Hosei University Repository
Not a member yet
22008 research outputs found
Sort by
The Morito’s Scandal : Assist. Prof. Morito’s Indictment for his Essay on Kropotkin
Get PDFThis essay is comprised of the following chapters: Preface 1) The origin of anarchism in Japan 2) The introduction of English and French words related to anarchism into Japan 3) Japan’ s first anarchic political organization called “Toyoshakaito” （東洋社会党） 4) The popularity of “Toyoshakaito” 5) Japan’s first books on anarchism and their influence 6) A brief history of the anarchic movement in Japan 7) Assist. Prof. Tatsuo Morito （森戸辰男） was indicted for his essay on Kropotkin 8) Morito’s study on Kropotkin’s social thought 9) Protest movement against the government 10) Some intellectuals’ views on the scandal as published in the “Taiyo” （「太陽」） and the “Legal Newspaper” （「法律新聞」）. Postface. The author’s abstract in English.Up until the end of the Pacific War in 1945, the Japanese government controlled our speech and writing. The essay titled “The study on Kropotkin’s social thought” by Assist. Prof. Morito of Tokyo university was indicted for disturbing public peace in January, 1920. Morito mentioned in his long essay of more than 65 pages, the means of building a better society. He said our final aim was to be a freemen. To attain this ideal, men should be given either political or economical freedom, which are the bases of social life. However nationalism and capitalism keep us from getting them. Nationalism is based on giving orders, constraint, and threat. People are slaves as well as subjects. Whereas capitalism rests on the system of private property, it entertains liberalism. On the one side liberalism means sweating the laborers.Morito seems to use Kropotkin’s theory of social thought to deny étatisme (i.e. state socialism) and the establishment at that time. He idealized to build up a new society where people were their own master living by mutual aid. Morito’s essay characterizes his fanciful view of anarchistic communism ― a society without authority and private ownership. In his view, the greatest happiness of the greatest number is to be a free citizen. But people under the absolute rule of the Emperor in Japan, they are placed under restraint. From the viewpoint of the ruling classes, Morito’s idea on society was not only fantastic but dangerous to maintain national polity. Finally he was sentenced to 2 months’ imprisonment and was fined 70 yen in October, 1920, on the charge of plotting to overturn the national structure. While the editor, Assist. Prof. Hyoei Ōuchi （大内兵衛） was also sentenced to 1 month imprisonment and was fined 20 yen with a 2 year stay of execution.Morito was clean taken in by Prof. Shinkichi Uesugi （上杉慎吉）, a scholar of Constitutions, who was the leader of the right-wing organization at Tokyo University. The Morito scandal caused not only a school disturbance but aroused public opinion regarding freedom of learning, freedom of thought and speech in the country. Morito intended to write the essay with a view to cure the ill-fame of anarchism in Kotoku’s High Treason case. He attained his objective though, he was prosecuted for disturbing public peace by chance.He was a brave man. Fear never unnerved him
Study on the scholarship loan program by the Japan Student Services Organization (JASSO) : A consideration on the relationship between the policy system and public policy norm
Get PDFわが国の大学等高等教育への就学を支援する政策制度は，殆どが日本学生支援機構の貸与奨学金制度による。2019年度現在全就学生の37％にあたる127万人の学生が約340万円の奨学金貸与を受け効果を上げている。一方2021年度にコロナ禍を理由として，大学中退・休学を余儀なくされた学生5,238人のうち，貸与奨学金が原因の経済的問題が理由の学生が一定数存在する。奨学金制度が貸与方式であるが故に大規模な奨学生の教育機会提供支援制度の役割を担う正の部分と，奨学生が自らの責にない原因で就業機会を失うと返済できなくなり苦境に立つ者も生み出されるという負の部分も併せ持つ。日本政府は，政策規範の認識フレームワークにおいて功利主義を取り，金融的側面における資金供与効率性や制度継続性を重んじている。他方本質主義を基とし，そもそも経済的困難者への就学機会の提供制度であるべきとういう考え方も存在する。双方の立場の比較に基づく慎重な議論が十分でなかった点が両義性の原因である。結論として，奨学金制度は教育機会均等化政策と金融制度双方の適切なバランスについて比較考量されることが必要である。①受益者である奨学生の立場をより正確に反映可能な政策検討プロセス，②給付奨学金制度の大幅な拡充，奨学生本人の責任に帰せぬ理由で経済的困難に陥った際の期間返済免除制度③この問題を通して，受益者自身がプロアクティブな意識・役割を担いより主体的な役割を求めるため，フィンテック手法のクラウドファンディングによる民間資金の導入により，奨学金制度の財源の多角化，受益者主体意識を含む政策制度への多元化を提言することとしたい
Employment Management of Japanese Brazilians and their Positions in a Regional Labor Market : A Case of Izumo City in Japan
Get PDFSpecial Issue : Thinking of Structural Racism in the United States : History and the Realities （1） : Color Line Demarcation and the “New Immigrants” : American Racial Society in the First Half of the 20th Century
Get PDFExplikation der Vorrede der Phänomenologie des Geistes Hegels （die Absätze 61-65）
Get PDFDer Kern des begreifenden Denkens besteht in der Beziehung zwischen der Seite der Form und des Inhalts des Satzes. Diese Beziehung läßt die Philosopie zur wissenschaftliche System entwickeln. Dadurch unterscheidet sich Hegel vom Kant und Fichte. Denn der Satz drückt bei Hegel nicht das erste Prinzip des Beweises aus. Die Seite des Inhalts des Satzes zerstört die Seite der Form des Satzes. Die wissenschaftliche System entsteht aus der dialektischen Bewegung dieses Satzes selbst
