Aila Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Not a member yet
2157 research outputs found
Sort by
Impostor Syndrome Experiences from University Students and Recent Graduates 2024
No full textAineisto koostuu kirjoituksista, joissa korkeakouluopiskelijat ja hiljattain korkeakoulusta valmistuneet kertovat kokemuksistaan liittyen huijaussyndroomaan. Kirjoituskeruun tarkoituksena oli saada tietoa siitä, kuinka työuransa alussa olevat korkeakoulutetut kokevat huijarisyndrooman vaikuttaneen heihin. Kirjoituksia toivottiin korkeakouluopiskelijoilta, jotka olivat opinnoissaan loppusuoralla ja olivat jo olleet alansa töissä, sekä työelämässä olevilta, enintään kolme vuotta aiemmin valmistuneilta korkeakoulutetuilta. Omista kokemuksista sai kirjoittaa täysin vapaamuotoisesti. Kirjoituskutsussa kirjoittamisen avuksi annettiin myös muutamia kirjoittamista helpottavia apukysymyksiä. Taustatietoina aineistossa on sukupuoli, ikä ja koulutusala. Aineistosta on tehty html-versio, jonka hakemiston avulla kirjoituksia on helppo selata.The data consists of writings by university students and recent graduates about their experiences of imposter syndrome. The purpose of the collection of writings was to gain insight into how early career graduates perceive the imposter syndrome to have affected them. Writings were expected from graduates who were in the final stages of their studies and had already been employed in their field, as well as from graduates who were in employment and had graduated up to three years earlier. They were free to write about their own experiences in a completely informal way. The invitation to write also included a number of questions to help with the writing process. Background information are classified by gender, age and educational background. The data were organised into an easy to use HTML version at FSD
eOpinion 2019
No full textAineisto eMielipide 2019 käsittää kahdeksalla kyselykierroksella kerättyjä mielipidemittauksia ja eduskuntavaaleihin liittyviä näkemyksiä toistuvasti samoilta vastaajilta. Vuoden 2019 eduskuntavaalien ja europarlamenttivaalien aikaan kerätyssä aineistossa tarkastellaan vastaajien näkemyksiä politiikasta ja näkemyksien muuttumista niin vaaleja lähestyttäessä kuin vaalien jälkeenkin. Tehdyllä kyselyllä on pyritty hahmottamaan kansalaisten poliittista osallistumista ja äänestyskäyttäytymistä. Kyselyiden pohjalta luotiin myös Suomen täysi-ikäistä väestöä edustava verkkopaneeli nimeltä Kansalaismielipide. Verkkopaneeli on osa kansallisen yleisen mielipiteen mittaamisen infrastruktuuria (FIRIPO). Alussa kartoitettiin vastaajan äänestyskäyttäytymistä, eli aikooko vastaaja äänestää, ja jos aikoo, niin mitä puoluetta on suunnitellut äänestävänsä. Kysyttiin, saako vastaaja tietoa vaaleista esimerkiksi television, radion, lehtien vai Internetin kautta, ja miten usein vastaaja seuraa eri medioita. Osallistujilta kysyttiin poliittisista asenteista ja mielipiteistä sekä luottamuksesta erilaisia poliittisia instituutioita kohtaan. Lisäksi osallistujilta kysyttiin luottamuksesta kuvitteellisiin kansanedustajiin, mikäli media olisi uutisoinut heistä epäsuotuisalla tavalla. Taustamuuttujia aineistossa ovat vastaajan ikä, sukupuoli, koulutustaso, elämäntilanne, äidinkieli, vaalialue ja maakunta.The data cover public opinion on Finnish parliamentary elections and European parliamentary elections held in 2019, collected in eight separate collection rounds from the same respondents. The respondents' views on politics and changes in these views were charted both before and after the elections. The survey investigated political participation and voting behaviour in Finland. The surveys were also used to create an online survey panel called Citizens' Opinion that represented the adult population of Finland. The panel is part of the Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion (FIRIPO). In the first collection round, the respondents were asked about their interest in politics and how they had been following the 2019 parliamentary elections (e.g. TV programs, newspapers, online voting advice applications, social media). The respondents' views on whether following the election campaign had improved their understanding of politics and whether the differences between the political parties had become clearer during the election campaign were investigated. Past voting behaviour was examined by asking whether in the 2015 parliamentary elections and which party they had voted for then. Further questions charted whether the respondents were going to vote in the 2019 parliamentary elections and which party they considered voting for. Opinions on several political parties in Finland were also surveyed. The second round of data collection charted whether the respondents had voted in advance in the 2019 parliamentary elections and if so, which party's candidate they had voted for. Those who had not voted in advance were asked which party's candidate they intended to vote for. Those who indicated that they would not be voting at all in the parliamentary elections were asked for their reasons for doing so (e.g. 