LUISSearch
Not a member yet
935 research outputs found
Sort by
Blameless behaviour, management and performance of European public top managers
No full textSkills, blameless behaviour and performances of public top managers are critical for the success both of the general performance of public administration and
of public administration reform attempts. With national policy making becoming increasingly complex and ever more exposed to international coordination, as is the
case in all EU Member States, the need is all the greater for top public managers with a broad perspective and the ability to coordinate their work with both national and
international institutions. The European Senior Civil Servant project was an innovative model of transnational networking and the exchange of best practice, thanks to the active involvement of European schools and institutes of public administration. This essay identifies the benefits and effectiveness of the introduction of a mix of methodologies, including the use of e‐learning, and concludes that this mix could improve the training process of all European senior civil servants.Skills, blameless behaviour and performances of public top managers are critical for the success both of the general performance of public administration and
of public administration reform attempts. With national policy making becoming increasingly complex and ever more exposed to international coordination, as is the
case in all EU Member States, the need is all the greater for top public managers with a broad perspective and the ability to coordinate their work with both national and
international institutions. The European Senior Civil Servant project was an innovative model of transnational networking and the exchange of best practice, thanks to the active involvement of European schools and institutes of public administration. This essay identifies the benefits and effectiveness of the introduction of a mix of methodologies, including the use of e‐learning, and concludes that this mix could improve the training process of all European senior civil servants.Articles published in or submitted to a Journal without IF refereed / of international relevanc
Organisation designing though the practice of multi-method research in information systems
No full textUninvited Submission
Il ruolo delle agenzie di rating nel mercato finanziario
No full textLe agenzie di rating: in generale. Funzioni, finalità e regolamentazione del rating. Problematiche attuali dell'attività di rating.Le agenzie di rating: in generale. Funzioni, finalità e regolamentazione del rating. Problematiche attuali dell'attività di rating.LUISS PhD Thesi
The quantification of damages caused by an infringement of Art. 101 or Art. 102 TFEU: is arbitration really a short cut?
No full textThe quantification of damages for a breach of Article 101 or 102 TFEU is complex, demanding and time consuming. Over the last few years, it has become one of the main issues in policy discussions within the European Union (EU). In particular, the European Commission (EC) investigated and revealed that the procedure for the quantification of
damages caused by a breach of EU antitrust laws not only requires expert economic and econometric skills, but varies from Member State to Member State. As a consequence of
this disparity, the EC issued new guidelines to render uniform the procedure for the quantification of damages caused by antitrust breaches across Member States and adopted new regulations to encourage private actions for damages. The latter aim at encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, most notably arbitration, to resolve antitrust disputes as they provide a more expedient process and a fairer solution than a national court judgment. Furthermore, arbitration may be compared to a noncooperative or Bayesian game. Indeed, an antitrust dispute is characterised by asymmetric information. Hence, the parties thereto act strategically in order to push the arbitrator to issue a settlement in their favour. As a result, both parties are incentivized to make extreme
offers, the effect of which is to slow down the arbitration proceedings and lead the arbitrator to reach a settlement which does not correctly quantify the damages suffered.
Thus, we require a system that has the double effect of encouraging the parties to avoid adopting extreme positions and converge in their offers. The amended final offer
arbitration (AFOA) seems to comply with both these equirements. Nevertheless, the fact that it involves a punishment could prove counter-productive by discouraging the parties from actually selecting arbitration as an ADR method to resolve their disputes. Thus, to be an effective private action for damages caused by an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU, arbitration must be structured in a manner that enables the arbitrator to reach a fair
settlement, encourages the parties to converge in their offers and incentivises the parties to actually select such arbitration mechanism to resolve their disputes.The quantification of damages for a breach of Article 101 or 102 TFEU is complex, demanding and time consuming. Over the last few years, it has become one of the main issues in policy discussions within the European Union (EU). In particular, the European Commission (EC) investigated and revealed that the procedure for the quantification of
damages caused by a breach of EU antitrust laws not only requires expert economic and econometric skills, but varies from Member State to Member State. As a consequence of
this disparity, the EC issued new guidelines to render uniform the procedure for the quantification of damages caused by antitrust breaches across Member States and adopted new regulations to encourage private actions for damages. The latter aim at encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, most notably arbitration, to resolve antitrust disputes as they provide a more expedient process and a fairer solution than a national court judgment. Furthermore, arbitration may be compared to a noncooperative or Bayesian game. Indeed, an antitrust dispute is characterised by asymmetric information. Hence, the parties thereto act strategically in order to push the arbitrator to issue a settlement in their favour. As a result, both parties are incentivized to make extreme
offers, the effect of which is to slow down the arbitration proceedings and lead the arbitrator to reach a settlement which does not correctly quantify the damages suffered.
