data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Replication data for: Fig 10.1, Upper right, GPDs, clan sizes and types, by year, 09 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Clan size, clan type, by year, GPDs
File name = Fig 10.1, Upper right, GPDs, clan sizes and types, by year, 09 Dec 2025
* = change made on 09 April 2020. These changes affect PEFO, RMC, and VCC
OLD File name = GPDs, Clan comps, 02 April 2020, 10 April 2020
I created this file from SYSTAT file = Clansize, which I created for PEFO GPDs on 21 Oct 1997
I assume that I checked this file TWO TIMES upon creation--but on 09 April 2020 I discover several errors
in data from PEFO GPDs. I have made the corrections in this file.
Most of these errors involve GPDs at PEFO that died in April. Evidently I counted them for 1999 article.
I used data from this file for Hoogland 1999 (Philopatry, dispersal, and social organization…)
All counts on this file on 09 April 2020 are for counts in MAY of every year.
Note: In 1989 only, all yearlings with R + number over 50 were females
In later years, all yearlings with R + ANY NUMBER were MALES.
I made this change because we had no many yearling males in 1990 and beyond.
On 09-10 April 2020, this file has been checked TWO TIMES by JLH alone.
But, I have not re-checked Terrsize on 09-10 April 2020.
For GPDs at RMC and VCC, I enter data on 09-10 April 2020.
Note well: For this file, I counted each male in a half-male clan as 1 rather than 0.5.
I used this same logic for half-male coteries of BTPDs and half-male clans of UPDs.
Clantype = 0 = No male clan = no resident sexually mature male
Clantype = 0.5 = half-male clan = two clans shared the same single sexually mature male
Clantype = 1 = one-male clan = single sexually mature male in single territory
Clantype = 2 = multi-male clan = single clan territory with >=2 sexually mature males
No GPD clan had >2 sexually mature males
Notice that Multi-male males occurred for GPDs at PEFO colony--
I did not observe any multi-male clans at either the RMC or VCC colonies.
NM = No Male = No resident sexually mature male in home territory
Admales = sexually mature males, regardless of age
Adfems = adult female, all of whom copulated
Yrl males = sexually immature yearling males
If a yrlmale was sexually mature, I considered him to be an ADMALE
These clan sizes and clan types are for MAY.
If one Admale was in a clan and another Admale lived in that clan and
shared another clan, I consider the number of Admales for the first clan to be TWO.
If two Admales shared the same two clans, then I consider each clan
to have TWO Admales
On 11 April 2020, I remove R22 from 8's clan, because R22
lived alone in a No male clan and is last entry for 2015
I make two final changes on 13 April 2020 (cases 229 and 296)
Note well: Everything for this file checked TWO TIMES on 11-13 April 2020.
On 24 June 2020, I delete 91 and BB6 from 31-R19A in 1994
This change will affect colony size and colony density
and also clan size and clan density
Number of SM females for 31-R19 is now 5 instead of 7 after
deletion of 91 and BB6
Clan size for 31-R19 in 1994 is now 17 instead of 19 after
deletion of 91 and BB6
Note than GPD territory sizes are from Petrified Forest National Park
only from 1989 through 1995. NO DATA on territory sizes from GPDs at the Redondo
Meadow and the Visitor Center Colonies at Valles Caldera National Preserve
Clan size = number of adults and yearlings in same territory.
This file contains data from all three GPD colonies: Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO),
Redondo Meadow Colony (RMC) of Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP, and
Visitor Center Colony(VCC) of VCNP.
These data used for Figure 10.1 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 05 Feb 2025.
File name = Fig 10.1, Upper right, GPDs, clan sizes and types, by year, 09 Dec 202
Updating the Urey-Craig diagram: The iron redox states in the building blocks of the outer solar system
No full textThe iron speciation and valence state of meteorites reflect the origin and evolution of primitive bodies in the solar system. This idea is illustrated in an iconic plot in planetary science, the so-called Urey-Craig diagram (UC diagram), where the amount of iron accommodated in sulfides and metallic alloys is plotted against that found in oxides and silicates. Hydrous carbonaceous chondrites (CI and CM) are usually considered the oxidized end-member despite the minor presence of sulfides. Here, we reevaluate the position of CIs inspired by the recent space missions that sampled CI-like materials and from a fresh CI meteorite (OC 002). The same approach was undertaken for C2-ungrouped, CM, and CR chondrites with varying proportions of phyllosilicates based on X-ray diffraction and Mössbauer spectroscopy. As a result, all fresh CI materials contain a considerable amount of iron sulfides and therefore plotted in the central part of the UC diagram. Tagish Lake and Tarda accommodate up to ~10 % of the iron in sulfides, and a contribution of kamacite is detected in less altered CM samples. The updated UC diagram suggests that the formation environments of carbonaceous chondrites are much less oxidizing than previously assumed, and possibly not so different from those of non-carbonaceous chondrites. Furthermore, the CM clan defines a trend that the more Fe2+-rich in phyllosilicates, the less metal in the samples. This CM trend excludes CI and C2-ungrouped samples, suggesting their distinct redox environments. This work demonstrates that CIs are never an oxidized end-member in the UC diagram. Instead, it most certainly marks the position of the dust present in the outer part of the protoplanetary disk before secondary processes occurred at parent bodies
Seine: Plan du quai et du faux-bras du bourg d'Argenteuil, projet de dessèchement, carte de Lesage (1783)
No full textSuite au rapport d'Alexandre Chailloux, sur les plaintes des riverains concernant l'eau stagnante dans le faux bras du bourg d'Argenteuil, un projet est conçu par l'ingénieur Lesage.