'I am not interested in politics and I don't care about voting', 'I had trouble finding a suitable party or candidate for myself', 'I did not have enough information to make a voting decision'). Additionally, the respondents were asked how much they trusted, for example, the Finnish Government, the Finnish President, and the European Union. The third round included questions on whether the respondents had already voted or intended to vote in the 2019 parliamentary elections and which party's candidate they had voted for or intended to vote for. Those who indicated that they would not be voting at all in the parliamentary elections were asked for their reasons for doing so (e.g. 'I am not interested in politics and I don't care about voting', 'I had trouble finding a suitable party or candidate for myself', 'I did not have enough information to make a voting decision'). In the fourth collection round, the respondents were asked how satisfied they were with the results of the 2019 parliamentary elections and which parties they thought should form the new coalition government. Views on current political issues were charted with a series of statements (e.g. 'Immigration is mostly a good thing for Finland', 'Finland should be much more active in the fight against climate change', 'Russia is a security threat to Finland', 'public services must be cut to balance the Finnish economy'). Additionally, the respondents were asked to what extent they had used various forms of media (e.g. online voting advice applications, election debates and interviews with party leaders on TV) to follow the parliamentary elections and to what extent the information they received from various sources (e.g. TV, friends and acquaintances, the social media pages of political parties or their candidates) had impacted their voting decision. The respondents' views on whether following the election campaign had improved their understanding of politics and whether the differences between the political parties had become clearer during the election campaign were also investigated. The fifth collection round surveyed how important the respondents considered various topics in politics (e.g. taxation, minority rights, European cooperation and EU, education) to be. The respondents' interest and intentions to vote in the 2019 European parliamentary elections were investigated. Those who indicated that they would vote in the European parliamentary elections were asked which party's candidate they would vote for. Internet use and social media use (e.g. Instagram, Facebook) were examined, and opinions on the political parties in the Finnish parliament were charted. Satisfaction with democracy in Finland in general and at the municipal level, as well as satisfaction with democracy in the EU were investigated. In the sixth round, the respondents were asked how satisfied they were with the likely government composition following the 2019 parliamentary elections. Views on the EU were charted with a series of questions. The respondents were, for example, asked how they would vote in the event of a referendum on Finland's EU membership, whether the British people had made the right choice leaving the EU, whether Brexit had been good or bad for the EU, whether Finland had benefited from EU membership, and whether the respondents were for or against the formation of an EU army in the future. A series of questions with hypothetical situations (e.g. 'Imagine that the media has revealed that a male MP of the National Coalition Party has strong ties to a neo-Nazi organisation in Helsinki. On a scale of zero to ten, to what extent do you trust this politician?') was used to investigate the respondents' attitudes in response to male or female members of different political parties being involved in scandals such as tax evasion, having an extramarital affair or having far-right ties. The seventh round examined political attitudes with a series of statements (e.g. 