Binus University Repository

Sanny, Lim

Effect of social media marketing on Instagram towards purchase intention: Evidence from Indonesia’s ready-to-drink tea industry

Chowanda, Andry

(Check) The Adventure of
BipBop: An Android App
Pathfinding Adventure Game
by Rini Wongso
Submission date: 04-Jan-2021 02:39PM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1482856034
File name: done_-_The_Adventure_of_BipBop_An_Android_App.pdf (617.96K)
Word count: 4716
Character count: 24591






8%
SIMILARITY INDEX
6%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
2%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 4%
2 3%
3 1%
4 1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 1%
(Check) The Adventure of BipBop: An Android App Pathfinding
Adventure Game
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
astesj.com
Internet Source
Erika Isabela, Jennifer Drona, Nailatul Fadhilah,
Dian Felita Tanoto et al. "NYAM: An Android
Based Application for Food Finding Using GPS",
Procedia Computer Science, 2018
Publication
Submitted to Arab Open University
Student Paper
www.astesj.com
Internet Source
FINAL GRADE
/0
(Check) The Adventure of BipBop: An Android App Pathfinding
Adventure Game
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6

Check Similarity "The adventure of BipBop: An android app pathfinding adventure game"

Tamara, Dewi

1600-M2
by Dewi Tamara
Submission date: 27-Jan-2020 01:22PM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1246980654
File name: 1600-M2.pdf (423.76K)
Word count: 5315
Character count: 30349



















18%
SIMILARITY INDEX
13%
INTERNET SOURCES
3%
PUBLICATIONS
16%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 5%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
8 1%
9
1600-M2
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
www.emeraldinsight.com
Internet Source
Submitted to University of Greenwich
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Hertfordshire
Student Paper
Submitted to 7034
Student Paper
Submitted to Napier University
Student Paper
Submitted to American Intercontinental
University Online
Student Paper
vuir.vu.edu.au
Internet Source
Submitted to West Liberty University
Student Paper
www.livecorp.com.au
1%
10 1%
11 <1%
12 <1%
13 <1%
14 <1%
15 <1%
16 <1%
17 <1%
18 <1%
19 <1%
Internet Source
ro.uow.edu.au
Internet Source
Submitted to Oxford Brookes University
Student Paper
Submitted to Middlesex University
Student Paper
Submitted to Embry Riddle Aeronautical
University
Student Paper
Submitted to CVC Nigeria Consortium
Student Paper
Submitted to Melbourne Institute of Technology
Student Paper
ijcsi.org
Internet Source
Submitted to Monmouth College
Student Paper
Submitted to Wawasan Open University
Student Paper
Submitted to Grenoble Ecole Management
Student Paper
Submitted to Maastricht School of Management
20 <1%
21 <1%
22 <1%
23 <1%
24 <1%
25 <1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 10 words
Student Paper
Submitted to Victoria University
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Southampton
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Sheffield
Student Paper
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
Internet Source
Submitted to Royal Holloway and Bedford New
College
Student Paper
FINAL GRADE
/0
1600-M2
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
RUBRIC: AE RUBRIC
TR
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
 
