data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Holocene biomarkers (branched Glycerol Dialkyl Glycerol Tetraethers and alkane), reconstructed air temperature from Lake Armor (Kerguelen) and diatoms-based Sea Surface Temperature from marine core MD11-3353, Southern Indian Ocean
No full textThese data set contained the results of analyses for two lacustrine sediment cores form Lake Armor (Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean) and a marine core MD11-3353 (50◦34.02′S–68◦23.13′E, 1,568 m water depth) , Southern Indian Ocean.
Lake Armor is composed of three sub-basins. Sediment cores were collected from two of them. This dataset contains the biomarker analysis results from sediments of core ARM14-I (Site I) and ARM14-II (Site II). The biomarkers analyzed are branched Glycerol Dialkyl Glycerol Tetraethers (brGDGTs) and linear alkanes (n-alkanes). The dataset includes the abundances of the major brGDGTs and their derived indices, the abundances of n-alkanes, and the hygrogen and carbon (δD and δ13 isotopic ratios of n-alkanes. δ13C analyses were not performed on core ARM14-II.
The marine core MD11-3353 (50◦34.02′S–68◦23.13′E, 1,568 m water depth) was collected onboard the Marion Dufresne II in 2011 during the oceanographic expedition MD185 INDIEN-SUD 1. We selected this core due to its proximity to the Kerguelen Archipelago (155 km south-westward) and the previously established low-resolution Holocene Sea Surface Temperature (SST) reconstruction (Civel-Mazens et al., 2021a). The core is 38.50 m long and is composed of diatom oozes, of which the upper 1.90 m corresponds to the Holocene period (Mazaud and Michel, 2011). At this localisation, the nearest oceanic front is currently the Antarctic Polar Front (Y. ‐H. Park et al., 2019). The modern summer SST at the core location is approximately 4.5 °C.
It is composed of to excel file (.xlsx) with their README text file (.txt).
This dataset is associate to the publication Bellet et al. 2025 "Holocene climatic changes in the Kerguelen archipelago (South Indian Ocean) based on marine and lacustrine palaeoclimatic archives", Quaternary Science Review
Replication data for Fig 5.12, Left side, BGUW, Weaning vs stage of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd thirds of mating season, 22 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords:
File name = Fig 5.12, Left side, BGUW, Weaning vs stage of 1st, 2nd,
and 3rd thirds of mating season, 22 Oct 2025
This table shows the probability of weaning a litter vs reproductive synchrony of
copulations with wards of all four species.
1st third = copulations in first third of mating season = early copulations
2nd third = copulations in second third of mating season = synchronous copulations
3rd third = copulations in third third of mating season = late copulations
The number above each bar indicates the number of females for which I have data.
BGUW = black-tailed, Gunnisons, Utah, and white-tailed prairie dogs
This file contains data from all four species.
Early copulations occurred in the first third of the mating season;
synchronous copulations in the middle third; and late copulations in the final thir
Yonne : Cours général de l'Yonne d'Auxerre à Montereau (17 feuilles) (1833)
No full textCartes géoréférencées élaborées en 1833.
Ensemble de 17 feuilles qui présentent le cours général de l'Yonne depuis Auxerre jusqu'à Montereau. Les projets de canalisation de la rivière sont représentés sur ces cartes.