'Finnish Members of Parliament are competent at their jobs', 'I trust my own abilities to take part in politics', 'By voting ordinary people can have an impact on political decision-making'). Trust in other people in general and trust in specific groups of people (e.g. Russians, Estonians, Somalis, Germans) were studied and the respondents were asked whether Islam is suitable in the context of Finnish culture and democratic tradition. Opinions on the political parties in the Finnish parliament were also investigated. In addition, the respondents were asked the so-called solidarity tax, where those who earn more than 76,100 euros per year pay an extra 2 percent of income tax, should be removed. The eighth collection round charted how satisfied the respondents were with the results of the European parliamentary elections and which party's candidate they had voted for. Those who had not voted in the European parliamentary elections were asked for their reasons for doing so (e.g. 'I am not interested in politics and I don't care about voting', 'I had trouble finding a suitable party or candidate for myself', 'I did not have enough information to make a voting decision', 'EU elections are not important to me'). The respondents' trust in, for example, the Finnish Government, the Finnish President, and the European Union was examined. The respondents' trust in politicians was also surveyed with several questions such as whether politicians exaggerate the effects of climate change, whether politicians' approach to immigration is too lax or too strict, and whether political decision making on the national level is well thought out or more or less haphazard. Background variables included the respondent's age, gender, highest level of education, economic activity and occupational status, mother tongue, electoral district, and NUTS3 region of residence
A Year of COVID-19: Finnish Experiences of Everyday Life during the Pandemic 2021
No full textAineisto koostuu kirjoituksista liittyen ihmisten kokemuksiin korona-ajasta. Aineisto on jatkoa SKS:n vuosi aikaisemmin järjestetylle Koronakevät-keruulle koronatilanteen jatkuessa edelleen vuonna 2021. Kyseinen Koronakevät-aineisto on saatavilla SKS:n arkistosta. Kirjoitusohjeissa oltiin kiinnostuneita ihmisten kokemuksista uudesta koronakeväästä vuonna 2021. Lisäksi kirjoitusohjeissa vastaajia pyydettiin pohtimaan, millaiseksi korona-aika jäsentyy vastaajan muistissa sekä miten suhtautuminen koronaan on muuttunut pandemian jatkuessa. Edelleen oltiin kiinnostuneita suhtautumisesta rajoituksiin ja turvatoimiin sekä pyrkimyksiin välttää tartunta. Myös mahdollista vastaajan omaa tai lähipiirin sairastumista koronaan tiedusteltiin sekä suhtautumista sairastumiseen. Tautiin liittyen kysyttiin myös suhtautumisesta koronarokotteisiin sekä yleistä suhtautumista koronaan. Lisäksi tiedusteltiin koronan vaikutuksista arkeen, sosiaalisiin suhteisiin ja yleisemmin elämään. Mahdollisista koronan positiivisista vaikutuksista sekä jaksamiseen vaikuttavista tekijöistä oltiin myös kiinnostuneita. Taustatietoina on mainittu sukupuoli, syntymäaika, ammatti sekä paikkakunnat. Aineistosta on tehty html-versio, jonka hakemiston avulla kirjoituksia on helppo selata.The dataset consists of self-administered written texts on experiences related to the coronavirus epidemic. The data chart people's everyday lives as the pandemic continued in 2021. The dataset is a continuation of the Finnish Literary Society's previous COVID-19 related data collection, Koronakevät ('COVID-19 Spring”), which was carried out in 2020. The Koronakevät dataset is available from the archive of the Finnish Literature Society. The writing guidelines directed participants to write about their experiences during the continuing COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2021. Participants were asked to reflect on how they personally perceived the time period affected by the coronavirus epidemic and how their attitudes towards the coronavirus had changed as the pandemic had continued. The study investigated participants' attitudes towards restrictions and security measures and their efforts to avoid contracting COVID-19. Participants were also prompted to write about their possible personal experiences of contracting COVID-19, the experiences of individuals in their immediate circle who had contracted COVID-19, and their attitudes towards contracting the virus. In relation to the coronavirus, participants were asked about their attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines and their general attitudes towards COVID-19. Additionally, participants could write about the impact COVID-19 had had on their everyday lives, interpersonal relationships, and life in general. Any possible positive effects of COVID-19 and factors affecting participants' well-being and resilience were also charted. Background information included the participant's gender, year of birth, occupation, and area of residence. The data were organised into an easy to use HTML version at FSD. The dataset is only available in Finnish
