197 research outputs found

    Indonesia's Party Court: Jurisdictional Ambiguity, Overlapping Authority, and the Structuring of Rule of Law of Political Parties Law (No. 2/2011)

    No full text
    The creation of the Political Party Court was a first step towards party accountability and cohesion, as per Law No. 2 of 2011 in relation to Political Parties (Republic of Indonesia). Despite its crucial function, the position of the law in Indonesia is still unclear, and it frequently competes with official courts like the Constitutional Court. The interpretation of Article 33 (1) and (2) has shown that it can potentially create legal instability and interfere with the resolution of disputes, undermine the legitimacy of democratic elections, or subvert decisions made by the constitutional court. Additionally, the Party Court's ambiguity in its jurisdiction undermines the legal credibility of final Constitutional Court decisions, despite extensive research being undertaken on its role in election conflicts. Additionally, there is a significant research gap in assessing the specific legal and institutional procedures. In order to understand how the Constitutional Court's decisions can impact Indonesian general elections, this paper examines the legal uncertainties that arise from party disputes. By using a qualitative juridical-normative technique, the study investigates statutes, court opinions, and doctrine in relation to election law. It concludes by indicating that "party courts" operate in ambiguous jurisdictions, often with decisions reflecting factional interests or conflicting formal court conclusions, leading to judicial incoherence. The lack of proper regulatory control amplifies this ambiguity. Besides suggesting significant legislative amendments to standardize internal party procedures, the study provides a theoretical framework for investigating the interaction between quasi-judicial institutions and upper courts.Mahkamah partai sebagai lembaga penyelesaian perselisihan partai politik memiliki kewenangan dalam memeriksa, mengadili, serta memutus perselisihan internal partai politik sebagaimana yang diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang Partai Poltik dan berkedudukan sebagai bagian dari organisasi internal partai yang ditempatkan dalam struktur partai dan merupakan kuasi peradilan. Mahkamah  Partai  Politik  dalam  menyelesaikan  perselisihan  internal  partai  politik  hasil  pemilihan  umum  legislatif  terlebih  dahulu  barulah memfasilitasi pihak pihak    yang    bersengketa    untuk    bermusyawarah.    Jika    tercapai kesepakatan,   Mahkamah   Partai   Politik   menuangkannya   dalam   penetapan Mahkamah Partai Politik yang sifatnya final dan mengikat. Jika tidak tercapai kesepakatan, selanjutnya Mahkamah Partai Politik menjatuhkan putusan yang amarnya  berbunyi  “Menyatakan  Mahkamah  Partai  Politik  tidak  berwenang untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan internal partai politik hasil pemilihan umum legislatif”, dan “Menyatakan permohonan pemohon tidak dapat diterima

    Investigation of Water Resources-Related Legal Violations Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XI/2013

    Full text link
    This study was conducted to analyze legal violations related to water resources after the Constitutional Court's decision to annul Law No. 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources. The decision caused confusion regarding the legal position of Civil Servant Investigators for Water Resources (PPNS SDA) in enforcing the law related to air resource management. The purpose of this study is to explore the legal status of PPNS SDA after regulatory changes and to assess the challenges faced in investigating legal violations in the air resource sector. The research method used in the analysis is qualitative, which includes literature studies from various legal sources, scientific articles, and interviews with relevant stakeholders in water resource management and protection. The results of the study indicate that despite the existence of laws and regulations, PPNS SDA are still legally recognized and have certain authorities in examining and investigating alleged violations of the law related to water resources. This study also identified several cases of investigations carried out by PPNS SDA, as well as coordination with other law enforcement officers. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that PPNS SDA still have legal standing in conducting investigations related to water resources despite regulatory changes. The investigation procedures followed by PPNS SDA are in accordance with the established methodology, but still require ongoing collaboration with other agencies, such as the police and prosecutors

    Legal Implications of The Second Amendment to The Electronic Information and Transactions Law: Balancing Freedom of Expression and Public Participation in Digital Democracy: Implikasi Hukum Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: Menyeimbangkan Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Demokrasi Digital