Feuille 1 l'Yonne d'Auxerre à Dumons : EAT_Yonne_Auxerre_Dumons_1_1833.tif
Feuille 2 l'Yonne de Dumons à Gurgy : EAT_Yonne_Dumons_Gurgy_2_1833.tif
Feuille 3 l'Yonne de Gurgy à Raveuse : EAT_Yonne_Gurgy_Raveuse_3_1833.tif
Feuille 4 l'Yonne de Raveuse à Bonnard : EAT_Yonne_Raveuse_Bonnard_4_1833.tif
Feuille 5 l'Yonne de Bonnard à Laroche : EAT_Yonne_Bonnard_La_Roche_5_1833.tif
Feuille 6 l'Yonne de Laroche-Saint-Cydroine à Saint-Cydroine : EAT_Yonne_La_Roche_Saint_Cydroine_6_1833.tif
Feuille 7 l'Yonne de Saint-Cydroine à Joigny : EAT_Yonne_Saint_Cydroine_Joigny_7_1833.tif
Feuille 8 l'Yonne de Joigny à Villevalier : EAT_Yonne_Joigny_Villevalier_8_1833.tif
Feuille 9 l'Yonne de Villevalier à Villeneuve-le-Roy : EAT_Yonne_Villevalier_Villeneuve_Le_Roy_9_1833.tif
Feuille 10 l'Yonne de Villeneuve-le-Roy à Étigny : EAT_Yonne_Villeneuve_Le_Roy_Etigny_10_1833.tif
Feuille 11 l'Yonne d'Étigny à Paron : EAT_Yonne_Etigny_Paron_11_1833.tif
Feuille 12 l'Yonne de Sens à Villenavotte : EAT_Yonne_Sens_Villenavotte_12_1833.tif
Feuille 13 l'Yonne de Villenavotte à Pont-sur-Yonne : EAT_Yonne_Villenavotte_Pont_Sur_Yonne_13_1833.tif
Feuille 14 l'Yonne de Pont-sur-Yonne à Courlon : EAT_Yonne_Pont_Sur_Yonne_Courlon_14_1833.tif
Feuille 15 l'Yonne de Courlon à Port-Renard : EAT_Yonne_Courlon_Port_Renard_15_1833.tif
Feuille 16 l'Yonne de Port-Renard à Gravelin : EAT_Yonne_Port_Renard_Gravelin_16_1833.tif
Feuille 17 l'Yonne de Gravelin à Montereau : EAT_Yonne_Gravelin_Montereau_17_1833.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juillet 2015. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET.</p
Replication data for: Fig 9.14, GPDs, clan size vs male ARS, 05 Dec 2025
No full textFILE INFORMATION
Keywords: GPDs, Clansize, male ARS
File name = Fig 9.14, GPDs, clan size vs male ARS, 05 Dec 2025
OLD File name = GPDs, Male ARS vs clan size, 05 Sept 2021
I started this file from File name = GPDs, Male RS for cops,babies,yrls, 01 April 2021
Details below for GPDs, Male RS for cops,babies,yrls, 01 April 2021 and related files
I used microsatellite data from only VCNP's RMC and VCC, because I had
microsat data on paternities from those colonies. I did NOT include info
from PEFO, from which I have no good information on paternites from microsats
I will keep info from PEFO on Sexpartners for now
If a GPD male had >=2 half clans, I used the LARGER of the two half-clans
for clan size for the GPD male.
In 2013, for example, GPD male-8 had one half-clan of size 12 (8A) and
two half clans of size 4 (8B and 8C)). For GPD-male-8 for this file, I used clan size = 12
If TWO GPD males shared the same multi-male clan, I used the same clan
size for both males. In 2013, for example, I used the same clan size of 20
for both male-0 and male-41. Multi-male clans were rare for GPDs.
For 0-41 in 2013, I do not use clan size--because smaller clans with large territory
almost certainly existed
For 44 in 2013, I use smaller clan (44a) for 44 (clansize = 4), because I new so little about clan-44B
For 28 in 2013, I no not use any information. Smaller clans within large territory seem likely.
For 49 in 2017, I use clan size = 4 (no females in his other half-clan of clan size = 5)
Clan sizes checked TWO TIMES on 05 Sept 2021
Other data were checked two times for earlier files.
I DO use GPD male-31 in 2018. We observed only 2 cops, but he sired babies from 5 litters!