Finnish Opinions on Security Policy and National Defence 2023
No full textMaanpuolustustiedotuksen suunnittelukunnan (MTS) tutkimuksessa selvitettiin suomalaisten mielipiteitä ulko-, turvallisuus- ja puolustuspolitiikasta, maanpuolustuksesta, asevelvollisuudesta sekä Venäjän hyökkäyssodasta Ukrainaan. Mukana oli myös kysymyksiä turvallisuuteen ja turvallisuudentunteeseen vaikuttavista tekijöistä, turvallisuuden kehittymisestä seuraavan viiden vuoden aikana sekä eri tahojen vaikutuksesta Suomen turvallisuuteen. Vastaajilta kysyttiin lisäksi heille mahdollisesti huolta aiheuttavista tekijöistä, erilaisiin uhkiin varautumisesta, luottamuksesta Puolustusvoimien kykyyn torjua sotilaallisia uhkia, suhtautumisesta puolustusliitto Naton jäsenyyteen, Euroopan unionin ja Naton väliseen yhteistyöhön, Suomen kutsuntajärjestelmän uudistamiseen sekä Ukrainan auttamiseen. Taustamuuttujina olivat muiden muassa vastaaja sukupuoli, ikä, työelämään osallistuminen, ammatti/asema, koulutus, elämäntilanne, kotona asuvien lasten iät, perheen tuloluokka, ruokakunnan koko, asunnon tyyppi, aluemuuttujia sekä puoluekanta.The annual Finnish Opinions on Security Policy National Defence survey charted Finnish public opinion on foreign policy, defence policy, security, military alliances, military service, and international armed conflicts at the time of the survey. Some questions examined views on factors affecting safety and security. Some questions examined views on factors affecting safety and security. This survey round also included questions about the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Opinions were charted on the success of foreign policy in the previous few years, funds allocated to the Defence Forces, whether Finland should resort to armed defence in case of any sort of attack, whether the respondents would be prepared to participate in national defence according to their abilities, and how the global security situation would develop in the next five years. Views were probed on the current, conscription-based defence system and whether women should also participate in conscription. Satisfaction with defence policy in the previous few years was also investigated. The respondents were asked to evaluate the impact of several countries and organisations, such as Russia, China, US, UN, NATO and EU, on Finland's security. The respondents were asked to evaluate Finland's preparedness for the prevention of various security threats, such as armed attack, energy supply issues, infectious diseases and epidemics, environmental hazards, political pressure from other states, economic crisis, terrorism, and attacks against information systems and networks. Views on how the military situation in nearby regions would develop during the next decade were also examined. Next, the respondents were asked whether their trust in the future of the European Union had weakened, strengthened or stayed the same. Views on co-operation between EU and NATO to increase security in Europe were also investigated. Additionally, the respondents' trust in the ability of the Finnish Defence Forces to defend Finland against military threats was examined. The respondents were asked how different issues affected the safety and security of Finland. These included, among others, Finland's EU membership, Finland's NATO membership, participation in the EU defence and in international crisis management. Views were also charted on Finnish military cooperation in the EU, with NATO, other Nordic countries, and the United States. Concerns caused by certain phenomena and issues were charted, such as withdrawals from arms controls agreements, climate change, various infectious diseases and epidemics, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, organised crime, international terrorism, inflation, cyberthreats, political extremism, racism, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and current developments in Russia, the US, the Middle East and Afghanistan. On the topic