GESIS Archive
Not a member yet
7693 research outputs found
Sort by
Media-related Teacher Cooperation as a School Quality Feature in the Digital World (MeLe)
No full textThe research project ´MeLe´ (duration: 11/2018-10/2021) investigated media-related cooperation as a central condition for the success of digitalisation processes in the education sector. On the other hand, conditions of success and failure for media-related teacher cooperation itself were analysed. In addition, the findings on media-related cooperation between teachers can subsequently be used to analyse the multi-professional cooperation of other school stakeholders. For example, the criteria-oriented development of the instrument developed can be adapted to record media-related cooperation between teachers and other educational staff or to record cooperation between teachers at different schools. In addition, the instrument developed as part of the project for recording media-related teacher cooperation can be used for internal self-evaluation by schools in order to obtain concrete indications of the successful implementation of digital media at the level of the individual school. The project was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the Empirical Educational Research framework programme in the guideline for funding research on ´Digitalisierung im Bildungsbereich - Grundsatzfragen und Gelingensbedingungen“ and is part of the Digitalisation in the education sector meta-project.Gender; age (grouped); teaching subjects; type of school; size of teaching staff (grouped); job scope; team teaching; media use; cooperation in school contexts; media use for cooperation in school context; frequency of media use; cooperation: Frequency, type/form, potentials and challenges, own cooperation competence; own media competence; attitude towards cooperation in the age of digitalisation; quality of equipment; didactic and technical support from shool; digital media in training/further education; participation in training/further education; school management actions: Use/promotion of digital media; cooperation of the teaching staff; conceptual anchoring of personnel development and further training planning for cooperation skills, media skills, cooperation culture with regard to digitalisation, evaluation of the effectiveness of cooperation for schools, for themselves personally and for pupils.Mit dem Forschungsprojekt ‚MeLe‘ (Laufzeit: 11/2018-10/2021) wurde mit der medienbezogenen Kooperation zum einen eine zentrale Gelingensbedingung von Digitalisierungsprozessen im Bildungsbereich erforscht. Zum anderen wurden Gelingensbedingungen und Misslingensbedingungen für die medienbezogene Lehrerkooperation selbst analysiert. Darüber hinaus können die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse zur medienbezogenen Kooperation zwischen Lehrkräften anschließend genutzt werden, um auch die multiprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit weiterer schulischer Akteure zu betrachten. So kann das entwickelte Instrument durch die kriterienorientierte Entwicklung beispielsweise für die Erfassung der medienbezogenen Kooperation zwischen Lehrkräften und dem weiteren pädagogisch tätigen Personal adaptiert werden oder auch die Kooperation zwischen Lehrkräften unterschiedlicher Schulen erfassen. Zudem kann das im Rahmen des Projekts entwickelte Instrument zur Erfassung der medienbezogenen Lehrerkooperation zur internen Selbstevaluation der Schulen genutzt werden, um auch auf Ebene der Einzelschule konkrete Anhaltspunkte hinsichtlich der erfolgreichen Implementation digitaler Medien zu erhalten. Das Projekt wurde im Rahmenprogramm Empirische Bildungsforschung in der Richtlinie zur Förderung von Forschung zu ´Digitalisierung im Bildungsbereich - Grundsatzfragen und Gelingensbedingungen“ vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) gefördert und ist im Metavorhaben Digitalisierung im Bildungsbereich verortet.Geschlecht; Alter (gruppiert); Unterrichtsfächer; Schulform; Größe des Kollegiums (gruppiert); Stellenumfang; Teamteaching; Mediennutzung; Schulische Kooperationskontexte; Mediennutzung für