Binus University Repository

Girsang, Abba Suganda

Peer Review "Word similarity score as augmented feature in sarcasm detection using deep learning"

Maharani, Anita

IEOM
by Anita Maharani
Submission date: 19-Nov-2018 07:07AM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1041429360
File name: IEOM_2018.pdf (199.1K)
Word count: 3752
Character count: 20114








10%
SIMILARITY INDEX
6%
INTERNET SOURCES
6%
PUBLICATIONS
7%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 2%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
IEOM
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Kul Bhushan C. Saxena, Swanand J. Deodhar,
Mikko Ruohonen. "Business Model Innovation
in Software Product Industry", Springer Nature,
2017
Publicat ion
Submitted to Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Student Paper
mafiadoc.com
Internet Source
Submitted to American Public University
System
Student Paper
Submitted to London School of Commerce
Student Paper
Submitted to Southern Business School
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Warwick
Student Paper
www.toolshero.com
8 <1%
9 <1%
10 <1%
11 <1%
12 <1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 10 words
Internet Source
eprints.qut.edu.au
Internet Source
Submitted to Strathfield College Pty Ltd
Student Paper
Submitted to Rhodes University
Student Paper
businesslibrary.uflib.ufl.edu
Internet Source
FINAL GRADE
/0
IEOM
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
RUBRIC: AE RUBRIC
TR
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
 