of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the respondents were asked whether the EU and its member states should continue to offer military and financial support to Ukraine and impose sanctions on Russia. The respondents were also asked whether other NATO states should be ready to defend Finland in case of an armed attack on Finland and whether Finland should be prepared to defend other NATO states in case of an armed attack on another NATO state. Background variables included, among others, the respondent's gender, age, economic activity and occupational status, household composition, ages of children living at home, gross annual income of the household, level of education, type of accommodation, region of residence, number of inhabitants in the municipality of residence, political party choice in the previous parliamentary elections, and political party choice if the parliamentary elections were held at the time of the survey
Intervention Study on Increasing Physical Activity and Reducing Sedentary Behaviour of Vocational Students: Student Interviews 2015-2017
No full textAineiston opiskelijahaastattelut on kerätty Let's Move It -hankkeessa, jossa tutkittiin ammattikouluopiskelijoiden istumista ja liikunnallista aktiivisuutta yli vuoden kestäneellä tutkimusjaksolla. Ensimmäiset haastattelut toteutettiin pian noin kahden kuukauden mittaisen interventiojakson jälkeen. Seurantahaastattelut kerättiin noin vuosi ensimmäisten jälkeen. Tutkimusta rahoittivat opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö (OKM/81/626/2014) sekä sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (201310238). Opiskelijat jaettiin hankkeen tutkimuksessa verrokki- ja interventioryhmiin. Interventioryhmä osallistui monimuotoisiin liikunnan lisäämisen ja passiivisen ajan vähentämisen toimenpiteisiin, kuten kuuteen Let's move it-ryhmätapaamiseen sekä taukojumppiin, ja oppilailla oli mahdollisuus käyttää esimerkiksi jumppapalloja tunneilla. Lisäksi oppilaitoksissa suoritettiin julistekampanja ja oppilaille tarjottiin materiaalia nettisivujen ja työkirjan avuin. Hankkeesta on arkistoitu myös kvantitatiivisia aineistoja (FSD3212, FSD3445 ja FSD3446). Haastatteluissa noudatettiin tarkasti haastatteluohjeita ja -runkoa, joka sisälsi neljä teemaa: 1) liikuntatottumusten muutos, 2) oman liikunnan lisäämis-, ylläpito- ja hallintakeinot, 3) ajatukset liikunnasta ja liikkujaidentiteetistä sekä 4) interventio-ohjelma. Jatkohaastattelussa oli myös viides teema, mittaukset. Haastateltavilta kysyttiin esimerkiksi, mikä heidän mielestään on liikkumista, mikä heitä motivoi liikkumaan, suunnittelevatko he liikkumistaan etukäteen ja millaisia liikkumistavoitteita heillä on. Lisäksi kysyttiin haastateltavien näkemyksiä istumiseen ja sen vähentämiseen liittyen. Lopuksi interventioryhmään kuuluvilta pyydettiin palautetta hankkeen tapaamisista ja materiaaleista. Seurantahaastatteluissa toistettiin samat teemat ja käytettiin myös virikekuvia ja väittämiä. Viimeiseksi kysyttiin haastateltavan kokemuksista liikemittarin käyttöön liittyen. Taustatietoina haastatelluista on kerätty sukupuoli ja ikä. Lisäksi tutkimukseen liittyen kerrotaan tutkimuksen aloitusajankohta (tutkimuserä/batch) sekä kuuluiko haastateltu verrokki- vai interventioryhmään. Arkistoinnin yhteydessä taustatiedoista tuotettiin erillinen html-hakemisto, jonka avulla aineistoa on helppo selata.The data from the student interviews was collected in the Let's Move It -project, which studied the sedentary behaviour and physical activity of vocational school students over a one-year period. The first interviews were conducted shortly after the intervention period of about two months. Follow-up interviews were collected about a year after the first ones. The study was funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture (OKM/81/626/2014) and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (201310238). The students were divided into control and intervention groups for the study. The intervention group participated in a variety of physical activity and inactivity reduction interventions, such as six Let's move it -group sessions and break-time exercise, and the students had access to equipment such as exercise balls during lessons. In addition, a poster campaign was carried out in schools and materials were made available to students through a website and a workbook. Quantitative data from the project have also been archived (FSD3212, FSD3445 and FSD3446). The interviews followed the interview guidelines and structure, which