Lehrerkooperation; Häufigkeit der Nutzung; Kooperationen: Häufigkeit, Art/Form, Potenziale und Herausforderung, eigene Kompetenz; eigene Medienkompetenz, Einstellung zur Kooperation im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung, Qualität der Ausstattung; didaktische und technische Unterstützung; digitale Medien in der Aus/Fortbildung, Teilnahme an Fort-/Weiterbildung, Schulleitungshandeln: Einsatz/Förderung digitaler Medien, Kooperation des Kollegiums, konzeptuelle Verankerung Personalentwicklung und Fortbildungsplanung für Kooperationskompetenz, Medienkompetenz, Kooperationskultur hinsichtlich Digitalisierung, Bewertung der Wirksamkeit von Kooperationen für Schule, für sich persönlich und für Schüler*innen
Stata code for assessing interrater reliability in the coding of the SDCCP 1 dataset
No full textThe syntax code has the purpose of assessing interrater reliability for various variables based on a random 10% sample from all survey programs encoded in the dataset SDCCP 1 - Survey Design and Data Quality During the Covid-19 Pandemic (doi:https://doi.org/10.7802/2652).The syntax code has the purpose of assessing interrater reliability for various variables based on a random 10% sample from all survey programs encoded in the dataset SDCCP 1 - Survey Design and Data Quality During the Covid-19 Pandemic (doi:https://doi.org/10.7802/2652)
Code/Syntax: Consistent Egalitarianism or Heterogeneous Belief Patterns? Gender Ideologies in Contemporary East and West Germany
No full textThese files include the syntax for the study "Consistent Egalitarianism or Heterogeneous Belief Patterns? Gender Ideologies in Contemporary East and West Germany". This paper analyzes the gender ideologies of respondents living in East and West Germany, and whether these belief patterns differ by socio-demographic characteristics. To this end, latent class analysis is applied to eight gender role items from the FReDA 2021 survey. This study uses FReDA panel data from the release 2.0.0. DOI: 10.4232/1.14065, Bujard et al. (2023).These files include the syntax for the study "Consistent Egalitarianism or Heterogeneous Belief Patterns? Gender Ideologies in Contemporary East and West Germany". This paper analyzes the gender ideologies of respondents living in East and West Germany, and whether these belief patterns differ by socio-demographic characteristics. To this end, latent class analysis is applied to eight gender role items from the FReDA 2021 survey. This study uses FReDA panel data from the release 2.0.0. DOI: 10.4232/1.14065, Bujard et al. (2023)
Stigma of COVID-19
No full textDie Daten für dieses Projekt stammen aus einer Webbefragung unter 1.643 in Deutschland lebenden Internetnutzer*innen ab 18 Jahren im Mai 2021. Die Befragten wurden aus dem von Respondi betriebenen deutschen Online Access Panel mingle rekrutiert. Der Fragebogen umfasste ein Vignettenexperiment zur Stigmatisierung einer COVID-19-Infektion und ein Experiment zur Akzeptanz von Algorithmen für autonomes Fahren.Die Daten für dieses Projekt stammen aus einer Webbefragung unter 1.643 in Deutschland lebenden Internetnutzer*innen ab 18 Jahren im Mai 2021. Die Befragten wurden aus dem von Respondi betriebenen deutschen Online Access Panel mingle rekrutiert. Der Fragebogen umfasste ein Vignettenexperiment zur Stigmatisierung einer COVID-19-Infektion und ein Experiment zur Akzeptanz von Algorithmen für autonomes Fahren
Code/Syntax: Changing Attitudes? Investigating the Link between Couples' Pandemic Behavior, Cognitive Dissonance, and Gender Role Attitudes in Germany
No full textThe do-files are made available here, which can be used to replicate the results from the paper "Firl, K., 2024: Changing Attitudes? Investigating the Link between Couples' Pandemic Behavior, Cognitive Dissonance, and Gender Role Attitudes in Germany. In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie". In the analyzes, the Scientific Use Files (SUF) from release 13.0 from the German Family Panel 'pairfam' are used. The data can be obtained via https://www.pairfam.de/daten/datenzugang/ . The doi of the data is: https://doi.org/10.4232/pairfam.5678.13.0.0 .
