data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Replication data for Fig 4.1, Gunnison uterine litter size vs litter size at first juvenile emergence, 19 Sept 2025.
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
File name = Fig 4.1, Gunnison uterine litter size vs litter size at first juvenile emergence, 19 Sept 2025.
These data used for Fig 4.1 (top and bottom) in Hoogland 2026.
Top graph: Number of different uterine litter sizes for GPDs in late pregnancy, all determined by using a Sonosite portable ultrasound machine. I had one data point for each GPD female per year, but considered data from the same female in
different years to be independent.
Bottom graph: Differences between uterine GPD litter size vs GPD litter size for the same females at first
juvenile emergence. These differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.267, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks
test). For each gunnison female shown here, I used one data point, which was the difference between uterine litter size in
late pregnancy vs litter size at first juvenile emergence from the natal nursery-burrow. For this figure, 0 = no difference;
1 = difference of 1 juvenile; and so forth. Numbers for each uterine litter size can be calculated directly from the top
histogram of this Fig 4.1 of Hoogland 2026.
Sample sizes for GPD uterine litter sizes in top graph differ from (smaller) GPD litter sizes in bottom graph because
many females in late pregnancy did not eventually wean a litter.
This file ready for longterm storage on 24 January 2025
Replication data for: File name = Fig 9.15,Lower left, UPDs, Kinships within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Kinships within home clan territory, UPDs, coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.15 Lower left, UPDs, Kinships within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = UPDs, Types of kinships in home territory, 07 Feb 2025
Numbers shown here are in same order as numbers in Figure 9.15 for UPDs
103 (row 2)= no known kinships
2 (row 3) = half first cousins twice removed
2 (row4) = full first cousins twice removed
etc.
I cannot find the RAW DATA for this figure, but this EXCEL file
shows all the raw data taken from original raw data sheets.
This EXCEL file checked TWO TIMES on 03 March 2000
These UPD data used for Figures 9.15 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
No known kinship means no kinship, but I might not have been able to detect distant kinships
Shown here are kinships among UPD FEMALES ONLY--no data from yearling males
All kinships are based on maternal genetic relationships only--no information from paternities
For littermates, I assume FULL SIBSHIPS for all cases--i.e., I assume single paternity
when assigning maternal kinships--but I recognize that some of those cases were HALF SIBSHIPS
Half sisters are nonlittermate females of the same mother born in different years.
These data are from UPD Horse Corral Colony at Bryce Canyon National Park in May 2000 only.
No data on UPD kinships from other years.
These UPD data used for Figures 9.15 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
Note well: These kinships do NOT include data from sexually active males, which (almost)
always were from a different clan
once rem = once removed
When female UPD had more than one common ancestor, I have depicted only the closer kinship in this EXCEL file.
For coefficients of relatedness (r) for kinships in this figure, see also Table 18.2, or Table 22.5 of Hoogland 2026.
For each species, data are shown for one year only. For UPDs, the year was May 2000.
r = coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.15 Lower left, UPDs, Kinships within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
UPD Horse Corral Colony had 29 clans in 2000
Replication Data for: Fig 5.5, Right side, WTPDs, territorial calls vs ward size, 17 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: territorial calls, ward size, white-tailed prairie dogs
File name = Fig 5.5, Right side, WTPDs, territorial calls vs ward size, 24 Sept 2025
Vocal conspicuousness during the mating season vs ward size for white-tailed prairie dogs (1975).
The number above each bar indicates the number of days of observation for 1-2 hours per day.
I counted territorial calls at each ward only once per day.
I assumed that data from different days from the same colony were independent.
These data were collected in late June or July 1975, when juveniles had emerged from
their natal nursery-burrows in late May or early June.
Estimated ward size includes adults and yearlings only (no juveniles), and are the maximal counts I ever observed.
Ranks and sizes of colonies and wards for most of the other graphs for my book also do NOT include juveniles.
Data for this figure come from summations of data in Tables 1 and 3 of Hoogland 1979 (superscript 1282),
for which I could not easily calculate standard errors.
BTPD = black-tailed prairie dog, WTPD = white-tailed prairie dog.
Note: Comparable data from BTPDs (Fig 5.5, Left side) DO include juveniles.