included four themes: 1) change in physical activity habits, 2) ways to increase, maintain and manage own physical activity, 3) thoughts about physical activity and physical activity identity, and 4) intervention program. A fifth theme, measurement, was also included in the follow-up interview. For example, interviewees were asked what they thought exercise was, what motivated them to exercise, whether they planned their exercise in advance and what exercise goals they had. In addition, interviewees were asked about their views on sitting and how to reduce it. Finally, the intervention group was asked to provide feedback on the project meetings and materials. The follow-up interviews repeated the same themes and also used stimulus pictures and statements. Finally, interviewees were asked about their experiences with the use of the motion sensor. Background information includes gender and age. In addition, information on the study includes the starting date of the study (study batch) and whether the interviewee belonged to the control or intervention group. The data were organised into an easy to use HTML version at FSD
Poverty and Welfare Survey 2005
No full textKyselyn tavoitteena oli saada kuva suomalaisten taloudellisesta toimeentulosta. Vastaajilta tiedusteltiin aluksi heidän asumistilanteestaan ja terveydestään sekä tyytyväisyydestä nykyiseen elintasoon. Vastaajilta tiedusteltiin erilaisten hyödykkeiden ja palveluiden välttämättömyydestä tai tarpeettomuudesta tämän päivän suomalaiselle aikuiselle. Edelleen kysyttiin, pitääkö vastaaja tiettyjä hyödykkeitä ja palveluita itselleen välttämättöminä. Arvioitavina olivat mm. matkapuhelin, auto, vaatetus, ruokailu ja asunnon ominaisuudet, parturissa käyminen, kotivakuutus ja terveyspalvelut. Avo- ja avioliitossa asuvat kertoivat, miten raha-asiat heidän perheessään hoidetaan ja onko puolisoiden välillä tuloeroja. Asenteita sosiaaliturvaan ja köyhyyteen kartoitettiin mm. esittämällä väittämiä köyhyydestä, toimeentulotuen asiakkaista tai toimeentulotuen tarpeessa olevista sekä tiedustelemalla minimituloa sekä mielipidettä siitä, onko toimeentuloturvan perusosa riittävä. Lopuksi vastaajat kertoivat, paljonko heillä on erilaisia tuloja, kuluja ja lainoja. Taustatietoja aineistossa ovat syntymävuosi, sukupuoli, siviilisääty, asumismuoto, ruokakunnan koko ja lasten lukumäärä, asuinpaikka 14-vuotiaana ja nykyisin, korkein koulutus, oma ja puolison pääasiallinen toiminta, sosioekonominen asema ja koko perheen kuukausitulot.The aim of the survey was to get a picture of Finns' financial well-being. Respondents were asked about their housing situation and their satisfaction with their current standard of living. Respondents were asked about the necessity or non-necessity of various commodities and services for today's Finnish adults. They were also asked whether they considered certain goods and services necessary for themselves. These included a mobile phone, a car, clothing, eating out and home furnishings, getting a haircut, home insurance and health services. Respondents reported on how financial matters are handled in their family and whether there are income differences between spouses. Attitudes towards social security and poverty were explored, for example by asking about poverty, welfare recipients or those in need of social security benefits, the minimum income and whether the basic income support is sufficient. Finally, respondents indicated how much they have in terms of income, expenses and loans. Background variables included the respondent's year of birth, gender, marital status, type of housing, household size and number of children, region of residence at age 14 and at present, highest level of education, economic activity of self and spouse, socio-economic status and monthly income of the household
Low-threshold Meeting Places and Inclusive Communities during COVID-19: Client Survey 2021-2022