In the analyzes, Stata version 17 is used, however, the analyzes can also be reproduced with older Stata versions.The do-files are made available here, which can be used to replicate the results from the paper "Firl, K., 2024: Changing Attitudes? Investigating the Link between Couples' Pandemic Behavior, Cognitive Dissonance, and Gender Role Attitudes in Germany. In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie". In the analyzes, the Scientific Use Files (SUF) from release 13.0 from the German Family Panel 'pairfam' are used. The data can be obtained via https://www.pairfam.de/daten/datenzugang/ . The doi of the data is: https://doi.org/10.4232/pairfam.5678.13.0.0 .
In the analyzes, Stata version 17 is used, however, the analyzes can also be reproduced with older Stata versions
Replication files for: Who should pay for higher education?
No full textThis replication package refers to a paper entitled 'Who should pay for higher education?' which has not yet been published. The reference will be added as soon as the paper is published.
The debate over free versus tuition-based higher education centers on their significant social, economic, and political consequences, particularly regarding social mobility and economic inequality. However little is known about public preferences for higher education finance, especially when the potential choice set of policy options is broadened and when equity considerations become more salient. We conduct a survey experiment on a representative sample of the German population (N=6208) to study this. We find that making respondents aware of the inequalities of the free system, makes respondents more supportive of all tuition fee systems. Regardless of experimental variation, respondents are more supportive of alternative tuition fee policies that depend on the students' downstream income, or on their parental income. This support increases with the experimental information treatments. The published Stata syntax file (do-file) and the dataset (a partial version of the 2020 Inequality barometer published under https://doi.org/10.7802/2740) can be used to replicate the results in the article.This replication package refers to a paper entitled 'Who should pay for higher education?' which has not yet been published. The reference will be added as soon as the paper is published.
The debate over free versus tuition-based higher education centers on their significant social, economic, and political consequences, particularly regarding social mobility and economic inequality. However little is known about public preferences for higher education finance, especially when the potential choice set of policy options is broadened and when equity considerations become more salient. We conduct a survey experiment on a representative sample of the German population (N=6208) to study this. We find that making respondents aware of the inequalities of the free system, makes respondents more supportive of all tuition fee systems. Regardless of experimental variation, respondents are more supportive of alternative tuition fee policies that depend on the students' downstream income, or on their parental income. This support increases with the experimental information treatments. The published Stata syntax file (do-file) and the dataset (a partial version of the 2020 Inequality barometer published under https://doi.org/10.7802/2740) can be used to replicate the results in the article
Eine Befragung zur Bereitschaft zum Teilen von Gesundheitsdaten in Deutschland \u2013 Einflussfaktoren, Pr\ue4ferenzen und Motive
No full textErfragt wurden 7 Themenfelder:
1) Digitale Kompetenz, Technikaffinität und Technikangst: Internetnutzung, Nutzung digitaler Technologien und Geräte, Technikkompetenz.
2) Bereitschaft zum Teilen persönlicher Gesundheitsdaten: Institutionen und Akteure im Gesundheitsbereich, Kontext des Datenteilens.
3) Allgemeine Einstellungen und Präferenzen zum Teilen
von Gesundheitsdaten: Datenarten, Einwilligungsformen.
4) Motivation zum Teilen von Gesundheitsdaten: intrinsische Motivation (Altruismus, Nutzen), extrinsische Motivation (Anreize), technische Anforderungen, Partizipation.
5) Einstellungen zu digitalen Technologien und Vertrauen in Institutionen und
Datenschutz/Privatsphäre: Vertrauen in die Wissenschaft, in Akteure des Gesundheitswesens, in die Politik und in Unternehmen, Sorgen, negative Auswirkungen, Datensicherheit, Legitimation, Forschungszwecke.
6) Einstellungen zur elektronischen Patientenakte (ePA): Bekanntheit, Verbreitung, Nutzungsbereitschaft, Bereitschaft zum Teilen von Gesundheitsdaten, Einwilligungsformen.
7) Allgemeine Spendenbereitschaft: Häufigkeit der Spenden für gemeinnützige Zwecke.