Le plan est lavé selon les conventions. Même s'il s'agit d'un document technique (les cotes et la profondeur de l'eau sont ajoutés à l'encre rouge), on remarquera l’attention portée à la représentation des jardins et de la végétation environnante, comme il est d'usage dans le troisième quart du XVIIIème siècle, chez les ingénieurs des Ponts et chaussées.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Argenteuil_Lesage_1783.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/20.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Replication Data for: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, GPDs, 21 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm calls, closest vs farther away, GPDs
Filename: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, GPDs, 21 Nov 2025
OLD Filename: GPDs, Alarm calls, closest vs farther from badger, 10 April 2019
216/710 of closest GPDs = 47.89% DID give alarm call
494/710 of closest GPDs = 52.11% DID NOT give alarm call
804/3030 farther GPDs = 38.45% DID give alarm call
2226/3030 of farther GPDs = 61.55% DID NOT give alarm call
The summaries I provide immediately above and in Fig 8.14 for my new
book are from the SUMMATION OF DATA FROM ALL YEARS
Variable = Frequency = number of observations of calling or non-calling for
closest and not closest prairie dogs
Close prairie dog = 1 = closest to prairie dog
Close prairie dog = 2 = NOT closest to prairie dog
GPD alarm call = 1 = prairie dog DID give alarm call
GPD alarm call = 2 = prairie dog did NOT give alarm call
For statistical analysis, I did a 2x2 chi-square test
These data used for Fig 8.14, Top, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025.
I considered data from the same prairie dog
on the same day and on different days and in different years to be independent.
Filename: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, GPDs, 21 Nov 2025
I assume that I checked these data TWO TIMES, but I cannot find that assurance.
GPD data are from GPDs at Petrified Forest National Park (1989-1995) and also
from the Redondo Meadow Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve (2013-2016)
and also from the Visitor Center Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve (2017-2018
Fig 5.1, Right side, WTPDs, Aggression vs ward rank, 16 Sept 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Aggression, white-tailed prairie dog, ward rank
File name = Fig 5.1, Right side, WTPDs, Aggression vs ward rank, 16 Sept 2025.
Sept 2025
These summary data used for Figure 5.1 (which also shows sample
sizes) are in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 24 January 2025.
These data come from summaries of Table 1 of Hoogland
1979. Aggression, ectoparasitism, and other possible costs
of prairie dog (Sciuridae, Cynomys) coloniality. Behaviour.
69:1-34.
Raw data for these summaries are not in an EXCEL file.
Colony rank is from smallest (1) to largest (5).
Individuals at WTPD colonies were not marked, so I could
accurately determine colony ranks (relative colony
sizes), but not exact colony sizes.
Note: These data are summaries. Raw data are in my field
notes, but not in any EXCEL file.
BTPD = black-tailed prairie dog WTPD = white-tailed
prairie dog
Data for this figure come from summations of data in Table
1 of Hoogland 19791282, for which I could not easily
calculate standard errors
Juine, Essonne, Remard : d'après Cassini, carte topographique de Forget-de-Lève (1757)
No full textCette carte, gravée, a été copiée d'après une réalisation de Cassini. Elle ne comporte pas de légende : les symboles sont doublés d'indications en toutes lettres comme il est souvent d'usage au XVIIIe siècle.
Le cartouche est très simple : il s'agit d'une carte peu onéreuse à visée pratique. Une carte plus prestigieuse aurait bénéficié d'un cartouche réalisé par un graveur spécialisé dans ce type de réalisation.
Il est intéressant de remarquer ici la mention des lieux industriels comme les forges, et moulins à vent qui ne sont habituellement pas figurés sur les cartes des Ponts et Chaussées.
