JURNAL CITA HUKUM
Not a member yet
403 research outputs found
Sort by
Legal Protection Against Indonesian Umrah Jemaah
No full textImplementation of Umra in Indonesia has increased significantly in recent years. It is caused by better condition of the economy in Indonesia so that raising the awareness of the Indonesian people to do the Sunnah that they believed. Therefore, it has become the obligation of the government to facilitate the implementation of Hajj and Umra to be good and not harm for Indonesian pilgrims. This is important because in some cases many problems occur and harm both morale and material to the Indonesian people. Therefore, clear and definite legal instrument are needed to protect the rights of pilgrims as consumers of Hajj and Umra. Pelaksanaan Ibadah umrah di Indonesia dari tahun ke tahun mengalami peningkatan yang signifikan. Hal ini didorong dengan semakin baiknya kondisi perekonomian di Indonesia sehingga meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat Indonesia untuk menjalankan ibadah Sunnah yang diyakininya. Oleh karena itu sudah menjadi kewajiban pemerintah memfasilitasi penyelenggaraan ibadah haji dan umrah agar pelaksanaannya menjadi baik dan tidak merugikan kepada calon jamaah Indonesia. Hal ini penting dikarenakan pada beberapa kasus banyak masalah yang terjadi dan merugikan baik moril maupun materil kepada jamaah. Untuk itu diperlukan perangkat hukum yang jelas dan pasti agar melindungi hak-hak jamaah sebagai konsumen penyelenggaraan ibadah haji dan umroh. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i1.6582Implementation of Umra in Indonesia has increased significantly in recent years. It is caused by better condition of the economy in Indonesia so that raising the awareness of the Indonesian people to do the Sunnah that they believed. Therefore, it has become the obligation of the government to facilitate the implementation of Hajj and Umra to be good and not harm for Indonesian pilgrims. This is important because in some cases many problems occur and harm both morale and material to the Indonesian people. Therefore, clear and definite legal instrument are needed to protect the rights of pilgrims as consumers of Hajj and Umra. Implementation of Umra in Indonesia has increased significantly in recent years. It is caused by better condition of the economy in Indonesia so that raising the awareness of the Indonesian people to do the Sunnah that they believed. Therefore, it has become the obligation of the government to facilitate the implementation of Hajj and Umra to be good and not harm for Indonesian pilgrims. This is important because in some cases many problems occur and harm both morale and material to the Indonesian people. Therefore, clear and definite legal instrument are needed to protect the rights of pilgrims as consumers of Hajj and Umra
Legal Protection for Victims of Corporate Crimes In The Employment Field at Palembang City
Get PDFCriminal sanctions which are imposed on corporations committing employment crimes as provided inArticle 185 paragraph (1) of the Manpower Act are sufficiently burdensome, both for corporations andcorporate administrators, as the cumulative and alternative system of criminal imposition of criminalpenalties. It means that the corporate executives who commit crimes may be subject to imprisonmentor criminal penalties and both imprisonment and fine. But in practice law enforcement officers do notdirectly impose criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment to corporate executives who commitcrimes in the field of employment in the city of Palembang. This is due to the tendency of lawenforcement officers to use the principle of subsidiarity, namely the criminal law placed in the ultimumremendium position, on the grounds of economic considerations, so that sanctions are imposed onlyadministrative sanctions and criminal penalties and close the normative rights of labor only. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.708
The Elimination of Constitutional Court\u27s Authority in The Dispute Case of General Election of Regional Head (Analysis of Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013)
Get PDFThe enactment of Law Number 32 Year 2004 is a manifestation of the development ofadvanced democracy, namely all local chief elected directly by the people except the positionof the Governor of Yogyakarta. However, in its development, the implementation of theGeneral Elections of Regional Head gave rise to dissatisfaction which resulted in the appealof the results of the General Election to the court for various reasons. The presence of theConstitutional Court as an institution that resolved the dispute over the General Election ofRegional Heads has not been able to provide justice to the public, especially the emergenceof many Constitutional Court rulings that cause debate. In its development, the ConstitutionalCourt abolished its authority in the settlement of disputes in the General Election of RegionalHeads as stipulated in Decision Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013. The Constitutional Court is ofthe opinion that the Constitutional Court only has the authority to resolve election disputes ofDPR, DPD, President/Vice President because the election is done nationally, while theelection is conducted in certain areas only. In addition, the volume of incoming cases relatedto election disputes more than the law review case which is the main authority of theConstitutional Court, so that this can affect the quality of the decisions of the ConstitutionalCourt considering the dispute resolution of the results of the General Election should beterminated within fourteen days. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.709