Allgemeine Angaben zur Person: Alter, Geschlecht, Geburtsland, Wohnort (Bundesland, Gemeindegröße), höchster Bildungsabschluss (Schulabschluss, Berufsabschluss), Haushaltseinkommen, Haushaltsgröße, Anzahl der Kinder im Haushalt, subjektiver Sozialstatus, Krankenversicherungsstatus, subjektiver Gesundheitszustand, Vorliegen chronischer/ psychischer Erkrankungen
Generierte Variablen: ID – Identifikationsnummer, GewichtungErfragt wurden 7 Themenfelder:
1) Digitale Kompetenz, Technikaffinität und Technikangst: Internetnutzung, Nutzung digitaler Technologien und Geräte, Technikkompetenz.
2) Bereitschaft zum Teilen persönlicher Gesundheitsdaten: Institutionen und Akteure im Gesundheitsbereich, Kontext des Datenteilens.
3) Allgemeine Einstellungen und Präferenzen zum Teilen
von Gesundheitsdaten: Datenarten, Einwilligungsformen.
4) Motivation zum Teilen von Gesundheitsdaten: intrinsische Motivation (Altruismus, Nutzen), extrinsische Motivation (Anreize), technische Anforderungen, Partizipation.
5) Einstellungen zu digitalen Technologien und Vertrauen in Institutionen und
Datenschutz/Privatsphäre: Vertrauen in die Wissenschaft, in Akteure des Gesundheitswesens, in die Politik und in Unternehmen, Sorgen, negative Auswirkungen, Datensicherheit, Legitimation, Forschungszwecke.
6) Einstellungen zur elektronischen Patientenakte (ePA): Bekanntheit, Verbreitung, Nutzungsbereitschaft, Bereitschaft zum Teilen von Gesundheitsdaten, Einwilligungsformen.
7) Allgemeine Spendenbereitschaft: Häufigkeit der Spenden für gemeinnützige Zwecke.
Allgemeine Angaben zur Person: Alter, Geschlecht, Geburtsland, Wohnort (Bundesland, Gemeindegröße), höchster Bildungsabschluss (Schulabschluss, Berufsabschluss), Haushaltseinkommen, Haushaltsgröße, Anzahl der Kinder im Haushalt, subjektiver Sozialstatus, Krankenversicherungsstatus, subjektiver Gesundheitszustand, Vorliegen chronischer/ psychischer Erkrankungen
Generierte Variablen: ID – Identifikationsnummer, Gewichtun
Dataset: Identifying major factors for success and failure of conservation programs in Europe
No full textIn Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society.In Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society
German General Social Survey ALLBUS - Cumulation 1980-2021
No full textThe German General Social Survey ALLBUS is a biennial trend survey based on random samples of the German population. Established in 1980, its mission is to monitor attitudes, behavior, and social change in Germany. Each ALLBUS cross-sectional survey consists of one or two main question modules covering changing topics, a range of supplementary questions and a core module providing detailed demographic information. Additionally, data on the interview and the interviewers are provided as well. Key topics generally follow a 10-year replication cycle, many individual indicators and item batteries are replicated at shorter intervals.
ALLBUS 1980-2021 compiles all of the time series in the ALLBUS program (i.e. it contains data for all questions that have been surveyed in at least two of the so far 22 cross-sectional surveys).The original surveys have been designed to monitor trends in attitudes, behavior, and societal change in the Federal Republic of Germany. The main topics of this cumulative study are:
1.) Economy
2.) Politics
3.) Social inequality
4.) Ethnocentrism and minorities
5.) Family
6.) Lifestyle and personality
7.) Health
8.) Religion and world view
9.) Personal and collective values
10.) Social networks and social capital
11.) Deviant behavior and sanctions
12.) ALLBUS-Demography
13.) Technical data, paradata and data on the interviewer
14.) Geographic data
15.) Added value
Topics:
1.) Economy: assessment of the present and future economic situation in Germany and in one´s own federal state, assessment of present and future personal economic situation.
