6547 research outputs found
Sort by
ePanorama February 2026
No full textThis digital issue of Panorama includes an article about Southern\u27s performance at the Lincoln Center, MLK Service Day, and the upcoming musical, King of Me.https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/parent_newsletter/1111/thumbnail.jp
Southern Adventist University Graduate Handbook 2025-2026
No full texthttps://knowledge.e.southern.edu/grad_student_handbook/1009/thumbnail.jp
Treasures of the Kingdom
No full textStore your treasures in heaven, where moths and rust cannot destroy, and thieves do not break in and steal. Wherever your treasure is, there the desires of your heart will also be.” Matthew 6:20-21, NLT
Panorama Spring 2026
No full textThis printed issue of Panorama includes information on student success, a mission spotlight, and an update on student life.https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/parent_newsletter/1112/thumbnail.jp
McKee Minute February 2026
No full textThe February 2026 edition of McKee Minute includes information on information literacy modules, Campus Research Day poster session proposals, and Black History Heritage Month
Entering the Kingdom
No full text“You can enter God’s Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway to hell is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that way. But the gateway to life is very narrow and the road is difficult, and only a few ever find it.” Matthew 7:13-14, NLT
The Kingdom is Coming
No full text“I have told you all this so that you may have peace in me. Here on earth you will have many trials and sorrows. But take heart, because I have overcome the world,” John 16:33, NLT.
The Kingdom is Comin
Fall 2025 DigSight
No full textFall 2025 issue of the Archaeology newsletter DigSight. Features the article Vessels in Time.https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/digsight/1034/thumbnail.jp
Genetic Entropy: A Critical Examination
No full textGenetic entropy is a hypothesis proposing that genomes deteriorate over time due to the gradual accumulation of slightly harmful mutations that natural selection cannot effectively remove. This paper explores the scientific debate surrounding this claim by examining differing perspectives on the theory of genetic entropy. Proponents of genetic entropy, such as John Sanford, argue that most mutations are deleterious and fall within a “near-neutral” range, allowing them to accumulate since their effects are too small for natural selection to detect. Evidence to support this claim includes Robert Carter and John Sanford’s research on the deterioration of the H1N1 viral genome and Gerald Crabtree and Michael Lynch’s concerns about weakened selection in humans. This paper also highlights how the theory of genetic entropy aligns with a biblical perspective by citing Sanford et al.’s research on recorded declines in human lifespans after the Flood. In contrast, critiques of genetic entropy point to studies such as Katharina Böndel’s Chlamydomonas reinhardtii research, Neda Barghi’s Drosophila simulans experiment, Richard Lenski’s E. coli research, and the University of Illinois’ corn selection study, which suggest adaptive change within populations over time. After analyzing both perspectives, this paper concludes that there is insufficient evidence to show that natural selection can counterbalance the steady influx of slightly deleterious mutations over long periods; thus, the issues highlighted by the genetic entropy framework are worthy of further study