University of Arts in Belgrade
Digital Repository of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of BelgradeNot a member yet
4571 research outputs found
Sort by
Pravo kao pristojnost: O emocionalnoj uslovljenosti prava
No full textPravo je sistem vrednosti i normi zasnovanih na tim vrednostima čija je svrha da učini ljudsko ponašanje u društvu predvidivijim, čime se zasniva mreža uzajamnih legitimnih očekivanja. U tekstu je reč o vrednosnim aspektima prava koji, s jedne strane, zasnivaju legitimitet prava (jer pozivno pravo koje odudara od fundamentalnih vrednosti svoje zajednice u važnom smislu nije legitimno), a s druge jasno razgraničavaju domen pravnog od domena nepravnog postupanja, bez obzira na to čije je to postupanje. Ono postupanje, uključujući i postupanje suda ili državnih organa, kojim se narušava načelo predvidivosti, odnosno ono ponašanje koje narušava legitimna očekivanja stranaka ili društva u celini (poput pristojnog i zakonitog ponašanja sudije) predstavlja nepravno ponašanje. Ova razlika pomaže da se izbegnu pravno-tehničke nedoumice, da se uvede jasniji standard discipline u pravnu profesiju i da se jasnije procenjuje rad sudova i drugih javnih ustanova
Čuvari kontrarevolucije: nacistička ekonomija i potčinjavanje rada
No full textČlanak razmatra shvatanje fašizma kroz okvire kontrarevolucije u
dvadesetovekovnim marksizmima sa namerom da pokaže kako je
kontra-revolucija promenila uslove proizvodnje omogućavanjem
upotrebe prinudnog rada u političkoj ekonomiji nemačkog
nacizma. Kritikujući različite varijante opisa nacizma kao “totalne
države” ili “državnog kapitalizma”, članak nudi pojašnjenje uloge
rada u nemačkom nacizmu kroz Marxovu teoriju vrednosti. Veza
koja kontra-revoluciju čini nužno povezanom sa teorijom vrednosti
pokazuje se u zadnjem poglavlju kroz kritiku Alfred Sohn-
Rethela
Darrell P. Arnold (ed.), Traditions of Systems Theory. Major Figures and Contemporary Developments, London/New York, Routledge, 2014.
No full textGiovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera (eds.), The Roots of Respect. A Historic-Philosophical Itinerary, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 2017.)
No full textDeconstruction at Work: The Philosophical Heritage of Milorad Belančić
No full textIn the organization of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory at the University of Belgrade and the Third Program of Radio Belgrade, on December 5, 2018, starting at 10 a.m., a philosophical meeting dedicated to the ideas and work of Milorad Belančić will be held at the premises of the Institute (Kraljice Natalije 45, fourth floor).
Milorad Belančic, one of the most prolific domestic philosophers, a French student and a longtime editor of the Third Program of Radio Belgrade, in his twenty books has left testimony of effective philosophical deconstruction, grappling with philosophical tradition, contemporary philosophical problems, as well as current political situations. During the seventies of the last century, Belančić is in France where he is visiting lectures of, above all, Vladimir Jankélévitch and Paul Ricœur. Upon returning to the country, initially, he undertook investigation of phenomenological motives on the Jankélévitch and Ricœur trails, publishing his most academic book The same and completely different, 1983, as well as the Interpretation Strategies, 1991. Shortly afterwards, along with the breakup of Yugoslavia, he dedicated himself to the poststructuralist deconstruction (Derrida’s provenance), and remains, perhaps, its the most consistent bearer in Serbian language. With the book Zero Point of Ideology (1989) he is clearly positioned on the public scene as an opponent of every authoritarian venture, and the Postmodernist anxiety (1994) is the peculiar announcement of a new philosophical perspective that he will hold, with the constant problematization of his own position, until the end in 2017. In a civil sense, therefore, Milorad Belančić never stood on the side of unfreedom, while in his philosophical work consistently advocated for multiperspectivity, for the kind of recognized differences without which freedom, simply, remains an empty term. In that sense Belančić has proved himself to be one of the most persistent and fierce polemicists in this region, especially in the books Polemologics (2008), The Philosopher must not go to Syracuse (2010) and We, We, We (2014).
The meeting is dedicated to the problematization of Belančić’s ideas and testing their capacity. In contrast to the commemorative tone that shifts the work into a better past, or leaves it to an uncertain future, Belančić directs his energy to the present, believing, along with one of his great philosophical opponents, Hegel, that philosophy is its own time apprehended in thoughts. It is precisely to such incessant (and unfinishable) work of deconstruction in present and on present Belančić dedicated almost all his philosophical energy: demolition of idols, decomposition of dangerous constructions and to the construction, of the same philosophical material, buildings that do not promise happiness but open spaces of freedom.
Planned participants: Petar Bojanić (Institute of Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade), Jovan Cekić (Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University), Novica Milić (Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University), Latinka Perović (Historian) Branko Romčević (Faculty of Security, University of Belgrade), Obrad Savić (Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University), Adriana Zaharijević (Institute of Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade), Aleksandar Zistakis (University of Athens, Greece)
Moderators: Ivan Milenković (Third Program of Radio Belgrade), Predrag Krstić (Institute of Philosophy and Social Theory
Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis
No full textThe extended mind thesis maintains that while minds may be centrally
located in one’s brain-and-body, they are sometimes partly constituted
by tools in our environment. Critics argue that we have no reason to
move from the claim that cognition is embedded in the environment to
the stronger claim that cognition can be constituted by the environment.
I will argue that there are normative reasons, both scientific and ethical,
for preferring the extended account of the mind to the rival embedded
account.Prema tezi o proširenom duhu iako se naši umovi prevashodno nalaze u našem mozgu i telu, njih ponekad delimično ustanovljuju delovi naše sredine. Kritičari tvrde da nemamo razloga da od teze da je naša kognicija uronjena u našu sredinu napravimo korak ka prihvatanju jače teze prema kojoj je naša kognicija konstituisana našom sredinom. U ovom radu, pokazujem da postoje normativni razlozi, naučni i etički, da prihvatimo tezu o proširenom duhu umesto suparničke, uronjene, teze
Naučne kritike i polemike: Tamar Meisels’ "Targeted Killing With Drones? Old Arguments, New Technologies"
No full textHow to Design Housing for the Poor?
No full textIn the second half of the 19th century, poverty is above all an urban problem. How do the first modern urban planners imagine the struggle against poverty, and can ‘wealth be in the service of the workers and the people’? Primarily using two Reports, John Locke’s 1697 The Report on the Poor and A Philosophical Review of Poverty (Wolff, Lamb, Zur-Szpiro) from 2015, I intend to explain and determine relative and absolute poverty, ghetto, the dark ghetto (Shelby), the suburbs, slums, ‘worker cities’ (Cités Ouvrières), the ‘social palace’, etc