Shift of Criminal Acts of Copyrights to the Direction of Civil Dispute (Review of Article 95 Paragraph (4) of Law Number 28 Year 2014 on Copyright)
No full textThis article conducted a study about the obligation of mediation as a precondition for copyright infringement based on article 95 paragraphs (4) of the Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Mediation provisions in the Laws Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration is a way of settlement of civil disputes outside the court to reach a settlement by consensus with the help of a mediator. While mediation is based on the supreme court rule number 1 of 2008 is intended as an obligation for judges at first instance in the district courts and religious courts in the settlement dispute resolution is the authority of commercial courts as special courts general judicial. But the commercial court does not apply the obligations mediation. A study conducted by the approach of the laws and regulations. By considering the crime of copyright as higly relevant to a complaint mediation prior obligations imposed as a condition of doing criminal charges. Article 95 paragraph 4 of the law number 28 of 2014 on copyright, which requires the completion of mediation prior to file criminal charges has brought about a shift in the field of copyright criminal offenses into civil disputes. Thus the obligation of mediation in the settlement of copyright disputes is not only necessary for a criminal offense, but also expanded as a condition for completion in litigation in the commercial courts. Artikel ini melakukan kajian terhadap kewajiban mediasi sebagai syarat untuk melakukan tuntutan pidana atas pelanggaran hak cipta berdasarkan Pasal 95 ayat (4) UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Ketentuan mediasi dalam Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase merupakan cara penyelesaian sengketa perdata di luar pengadilan untuk mencapai penyelesaian secara musyawarah mufakat dengan bantuan mediator. Sedangkan mediasi berdasarkan Perma No.1 tahun 2008, ditujukan sebagai kewajiban bagi hakim pada pengadilan tingkat pertama di Pengadilan Negeri maupun Pengadilan Agama dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa keperdataan. Penyelesaian sengketa hak cipta merupakan kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga, sebagai pengadilan khusus di lingkungan peradilan umum. Namun di Pengadilan Niaga tidaklah berlaku kewajiban mediasi. Kajian dilakukan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statuta aproacht). Dengan mengingat tindak pidana hak cipta sebagai delik aduan sangatlah relevan dibebankan kewajiban mediasi terlebih dahulu sebagai syarat melakukan tuntutan pidana. Pasal 95 ayat (4) UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta yang mensyaratkan penyelesaian mediasi terlebih dahulu untuk mengajukan tuntutan pidana, telah membawa konsekuensi pergeseran tindak pidana bidang hak cipta menjadi sengketa keperdataan. Dengan demikian kewajiban mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak cipta (HKI) tidak hanya diperlakukan bagi tindak pidana saja namun juga diperluas sebagai syarat untuk penyelesaian secara litigasi di Pengadilan Niaga. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i1.658
Perencanaan Kota Secara Komprehensif Berbasis Hukum Integratif Menuju Pembangunan Kota Berkelanjutan (Comprehensive Urban Planning Based On Integrative Law Towards Sustainable Urban Development)
No full textAbstract: Comprehensive Urban Planning Based on Law Integrative Towards Sustainable Urban Development. This study is aimed to analyze the dynamics of sustainable urban development and comprehensive urban planning based on integrative law. Using a qualitative approach to the normative juridical method. The analysis showed that the dynamics of sustainable urban development not only implies ecological sustainability or biophysical, but also the sustainability of socio-cultural and economic sustainability. A comprehensive urban planning based on integrative meaningful spatial law as an interdisciplinary science is the mindset that is comprehensive and integrated. Implementation of integrative law to a sustainable city spatial plan guarantees that every citizen has access to freedom in activity, the equality and rights among themselves. Abstrak: Perencanaan Kota Secara Komprehensif Berbasis Hukum Integratif Menuju Pembangunan Kota Berkelanjutan. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dinamika pembangunan kota berkelanjutan dan perencanaan kota secara komprehensif berbasis hukum integratif. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dinamika pembangunan kota berkelanjutan tidak sekedar mengandung pengertian keberlanjutan ekologis atau biofisik semata-mata, melainkan juga keberlanjutan sosio-kultural dan keberlanjutan ekonomis. Perencanaan kota secara komprehensif berbasis hukum integratif bermakna tata ruang sebagai ilmu interdisiplin adalah pola pikir yang bersifat menyeluruh (comprehensive) dan terpadu (integrated). Penerapan hukum integratif terhadap suatu rencana tata ruang kota berkelanjutan menjamin bahwa setiap warga kota memiliki akses terhadap kebebasannya dalam beraktifitas, adanya persamaan derajat dan hak di antara sesamanya. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v2i2.231
Politik Hukum Ratifikasi Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi di Indonesia
Get PDFAbstact : This study sought to see an international legal ratification of UN conventions in the form of anti-corruption and its impact on the internal environment of a country, especially Indonesia.Corruption is a never-ending problem discussed and resolved. Corruption became the nation\u27s disease because it has been longstanding, massive and systemic. Corruptions become a disaster for the national economy and undermine system of governance. Corruption is not merely the loss of state money, but the impact on poverty and the miserable life of the people. Indonesia considers the UN anti-corruption convention is quite important in the effort to uphold the "good governance" and create a climate conducive to investment. International cooperation is needed to resolve the problem of corruption in order to prevent and eradicate corruption, of course, need to be supported by integrity, accountability, and management of good governance and the nation Indonesia has been active in the international community\u27s efforts to prevent and eradicate corruption to have signed the United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003 (United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003). Ratification is an attempt to construct the identity of Indonesia that first acts as a corrupt country into a country that has a desire to create a clean government. Abstrak: Tulisan ini mencoba untuk melihat ratifikasi hukum internasional khususnya konvensi PBB anti korupsi serta dampaknya bagi kondisi dalam negeri sebuah Negara, khususnya Indonesia. Indonesia memandang konvensi PBB anti korupsi cukup penting dalam upaya menegakkan "good governance"dan menciptakan iklim investasi yang kondusif. Kerja sama internasional diperlukan untuk menyelesaikan masalah korupsi ini dalam rangka pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak korupsi, tentunya perlu didukung oleh integritas, akuntabilitas, dan manajemen pemerintahan yang baik. Indonesia telah ikut aktif dalam upaya masyarakat internasional untuk pencegahan dan pemberantasan korupsi dengan menandatangani Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Anti Korupsi, 2003. Ratifikasi merupakan upaya konstruksi identitas Indonesia sebagai negara yang korup menjadi negara yang mempunyai keinginan untuk menciptakan pemerintahan yang bersih. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v4i2.409
Pemberatasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia (Analisis Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 15 dan 16 Tahun 2003 Berdasarkan Teori Hukum)
No full textEradicating Criminal Acts of Terrorism in Indonesia: Legal Theory Perspective. The terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001 has fundamentally changed the United States and the world\u27s understanding towards the dangers posed by terrorism. As a result, the Act (Act) Anti-Terrorism Law No. 15 and 16 of 2003 was regulated and legalized by the House of Representatives (DPR). Anti-Terrorism Act is expected to provide support functions as a component of the rule of law and a fair legal basis, and effectively prevent the occurrence of acts of terrorism. This article focused on analyzing the anti-terrorism act based on the applicable legal theory. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v1i1.298
Strategi Politik-Hukum Meningkatkan Kualitas Kinerja DPR Ri Dalam Produktivitas Legislasi Nasional