2.) Politics:
satisfaction with the federal and state government, with German democracy and with the performance of the German political system (political support);
basic political attitudes: self-placement on left-right continuum, placement of political parties on a left-right-continuum, political interest, party inclination;
voting intention (Sonntagsfrage), participation in last federal elections, recall of vote in last federal elections, party-sympathy-scales, likelihood of voting for different political parties;
political participation: personal participation and willingness to participate in selected forms of protest and other political activities, norms for political participation; frequency of discussing politics with friends, acquaintances, strangers, and family;
political issues: attitudes towards nuclear energy, the death penalty for terrorists, towards the privatization of publicly owned companies; support for less government interference in the economy, for stricter environmental protection measures, for harsher punishment of criminals, for making social security government´s top priority, for a redistribution of income in favor of the common people; for the view that immigrants are good for the economy, for access to abortion without legal limitations, for more global free trade; attitude towards expanding or cutting budgets for social services and defense, perceived position of the federal government in these matters;
democracy scale;
political knowledge questions (party affiliation of top-level politicians, functioning of democratic institutions etc.);
political efficacy: perception of individual influence on politics, gap between politicians and citizens, self-assuredness with regard to political group work, too much complexity in politics, perception of politicians´ closeness to constituents, participation in the vote as a civic duty;
perceived strength of conflicts between social groups;
confidence in public institutions and organizations;
Identification with various political entities: identification with own municipality, the federal state, the old Federal Republic or the GDR, unified Germany and the EU;
Attitudes relating to the process of German unification: attitude towards the demand for increased willingness to make sacrifices in the West and more patience in the East, unification is advantageous, for East and West respectively, future of the East depends on the willingness of eastern Germans to make an effort, strangeness of citizens in the other part of Germany, performance pressure in the new states, attitude towards dealing with the Stasi-past of individuals, evaluation of socialism as an idea;
evaluation of administration services and assessment of treatment by the administration;
national pride and right-wing extremism: pride in German institutions and German achievements, pride in being a German, extremism scale.
3.) Social Inequality: fair share in standard of living, self-assessment of social class and classification on a top-bottom-scale, evaluation of personal occupational success, comparison with father´s position and personal occupational expectations for the future, attitudes towards the German economic system and evaluation of policies supporting the welfare state, assessment of access to education, perceived prerequisites for success in society, income differences as incentive to achieve, acceptance of social differences, evaluation of personal social security.
4.) Ethnocentrism and minorities: attitude towards the influx of different groups of immigrants; perceived consequences of presence of foreigners in Germany, attitudes towards refugees, treatment of foreigners by the administration, ranking in terms of importance of different citizenship requirements; scale of attitudes towards foreigners and contacts with foreigners (split: guest-workers) within the family, at work, in the neighborhood or among friends; opinion on dual citizenship and on equal rights for foreigners, support for the teaching of Islam in public schools, estimation of proportion of foreigners in East and West Germany and in the neighborhood where respondent lives, living in neighborhoods with high percentage of foreigners, perceived differences in lifestyle, indicators for social distance to ethnic minorities and foreigners, support for Islam as a school subject; attitudes towards Islam (Islamophobia scale), attitudes towards Jews (Antisemitism scale) items on anti-Semitism, perception and evaluation of discriminatory behavior towards foreigners.
5.) Family: attitude towards marriage and having a family, ideal number of children, attitude towards employment of women and mothers, attitude towards the role of men and women in the family, division of labor regarding house and family work, importance of educational goals, most important educational goals in school, classification of the importance of certain educational aspirations for a child, desired characteristics of children.
6.) Lifestyle and personality: authoritarianism, importance of life aspects, preferred job characteristics (security, income, responsibility, etc.), free time activities, use of media (frequency of watching television over the week, taste in television programs, frequency of watching the news on tv and of reading a daily newspaper per week, musical preferences), mobile phone ownership.