Date = 11 April 2021
OLDFile name = GPD, Male ARS for cops, PEFO and VCNP, 11 April 2021
I created this file by combining data from the following two EXCEL files:
File name = GPDs, Male RS for cops,babies,yrls, 01 April 2021 [and]
File name = GPDs, Male ARS and LRS for cops, 13 Jan 2021
Details from both files immediately below
Date = 02 April 2021
OLD File name = GPDs, Male ARS for cops,babies,yrls, 01 April 2021
I created this file from File name = GPDs, Male ARS-LRS summaries, 31 March 2021. See notes below.
OKtouse = 0 = we did not see many of the copulations--probably <50%
OKtouse = 1 = we documented most of the copulations--probably > 50%
I checked all the data on Age and Sexpartners on the hard-copy summary sheets ONE TIME ONLY---
I found only 1 error, so I did not check a second time
This file has been checked TWO TIMES on 02 April 2021
In particular, I checked the new data for Sexpartners, OK to use, and Age on 02 April 2021
For GPDs from VCC of VCNP, I use a suffix of "V" for every GPD marker and eartag--
to reduce possible confusion with GPDS from RMC of VCNP
All data in this file are from GPD males that copulated with >=1 female
All data from males that were not observed to copulate are EXCLUDED from this file
For several males listed in this file that copulated with >=1 female, we
have NO EVIDENCE FROM MICROSATS that those males sired >=1 emergent juvenile.
Copulating males that evidently did not sire any offspring include the following:
For 2013: 28 (123)
For 2014: 108 (C47), 25 (439), 32 (593)
For 2015: 20#2 (815), 107 (C39)
For 2016: 37#2 (C99)
For 2017: 24 (203)
For 2018: 32 (79), 6 (395). 14 (55), 47 (435), 17 (O235)
Date = 31 March 2021
This new file checked TWO TIMES for Babies and Yearlings on 31 March-02 April 2021
Babies = cumulative number of babies sired by each male per year
Yearlings = cumulative number of babies sired by each male per year
File name = GPDs, Male ARS-LRS summaries, 31 March 2021
I made this file directly from file = GPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops, babies, yrls, 30 March 2021
Details immediately below for GPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops, babies, yrls, 30 March 2021
Name of file = GPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops, babies, yrls, 30 March 2021
No information on survivorship of juveniles for 2016 (last year at VCNP's RMC)
or 2018 (last year at VCNP's VCC)
Number in parentheses after number of babies or yearlings for a male = number
of babies or yearlings ESTIMATED or INFERRED. I only made estimates or
inferences that seemed reasonable. For example, if microsats showed that the single male that
copulated with the mother sired 2 of 3 babies, I inferred paternity to that male for the third baby as well.
Similarly, if microsats showed for a litter of 6 that one of two copulating males sired 2 babies and that the
other of two copulating ales sired 2 babies, then I inferred paternity for 3 babies for both males.
If a female copulated with 2 males, for example, and 1 of the copulating males sired three of four babies
and we have NO INFORMATION from microsats for the fourth babies, then I inferred that the male that sired
three of the babies (from microsats) also sired the fourth baby as well. I only
made this inference if the one male sired AT LEAST HALF of babies. So, if a female copulated
with two males and weaned five babies, for example, and if one of the copulating males sired two babies and we have
NO INFORMATION from microsats for the other three babies, I have NOT inferred paternities for any of those 3 babies.
For this file I have made no attempt to include information for body mass or age of the copulating males.
Information on age and body mass vs male ARS and LRS is summarized in other chapters.
This file has been checked TWO TIMES on 29-30 March 2021.
I have excluded some cases for which paternity makes no sense.
Dognumber does not equal integer--e.g., 15.5, 33.2, 58.5--means that GPD was added after I created an
earlier, numbered file.