No full textKyselyssä selvitetään matalan kynnyksen toimipaikkojen kävijöiden hyvinvointia ja kokemuksia koronapandemia-aikana. Lisäksi kyselyssä käsitellään pandemia-ajan ja matalan kynnyksen toimipaikkojen toiminnan vaikutuksia kävijöiden arjen hyvinvointiin. Vastaajiksi on pyritty tavoittamaan haavoittuvassa asemassa olevia ihmisiä, kuten mielenterveys- tai päihdeongelmien kanssa eläviä, asunnottomia, työttömiä tai vankilasta vapautuneita ihmisiä. Aineisto kerättiin Helsingin yliopiston Osallistavat yhteisöt -osahankkeessa, joka sisältyy Korona yhteiskunnan marginaaleissa -tutkimusprojektiin (KoMa). Aluksi vastaajaa pyydettiin arvioimaan matalan kynnyksen kohtaamispaikassa käymisen syitä. Syinä olivat esimerkiksi perustarpeet, vertaistuki, kriisitilanne, työkokeilu tai päihde- tai mielenterveysongelma. Vastaajalta tiedusteltiin, kuinka usein hän on osallistunut paikan toimintaan sekä millaisia esteitä toimintaan osallistumiselle on ollut. Lisäksi kyselyssä kartoitettiin, millaisia hyötyjä vastaaja kokee saaneensa käynneistä. Kyselyssä selvitettiin myös vastaajan sosiaalista ja henkilökohtaista tilannetta, kuten luottamusta muihin ihmisiin, tyytyväisyyttä elämään sekä yksinäisyyden ja ulkopuolisuuden kokemuksia. Seuraavaksi vastaajaa pyydettiin arvioimaan omaa terveyttään ja päihteiden käyttöä viimeisen 6 kuukauden aikana, minkä lisäksi hänen tuli arvioida itsensä asteikolla kaikkein huono-osaisimmasta kaikkein hyväosaisimpaan. Tämän jälkeen vastaajalta tiedusteltiin, mitkä tekijät olivat merkittävimpiä oman selviytymisen kannalta vuonna 2021. Lopuksi vastaajan tuli arvioida viimeisen vuoden aikana käyttämiensä palveluiden saavutettavuutta ja riittävyyttä. Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat vastaajan sukupuoli, suuralue, kuntaryhmitys, koulutusaste, pääasiallinen toiminta, perhemuoto, asumismuoto, oma ja vanhempien syntymämaa sekä tietoja kotitalouden rakenteesta ja taloudellisesta tilanteesta.The survey explores the well-being and experiences of people attending low-threshold meeting places during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey focused on meeting places serving disadvantaged groups. The data was collected by the University of Helsinki's Inclusive Communities sub-project, which is part of the COVID-19 in the margins of society (KoMa) project. First, respondents were asked to assess their reasons for visiting a low-threshold meeting place. These included for example basic needs, peer support, crisis situation, work try-out, substance abuse or mental health problem. Respondents were asked about the frequency of their participation in meeting place activities and the obstacles they encountered in attending. The survey also asked respondents about the benefits they had received from their visits. The survey also looked at their social and personal situation, such as trust in other people, life satisfaction and experiences of loneliness and exclusion. Next, respondents were asked to rate their own health and substance use in the last 6 months, and to rate themselves on a scale from most underprivileged to most well-off. Respondents were then asked which factors were most important for their own coping in 2021. Finally, respondents were asked to rate the accessibility and adequacy of the services they had used in the past year. Background variables included the respondent's gender, NUTS2 major region, statistical grouping of municipalities, level of education, main activity, type of housing, own and parents' country of birth, and information on household structure and financial situation
Tampere University Survey for First-year Students 2021-2022
No full textTampereen yliopiston ensimmäisen vuoden opiskelijoille teetetyssä kyselyssä kerätään tietoa ensimmäisen vuoden opiskelukokemuksista ja kiinnittymisestä opintoihin ja yliopistoon. Vuosien 2021 ja 2022 kevään kyselyt keskittyivät edellä mainittujen lisäksi henkilökohtaisiin opintosuunnitelmiin, opiskelija- ja opettajatuutorointiin sekä opiskelukykyyn. Kysely aloitettiin selvittämällä, miten vastaajan opinnot ovat edenneet, onko hän saanut tarvitsemaansa suunnitteluun liittyvää tukea sekä miten vastaajan opintojen suunnittelu on onnistunut SISU-järjestelmässä. Seuraavaksi selvitettiin opiskelijoiden mielipiteitä opiskelija- ja opettajatuutoroinnista. Viimeinen osio käsitteli opintoihin kiinnittymistä ja opiskeluhyvinvointia. Vastaajat arvoivat erilaisia väittämiä liittyen esimerkiksi jaksamiseen, yksinäisyyteen ja etäopiskeluun. Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat sukupuoli, tiedekunta, tutkinnon taso sekä kyselyvuosi.The Tampere University first-year student survey collects information about the first-year student experience and the attachment to studies and the university. The spring surveys for 2021 and 2022 focus on personal study plans, student and faculty mentoring, and study skills, in addition to the above. The questionnaire started by asking how the respondent's studies have progressed, whether they have received the planning support they need and how successful their study planning has been in SISU. The next step was to find out students' opinions on student and teacher tutoring. The final section dealt with attachment to studies and student well-being. Respondents rated different statements related to issues such as coping, loneliness and remote study. The background variables included gender, faculty, degree level and survey year