    Full text link
    Penelitian ini membahas implikasi yuridis dari perubahan kedua Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 terhadap partisipasi masyarakat dalam ruang siber, khususnya dalam konteks pemilihan umum (PEMILU). Dalam perkembangannya, UU ITE sering dianggap multitafsir dan represif, yang berpotensi menghambat kebebasan berpendapat. Pasal-pasal seperti Pasal 27A dan Pasal 27B, meskipun dirancang untuk menggantikan pasal-pasal sebelumnya yang dianggap "pasal karet," tetap menuai kritik karena masih menciptakan efek jera (chilling effect). Situasi ini memunculkan kekhawatiran akan pengurangan kualitas partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses demokrasi digital. Namun, kajian mengenai dampak perubahan kedua UU ITE terhadap kebebasan berekspresi dalam pemilu 2024 serta perbandingan regulasi internasional yang lebih proporsional masih terbatas, sehingga diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif untuk menganalisis implikasi perubahan UU ITE terhadap kebebasan berpendapat dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pemilu. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa regulasi yang tidak jelas dalam UU ITE dapat memicu ketidakpastian hukum, memarjinalkan kelompok tertentu, dan menciptakan ketidaksetaraan dalam akses informasi. Reformasi UU ITE diperlukan untuk memastikan bahwa regulasi tersebut selaras dengan prinsip-prinsip demokrasi, melindungi kebebasan berpendapat, dan mendorong partisipasi masyarakat secara inklusif. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis spesifik terhadap pasal-pasal hasil revisi dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2024 dan bagaimana perubahan tersebut berdampak pada kebebasan berekspresi dalam pemilu 2024, dengan pendekatan perbandingan global untuk mengusulkan regulasi ruang siber yang lebih adil dan demokratis. Studi ini merekomendasikan pendekatan berbasis prinsip demokrasi, peningkatan literasi digital, serta pelibatan berbagai pemangku kepentingan untuk menciptakan regulasi ruang siber yang adil dan responsif terhadap dinamika sosial.This study examines the legal implications of the second amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) through Law No. 1 of 2024 on public participation in cyberspace, particularly in the context of general elections (PEMILU). Over time, the UU ITE has often been regarded as ambiguous and repressive, potentially hindering freedom of expression. Provisions such as Articles 27A and 27B, while intended to replace previously criticized "rubber articles," continue to face criticism for perpetuating a chilling effect. This situation raises concerns about the declining quality of public participation in digital democracy processes. However, studies on the impact of the second amendment to the UU ITE on freedom of expression in the 2024 elections, as well as comparative analyses of more proportional international regulations, remain limited, necessitating further research. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze the implications of the amendments to the UU ITE on freedom of expression and public participation in elections. The findings reveal that the unclear regulations in the UU ITE may lead to legal uncertainty, marginalize certain groups, and create inequality in access to information. Reforming the UU ITE is essential to ensure that the regulations align with democratic principles, protect freedom of expression, and promote inclusive public participation. The novelty of this study lies in its specific analysis of the revised provisions in Law No. 1 of 2024 and their impact on freedom of expression in the 2024 elections, incorporating a global comparative approach to propose a more just and..

    Geographical Indications-Based Environmental Protection: Legal Challenges and Sustainable Development Goals Implementation in Indonesia: Perlindungan Lingkungan Berbasis Indikasi Geografis: Tantangan Hukum dan Implementasi Sustainable Development Goals di Indonesia

    No full text
    Geographical Indications play a crucial role as an intellectual property regime that protects unique products originating from specific regions, shaped by both human and natural factors. The presence of natural factors makes Geographical Indications a potential tool for strengthening local economies while simultaneously protecting the environment. This study aims to analyze the potential utilization of the Geographical Indications regime in Indonesia to support sustainable development, particularly in relation to environmental protection. Employing a normative legal research method supported by a statutory approach, this study examines the connection between Geographical Indications and environmental protection. The analysis reveals that despite the conceptual link between Geographical Indications and environmental sustainability, there is no normative legal support within the existing regulatory framework governing Geographical Indications. A normative construction model is proposed to facilitate the integration of environmental protection into the Geographical Indications regime, emphasizing aspects of planning, utilization, supervision, maintenance, control, and law enforcement.Indikasi Geografis berperan penting sebagai salah satu rezim kekayaan intelektual yang dapat melindungi produk unik daerah tertentu, dengan unsur unik dari faktor manusia dan faktor alam. Adanya faktor alam menjadikan Indikasi Geografis sebagai potensi yang dapat dimanfaatkan untuk memperkuat ekonomi lokal sekaligus melindungi lingkungan hidup. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi pemanfaatan rezim Indikasi Geografis di Indonesia dalam mendukung agenda pembangunan berkelanjutan, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan perlindungan lingkungan hidup. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang didukung oleh pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, penelitian ini menelaah keterkaitan antara Indikasi Geografis dan perlindungan lingkungan hidup. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara konseptual Indikasi Geografis dan lingkungan hidup berkaitan erat, tidak ada dukungan normatif dalam sumber hukum yang mengatur mengenai Indikasi Geografis. Model konstruksi normatif diusulkan untuk memungkinkan integrasi perlindungan lingkungan hidup ke dalam Indikasi Geografis, dengan penekanan terhadap aspek perencanaan, pemanfaatan, pengawasan, pemeliharaan, pengendalian, dan penegakan hukum