File name = GPDs, Male ARS and LRS for cops, 13 Jan 2021
Date = 12 Jan 2021
This file is IDENTICAL to file = GPDs, MCs vs male body mass, ARS, 06 Jan 2021
I have created this identical file so that I can keep it with other ARS files
See notes below from that file
Note on 08 Feb 2021. These data are all from PEFO from 1989 through 1995
i.e., no data from RMC or VCC of VCNP
Sired weanlings = Number of sired babies weaned by females with whom male copulated
Note, however, that the male did NOT necessarily sire all juveniles listed as babies
Some of those babies were sired by other males
For paternities, see information from Keller
Each male had unique eartags.
If we had data from the same male in different years, then that male might have
1, 2, 3, or even 4 "Dognumbers"
This file has now been checked TWO TIMES
MCs = total number of MCs given by male for all females with whom he copulated
PEFO = Petrified Forest National Park in Arizona
RMC = Redondo Meadow Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve in New Mexico
VCC = Visitor Center Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve in New Mexico
Note: this EXCEL file does NOT contain information on GPD clantypes.
Data for GPD clantypes are in file that begins with "Fig 18.8, GPDs,,,"
Date = 08 Jan 2021
File name = GPDs, MCs vs male body mass, male cops, 08 Jan 2021
I derived this file from file = GPDs, MCs vs female body mass, ARS, 06 Jan 2021,
which I checked ONE TIME ONLY on 05 Jan 2021
File name = GPDs, MCs vs male body mass, male cops, 08 Jan 2021 has been checked TWO TIMES ON 08 Jan 2021
A GPD male will have the SAME EARTAGS in different years, but will have a
different Dognum in different years
For most analyses, I will consider data from the same GPD male in different
years to be statistically independent
Oktouse = 1 means that we think we observed most or all copulations
by a GPD male in a particular year
Oktouse = 0 means that we think we DID NOT OBSERVE most or all copulations
by a GPD male in a particular year
I only use AGE if I was certain--or almost certain--about a GPD male's exact age
Babies = all babies weaned by all females with whom a GPD male copulated.
SOME of the babies might have been sired by the copulating male, but
OTHER offspring might have been sired by other males that copulated with the GPD female
Yrls = all yrls reared by all females with whom a GPD male copulated.
SOME of the yrls might have been sired by the copulating male, but
OTHER yrls might have been sired by other males that copulated with the GPD female
SEXPARTNERS = minimal number of GPD females with whom GPD male copulated,
with or without MCs by the copulating male
Note GPD male with Dognum = 63.5--so that I could insert additional data for
GPD male-07 (B17, C68) in 1993.
Note also that GPD male-34 and GPD male 34#2 are DIFFERENT GPD MALES, and they
have different Dognums and different Eartags
Microsats = microsatellites
These GPD data used for Figure 9.14 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 06 Feb 2025.
File name = Fig 9.14, GPDs, clan size vs male ARS, 05 Dec 202
Replication data for: Fig 10.8, WTPDs, Lower right, clan size and clan type vs male ARS, 17 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: white-tailed prairie dog, clan size, clan type, copulating females
File name = Fig 10.8, WTPDs, Lower right, clan size and clan type vs male ARS, 17 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = WTPDs, Male ARS vs clan type, 22 Sept 2021
Today I add variable = clantype
I started this file from File name = WTPDs, Male ARS vs clan size, 01 Sept 2021
In this file, clantype = 0.5 = Half-male clan, for which >=1 are controlled by single male
Clan type = 1 = One male clan
Clan type = 2 = Multi-male clan
Clan type = 0 = Male that lived alone, with no other females in his territory, who did not DISAPPEAR shortly after mating season
If a WTPD male mated and then disappeared in early April, I did not assign a clantype
Examples of latter males include 45 and 48 in 2011, and O1 in 2010
Microsats = microsatellites, all determined by Stephen Keller and Regina Trott
This file includes ONLY THOSE WTPD MALES THAT COPULATED WITH >=1 FEMALE--
OR MALES KNOWN TO SIRE OFFSPRING FROM MICROSATS--i.e., I have EXCLUDED WTPD males
for which I have no evidence of copulation from either observations or microsats
Example of excluded WTPD male is 49 (9) in 2009--no observed cops, no sired babies from microsats
Note that these definitions of Clantype differ from definitions for BTPDs. Note also unique data for cottype = 0.
