data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Replication data for: Fig 11.1, Top left, BTPDs, Colony sizes and compositions by year, 18 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: black-tailed prairie dog, Colony sizes and colony compositions by year
File name = Fig 11.1, Top left, BTPDs, Colony sizes and compositions by year, 18 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = BTPDs, Colony sizes, 25 March 2020
Note that I have combined male and female yearlings into one group. I do this only for BTPDs
Note: USUALLY, male and female BTPDs do not copulate as yearlings--
hence the lumping of BTPD male and female yearlings so graph is not too cluttered
Note also that these numbers are for MAY of each year
Note also: I have EXCLUDED data from 1975 (my first year at Rankin Ridge),
but I have INCLUDED data from 1989 (when Jim Loughry worked at Rankin Ridge).
This file checked TWO TIMES by JLH alone on 25 March 2020
All data for this file from Table 16.1 of Hoogland 195 (page 377).
Note: Counts of emergent juveniles in this EXCEL file INCLUDE babies never captured
but listed in Table 16.1 of Hoogland 1995
Weanling = juvenile at first emergence from the natal burrow entrance
Colony size = number of adults and yearlings in May
For this EXCEL file, adult = prairie dog that was >=2 years old
For this EXCEL file, yearlings were young adults that emerged from the natal nursery-burrow >9 months ago, but <20 months ago.
These data used for Fig 11.1 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 15 Feb 2025.
File name = Fig 11.1, Top left, BTPDs, Colony sizes and compositions by year, 18 Dec 2025
All data from BTPD Rankin Ridge Colony at Wind Cave National Park
Seine: Petit bras de la Seine à Paris de Notre-Dame au pont Saint- Michel, carte de Duchanoy (1812)
No full textPlan coté effectué par L. Duchanoy et destiné à être joint aux rapports des Ingénieurs
ordinaires des Ponts et Chaussées supervisés par Becquey de Beaupré.
Comme semble le montrer le géoréférencement, le projet ne semble pas avoir été réalisé, ou a été modifié par la suite. Les couleurs rouges et bleues ne sont pas légendées. Tous les projets indiqués dans
la légende ne sont pas figurés sur le plan, par exemple l'agrandissement du Parvis de Notre-Dame.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Pont_Saint_Michel_Duchanoy_1812.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/52.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Data2Geo: A converter for transforming Dataverse metadata exported in JSON into GeoNetwork metadata formatted in XML
No full textThe RZA information infrastructure comprises a data warehouse (data.indores.fr, DataCite metadata scheme) and a geocatalog (cat.indores.fr, Inspire norm, XML format), both maintained through a collaboration with the Indores team.
In order to solve the interoperalibility issue raise by the use of two misaligned metadata scheme, we propose this small HTML&JavaScript web interface provides a converter for transforming "Dataverse metadata exported in JSON" into "GeoNetwork metadata formatted in XML"
Seine: Le secteur de Croissy, chemin de halage jusqu'au Vésinet (1776)
No full textPlan de Croissy concernant l'alignement du jardin du prieuré.
Plan du chemin de halage jusqu'au Vésinet.
Carte de 1776.
C'est un plan en arc de cercle.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Croissy_Vesinet_1776.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/12.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Aisne: Projet de canal en aval de Condé-sur-Aisne, carte de Marcilly (1837)
No full textCe plan détaillé présente le projet de canalisation de l'Aisne en aval de Condé-sur-Aisne.
La partie comprise s'étend entre le premier barrage à l'amont de Soissons et la rivière Oise.
La carte a été réalisée en 1837 par Marcilly, ingénieur en chef à Soissons.
Le canal latéral à l'Aisne a ouvert en 1841, sur une longueur de 51,5 km.
Rasters GeoTIFF :
EAT_Aisne_Conde_Sur_Aisne_Canalisation_1837_1.tif
EAT_Aisne_Conde_Sur_Aisne_Canalisation_1837_2.tif
EAT_Aisne_Conde_Sur_Aisne_Canalisation_1837_3.tif
EAT_Aisne_Conde_Sur_Aisne_Canalisation_1837_4.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10049/1/15.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juin 2015.</p
Replication data for: Fig 10.5, Top, BTPDs, Copulating males vs copulating females in same coterie, 11 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: BTPDs, copulating males vs copulating females, same coterie
File name = Fig 10.5, Top, BTPDs, Copulating males vs copulating females in same coterie, 11 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = BTPDs, cotsize, cottype, SM females, 01 May 2020
* = Change made on 14 or 15 April 2020
Note well: These numbers are for MAY. Prior to today, most of my BTPD counts are from APRIL.