    TINJAUAN SOCIO-LEGAL PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP NARAPIDANA SETELAH MENJALANI MASA HUKUMANNYA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN: Tinjauan Socio-Legal Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Narapidana Setelah Menjalani Masa Hukumannya Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan

    No full text
      The role of correctional institutions and society as entities responsible for the implementation of legal sanctions, in reality, holds a key role in shaping the life trajectory of former prisoners after release. However, former prisoners are often confronted with stigma, discrimination, and isolation in various aspects of life, which in turn encourages repeated criminal acts (recidivism). Consequently, a view emerges that the law has not yet provided strong certainty, particularly for former prisoners, due to the continuing imposition of social sanctions by society. This socio-legal research employs a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design. The data used are primary data obtained through interviews with informants. The interview results are discussed descriptively to provide a comprehensive perspective on public perceptions of former prisoners. The findings indicate that stigma and discrimination as social sanctions do not produce a positive impact on the reintegration process, especially as they increase the tendency of former prisoners to reoffend. The completion of legal obligations by offenders is not accompanied by a positive societal role in accommodating behavioral changes among former prisoners, particularly in the presence of stigma, discrimination, and isolation. An approach is therefore needed through the implementation of rehabilitation programs involving the community to generate a holistic impact, namely behavioral improvement among former prisoners and increased public understanding of their vital role as an integrated whole in the reintegration and social improvement process.Peran lembaga pemasyarakatan dan masyarakat sebagai entitas yang bertanggung jawab atas pelaksanaan sanksi hukum, pada kenyataannya turut memegang peranan kunci dalam membentuk lintasan hidup mantan narapidana pasca pembebasan. Meski demikian, tidak jarang mantan narapidana dihadapkan pada stigma, diskriminasi, dan isolasi di berbagai aspek kehidupan, sehingga mendorong terjadinya tindak pidana berulang (residivisme). Dengan demikian, muncul sebuah pandangan bahwa hukum masih belum memberikan kepastian yang kuat, terlebih terhadap mantan narapidana dengan terus bergulirnya sanksi sosial dari masyarakat. Penelitian socio-legal ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan desain fenomenologi sebagai desain penelitian. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer yang didapatkan melalui kegiatan wawancara terhadap para informan. Hasil dari wawancara tersebut akan dibahas secara deskriptif, untuk memberikan perspektif yang komprehensif terkait persepsi masyarakat terhadap mantan narapidana. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa stigma dan diskriminasi sebagai sanksi sosial terhadap mantan narapidana tidak memberikan dampak yang positif bagi proses reintegrasi, terlebih karena adanya peningkatan kecenderungan terjadinya pengulangan kejahatan oleh mantan narapidana. Selesainya kewajiban hukum para pelaku kejahatan ternyata tidak diiringi dengan peran positif masyarakat dalam mengakomodir perubahan perilaku para mantan narapidana, terlebih dengan adanya stigma, diskrimnasi dan isolasi. Dibutuhkan upaya pendekatan melalui implementasi sejumlah program rehabilitasi yang melibatkan masyarakat, guna menghasilkan dampak holistik, yakni perbaikan perilaku mantan narapidana dan peningkatan pemahaman masyarakat akan peran vital sebagai kesatuan yang utuh dalam proses reintegrasi dan perbaikan sosial