I should also have information for males of Clantype = 0 for GPDs and UPDs. This is information
for resident males that copulated--usually SOLITARY MALES--that did not live in a coterie with any females.
For BTPDs, I did not have any information of solitary males that did not copulate--hence the difference
in definitions just explained
This file has now been checked TWO TIMES FOR CLANTYPE. Other data were
all checked two times for earlier files. See note for 02 Sept 2021.
WTPD male-02 died shortly after the mating season in 2010; he was with 25 in 2010 during the
mating season, so I score 02's clantype as 2; I score 25's clantype in 2010 as 1.
Same logic as for male 02 for male-29 in 2010: I score male-29's clantype as 2, and I score
male-36's clan type as 1--because 29 and 36 lived in same territory during the 2010 mating season
I score clantype of male OxUn = 0 in 2010 as 1, because he was the only male with RAB and H8
during the 2010 mating season
If a WTPD male copulated or microsats show that he sired offspring, I assigned him a cottype,
but sometimes the assignment was dubious if the male disappeared or died.
Key stats for this file are IDENTICAL to stats for WTPDs, Male ARS vs clan size, 01 Sept 2021--as they should be
OLDFile name = WTPDs, Male ARS vs clan size, 01 Sept 2021
I made this file by adding information about clan size to the
following file: File name = WTPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops ,babies, yrl,12 Apr 2021
Details below for OLDFile = WTPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops,babies,yrl,12 Apr 2021
If a WTPD male had >=2 half clans, I used the LARGER of the two half-clans
for clan size for the WTPD male.
In 2006, for example, WTPD male-R16 had one half-clan of size 2 (R16B) and one
half-clan of size 7 (R16A). For R16 for this file, I used clan size = 7
If TWO WTPD males shared the same multi-male clan, I used the same clan
size for both males. In 2011, for example, I used the same clan size of 4
for both male-19 and male-49. Multi-male clans were rare for WTPDs.
On 01-02 Sept 2021, I add info on clan sizes.
I check info on clan sizes TWO TIMES on 02 Sept 2021.
Date = 12 April 2021
OLDFile name = WTPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops,babies,yrl,12 Apr 2021
OLD File name = WTPDs, Male ARS-LR for cops, babies, yr., 22 Mar 2021
Change made on 12 April 2021: 3 babies (not 4) for male-01 (87) in 2010
I started this file from File name = WTPDs, Male ARS and LRS for cops, 19 Dec 2020
Note, however, that new counts of babies and yearlings are accurate FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL MALE
New cases added to file since 19 Dec 2020 start with 101, end with 114
All data checked TWO TIMES on 22-23 March 2021
Since 19 Dec 2020, I have added ages for Oxone (621) in 2009, 8#2 (949)
in 2009, 2010, and 2011, and O#2 (J94) up 2012.
For these latest ages, if a male was captured in autumn (September or October), I
assumed he was about 5 months old at that point, and that he was a yearling (1-year old)
in the following spring. The logic here is that almost all male 5-month olds were still coming
aboveground in autumn. Older males (>=2 years), by contrast, were almost always
hibernating by autumn. I can only think of one >=2 year old WTPD male that we captured in autumn (WTPD male-8?)
Note well: All analyses are for COPULATIONS SEEN. I do nothing here with copulations INFERRED
from microsats with no behavioral observations of estrus and copulations.
Change made on 12 April 2021: 3 babies (not 4) for male-01 (87) in 2010
OLDFile name = WTPDs, Male ARS and LRS for cops, 19 Dec 2020
This file is IDENTICAL to file = WTPDs, MCs vs cops, male body mass, 18 Dec 2020
I have created this identical file so that I can keep it with other ARS files
Weanlings = Number of babies weaned by females with whom male copulated.