For example, all data for coterie sizes in Hoogland 1995 are for APRIL rather than May.
For this table, SM male = sexually mature male, including some BTPD yearling males that copulated.
Adfem = >=2 year old female. I do NOT score yearlings that copulated as Adfems for this table.
If a BTPD male was >=2 years old but showed not evidence of sexual activity (No Pigmented Scrotum [PS],
No Descended testes [DT] or no observed copulations), then I scored that male as a SI male.
SI male = sexually inactive in year of observation.
On 15 April 2020, I check everything in this table TWO TIMES.
On 01 May 2020, I include fems that did not cop, and I add yearling fems that copped or weaned a litter
On 01 May 2020 I also compute the column of SM-Allfems. This column includes (a) adult BTPD fems
that copped; (b) EXCLUDES fems that did NOT cop; and (c) adds yearling fems that either copped or weaned
a litter.
So, SM-Allfems includes ALL FEMALES THAT COPULATED, and includes both adult and yearling females.
Adfems-No cop = adult BTPD fems that did not cop. These fems EXCLUDED in column = SM-Allfems
Yrl fems w/cop = yearling BTPDs that either copulated or weaned a litter.
This file has been checked TWO TIMES on 01 May 2020
Cottype = Type of coterie = One-male (1), Multi-male (2), Half-male (0.5), and No-Male (0). See below.
Yrlfems = yearling females = one-year old females.
In 1986, R51 and R76 came into estrus two times. In 1987, R71 came
into estrus two times. I score each of these double-estrus females
one time only in this file. I also scored several double-estrous
ADULT FEMALES one time only in this file.
These data used for Figs 9.4 and 10.5 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 04 Feb 2025.
coteriesize = coterie size = Number of adults and yearlings living in same territory
coterietype = coterie type. See immediately below.
coterietype = 0 = No male coterie = no resident sexually mature male
coterietype = 0.5 = half-male coterie = two coteries shared the same single sexually mature male
coterietype = 1 = one-male coterie = single sexually mature male in single territory
coterietype = 2 = multi-male coterie = single coterie territory with >=2 sexually mature males
See Chapter 10 of Hoogland 2026 for more details about coterie types.
This file contains some BTPD data that I do NOT use for Figure 10.5.
White-tails did not show a similar trend.
File name = Fig 10.5, Top, Copulating males vs copulating females in same coterie, 11 Dec 202
Replication data for: Fig 8.1, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, and 8.12, Alarm call frequencies, Males and Females, GPDs, 19 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm calls, GPDs, age, ARS, clan size, sex
Filename = Fig 8.1, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, and 8.12, Alarm call frequencies, Males and Females, GPDs, 19 Nov 2025
Change to 101 (945V) made on 28 March 2019.
OLD Filename = GPDs, NEW alarm calls for stats, 01 March 2022
Note on 01 March 2022. Because I knew no kinships for original residents at RMC in 2013,
and also because even many maternities were suspect because of the Thompson Ridge Fire in May-June 2013,
I have excluded all data from badger-pulls in 2013.
14 Feb 2019. This file has been checked TWO TIMES, ONCE by JLH alone,
and once by JLH + Rebecca Phillip. Note change to 50 (51V) on 01 March 2022
For 50 (51V), CallFreq is now 58.3 (from 53.8) and Trials is now 12 (from 13)
For the eartag suffixes, P = Petrified Forest National Park (1989-1995).
R = Redondo Meadow Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve (2013-2016)
V = Visitor Center Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve (2017-2018)
This file contains GPD alarm calls in response to stuffed badger for 2013 through 2018 and 1989-1994
GPD = Nyanzol marker on pelage
Eartag = right or left eartag
Sex = Male or Female (Fem)
Newclass of caller: 0 = No known kin of any kind in home territory
1 = distant kin only in home territory (cousins, nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles, with r <=0.25)
Newclass 1 also includes NON-LITTERMATE siblings from different years
2 = parents, littermate sibling in home territory, but NO OFFSPRING
3 = offspring in home territory. In most cases, the offspring are juveniles of the
current year. In a few cases, the offspring are adults form earlier years.
