, TPS or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students learning difficulties (low, medium or high) results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics.This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all of the students in Grade X of State Senior High Schools in Magetan regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the researh consisted of 232 students; 82 students belonged to experiment class one, 78 students belonged to experiment class two and 72 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of students learning difficulties. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research showed that: (1) the TTW and TPS learning models result in the same good achievement in mathematics, the TTW and conventional result in the same good achievement, but TPS result in better than the conventional learning model; (2) The students with low learning difficulties result in better than with the high learning difficulties, the students with the low learning difficulties result in the same good with the medium learning difficulties, the students with the medium learning difficulties result in the same good with the students with high learning difficulties; (3) ) in each students learning difficulties, the TTW and TPS result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, TTW and conventional result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, TPS learning model result in better learning achievement than conventional; (4) in each learning model, the student with low learning difficulties result in better learning achievement than with high learning difficulties, the students with low learning difficulties result in the same good learning achievement with the medium learning difficulties, that with medium learning difficulties result in the same good learning achievement with the high learning difficulties.Keywords: learning model, TTW, TPS, conventional, students learning diffulties
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN SMP NEGERI KABUPATEN KEBUMEN
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this research are to know: (1) which one was better result in learning achievement of mathematics among PBL, NHT, and TPS, (2) which one was better learning achievement among students in high, middle, and low creativity categories of mathematics, (3) in each learning model, which one was better learning achievement among students’ creativity categories, students having high, middle, or low; and (4) in each creativity categories, which one was better learning achivement among students of PBL, NHT, or TPS. This research used quasi-experimental research. The population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High School in Kebumen. The samples of research were taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 268 students. They divided into three groups. They were 92 students in the group of first experiment, 88 students in the group of second experiment, and 88 students in the group of third experiment. The instruments to collect the data were test of learning achievement and the questionnaire of learning creativity in mathematics. The data were examined by using two-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) Student in the model of PBL model result in a better learning achievement than NHT and TPS learning models. Student in NHT learning model results in a better learning achievement than TPS learning model. (2) Learning creativity gives students a different effect on mathematics’ learning achievement in the subject of set. The students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the middle and low categories, and student with the middle creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity categoriy. (3) In each learning model, students with the high creativity category have learning achievement as good as those with the middle or low categories. (4) In each of the creativity categories of students, students with the high creativity category of PBL have learning achievement as good as those in NHT and TPS, students with the middle creativity category of PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, then learning models of NHT and TPS have same learning achievement, and students in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement; last, in the low learning category, student in PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, student in NHT and TPS have same learning achievement and the student in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Numbered Head Together, Think Pair Share, and learning creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ROUNDTABLE (RT) DAN QUESTION STUDENT HAVE (QSH) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015
Get PDFAbstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of RT with scientific approach, QSH with scientific approach or classical with scientific approach one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ learning styles, students having visual, auditorial or kinesthetic giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ learning styles in giving mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each learning styles, which one is better among RT with scientific approach, QSH with scientific approach or classical with scientific approach in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Metro, Lampung. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of learning styles. As a requirement of research, both of the instruments should be measured. Test of students’ learning achievement data was measured by using content validity, level of difficulty, discrimination power and reliability. Questionnaire data were examined by using content validity, internal consistency and reliability. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it shows that the populations have same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It shows that three classes have balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows. (1) The RT with scientific approach had better learning achievement than the QSH and classical with scientific approach. QSH with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than the classical with scientific approach, (2) The students having visual learning style had learning achievement as good as those having auditorial learning style. The students having visual learning style had better learning achievement than did those having kinesthetic learning style. The students having auditorial learning style had learning achievement as good as those having kinesthetic learning style. (3) In each of learning styles, student’s mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with result of learning models (4) In each learning models, the student’s mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with result of learning style categories.Keywords: Round Table (RT), Question Student Have (QSH), Classical, Learning Styl