Yearlings = number of sired weanlings that survived for >=9 months after first emergence from natal burrow entrance.
Note, however, that the male did NOT necessarily sire all the listed weanlings and yearlings
Some of those weanlings and yearlings were sired by other males
For paternities, see information from Keller
Each male had unique eartags.
If we had data from the same male in different years, then that male might have
1, 2, 3, or even 4 "Dognumbers"
Dognumber = number for tracking different males for convenience. See note immediately above.
This file has now been checked TWO TIMES
These data used for Figure 10.8, Lower right, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 11 Feb 2025.
Clan size = clan size = number of adult and yearling GPDs living in same clan territory
Clan type = Clan type. See below for definitions.
Females that copulated = number of females in coterie that copulated
Female GPDs first copulated as yearlings, and almost ALL GPD females copulated
No-male clan had no resident sexually mature male in May
Half-male clan shared a single sexually mature male in May with another clan
One-male clan had a single resident sexually mature male in May
Multi-male clan had >=2 sexually mature males in May
For more information about clan types, see Chapter 10 of Hoogland 2025
On 17 Dec 2025, I cannot remember the meaning of variables = OLDBabies and OLDYrls
Perhaps the meanings are in computer output not shown here.
A WTPD male had the SAME EARTAGS in different years, but might have had a
different Nyanzol marker or Dognumber in different years
For most analyses, I will consider data from the same WTPD male in different
years to be statistically independent
Oktouse = 1 means that we think we observed most or all copulations
by a GPD male in a particular year
Oktouse = 0 means that we think we DID NOT OBSERVE most or all copulations
by a GPD male in a particular year
I only use AGE if I was certain--or almost certain--about a GPD male's exact age
SEXPARTNERS SEEN = minimal number of GPD females with whom GPD male copulated,
with or without MCs by the copulating male
I do not have variable = Oktouse in t his EXCEL file for WTPDS.
Variable = WEIGHT in this file is for male body mass just before, just after, or during mating season, I think.
I need to check if weight = male body mass during mating season. I do NOT use variable =
weight for data shown in Fig 10.8 of Hoogland 2026.
cops = copulations
File name = Fig 10.8, WTPDs, Lower right, clan size and clan type vs male ARS, 17 Dec 202
Aisne: Projet de canal latéral à l'Aisne, de Vieux-lès-Asfeld à Condé-sur-Aisne (1837)
No full textIl s'agit d'une carte de la navigation de l'Aisne, qui concerne la partie comprise entre Vailly et Condé-sur-Aisne. La carte date de 1837.
Cette carte présente un projet de canal latéral à l'Aisne, indiqué en rouge, allant de Vieux-lès-Asfeld à Condé-sur-Aisne, au confluent de la Vesle.
La construction de ce canal est mentionnée dans la "Situation des travaux au 31 décembre 1838", de l'Administration générale des Ponts et Chaussées et des Mines : "un canal latéral sera établi sur la rive gauche, depuis l'écluse de Vieux-lès-Asfeld jusqu'à Condé-sur-Aisne. Ce canal, qui n'aura que 53,000 mètres de longueur, abrègera de 16,000 mètres le trajet que l'on eût été obligé de faire en rivière." (Perfectionnement de la navigation des fleuves et des rivières, Aisne, p. 272)
Ce canal a en effet été réalisé, ouvert en 1841, sur une longueur de 51,5 km.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Aisne_Canal_Conde_Sur_Aisne_1837.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10049/1/17.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juin 2015.</p
Replication data for: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, BTPDs, 21 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm calls, closest vs farther away, BTPDs
Filename: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, BTPDs, 21 Nov 2025
OLD Filename: BTPDs, Alarm calls, closest vs farther from badger, 10 April 2019
These data are from my first book (Hoogland 1995), so
I assume they were checked TWO times
340/710 of closest BTPDs = 47.89% DID give alarm call
370/710 of closest BTPDs = 52.11% DID NOT give alarm call
877/2281 farther BTPDs = 38.45% DID give alarm call
1404/2281 of farther BTPDs = 61.55% DID NOT give alarm call
The data in this file are grouped BY YEAR. The summaries
I provide immediately above and in figure for my new
book are from the SUMMATION OF DATA FROM ALL YEARS
Variable = Frequency = number of observations of calling or non-calling for
closest and not closest prairie dogs
Close prairie dog = 1 = closest to prairie dog
Close prairie dog = 2 = NOT closest to prairie dog
BTPD alarm call = 1 = prairie dog DID give alarm call
BTPD alarm call = 2 = prairie dog did NOT give alarm call
For statistical analysis, I did a 2x2 chi-square test
These data used for Fig 8.14, Top, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025.