    Hukum Bernilai Pancasila Menentukan Tatanan Pemersatu Elemen Kesatuan Bangsa

    No full text
    Indonesia is currently facing a variety of legal challenges, societal tensions, and crises amid its national diversity. If these issues are not properly and fundamentally addressed, they may evolve into multidimensional crises, leaving behind deep social residues and conflicts in an already uncertain national context. In confronting these problems, a fundamental question arises: can a legal system grounded in Pancasila values provide direction, purpose, solutions, and legal certainty to resolve national issues and strengthen the unity of the nation in pursuit of the ideals of a Rechtsstaat (rule of law state) based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Using a normative juridical research method supported by secondary data, this study adopts a conceptual–exploratory approach and an inductive qualitative analysis. The findings reveal that law infused with Pancasila values establishes an orderly legal framework with a strong guarantee of effectiveness in resolving societal problems and reinforcing national unity. It concludes that law embodying the substantive values of Pancasila is fundamental, responsive, and accommodative, forming an essential part of the state’s normative order that functions to resolve issues and unite the diverse elements of Indonesian society sustainably, in support of national progress. It is therefore recommended that the values of Pancasila’s five principles be continually integrated into the substance of national legal products to ensure the sustainable resolution of Indonesia’s societal and national challenges.Berbagai persoalan Indonesia kini di tengah masyarakatnya yang majemuk, perbedaan ideologis, pandangan, kepentingan dan perbedaan aliran kebutuhan hidup berlainan antar satu dengan lainnya, jika tidak diselesaikan dengan baik bersifat fundamental dapat menimbulkan krisis multidimensional, meninggalkan residu-residu serta pertentangan di tengah krisis dan situasi tidak termanfaatnya dengan baik nilai-nilai Pancasila masuk mengisi menjadi bagian materi muatan produk hukum bagi penyelesaian masalah di Indonesia. Hal itu dapat menghambat pencapaian hakikat-tujuan pendirian negara sebagaimana dalam Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 untuk melindungi seluruh tumpah Indonesia, memajukan kesejahteraan umum, mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa serta mewujudkan keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Melalui penelitian yuridis normatif menggunakan data sekunder, dengan pendekatan eksploratif konseptual dan anilisis  kualitatif induktif, hasil memperlihatkan, bahwa hukum bernilai Pancasila menentukan tatanan, memiliki jaminan kuat dengan taraf keefektifan tinggi bagi penyelesaian masalah-masalah dan pemersatu elemen kesatuan bangsa dan negara. Kesimpulan, hukum yang materi muatan terkandung nilai-nilai Pancasila menentukan tatanan, keberadaannya sangat asasi, fundamental, mendasar, responsif dan akomodatif sebagai bagian dari kaedah atau norma dasar negara berfungsi bagi penyelesaian masalah-masalah dan pemersatu elemen masyarakat bangsa dan negara secara berkelanjutan bagi kemajuan bangsa dan negara. Saran, nilai dari sila-sila Pancasila harus terus bergulir masuk mengisi materi muatan produk hukum nasional bagi penyelesaian masalah bangsa dan negara Indonesia secara berkelanjutan.  &nbsp

    REKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA ANALISIS EKONOMI PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM BAGI USAHA MIKRO DALAM RANGKA PENINGKATAN PEREKONOMIAN NASIONAL MENUJU INDONESIA EMAS: Rekonstruksi Paradigma Analisis Ekonomi Pembangunan Hukum Bagi Umkm Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Perekonomian Menuju Indonesia Emas

    No full text
    Several regulations related to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) have brought about significant changes in accelerating business growth. The greatest impact has been felt, particularly by micro-enterprises, which were previously considered a less influential sector, but have now proven to contribute significantly to strengthening the real sector. Regulatory changes have also created a new paradigm for micro-enterprises. This is evident in the change in capital requirements, from Rp 50 million to Rp 1 billion. This change reflects a shift in perspective, emphasizing that micro-enterprises are no longer merely informal sectors but can develop into reliable, leading businesses. This phenomenon has become even more evident since the Covid-19 pandemic, when the micro-enterprise sector has proven to be a key pillar of national economic recovery. This development confirms the resilience and strategic role of micro-enterprises in maintaining economic stability. Therefore, reconstructing the legal development paradigm is crucial. This paradigm serves not only as a regulatory instrument but also as a fundamental foundation that shapes the perspectives, mindsets, and actions of micro-entrepreneurs. With supportive and progressive legal support, micro-enterprises are expected to rise to the top, become leading businesses, and make a significant contribution to realizing the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045.Beberapa peraturan terkait UMKM memberikan beberapa perubahan yang mempengaruhi terciptanya percepatan bagi pelaku usaha UMKM, dimana yang paling berdampak khususnya adalah Usaha Mikro yang mengalami percepatan pertumbuhan akibat peraturan yang mempengaruhi pertumbuhan sektor mikro. Pada awalnya sektor mikro dianggap sebagai sektor usaha yang paling tidak berpengaruh namun kini memberikan kontribusi nyata terhadap sektor riil. Karena terciptanya rekonstruksi paradigma baru bagi pelaku usaha mikro, yang awalnya bermodal 50 juta Rupiah kini berubah menjadi 1 Miliar Rupiah. Oleh karena itu, cara pandang yang digunakan adalah sistem kepercayaan fundamental yang melandasi cara pandang para pelaku usaha mikro yang menganggap bahwa hanya usaha nonformal yang bisa menjadi usaha unggulan yang dapat diandalkan, hal ini terlihat jelas pada membaiknya perekonomian pasca Covid-19 yang membuktikan bahwa sektor usaha mikro menjadi salah satu sektor andalan di negeri ini. Namun pentingnya rekonstruksi paradigma pembangunan hukum ini adalah agar para pelaku usaha dapat menyongsong Indonesia Emas pada tahun 2045. Agar usaha mikro dapat menjadi salah satu usaha unggulan yang dapat memberikan kontribusi, khususnya paradigma pembangunan hukum sebagai pandangan mendasar sebagai salah satu aspek terpenting dalam menjalankan usaha maupun dalam berpikir dan bertindak. &nbsp