Note: WTPD territorial calls are also called laughing barks (see Waring 1970 and Hoogland 2026
Replication data for: Fig 9.3, Bottom, Territory sizes, WTPDs, 03 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: white-tails, territory size
File name: Fig 9.3, Bottom, Territory sizes, WTPDs, 03 Dec 2025
OLDfile name = WTPDs, clans sizes, comps, 04 April 2020
Date = 04 April 2020
For WTPDs, I knew the exact area for the following study areas: 35-90, Jane, John, Kathleen,
Oreo, Rick, and West Barn Triangle. I know these areas from calculations by David McCray
of Valles Caldera National Preserve.
From these exact areas, I have calculated the approximate area for each clan territory for
2006 through 2012. Usually I did that by dividing the exact area by the number of clans
in each study area. But sometimes I gave more area to certain clans and less area to
other clans, depending on our observations of who slept and interacted where.
I have checked this file ONE TIME ONLY.
Note well: For this file, I counted each male in a half-male coterie as 1 rather than 0.5.
I used this same logic for half-male coteries of BTPDs and half-male clans of GPDs.
Clan type = 0 = No male clan = no resident sexually mature male
Clan type = 0.5 = half-male clan
Clan type = 1 = one-male clan
Clan type = 2 = two-male clan
NM = No Male = No resident sexually mature male in home territory
SM males = sexually mature males, regardless of age
Ad fems = adult females, all of whom copulated
SIM Yrl males = sexually immature yearling males
Note well: I could not easily match territory size and clan density for
for No-Male clans--so I have just entered NO DATA for values for
territory size and clan density for NM clans
These clan sizes are for MAY.
If one SI male was in a clan and another SI male lived in that clan and
shared another clan, I consider the number of SI males to be TWO.
If two SI males shared the same two clans, then I consider each clan
to have TWO SI males (e.g., 6A-42A and 6B-42Bin 2008).
Some changes made on 04 April 2020:
For 2012, I consider 13, 14, and 17 as sexually immature
In 2009, I consider 38 as sexually immature
For 2008, I consider 49 as sexually mature. Not sure about this assignment.
For 2006, 21 was PS, No DT--so I consider him sexually mature
15, 20, and 38 all copulated in 2010
8 copulated in 2009
I did NOT calculate the territory sizes for certain WTPD clans. I knew
the clan sizes for many clans but had not information about the territory size.
I did NOT calculate the territory sizes for certain GPD clans at PEFO. I knew
the clan sizes for many clans but had no information about the territory size.
All data in this file checked TWO TIMES by JLH alone on 04 April 2020
Note on 21 April 2020: Notice that entry for clan-9-43 in 2011 is CORRECT--
i.e., no data for male-9, who disappeared in late March 2011
These data used for Figure 9.3, Bottom, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 04 Feb 2025.
File name: Fig 9.3, Bottom, Territory sizes, WTPDs, 03 Dec 2025
Clan size = number of adults and yearlings in home coterie territory
Territory size is in hectares
No information on number of burrow entrances per clan territory
No information on territory sizes or burrow-counts for Utah prairie dogs
Territory size is in hectares
This EXCEL file has other information besides territory sizes
No information for WTPDs for burrow-counts per territory
Marmosa murina M1496
No full textThis dataset includes the slices of the specimen M1496 from the species Marmosa murina (Mammalia, Marsupiala) which have been scanned with a using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at the AST-RX platform (UAR 2AD) of the MNHN, utilizing a "v|tome|x L240-180" ( Baker Hughes Digital Solutions) with a resolution of 14µm
Seine: Intérieur de Paris, carte de Dunaime (1833)
No full textPlan figuratif de la Seine: l'intérieur de Paris (1833). Lithographie. Carte de Dunaime, commis d'ordre à l'inspection générale de la navigation et des ponts.
Figurent également sur la carte un "profil des sondes faites dans la Seine en suivant la route des bateaux"; ainsi que de nombreux aménagements et équipements : berges, bateaux à vapeur, écoles de natation, trinquets, jardins, puisoirs, escaliers, etc.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Paris_Dunaime_1833.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/73b.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Aisne: Cours de l'Aisne entre l'extrémité du canal des Ardennes et la rivière d'Oise, carte de Marcilly (1837)
No full textPlan détaillé du projet de perfectionnement de la navigation dans la vallée de l'Aisne entre l'extrémité du canal des Ardennes et la rivière d'Oise.
Carte réalisée par l'ingénieur Marcilly en 1837.
Le canal latéral à l'Aisne a ouvert en 1841, sur une longueur de 51,5 km.