Thus, we require a system that has the double effect of encouraging the parties to avoid adopting extreme positions and converge in their offers. The amended final offer
arbitration (AFOA) seems to comply with both these equirements. Nevertheless, the fact that it involves a punishment could prove counter-productive by discouraging the parties from actually selecting arbitration as an ADR method to resolve their disputes. Thus, to be an effective private action for damages caused by an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU, arbitration must be structured in a manner that enables the arbitrator to reach a fair
settlement, encourages the parties to converge in their offers and incentivises the parties to actually select such arbitration mechanism to resolve their disputes.LUISS PhD Thesi
La rappresentanza politica nei gruppi del Parlamento europeo: il divieto di mandato imperativo
No full textLa storia. L'analisi: requisiti formali e sostanziali. La critica: relazione tra rappresentante e rappresentato. Il quadro del Parlamento europeo. Generalità e disciplina dei gruppi politici. Osservazioni sulla rappresentanza politica nei gruppi del Parlamento europeo.La storia. L'analisi: requisiti formali e sostanziali. La critica: relazione tra rappresentante e rappresentato. Il quadro del Parlamento europeo. Generalità e disciplina dei gruppi politici. Osservazioni sulla rappresentanza politica nei gruppi del Parlamento europeo.LUISS PhD Thesi
Digital artifacts development and evolution: who has the control/supremacy? A story of UNIX developmental trajectories read from institutional theory perspective
No full textUninvited Submission
Collaborazione tra imprese ed imposizione sui redditi: le prospettive del contratto di rete
No full textProfili funzionali e strutturali. Soggettività tributaria e imputazione dei redditi. Agevolazioni a favore della collaborazione tra imprese.Profili funzionali e strutturali. Soggettività tributaria e imputazione dei redditi. Agevolazioni a favore della collaborazione tra imprese.LUISS PhD Thesi
Il contratto fiduciario oggi: profili problematici e ricostruttivi
No full textSocietà fiduciarie e quadro normativo di riferimento.
La ricostruzione del negozio fiduciario nella giurisprudenza: tra classicità ed innovazione.
I problemi operativi sottesi alla dicotomia “fiducia romanistica” e “fiducia germanistica”: allocazione del diritto di proprietà e legittimazione a disporre.
Profili applicativi: la separazione patrimoniale.
Interessi rilevanti del rapporto tra fiduciario e fiduciante e nei rapporti con i rispettivi creditori.
Problemi teorici connessi all’ammissibilità del negozio fiduciario e conseguente qualificazione.
Negozio fiduciario e mandato ad acquistare: un indice normativo della fiducia?
Gestione di patrimoni altrui nel codice civile, nella legislazione speciale primaria e secondaria.
L’amministrazione del patrimonio altrui e nell’interesse altrui: principi e regole operative.
Destinazione di beni allo scopo e separazione patrimoniale: una tecnica di tutela per il fiduciante.
La fattispecie dei patrimoni separati: profili problematici e sistematici.
Dal dogma un soggetto un patrimonio al negozio atipico di destinazione.
Atto atipico di destinazione: ammissibilità, effetti ed opponibilità.
Destinazione patrimoniale e modelli stranieri: trust e fiducie quali omologhi dell’atto negoziale di destinazione?
Peculiarità del contratto fiduciario di cui è parte la società fiduciaria.
L’oggetto del contratto fiduciario.
I doveri di comportamento della società fiduciaria: disciplina applicabile e rimedi per il cliente.
L’interesse del fiduciante alla segregazione patrimoniale: strumenti giuridici ed interessi meritevoli di tutela.
La concorrenza tra ordinamenti e l’evoluzione dell’Italia quale Paese trust.Società fiduciarie e quadro normativo di riferimento.
La ricostruzione del negozio fiduciario nella giurisprudenza: tra classicità ed innovazione.
I problemi operativi sottesi alla dicotomia “fiducia romanistica” e “fiducia germanistica”: allocazione del diritto di proprietà e legittimazione a disporre.
Profili applicativi: la separazione patrimoniale.
Interessi rilevanti del rapporto tra fiduciario e fiduciante e nei rapporti con i rispettivi creditori.
Problemi teorici connessi all’ammissibilità del negozio fiduciario e conseguente qualificazione.
Negozio fiduciario e mandato ad acquistare: un indice normativo della fiducia?
Gestione di patrimoni altrui nel codice civile, nella legislazione speciale primaria e secondaria.
L’amministrazione del patrimonio altrui e nell’interesse altrui: principi e regole operative.
Destinazione di beni allo scopo e separazione patrimoniale: una tecnica di tutela per il fiduciante.
La fattispecie dei patrimoni separati: profili problematici e sistematici.
Dal dogma un soggetto un patrimonio al negozio atipico di destinazione.
Atto atipico di destinazione: ammissibilità, effetti ed opponibilità.
Destinazione patrimoniale e modelli stranieri: trust e fiducie quali omologhi dell’atto negoziale di destinazione?
Peculiarità del contratto fiduciario di cui è parte la società fiduciaria.
L’oggetto del contratto fiduciario.
I doveri di comportamento della società fiduciaria: disciplina applicabile e rimedi per il cliente.
L’interesse del fiduciante alla segregazione patrimoniale: strumenti giuridici ed interessi meritevoli di tutela.
La concorrenza tra ordinamenti e l’evoluzione dell’Italia quale Paese trust.LUISS PhD Thesi