    Legal Consequences Of Incomplete Delivery of Information in Medical Checkups Where The Treadmill Test Was Not Conducted Due To Medical Reasons: Akibat Hukum Ketidaklengkapan Informasi Pada Medical Checkup Yang Treadmill Testnya Tidak Terlaksana Dengan Alasan Medis

    No full text
    The Medical Checkup (MCU) service that includes a treadmill test facility is a routine health examination designed to identify potential cardiovascular diseases, implemented using the Bruce Protocol method as Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Hospital Practice Guidelines to conduct the treadmill test. The legal basis for this medical service outlined in Indonesian Ministry of Health Decree Number 772/Menkes/SK/VI/2002 and Indonesian Ministry of Health Regulation Number 512/Menkes/PER/IV/2007. The treadmill test has risks and contraindications, which means that not all patients may be able to undergo the treadmill test procedure in the MCU package. This study will explore the legal implications of incomplete information during medical checkups in cases of MCU package services which treadmill test facilities cannot be carried out due to patient's medical condition. Consumer Protection Law Number 8 of 1999 and Article 1320 of the Civil Code will serve as the foundation for analyzing therapeutic contracts. The research method which used in this study is normative juridical approach which is supported by interveiw data. The Results of this study found that when a treadmill test cannot be performed due to patients' medical condition, the patient unable to undergo the procedure, , resulting in legal consequences in form of financial loss which may causes potential disputes if not handled properly. This incident cannot be considered as as breach of contract because the hospital has fulfilled its obligations by providing information and asking for approval through informed consent, so the hospital is not required to reimburse the patient. However, it is...Pelayanan Medical checkup (MCU) dengan fasilitas treadmill test adalah paket pemeriksaan kesehatan berkala untuk mendeteksi penyakit kardiovaskuler yang dilaksanakan dengan metode Bruce Protocol berdasarkan Standard Operating Procedures (SPO) dan Panduan Praktik Klinik Rumah Sakit (PPK RS) untuk melakukan pelayanan tersebut. Landasan hukum dari pelayanan ini adalah Kepmenkes Nomor 772/Menkes/SK/VI/2002 tentang Pedoman Peraturan Internal Rumah Sakit (Hospital bylaws) dan Permenkes Nomor 512/Menkes/PER/IV/2007 tentang Izin Praktik dan Pelaksanaan Praktik Kedokteran. Treadmill test memiliki risiko dan kontraindikasi sehingga pasien memiliki kemungkinan tidak dapat menjalankan treadmill test dalam paket MCU. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akibat hukum atas ketidaklengkapan dalam penyampaian informasi dalam kasus pelayanan paket MCU dengan fasilitas treadmill test yang tidak terlaksana dengan alasan kondisi medis pasien di RS Jantung dan Pembuluh Darah harapan Kita dari sudut pandang Undang - Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan juga Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata sebagai dasar dari kontrak terapeutik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh data dari wawancara. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa ketika treadmill test tidak dapat dilakukan karena kondisi medis pasien, pasien mengalami akibat hukum berupa kerugian, sehingga terdapat potensi sengketa medis jika tidak ditangani dengan baik. Kejadian ini tidak dapat dianggap sebagai wanprestasi oleh pihak RS karena RS telah memenuhi kewajibannya dengan memberikan informasi dan meminta persetujuan melalui informed consent, sehingga RS tidak perlu untuk mengganti biaya terhadap pasien, namun perlu dilakukan pemberian informasi dan penjelasan lengkap kepada pasien baik dalam bentuk persetujuan umum (general consent) maupun informed consent

