University of Arts in Belgrade
Digital Repository of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of BelgradeNot a member yet
4571 research outputs found
Sort by
Fasizmus, posztfasizmus, neoliberalizmus
Fasizmus, posztfasizmus, neoliberalizmus
A tanulmány a neoliberalizmus és a fasizmus viszonylatával foglalkozik, és arra tesz kisérletet, hogy rekonstruálja a neoliberalizmus kibontakozását a fasizmus történelmi környezetében. Ennek fényében tárgyalja a neoliberalizmus autoritárius tendenciáit és az átmeneti diktatúra jelentéseit. A szerzők figyelmet szentelnek a „felújított liberalizmusnak”, amely megannyi olyan kategóriát működtet, amelyek talajra találnak a fasizmusban. Ennek kontextusában a szerzők Lukács György okfejtéseire támaszkodnak, amelyek: (1) érzékelik a liberalizmus modifikációit a harmincas években: noha Lukács nem használja a neoliberalizmus fogalmát, kétségtelen, hogy fontos tendenciákat rögzít, amelyek eredményesen felhasználhatók a neoliberalizmussal kapcsolatos gondolkodásban, (2) a liberalizmus és a demokrácia ellentétét hangsúlyozzák, (3) megkülönböztetik a kapitalizmusra irányuló indirekt és direkt apologetika fogalmát. Lukács gondolatai – kontrafaktuális módon – a neoliberalizmust a kapitalizmus direkt apologetikájaként írják le
The Concept of Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Well-being
Social capital refers to the patterns and qualities of relationships in a community operating from a variety of different sources, including social well–being. The potential for social capital to make a positive contribution to well–being as an outcome of criminal justice is among the priorities of social concern as it is related to capabilities of criminal justice to affect an infrastructure of security around human relationships that are guaranteed by institutions of justice. Constraints related to implementation of traditional criminal justice continually instigate search for more adequate legitimate response to criminal behavior. Therapeutic jurisprudence is a new approach based on the view that the practice of law involves resolution of conflicts between people, and that a legal practitioner, in order to fulfill his or her tasks, must fully understand the social and psychological consequences to the parties concerned entailed by these conflicts as reflected in legal proceedings they are involved with. This article seeks to address some of the therapeutic consequences that law, legal actors and legal decisions could have on both subjective and collective well– being
Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument
Nakon kratkog istorijskog pregleda filozofskih pogleda na svojinu u tekstu se iznosi analiza argumenta kojim se svojina opravdava na osnovi univerzalnog poštovanja svačijeg prava na upotrebu stvari za bilo koju svrhu. Mogućnost upotrebe stvari za realizaciju postavljenih ciljeva je uslov mogućnosti delanja, kao stvarnog događanja u svetu. To je ono u čemu se ispoljava kapacitet slobode kao kauzalne moći u realnom svetu. Ali bez izglednosti na završetak započetog procesa realizacije cilja ta kauzalna moć bi bila praktično obesmišljena (iako bi i dalje postojala kao realna ontološka mogućnost). Svojina je shema unutar koje ova izglednost postaje aktualna, i otuda je svojina zapravo sastojak i nužna pretpostav- ka slobode kao mogućnosti svrhovitog delanja. Svojina menja normativnu pozici- ju svih drugih, oni (više) nemaju pravo slobodnog korišćenja zaposednutih stvari (onih koje su postale predmet svojine). Kao pravo svojina povlači, prvo, dužnost
poštovanja poseda koja, pored zabrane sprečavanja tuđeg korišćenja stvari u po- sedu uključuje i obavezu nesprečavanja bilo čije upotrebe i raspolaganja stvarima koje nisu već zaposednute: svačija svojina se mora poštovati, ničija svojina se mo- že slobodno zaposesti (neki oblici svojine su opšta ili kolektivna svojina). Drugo,
tek kao vlasništvo, u kome pravo raspolaganja više ne zavisi od faktičke moći ras- polaganja u posedu, svojina dobija svoj puni normativni i praktički kapacitet. Vlasništvo je garancija budućnosti prava svojine. Za ovo je potrebno eksplicitno priznanje činjenice uspostavljenosti prava raspolaganja od strane svih drugih, priznanje koje nužno sledi (ne može da se uskrati) ukoliko niko nije povređen ovim raspolaganjem. To sledi iz prirode razlike između stvari i osoba, koje su ličnosti sa kapacitetom za slobodno delanje (korišćenje sredstava za realizaciju postavljenih