I considered data from the same prairie dog
on the same day and on different days and years to be independent.
Counts for this file come from study of alarm call raw data sheets.
Filename: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, BTPDs, 21 Nov 202
Replication data for: Fig 8.11, Alarm calling for mothers with ADULT OFFSPRING ONLY in home territory vs mothers with juvenile offspring in home territory, UPDS, 20 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm calling, UPDs, adult offspring only vs juvenile offspring
File name = Fig 8.11, Alarm calling for mothers with ADULT OFFSPRING ONLY in home territory vs mothers with juvenile offspring in home territory, UPDS, 20 Nov 2025
OLDFile name = UPDs, New alarm calls, 01 April 2019
05 March 2019. This file has been checked TWO TIMES.
once by JLH alone, and once by JLH and MAH.
Year = year when frequency of alarm calling recorded in response to moving
stuffed specimen of American badger
UPD = Marking scheme with Nyanzol fur dye for Utah prairie dog
After a UPD died, the marking scheme was often used again for a
different prairie dog in a different year
Eartag = unique eartag for each UPD. The same eartag was never used
again for a different prairie dog in a different year
Sex = Male or Female
Class caller = type of kin in home territory
0 = no known kin in home territory (r <0.0313)
1 = distant kin only in home territory (first and second full or half cousins, aunts,
uncles, nephews, nieces, nonlittermate siblings)
For class = 1, 0.0625 < r < 0.2500
2 = littermate siblings in home territory
3 = mother in home territory
4 = offspring in home territory
Callfreq = percentage of times UPD gave alarm call in response to stuffed badger
Trials = number of experimental runs with moving stuffed badger
Age = age in years of UPD
Clan size = number of adult UPDs in home territory
Adult utahs were either 1 year old or >=2 years old
Yrl babies only indicates age of offspring in home territory
0 = juvenile offspring in home territory, with or without
adult offspring as well
1 = adult offspring in home territory, with no juvenile offspring
Note for class caller: The number indicates the closest kin in the
home territory, with or without other possible kin.
Example: If a UPD had offspring and full first cousins in the
home territory, the class caller would be 4
Note for littermate siblings: For this analysis, I make no attempt
to discriminate between full siblings (same mother, same father)
and half-siblings (same mother, different father).
On 16 Feb 2019, I detect an error in this file. The eartag for female-H4 in 2000
should be V63 (not U64). I have made this correction to this file, and I will re-
do whatever statistical analyses are necessary.
On 05 March, this revised file is now ready for statistics.
On 29 March2019 I discover that female-92 (W65) in 2004 was LACTATING on
15 June 2004. So, on 28 March 2019 I change Newclass for female-92 from 2 to 4.
On 09 April 2019, Callfreq of 4str (A47) for 1997 stays at 100%, but trials changed to 6 (instead of 5)
On 09 April 2019, Callfreq of RS (A31) for 1997 changed to 66.7% (from 50%), and trials
changed to 3 (from 2)
On 11 April 2019, Callfreq for BB5 (E41) changed to 66,7% (from 80%)
On 11 April 2019, Callfreq for HBS (A39) changed to 16.7% (from 28.6%)
On 11 April 2019, Callfreq for 61 (J27) changed to 66.7% (from 50%)
On 15 April 2019, Callfreq for 66 (J33) changed to 66.7% (from 80%)
On 18 June 2019, Callfreq for RABR (485) in 2003 changed to 18.2% (from 10%)
On 04 July, I notice that Callfreq for BB2 in April 2004 should be 3/8 = 37.5% instead of 2/7 = 28.6%.