Task Response
• does not submit • does not attempt the task in any way
• answer is completely unrelated to the task
• barely responds to the task • meets only a small proportion of the required number
of words • does not express a thesis • may attempt to present one or two ideas
but there is no development
• does not adequately address any part of the task • meets only a small proportion of
the required number of words • does not express a clear position • presents few
ideas, which are largely undeveloped or irrelevant
• responds to the task only in a minimal way or the answer is tangential; the format may
be inappropriate • the report is substantially shorter or longer than the required
number of words • presents a thesis but this is unclear • presents some main
ideas but these are difficult to identify and may be repetitive, irrelevant or not well
supported
• addresses the task only partially; the format and/or content of the section headings may
be inappropriate in places • the report is substantially shorter or longer than the
required number of words • expresses a thesis but its development is not always
clear and there may be no conclusions drawn • presents some ideas but these are
limited and not sufficiently developed; there may be irrelevant detail
• addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate for its nature and purpose
although some parts or sections may be more fully covered than others • is only over
or under by approximately 15 percent of the required number of words • presents
relevant ideas to support the thesis but the other parts or sections of the report are not
well developed • presents relevant ideas but some may be inadequately developed/
unclear
• addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate for its nature and purpose • is only over or under by approximately 10 percent of the required number of words • presents a clear thesis with supporting ideas , but there may be a tendency to over-
generalize and /or supporting ideas may lack focus
• sufficiently addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate for its nature and
purpose • is only over or under by approximately 5 percent of the required number
of words • presents a well-developed thesis and presents relevant, extended and
supported ideas under each part or section of the report
• fully addresses all parts of the report as appropriate for its nature and purpose •
meets the required number of words , excluding references • presents a fully
developed thesis and presents relevant, fully extended and well- supported ideas under
each part or section of the report
• excellently addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate for its nature and
CC
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
LR
purpose • meets the required number of words , excluding references •
presents a fully developed thesis and presents relevant, fully extended and well-supported
ideas under each part or section of the report
Coherence and Cohesion
• does not submit
• fails to communicate any message
• has very little control of organization features
• does not organize ideas logically • may use a very limited range of cohesive
devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas
• presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no
clear progression in the response • uses some basic cohesive devices but these may
be inaccurate or repetitive • may not write in paragraphs or their use may be
confusing
• presents information with some organization but there may be lack of overall
progression • makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices •
may be repetitive because of lack of use of referents and substitution • may not write
in paragraphs or paragraphing may be inadequate
• arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression •
uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be
faulty or mechanical • may not always use referents clearly and appropriately •
uses paragraphing, but not always logically
• logically organizes information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout •
uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under/-over-
use • presents a clear central topic within each section of the report
• sequences information and ideas logically using appropriate main and sub-headings • manages all aspects of cohesion well • uses paragraphing sufficiently and
appropriately
• uses cohesion fluently • skillfully manages paragraphing and logically develops
main and sub-headings • presents a clear central topic within each part or section of
the report
• excellently uses cohesion in such a way that it falls naturally and attracts no attention • skillfully manages paragraphing and logically develops main and sub-headings of the
report • excellently presents a clear central topic within each part or section of the
report
Lexical Resource
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
GRA
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
• does not submit
• can only use a few isolated words
• uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation
and/or spelling
• uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word
formation and/or spelling • errors may severely distort the message
• uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be
inappropriate for the task • has limited control of word formation and/or spelling;
errors may cause strain for the reader
• uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task • may
make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for
the reader
• uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task • attempts to use less common
vocabulary but with some inaccuracy • makes some errors in spelling and/or word
formation, but they do not impede communication
• uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision • uses
less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation • may
produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation
• uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings •
skillfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word
choice and collocation • produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation
uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical
features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’
uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical
features
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
• does not submit
• cannot use sentence forms at all
• cannot use sentence forms except in memorized phrases
• attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort
meaning
• uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses • some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty
• uses only a limited range of structures • attempts complex sentences but these
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
R
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
tend to be less accurate than simple sentences • may make frequent grammatical
errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader
• uses a mix simple and complex sentence forms • makes some errors in grammar
and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication
• uses a variety of complex structures • produces frequent error-free sentences • has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors
• uses a wide range of structures • the majority of sentences are error-free •
makes only very occasional errors
uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur
only as ‘slips’
uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy
Referencing
• does not submit
• does not include any references and/or in-text citations.
• Probably no in-text citations and/or a few references which may or may not be relevant,
none in the correct format, or sufficiently balanced to provide support to the paper.
• Some in-text citations and few references are relevant, none in the correct format, and
are either insufficient in number to provide adequate support to the paper or too many to
justify originality
• Some in-text citations and some references are relevant, rarely in the correct format, but
are poorly distributed to provide support to the paper
• Some in-text citations and the majority of references are relevant, some in the correct
format, but are not well-distributed to provide support to the paper
• The majority of in-text citations and references are relevant, majority in the correct
format, and distributed to provide support to the paper
• The majority of in-text citations and most references are relevant, mostly in the correct
format, and sufficiently distributed to provide support to the paper
• Most in-text citations and all references are relevant, in the correct format, and well-
distributed to provide strong support to the paper
All in-text citations and most references are relevant, in the correct format, and very well-
distributed to provide strong support to the paper
• All in-text citations and references are completely relevant, in the correct format, and
extremely well-distributed to provide convincing support to the paper

Similarity "Employees’ Perception of the Implementation of Activity-Based Costing in Cattle Feedlot Company"

Reviewer "Employees’ Perception of the Implementation of Activity-Based Costing in Cattle Feedlot Company "

Gaol, Ford L.