Get PDFABSTRACT: This study examines and learn more on the need to improve the functioning of the House of Representatives (DPR RI) in national legislation. The main problem of the functions of Parliament in every period of the membership of Parliament from 2005-2016 year is the low productivity performance of the Parliament in legislation. This research is a normative law (legal research) or doctrinal explorative research-analysis. The data used is secondary data, in the form of material and the primary law and secondary law. The results showed the main causes of poor quality of legislation the DPR RI because of the extreme multiparty, Parliament favored the performance of supervisory functions in the executive and member of Parliament in the discipline in the use of his time. The legal policy strategy to improve the productivity of legislation DPR RI is, change the course of politics from the agent/delegete to the trustee, eliminating the function of the fraction DPR RI, balancing the role and function of DPR RI and DPD RI, accommodate veto the president, increasing public participation, and streamline costs in making law. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini mengkaji dan mendalami tentang perlunya DPR RI meningkatkan fungsi legislasi nasional. Problem utama fungsi DPR dalam setiap periode keanggotaan DPR dari tahun 2005-2016 adalah rendahnya kinerja DPR dalam produktivitas legislasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (legal research) atau penelitian doktrinal yang bersifat eksploratif-analisis. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, berupa bahan hukum primer dan dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukan penyebab utama rendahnya kualitas produk legislasi DPR karena faktor multipartai ekstrim, DPR lebih mengutamakan pada fungsi kinerja pengawasan pada eksekutif dan rendahnya disiplin anggota DPR dalam memanfaatkan waktunya. Adapun strategi politik-hukum untuk meningkatkan kualitas produktifitas legislasi DPR adalah, mengubah haluan politik dari agent/delegete ke trustee, menghilangkan fungsi fraksi di DPR RI, menyeimbangkan peran dan fungsi DPR RI dengan DPD RI, mengakomodasi hak veto pada presiden, meningkatkan partisipasi publik, dan mengefektifkan biaya dalam pembuatan undang-undang. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v4i2.414
Pengusulan Pasangan Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Sebagai Peserta Pemilu Menurut Undang-Undang Pilpres
Get PDFAbstract : Nomination of the Candidate Pair of President and Vice President For Participants Election According to the Presidential Election Law. Knowing the legal position of the candidates for President and Vice-President and the Political Parties Elections, namely Knowing setting Political Parties in the nomination of the Candidate Election of President and Vice-President and the timing of the nomination of the candidate of President and Vice President based on legal analysis. It is motivated by the lack of rules regarding the nomination of candidates for President and Vice President of the Law No. 42 Year 2008 on the General Election of President and Vice President, namely in the norm of Article 9 and Article 14 paragraph (2) which do not conform to the norms of Section 22E paragraph (3) and the norm of Article 6A paragraph (2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 NRI 1945). Abstrak : Pengusulan Pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Sebagai Peserta Pemilu Menurut Undang-Undang Pilpres. Mengetahui kedudukan hukum calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dan Partai Politik Peserta Pemilu, yakni Mengetahui pengaturan Partai Politik Peserta Pemilu dalam pengusulan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dan pengaturan waktu pengusulan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden berdasarkan analisa hukum. Hal tersebut dilatar belakangi oleh adanya aturan mengenai pengusulan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, yakni di dalam norma Pasal 9 dan Pasal 14 ayat (2) yang tidak sesuai dengan norma Pasal 22E ayat (3) dan norma Pasal 6A ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945). DOI: 10.15408/jch.v2i2.232
Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dalam Pluralitas Hukum Agama (Judicial Review Pasal Perkawinan Beda Agama)
No full textAbstrak: Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dalam Pluralitas Hukum Agama. Pernikahan beda agama memang menjadi suatu fenomena yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dari kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia yang sarat dengan pluralisme. Pernikahan beda agama tidak bisa begitu saja dihilangkan hanya dengan peraturan hukum, karena mencintai orang lain tidak bisa dibatasi dengan agama. Keutuhan dan keharmonisan hubungan menjadi dambaan bagi semua pasangan suami istri, tak terkecuali pasangan suami istri beda agama. Perbedaan agama memang menjadi suatu hal yang rentan terhadap munculnya masalah dan konflik dalam kehidupan berumah tangga pasangan beda agama, karena banyak perbedaan dalam pola pikir, cara pandang, aktivitas dan kebiasaan sehari-hari yang sedikit banyak disebabkan oleh perbedaan agama yang dimiliki oleh keduanya. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, penulis memandang perlunya meneliti bagaimana realitas yang terjadi dalam aturan agama yang diakui di Indonesia. Serta melalui penetapan inkracht oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, maka pernikahan beda Agama kini dan nanti lebih diakomodasi oleh negara, agar tidak terjadi permasalahan dikemudian hari. konflik dalam hubungan dapat diminimalisir. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v2i2.231