I do not think this change will affect any analyses, because
I do not THINK I used UPD data from APRIL (not June) 2004 for any analyses.
But watch for this possibility.
On 04 July, I notice that Callfreq for 59 in April 2004 should be 3/6 = 50% instead of 2/5 = 40%
I do not think this change will affect any analyses, because
I do not THINK I used UPD data from April (not June) 2004 for any analyses.
But watch for this possibility.
On 28 Feb 2020, I do not find any new changes to this file beyond those described above.
Note: Utah mothers with yearling offspring in the home territory
often had >=2 year old offspring in the home territory as well
But UPD mothers with yearling offspring only in home territory did NOT
also have juvenile offspring in home territory
Remember: Adult UPDs were either yearlings or >=2-years old.
Numbers in this table file are PERCENTAGES, not proportions.
For Mann-Whitney U test, I selected Sex = fem and Newclass = 4
File name = Fig 8.11, Alarm calling for mothers with ADULT OFFSPRING ONLY in home territory vs mothers with juvenile offspring in home territory, UPDS, 20 Nov, 202
Loing: Plan d'une partie de la rivière vers Nemours, carte de François Jonas Eustache (1821)
No full textCette carte a été levée à l'occasion de la construction du canal du Loing.
Le projet élaboré à partir de 1644 a débuté en 1720 et le nouveau canal a été ouvert trois ans plus tard.
La carte a donc sans doute été réalisée entre 1720 et 1723.
La mise en couleur et l'iconographie de la carte restent parfaitement conventionnelles et correspondent aux réalisations de cette période.
Son géoréférencement révèle que notre document est assez exact. On remarque une modification du tracé du canal près d'Epizy, peut-être le résultat de la modernisation des canaux prévus dans le cadre du plan Freycinet.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Loing_Nemours_Eustache_1821.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10065/9/2.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Replication data for: Fig 10.6, Bottom, WTPDs, Percentage of sexually active males in colony vs clan type, 13 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: WTPDs, clan type, percentage of sexually active males in colony
File name = Fig 10.6, Bottom, WTPDs, Percentage of sexually active males in colony vs clan type, 13 Dec 2025
OLD File name = WTPDs, Percentage of sexually active males vs clan type, 12 Feb 2025
Percent of colony residents that were sexually active males = number of sexually active-mature males/total
number of all adult and yearling residents in colony in May (X 100 for calculation of percentage)
Percentage of No-male WTPD clans = Percentage of WTPD clans that were No-male
Percentage of Half-male WTPD clans = Percentage of WTPD clans that were Half-male
Percent Multi-male WTPD clans = Percentage of WTPD clans that contained >=2 sexually mature/active males
These data checked TWO TIMES at creation of this file on 12 Feb 2025
These data used for Fig 10.6 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 12 Feb 2025.
clan type = Type of clan = One-male (1), Multi-male (2), Half-male (0.5) or No-male (0)
No-male clan had no resident sexually mature male in May
Half-male clan shared a single sexually mature male in May with another clan
One-male clan had a single resident sexually mature male in May
Multi-male clan had >=2 sexually mature males in May
For more information about clan types, see Chapter 10 of Hoogland 2025
One entry per year for columns A, B, C, and D
All WTPD data from Arapaho National Wildlife Refuge from 2006 through 2012.
I have not shown the percentage symbol (%) for any of the three columns (A, B, and C).
File name = Fig 10.6, Bottom, WTPDs, Percentage of sexually active males in colony vs clan type, 13 Dec 2025
This file does not contain information on YEAR for each line. I could find those data, if necessary