Finnish Government Media Conferences on COVID-19 2020
No full textAineisto koostuu valtioneuvoston järjestämistä, medialle ja kansalaisille suunnatuista tiedotustilaisuuksien litteraateista, joissa käsitellään COVID-19-pandemian ehkäisytoimenpiteitä. Tiedotustilaisuuksiin osallistuivat pääasiassa pääministeri Sanna Marin, pääministerin kabinettiministerit, kansallisia viranomaisia, erilaisia asiantuntijoita ja medioiden edustajia. Tiedotustilaisuuksissa esitetään tilannekatsauksia koronaviruspandemiasta, sekä tiedotetaan hallituksen muodostamista linjauksista ja rajoituksista taudin leviämisen estämiseksi. Keskiössä on kansalaisten ja riskiryhmien suojeleminen tartuntataudilta sekä terveyden- ja tehohoitokapasiteetin turvaaminen hidastamalla epidemian etenemistä. Lisäksi aineistossa käsitellään kansantalouden tukemista ja sen vahvistamista kriisin jälkeen. Aineistossa kuvataan myös valmiuslainsäädäntöä, poikkeusoloja sekä rajoitusten purkamista. Taustatietoina aineistossa ovat tiedotustilaisuuden kesto sekä tiedoston nimi, josta selviää tilannekatsauksien ajankohta ja aihe. Aineistosta on tehty html-versio, jonka hakemiston avulla haastatteluja on helppo selata.The data consists of transcripts of media conferences organised by the Finnish Government on measures to prevent the COVID-19 pandemic. The media conferences were mainly attended by Prime Minister Sanna Marin, the Prime Minister's Cabinet Ministers, national authorities, various experts and media representatives. The media conferences provide an update on the coronavirus pandemic, as well as information on government policies and restrictions to prevent the spread of the disease. The focus will be on protecting citizens and at-risk groups from the disease and on safeguarding health and critical care capacity by slowing the progress of the epidemic. The material also addresses how to support and strengthen the national economy in the aftermath of the crisis. It also describes the Emergency Powers Act legislation, state of emergency and the removal of restrictions. Background information includes the duration of the media conference and the name of the file, which indicates the time and subject of the media conference. The data were organised into an easy to use HTML version at FSD
Knowledge Attainment, Learning Approaches, and Self-perceived Study Burnout among European Veterinary Students 2023
No full textAineisto tarkastelee eurooppalaisten eläinlääketieteellisten korkeakoulujen opiskelijoiden menestystä opinnoissa, opiskeluun liittyviä strategioita sekä koettua opintoihin liittyvää loppuunpalamisen tunnetta. Aineisto on kerätty osana eurooppalaisen eläinlääketieteellisen koulutuksen arviointia ja opinnoissa edistymisen testaamista kehittävää VetRepos-hanketta. Aineisto sisältää 21 väittämää Helsingin yliopistossa kehitetystä, validoidusta HowULearn-opintokyselystä (https://blogs.helsinki.fi/howulearn/en/). Väitelauseet käsittelevät vastaajien oppimis- ja opiskelutapoja, opinnoissa pärjäämistä sekä koettua opiskelu-uupumusta ja uupumisriskiä. Vastaajat ovat osallistuneet myös yhden tai useamman kerran VetRepos-kehitystestiin, joka mittaa edistymistä koulutuksen keskeisissä sisällöissä. Aineistossa on opiskelijan VetRepos-testin tuloksiin perustuva skaalamuuttuja. Taustatietona on vastaajan opiskeluvuosi.The study examines the learning approaches of students in European veterinary schools, their study success, study strategies and self-perceived study-related burnout. The data were collected as part of the VetRepos project, which develops the assessment and progress testing of European veterinary education. The dataset contains 21 statements from the validated HowULearn study questionnaire developed at the University of Helsinki (https://blogs.helsinki.fi/howularn/en/). The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with statements relating to learning and studying habits, coping with studies, and experienced study exhaustion and the risk of burnout. Respondents have also taken once or more the VetRepos formative progress tests, which measures progress in key content of the education. The dataset includes a scale variable based on the results of the respondent's VetRepos test. The background variable is the respondent's year of study