Form Reviewer "Solving the Graph Problem on the Maximal Clique Problem on the P-Systems with Mitochondria Enzymes Layer"

Behavior of Partner Users in New Collaborative Online Application in Indonesia based on Theory of Plan Behavior

Form Reviewer "Evaluating ERP System Merging Success in Chemical Companies: System Quality, Information Quality, and Service Quality"

Supply Chain Risk Analysis in Interior Design SME in Indonesia

English

Exploring Employee’s Motivation and Performance Factors: Evidence in a 3 Star Hotel in Indonesia by Contrasting Maslow’s and Çetin’s Model

(Check) Identification of
readiness factors for the agile erp
ASSESSMENT
by Rini Wongso
Submission date: 13-Jun-2020 11:29PM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1343132297
File name: tification_of_readiness_factors_for_the_agile_erp_ASSESSMENT.pdf (552.57K)
Word count: 3785
Character count: 21760













15%
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
14%
PUBLICATIONS
%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 4%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5
(Check) Identification of readiness factors for the agile erp
ASSESSMENT
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Jungyun Bae, Woojin Chung. "A Heuristic for
Path Planning of Multiple Heterogeneous
Automated Guided Vehicles", International
Journal of Precision Engineering and
Manufacturing, 2018
Publication
"A Readiness Assessment Model for ERP
Implementation", International Journal of Recent
Technology and Engineering, 2020
Publication
Mehmet Kirmizi, Batuhan Kocaoglu. "The key
for success in enterprise information systems
projects: development of a novel ERP readiness
assessment method and a case study",
Enterprise Information Systems, 2019
Publication
docplayer.net
Internet Source
Budi Yulianto, Harjanto Prabowo, Raymond
1%
6 1%
7 1%
8 1%
9 1%
10 <1%
11 <1%
12
Kosala, Manik Hapsara. "Harmonik = ++(Web
IDE)", Procedia Computer Science, 2017
Publication
Santo Fernandi Wijaya, Harjanto Prabowo,
Raymondus Raymond Kosala, Meyliana. "an
Agile Implementation Model for ERP", 2019
International Conference on Information
Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 2019
Publication
www.ijain.org
Internet Source
worldwidescience.org
Internet Source
Payam Hanafizadeh, Ahad Zare Ravasan.
"chapter 9 A McKinsey 7S Model-Based
Framework for ERP Readiness Assessment",
IGI Global, 2013
Publication
Xuemei Xie. "Cooperative Factors, Cooperative
Innovation Effect and Innovation Performance
for Chinese Firms: an Empirical Study", Physics
Procedia, 2012
Publication
research.upjohn.org
Internet Source
Santo Fernandi Wijaya, Harjanto Prabowo,
<1%
13 <1%
14 <1%
15 <1%
16 <1%
17 <1%
Raymondus Raymond Kosala, Meyliana. "Agile
Methods for ERP Implementation: A Systematic
Literature Review", 2018 International
Conference on Information Management and
Technology (ICIMTech), 2018
Publication
Ahmadi, Sadra, Elpiniki Papageorgiou, Chung-
Hsing Yeh, and Rodney Martin. "Managing
readiness-relevant activities for the
organizational dimension of ERP
implementation", Computers in Industry, 2015.
Publication
Shanaka de Soysa, Julian Nanayakkara.
"Readiness for ERP Implementation in an
Organization: Development of an Assessment
Model", 2006 International Conference on
Information and Automation, 2006
Publication
Sudhaman Parthasarathy, Maya Daneva.
"Customer requirements based ERP
customization using AHP technique", Business
Process Management Journal, 2014
Publication
core.ac.uk
Internet Source
Arief Agus Sukmandhani, Bambang Dwi
Wijanarko, Eric Gunawan, Devriady Pratama,
18 <1%
19 <1%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches Off
Ford Lumban Gaol, Indrajani Sutedja.
"Measurement effectiveness and efficiency to
improve the IT services using ITSM", 2017
International Conference on Information
Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 2017
Publication
Bashaer Al Kilani, Souha Adlouni, Sara Al
Ahbabi, Zainab Al Yahyaei. "chapter 5 ERP
Systems in Arab Education Sector", IGI Global,
2013
Publication
Prodromos Chatzoglou, Dimitrios Chatzoudes,
Georgia Apostolopoulou. "Chapter 9 Examining
the Antecedents and Outcomes of ERP
Implementation Success: An Explanatory
Study", Springer Science and Business Media
LLC, 2017
Publication
FINAL GRADE
/0
(Check) Identification of readiness factors for the agile erp
ASSESSMENT
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13

Check Similarity "Identification Of Readiness Factors For The Agile Erp Assessment"

Binus University

Not a member yet