ciljeva). Po svojoj prirodi stvari se mogu posedovati, a kako je upotreba sredstava za bilo koji legitimni cilj takođe legitimna to svaka neposedovana stvar može bez prepreka postati predmet svojine, bilo zaposedanjem bilo transferom
Zdravko Kučinar, Arthur Liebert: Život i dela / Leben und Werke / Life and Works (Beograd: Dosije, 2015)
Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe
The volume contains a selection of articles written during the international project “Figuring Out the Enemy: Re-imagining Serbian-Albanian Relations” (2014-2016). Containing 13 reviewed articles previously published in Serbian or Albanian, this is one of the first joint research initiatives, involving twenty eight scholars and intellectuals solely from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania, putting forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to current hostilities. The project’s mission was to engage scholars from national communities at stake instead of bringing them from aside, and to provide environment for discussion and mutual understanding. The project created a base for lasting cooperation and a strong network of scholars, intellectuals, but also cultural institutions from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania.
The edited volume “Figuring Out the Enemy: Re-imagining Serbian-Albanian Relations” challenges Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating events and discourses from the past as well as more recent times. It seeks to identify and elaborate common views, ideas and traditions that undermine the present enmity and promote cooperation. These articles therefore offer an alternative to the dominant discourse of hostility and centennial ethnic hatred between the two nations. It also aims to bridge the existent gap in comparative research on Serbian-Albanian issues that has resulted in a serious lack of joint research projects, cooperation and other cultural activities
Ambivalence and the Work of Hope: Anticipating Futures in a Serbian Industrial Town
This study is based on fourteen months of ethnographic fieldwork that I conducted in Bor, a copper-processing town in Eastern Serbia. From the perspectives of “ordinary” people, this dissertation explores the process of post-socialist transformation through ethnography of the interconnections between the town (characterised by mono-structural economy) and the industrial company.
After a prosperous period during Yugoslav socialism there was an economic, social, and symbolic decline of the copper-processing company followed by decay of the town and industry during the 1990s. This thesis captures the moment of political promise that brought a new horizon of hope for a better life and the promise of economic growth through the revival of the rundown industry. It captures the experiences of people who have had different encounters with existing attempts to revitalise and transform everyday life, in the context of the mutual revival of the company and the town.
In this thesis I analyse people’s anticipations of their futures as well as the practices they invested in maintaining and realising their hopes (which I call the “work of hope”). I argue that ambivalence, which consisted of simultaneous coupling of hope with various other competing and conflicting sets of dispositions, such as risk, despair, entrapment, dismay, anxiety, frustration, and so on, was reflected in how people’s futures were imagined, conveyed, and lived towards. The first part of the dissertation focuses on how material objects, such as the renovated sites, the district heating, and pollution, appeared in my interlocutors’ work of hope and in their anticipations of futures. In parallel with this, the second part focuses on how the temporality of waiting and the work of hope played out in relation to gender, age, and generation among the people with whom I spent time.
I argue that my interlocutors’ anticipations of futures and their work of hope resulted in reproduction of inequalities (in terms of gender, age, and class). I argue that in their encounter with the omnipresent industrial company that pervaded and constructed everyday lives, and through their work of hope, the state was encountered and reproduced and the social contract between the company, the town and the people was maintained. The analysis of how people in the industrial town of Bor played with and sought to reconcile ambivalence feeds into existing debates about how hope is read through, produced through, and articulated in relation to the material and social landscapes