Rasters GeoTIFF :
EAT_Aisne_Canal_Ardennes_Oise_1837_1.tif
EAT_Aisne_Canal_Ardennes_Oise_1837_2.tif
EAT_Aisne_Canal_Ardennes_Oise_1837_3.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10049/1/16.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juin 2015.</p
Replication data for: Fig 8.13, Alarm callers vs clan size, GUW, 20 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm callers, clan size, GPDs, UPDs, WTPDs
Filename: Fig 8.13, Alarm callers vs clan size, GUW, 20 Nov 2025
OLD Filename: Probability of at least one alarm call, 3 species, 05 Nov 2019
Note: This file contains data from THREE species: GPDs, UPDs, and WTPDs
This file has been checked ONE TIME ONLY by JLH
I have deleted most UPD data from April 2004. I have added data from
April 2004 to data from June 2004. So, one data set from each clan per year.
I have used data from one clan only in April 2004 (46B), because I do not have
data from 46B in June 2004.
Note: Notice that clan size is always an integer. For example, if a half-male clan had
one male and two females, I scored clan size as 3 rather than 2.5.
I used this same logic for BTPDs.
Note: This file contains WTPD data from BOTH May 2004 (before babies) and
July 2004 (after babies)
I have deleted most WTPD data from May 2008. I have added WTPD data from
May 2008 to data from July 2008. So, one data set from each clan per year.
I have used data from two WTPD clans in May 2008: 28 and 43B, because I do not
have data from 28 and 43B in July 2008.
No-male clans and coteries are described in Chapters 9 and 10 of Hoogland 2026.
These data used for Fig 8.13 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025.
I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent.
For each clan, I calculated a single mean number of alarm callers from all experimental runs with moving stuffed badger
The percentage of experiments with at least one alarm caller is obvious
Number of experiments = number of experimental runs with moving stuffed badger
These data are for upper right, lower left, and lower right for Fig 8.13 GPDs, UPDs, and WTPDs).
Data for upper left of Fig 8.13 (BTPDs) are in a different EXCEL file.
Filename: Fig 8.13, Alarm callers vs clan size, GUW, 03 July 2025
Keep = Yes = I DO use data on this line for analysis.
Keep = No = I do NOT use data on this line for analysis
Monitoring biodiversity and envionmental changes of temperate rocky-shore communities
No full textwe introduce the “Algues brunes and Bigorneaux” (Brown algae and periwinkles) dataset which is dedicated to monitoring rocky-shore communities. This dataset is part of the BioLit citizen science program created in 2012 by the NGO “Planète Mer” and the French National Museum of natural history (MNHN) which aims to leverage the potential of citizen scientists in order to enhance knowledge of french marine biodiversity. This dataset specifically focuses on the intertidal brown macroalgae canopy habitat across 3 ecoregions along the french Atlantic coastline. As it include the description of both the macroalgae belt cover and the abundance of associated epifaunal species, the ABB dataset provided valuable insights into how intertidal gastropod communities was influenced by multiscale drivers (Serranito et al. 2021). Moreover, since 2023, the dataset has been expanded to include a description of the epifaunal size structure and additional habitat descriptors, designed to monitor the impacts of eutrophication and climate change on this rocky shore ecosystem
Replication data for: Fig 7.4, Vigilance vs ward size, WTPDs, 05 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: WTPDs, focal samples, small vs large wards
Filename = Fig 7.4, Vigilance vs ward size, WTPDs, 05 Nov 2025
OLD File name = WTPDs, Alertness, 1974-1976, 12 Oct 2021
Ward size = 1 = <8 adults in colony
Ward size = 2 = >15 adults in colony
Note that Ward size does NOT include juveniles
I made this EXCEL file from computer output when I was
a graduate student at Michigan
This file has been checked ONE TIME ONLY with Judy, but
STATS are IDENTICAL to stats in Hoogland 1979b, and
that indicates that all data are 100% accurate
Note that the data in this file is for absolute times for watching
and absolute times for vigilance.
To calculate the PERCENTAGE of time devoted to WTPD vigilance, I divided
the time devoted to vigilance by the observation time.
These data are from my doctoral research in 1974-1976.
Most of the WTPDs for this file were unmarked and from several colonies,
so I assumed independence of observations--but a few cases might have
from the same WTPD on different days.
These data used for Fig 7.4 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 30 May 2025.
As just noted, I assumed data from all WTPDs were from different
individuals and therefore independent.
All these data are from FOCAL SAMPLES in 1974-1976.
My methods for estimate vigilance from focal samples in 1974-1976
were different from my methods used for focal samples in 2012.
For this reason, I have NOT combined WTPD data from 1974-1976 vs
data from 2006-2012.
Filename = Vigilance vs ward size, WTPDs, 05 Nov 202