New class: 0 = No known kin of any kind in home territory
1 = distant kin only in home territory (cousins, nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles, with r <=0.25)
Class 1 also includes NON-LITTERMATE siblings from different years
2 = littermate sibling in home territory, but NO OFFSPRING
3 = mother in home territory
4 = juvenile offspring in home territory
Callfreq = proportion of experiments with moving stuffed badger when GPD gave alarm call
Trials = number of experiments with stuffed badger
Age = age in years of GPD
Clan size = number of adults in home territory
Yearling offspring only = 0 means that female had weaned juveniles BUT NO OLDER OFFSPRING in home territory for experiments
Yearling offspring only = 1 means that female had adult offspring only (NO BABIES)
in home territory for experiments
For half-male clans, I usually INCLUDED the single male in BOTH clans
If a GPD male copped with a female, I scored him as class = 3,
EVEN IF HE DID NOT SIRE ANY OFFSPRING WITHIN THE HOME TERRITORY
On 05 Mar 2019, this file with new classes has been checked TWO TIMES by JLH alone.
Note earlier check with Becca Phillip on 14 Feb 2019.
On 05 March 2019, this file is now ready for statistics.
On 22 March, this file checked TWO TIMES by JLH alone.
On 29 March 2019, I change Newclass for female-101 (945V in 2028) from 4 to "No data"
Female 101 had two tiny babies that emerged from the natal burrow, but they disappeared
immediately after appearing aboveground. I do not know if fem-101 had other kin, hence
the designation of her Newclass as "No data"
These data used for Figure 8.1, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7 and 8.8 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 30 January 2025.
I considered data from the same GPD in different years to be independent
GPD Redondo Meadow Colony (RMC, studied in 2013 through 2016) was at Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP).
GPD Visitor Center Colony (VCC, studied in 2017 and 2018) was also at VCNP.
GPD colony at Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO) was studied from 1989 through 1995.
Filename = Fig 8.1, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, and 8.12, Alarm call frequencies, Males and Females, GPDs, 19 Nov 202
Replication data for: Fig 5.8, left side, BTPDs, First visual and vocal alarms vs ward rank, 20 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: badger, black-tailed prairie dog, first visual and vocal alarms, ward rank
File name, Fig 5.8, left side, BTPDs, First visual and vocal alarms vs ward rank, 20 Oct 2025
These data are from Fig 5.8 in Hoogland 2026, left side, and show elapsed time in
minute (mean + SEM) between appearance of moving stuffed badger from concealed
position vs first visual alarm and first vocal alarm (= alarm call)
Ward rank = relative ward size. 1 = smallest, 4 = largest
At each ward, students and I pulled moving stuffed badgers three times
from at least three different starting-points.
These data show means + one standard error. Raw data are in my field notes
from 1974 through 1976
Replication data for: File name= Fig 6.2, Time of day when prairie dog captured by American badger, GPDs, 03 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Time of day, captures by single American badger, Gunnison's prairie dog
File name= Fig 6.2, Time of day when prairie dog captured by American badger, GPDs, 03 Nov 2025
Time of day (24-hour time = military time) when prairie dog was captured by American badger
All victims shown here were captured by a single female American
badger (named Becky; see text).
All data shown here are from a single study-area of Gunnison's prairie dogs at Valles Caldera National Preserve in 2018.
Data in this file were checked one time by Samantha Kagel, and one time by John Hoogland shortly after creation of file in 2019.
These data used for Fig 6.2 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 27 May 2025.
File name= Fig 6.2, Time of day when prairie dog captured by American badger, GPDs, 03 Nov 202
Replication Data for: Fig 10.9, BGUW, Coterie types and clan types per species, 18 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: BGUW, clan types per species
File name: Fig 10.9, BGUW, Coterie types and clan types per species, 18 Dec 2025
Overall percentages across all years for No-male, Half-male, One-male, and Multi-male coteries/clans for all four species of prairie dogs.
14 Feb 2025
For this figure, I have excluded data from coteries and clans with 0 females that copulated.
For annual variation in the types of clans for each species, see Fig 10.1.
All data in this EXCEL file were checked TWO TIMES at creation,
Raw data for this EXCEL file are in EXCEL file for Fig 10.1 of Hoogland 2026.
These data used for Figure 10.9 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 11 Feb 2025.
Clan type = 0 = No male clan = no resident sexually mature male
Clan type = 0.5 = half-male clan = two clans shared the same single sexually mature male
Clan type = 1 = one-male clan = single sexually mature male in single territory
Clan type = 2 = multi-male clan = single clan territory with >=2 sexually mature males
No GPD clan had >2 sexually mature males
For this EXCEL file I assumed that data from the same coterie or clan from different years were independent.
Numbers shown here are percentages different clan types per species.
I have not shown the percentage sign (%) for the percentages shown in this EXCEL file.
File name: Fig 10.9, BGUW, Coterie types and clan types per species, 18 Dec 202