    The End of Blasphemy Crimes in Indonesia: Shifts in Human Rights Limitations and MUI’s Fatwa Authority

    No full text
    The old Indonesian Criminal Code poses problems with regard to the handling of religious crimes. For example, Article 156a criminalises religious expressions considered deviant or heretical. The old Criminal Code limits religious expression by criminalising heretical religious interpretations. These limitations obscure the freedom of religion as a human right. This study examines the paradigm shift in human rights limitations in the new Criminal Code, and its impact on the fatwa authority of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI). A normative juridical method is employed through a literature-based analysis of statutory provisions on blasphemy offences under both the former Indonesian Criminal Code and the new 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code, alongside fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and relevant legal and human rights scholarship. The findings demonstrate that Article 300 of the new Criminal Code reconfigures the regulation of blasphemy offences by shifting the framework of limitations on human rights of religious expression, particularly through changes in the scope of criminalisation and the normative role of the fatwa authority. Criminalisation now applies to actions that interfere with freedom of religion, rather than to blasphemy against religion itself. The objective of limitation has shifted from protecting religion to protecting religious freedom. This change has implications for the role of local fatwa authorities in handling religious crimes

    PERBANDINGAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN ANTARA KUHP BARU INDONESIA DENGAN SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2003 INGGRIS

    Full text link
    Indonesian criminal law has undergone reforms since the promulgation of the Indonesia’s New Penal Code in 2023. This legal reform also refers to the provisions for the crime of rape which are regulated in Article 473 paragraph (1) of the Indonesia’s New Penal Code. This reform indicates that the paradigm regarding the rape crime in Indonesia has changed. With those changes, this research attempts to make a legal comparison between the New Penal Code and the England Sexual Offences Act 2003 – which is also a form of the legal reform. The research method used is normative juridical using analysis on legislation and comparative analysis. Based on a comparison on the regulation of the rape crime between the Indonesia’s New Penal Code and the England Sexual Offences Act 2003, there are several similarities and differences. Therefore, it could be seen the advantages and disadvantages of each regulation, both from the Indonesia’s New Criminal Code and the England’s Sexual Offences Act 2003. From this comparison, several advantages could be found in the Sexual Offences Act 2003 regarding the rape crime in England which could be an input on the regulation of the rape crime in the Indonesia’s New Criminal Code, so that better law would be created. Keywords: Rape, The New Indonesian Criminal Code, Sexual Offences Act 2003.Hukum pidana Indonesia telah mengalami pembaruan sejak diundangkannya Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia yang baru pada 2023 lalu. Pembaruan tersebut tidak terkecuali pada ketentuan tindak pidana perkosaan yang diatur pada Pasal 473 ayat (1) KUHP Baru. Pembaruan tersebut mengisyaratkan bahwa paradigma mengenai tindak pidana perkosaan di Indonesia telah mengalami perubahan. Dengan adanya perubahan tersebut, penelitian ini berusaha untuk melakukan perbandingan hukum antara KUHP Baru dengan Sexual Offences Act 2003 Inggris—yang juga merupakan produk pembaruan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan analisis peraturan perundang-undangan dan analisis perbandingan. Berdasarkan perbandingan pengaturan tindak pidana perkosaan antara KUHP Baru dengan Sexual Offences Act 2003 terdapat beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan. Dari persamaan dan perbedaan tersebut dapat diketahui kelebihan dan kekurangan dari masing-masing pengaturan baik dari KUHP Baru maupun Sexual Offences Act 2003. Sehingga dari perbandingan tersebut dapat ditemukan beberapa kelebihan dari Sexual Offences Act 2003 tentang tindak pidana perkosaan di Inggris yang dapat menjadi masukan bagi pengaturan tindak pidana perkosaan dalam KUHP Baru di Indonesia, sehingga akan terciptanya hukum yang lebih baik (better law). Kata kunci: Perkosaan, KUHP Baru, Sexual Offences Act 2003

    164

    full texts

    197

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    LITIGASI
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