Task Response
• does not submit • does not attempt the task in any way
• answer is completely unrelated to the task
• barely responds to the task • meets only a small proportion of the required
number of words • does not express a thesis • may attempt to present one
or two ideas but there is no development
• does not adequately address any part of the task • meets only a small
proportion of the required number of words • does not express a clear
posit ion • presents f ew ideas, which are largely undeveloped or irrelevant
• responds to the task only in a minimal way or the answer is tangential; the f ormat
may be inappropriate • the report is substantially shorter or longer than the
required number of words • presents a thesis but this is unclear • presents
some main ideas but these are dif f icult to identif y and may be repetit ive, irrelevant or
not well supported
• addresses the task only partially; the f ormat and/or content of the section headings
may be inappropriate in places • the report is substantially shorter or longer than
the required number of words • expresses a thesis but its development is not
always clear and there may be no conclusions drawn • presents some ideas but
these are limited and not suf f iciently developed; there may be irrelevant detail
• addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate f or its nature and
purpose although some parts or sections may be more f ully covered than others • is only over or under by approximately 15 percent of the required number of
words • presents relevant ideas to support the thesis but the other parts or
sections of the report are not well developed • presents relevant ideas but
some may be inadequately developed/ unclear
• addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate f or its nature and
purpose • is only over or under by approximately 10 percent of the required
number of words • presents a clear thesis with supporting ideas , but there may
be a tendency to over-generalize and /or supporting ideas may lack f ocus
• suf f iciently addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate f or its
nature and purpose • is only over or under by approximately 5 percent of the
required number of words • presents a well-developed thesis and presents
relevant, extended and supported ideas under each part or section of the report
• f ully addresses all parts of the report as appropriate f or its nature and purpose • meets the required number of words , excluding ref erences • presents a f ully
developed thesis and presents relevant, f ully extended and well- supported ideas
under each part or section of the report
• excellently addresses all parts or sections of the report as appropriate f or its
CC
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
LR
nature and purpose • meets the required number of words , excluding
ref erences • presents a f ully developed thesis and presents relevant, f ully
extended and well-supported ideas under each part or section of the report
Coherence and Cohesion
• does not submit
• f ails to communicate any message
• has very litt le control of organization f eatures
• does not organize ideas logically • may use a very limited range of cohesive
devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas
• presents inf ormation and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is
no clear progression in the response • uses some basic cohesive devices but
these may be inaccurate or repetit ive • may not write in paragraphs or their use
may be conf using
• presents inf ormation with some organization but there may be lack of overall
progression • makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices • may be repetit ive because of lack of use of ref erents and substitution • may
not write in paragraphs or paragraphing may be inadequate
• arranges inf ormation and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall
progression • uses cohesive devices ef f ectively, but cohesion within and/or
between sentences may be f aulty or mechanical • may not always use ref erents
clearly and appropriately • uses paragraphing, but not always logically
• logically organizes inf ormation and ideas; there is clear progression throughout • uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some
under/-over-use • presents a clear central topic within each section of the report
• sequences inf ormation and ideas logically using appropriate main and sub-
headings • manages all aspects of cohesion well • uses paragraphing
suf f iciently and appropriately
• uses cohesion f luently • skillf ully manages paragraphing and logically develops
main and sub-headings • presents a clear central topic within each part or
section of the report
• excellently uses cohesion in such a way that it f alls naturally and attracts no
attention • skillf ully manages paragraphing and logically develops main and sub-
headings of the report • excellently presents a clear central topic within each
part or section of the report
Lexical Resource
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
GRA
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
• does not submit
• can only use a f ew isolated words
• uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word
f ormation and/or spelling
• uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of
word f ormation and/or spelling • errors may severely distort the message
• uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetit ively or which may be
inappropriate f or the task • has limited control of word f ormation and/or spelling;
errors may cause strain f or the reader
• uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate f or the task •
may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word f ormation that may cause some
dif f iculty f or the reader
• uses an adequate range of vocabulary f or the task • attempts to use less
common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy • makes some errors in spelling
and/or word f ormation, but they do not impede communication
• uses a suf f icient range of vocabulary to allow some f lexibility and precision •
uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation •
may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word f ormation
• uses a wide range of vocabulary f luently and f lexibly to convey precise meanings • skillf ully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in
word choice and collocation • produces rare errors in spelling and/or word
f ormation
uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical
f eatures; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’
uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical
f eatures
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
• does not submit
• cannot use sentence f orms at all
• cannot use sentence f orms except in memorized phrases
• attempts sentence f orms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and
distort meaning
• uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate
clauses • some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation
is of ten f aulty
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
SCALE 10
R
SCALE 0
SCALE 1
SCALE 2
SCALE 3
SCALE 4
SCALE 5
SCALE 6
SCALE 7
SCALE 8
SCALE 9
• uses only a limited range of structures • attempts complex sentences but
these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences • may make f requent
grammatical errors and punctuation may be f aulty; errors can cause some dif f iculty
f or the reader
• uses a mix simple and complex sentence f orms • makes some errors in
grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication
• uses a variety of complex structures • produces f requent error- f ree
sentences • has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a f ew
errors
• uses a wide range of structures • the majority of sentences are error- f ree • makes only very occasional errors
uses a wide range of structures with f ull f lexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors
occur only as ‘slips’
uses a wide range of structures with f ull f lexibility and accuracy
Ref erencing
• does not submit
• does not include any ref erences and/or in- text citations.
• Probably no in- text citations and/or a f ew ref erences which may or may not be
relevant, none in the correct f ormat, or suf f iciently balanced to provide support to
the paper.
• Some in-text citations and f ew ref erences are relevant, none in the correct f ormat,
and are either insuf f icient in number to provide adequate support to the paper or too
many to justif y originality
• Some in-text citations and some ref erences are relevant, rarely in the correct
f ormat, but are poorly distributed to provide support to the paper
• Some in-text citations and the majority of ref erences are relevant, some in the
correct f ormat, but are not well-distributed to provide support to the paper
• The majority of in- text citations and ref erences are relevant, majority in the correct
f ormat, and distributed to provide support to the paper
• The majority of in- text citations and most ref erences are relevant, mostly in the
correct f ormat, and suf f iciently distributed to provide support to the paper
• Most in- text citations and all ref erences are relevant, in the correct f ormat, and well-
distributed to provide strong support to the paper
All in- text citations and most ref erences are relevant, in the correct f ormat, and very
well-distributed to provide strong support to the paper
SCALE 10 • All in- text citations and ref erences are completely relevant, in the correct f ormat,
and extremely well-distributed to provide convincing support to the paper

Similarity "Case Study On Strategic Development Of Genuine Leather Bags Using Business Canvas Model"

Furinto, Asnan

Impact of Non-Advertisement
Mass Media
by Asnan Furinto
Submission date: 11-Oct-2019 07:38AM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1190426133
File name: Advanced Science Letters_Impact of Non-Advertisement Mass Media.pdf (98.2K)
Word count: 3471
Character count: 17824