L'auteur, Forget-de-Lève n'est d'ailleurs pas mentionné dans la liste des ingénieurs recensé par le bibliothécaire Richard du Ministère des Travaux publics. Une indication sur la retombe nous apprend que la carte est « notoirement inexacte ».
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Juine_Essonne_Remard_1757.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10064/3/1
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Loing : Cours de la rivière de Loing de Nemours à Moret (18ème siècle)
No full textCette carte représente une partie du cours de la rivière de Loing au-dessus et au-dessous de la ville de Nemours. La rivière passe notamment à Chaintreauville, Nemours et Fromonville. La carte indique notamment les inondations de la ville de Nemours.
La carte a été réalisée par l'ingénieur en chef des Ponts et chaussées François Jonas Eustache.
Un grand soin a été apporté à la réalisation de cette carte, les routes sont représentées de façon excessivement précise.
Rasters Geotiff :
EAT_Loing_Nemours_Moret_1750_1.tif
EAT_Loing_Nemours_Moret_1750_2.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10065/9/3.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juin 2015.</p
Replication data for: Fig 7.1, Scan samples, WTPDs, Raw data, 04 Nov 3025, COPY
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: white-tailed prairie dog, vigilance, scan samples
File name = Fig 7.1, Scan samples, WTPDs, raw data, 04 Nov 2025
OldFile name = WTPDs, ALL scan samples from 2007, 01 May 2022
I created this file directly by exporting SYSTAT file named Vig2007.SYS, which I created on 29 Jan 2010
I used this file for Hoogland et al. 2013, and I assumed that I checked it TWO TIMES at creation, but
see comment below about Repro condition
WTPD = unique number for each WTPD. I should have used eartag here. Sigh
Sex = 1 = male and Sex = 2 = female
All WTPD SCAN samples were collected in 2007. Note, however, that all WTPD
FOCAL samples were collected in 2012.
I THINK THAT Repro condition = 0 = no copulation in 2007 and Repro condition= 1 = copulation in 2007
I could verify the information for Repro condition, if necessary.
Each line in this file is the MEAN VALUE OF ALL SCANS FOR THAT WTPD FOR A SINGLE DAY
Month and day = Month and exact date. 617, for example, means 17 June 2007. 407 means 07 April 2007.
531 means 31 May 2007. And so forth.
Hoogland JL, et al. 2013. Individual variation in vigilance among
Ref here is Hoogland JL, et al. 2013. Individual variation in vigilance among among white-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys
leucurus). Southwestern Naturalist 58: 379-285.
Note: I do NOT have a file like this for GPDs with all the raw data per day. I DO have
daily summaries for GPDs in another EXCEL file.
I used these raw data for Figs 7.1 and 7.2 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 30 May 2025.
File name = Fig 7.1, Scan samples, WTPDs, raw data, 04 Nov 2025
Note that the data in column-I are PROPORTIONS. To convert proportions PERCENTAGES
for Figs 7.1 and 7.2, I multiplied proportions by 100
Supplementary data to Jeanty A et al 2025 Archaeobiological evolution of barley
No full textThese tables contain the detailed results of the article Jeanty A et al 2025 Archaeobiological evolution of barley (Hordeum vulgare) over the last 8 millennia in the northwestern Mediterranean Basin. Phil Trans R Soc B 380: 20240194. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0194. Si Table1 contains the full morphometric data (size measurements and Elliptical Fourier transform seed outline descriptors) of all the barley grains analysed in this work. SI_Table1 is organized in 4 table: ReadMe containing the explanations to all the columns, UncharredGrains containing the data for uncharred modern grains used as reference, CharredGrains containing the data for modern grains used as reference but after artificial charrring, ArcheoGrains containg all morphometric data for archaeological grains. SI_Table2 contains the full contextual information and morphometric results related to all the archaeological samples studied in this work. The ReadMe file contains the signification and explanations for all colums of the SI_Table2_Data file which contains all the archaeological and morphometric data
Seine: Cours de la Seine depuis le pont de Grenelle à Paris jusqu'aux Andelys (1843)
No full textIl s'agit d'un plan général du cours de la Seine depuis le pont de Grenelle à Paris jusqu'aux Andelys.
Ce plan gravé a été réalisé en 1843 par les ingénieurs ordinaires des Ponts et chaussées L. Emery, Ch. Poirée et présenté par l'ingénieur en chef Michal.
Différents ouvrages sont représentés, notamment un chemin de halage, une écluse au niveau de Denouval et plusieurs barrages mobiles.
Rasters GeoTIFF :
EAT_Seine_Grenelle_Andelys_1843_1.tif
EAT_Seine_Grenelle_Andelys_1843_2.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/2/31.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juin 2015.</p