5%
SIMILARITY INDEX
1%
INTERNET SOURCES
2%
PUBLICATIONS
5%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 1%
2 1%
3 1%
4 1%
5 <1%
6 <1%
7 <1%
Impact of Non-Advertisement Mass Media
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to University of Newcastle
Student Paper
Submitted to Intercollege
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Hertfordshire
Student Paper
Sung-Eun Kim, Kyung Young Lee, Soo Il Shin,
Sung-Byung Yang. "Effects of tourism
information quality in social media on
destination image formation: The case of Sina
Weibo", Information & Management, 2017
Publication
Submitted to University of Leicester
Student Paper
Submitted to Monash University
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Kent at Canterbury
Student Paper
www.docstoc.com
8 <1%
9 <1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 10 words
Internet Source
Submitted to Mount Kenya University
Student Paper

Similarity "Impact of Non-Advertisement Mass Media Tourism Contents on Tourists’ Choice of Destination"

Bens, Pardamean

Form Reviewer "Mobile Learning for Early Detection Cancer"

form reviewer "Ecological Show Cave and Wild Cave: Negative Binomial Gllvm’s Arthropod Community Modelling"

Sasmoko, Sasmoko

Check 19. 2018 Scopus - Full -
Public engagement for
objective.pdf
by Arta Sundjaja
Submission date: 27-May-2019 10:02AM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1102514169
File name: 19._2018_Scopus_-_Full_-_Public_engagement_f or_objective.pdf (1.29M)
Word count: 9130
Character count: 55650


















6%
SIMILARITY INDEX
5%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
6%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 1%
2 1%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 1%
Check 19. 2018 Scopus - Full - Public engagement for
objective.pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Universiti Putra Malaysia
Student Paper
Samuel Anindyo Widhoyoko, Sasmoko .,
Dheny Biantara, Bambang Sugiarto. "Data
Mining: a Three-Step of Real-Time Audit
Paradigm", International Journal of Engineering
& Technology, 2018
Publicat ion
cv.archives-ouvertes.fr
Internet Source
mech.uthm.edu.my
Internet Source
irep.iium.edu.my
Internet Source

Similarity "Public engagement for objective and holistic officials' evaluation: An integrated political-social-legal view"

Check 22. 2018 Scopus - full -
The role of corporate reputation
& distinctive organization
capability in developing business
model innovation.pdf
by Arta Sundjaja
Submission date: 27-May-2019 10:05AM (UTC+0700)
Submission ID: 1102514624
File name: anization_capability_in_developing_business_model_innovation.pdf (2.47M)
Word count: 8190
Character count: 47505





























15%
SIMILARITY INDEX
13%
INTERNET SOURCES
9%
PUBLICATIONS
11%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 3%
2 1%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
Check 22. 2018 Scopus - full - The role of corporate reputation
& distinctive organization capability in developing business
model innovation.pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
www.arpgweb.com
Internet Source
www.ijmsbr.com
Internet Source
Submitted to Anglia Ruskin University
Student Paper
Ilham Sentosa, Obsatar Sinaga, Zaimie Zainal,
Arry Hutomo Mustika Djaya. "DEVELOPING
ISLAMIC SMART CITY MANAGEMENT USING
ORGANISATION PUBLIC RELATIONSHIP
(OPR) EFFECTIVENESS: A STRUCTURAL
EQUATION MODELING (SEM) PARTIAL
LEAST SQUARE APPROACH", Humanities &
Social Sciences Reviews, 2019
Publicat ion
faculty.haas.berkeley.edu
Internet Source
6 1%
7 1%
8 1%
9 1%
10 1%
11 1%
12 1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 1%
eprints.unipdu.ac.id
Internet Source
theses.gla.ac.uk
Internet Source
irep.iium.edu.my
Internet Source
Submitted to University Of Tasmania
Student Paper
Submitted to University College London
Student Paper
www.growingscience.com
Internet Source
ieomsociety.org
Internet Source

Similarity "The role of corporate reputation & distinctive organization capability in developing business model innovation: Case study of indonesian ict firms in facing industry resolution 4.0 "

Form Reviewer "The difference on Arthropod communities' structure within show caves and wild caves in Gunungsewu Karst area, Indonesia"

form reviewer "Smokescreen Genotyping Array (GTA) Indonesia"

Fernando, Erick

form reviewer "Implementation of COBIT 5 Framework for Academic Information System Audit Perspective: Evaluate, Direct, and Monitor"

Binus University

Not a member yet