7.) Health: overall health, physical and psychological shape during the last four weeks, health problems’ impact on everyday life, chronic illnesses, been sick in the last four weeks, reason for and frequency of seeing a doctor in the last three months, time spent in hospital during the last 12 months, officially recognized disability level, smoking habits, overall life satisfaction, height and weight, consumption of various foodstuffs and beverages, affectedness by unhealthy working conditions and by mobbing, perception of general environmental pollution and personally experienced environmental pollution, questions on AIDS (knowledge of the disease AIDS, attitudes towards AIDS-infected people, worry about personal AIDS infection, personal protective measures and behavioral changes, AIDS-infected people in one´s own circle of friends).
8.) Religion and world view: present and former religious affiliation, frequency of church attendance, frequency of attending other place of worship, importance of religion in parental home, frequency of prayer, participation in religious activities, frequency of meditation, interest in Christian programs in the media, self-assessment of religiousness and spirituality, religious cosmology and belief in God, religious beliefs, meaning of life, religious indifference, thinking about metaphysical questions, experience with and attitude towards different forms of belief, parabelief and superstition, religion vs. science, funeral by church, marriage in church, baptism of children, attitude towards person with different faiths marrying into the family.
9.) Personal and collective values: materialism/postmaterialism (importance of law and order, fighting rising prices, free expression of opinions and influence on governmental decisions), individual value orientations (Klages), attitudes towards legalizing abortion.
10.) Social networks and social capital: ego-centered networks (number of contacts in network, information on: gender, age, kinship or type of relationship, employment status, occupational position, voting behavior, citizenship, mutual familiarity between contacts), membership in trade unions, trade associations, clubs, political parties or other organizations; frequency of spending time with colleagues from work, club members or with friends; interpersonal trust, social pessimism and orientation towards the future (anomia), reciprocity.
11.) Deviant behavior and sanctions: fear of crime, personal victimization, moral assessment of different behaviors, desire to sanction different criminal acts, desire to make various behaviors illegal, self-reported deviant behavior (past and future), assessment of probability of being caught committing various crimes, respect of the law, believe in deterrence through punishment, purposes of punishment, assessment of sentencing practices.
12.) ALLBUS-Demography:
Details about the respondent: gender, age, citizenship(s) (nationality), number of citizenships, present and former religious affiliation, currently at school or university, school education, vocational training, employment status, secondary job, details about current and former occupation respectively, details about first occupation, date of termination of full- or part-time employment, fear of unemployment or loss of business, industrial sector, affiliation to public service, fixed-term or permanent employment contract, length of commute, driver’s license, supervisory functions, length of employment, size of workplace, working hours per week (primary and secondary job), length of unemployment, gaps in occupational biography, desire for work, marital status, marital biography.
Details about personal and household income: respondent’s personal income, principal source of livelihood, capital income, household income, per capita income, equivalized income (OECD-modified scale), types of income in household, number of sources of income in household, principal source of income.
Details about respondent’s current spouse: cohabitation before marriage, age, citizenship(s), number of citizenships, original citizenship, religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, university degree, employment status, details about current and former occupation respectively, affiliation to public service, date of termination of full- or part-time employment, length of unemployment, fear of unemployment or loss of business.
Details about respondent’s former spouse: age, religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, details about current and former occupation respectively.
Details about respondent’s steady partner: length of relationship, common household, age, citizenship(s), number of citizenships, original citizenship, school education, vocational training, university degree, employment status, details about current and former occupation respectively, affiliation to public service, fear of unemployment or loss of business, date of termination of full- or part-time employment.
Details about respondent’s parents: cohabitation with respondent as adolescent, age of respondent when leaving parental home, religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, university education, details about parents’ occupation.
Description of household: size of household, number of persons older than 17 in household (reduced size of household).
Details about household members: family relation to respondent, gender, age, marital status, income; for children of respondent or partner also: school education, university degree.
Details about children: number of children, deceased children, desire to have children.
Details about children not living in the household: number of children not living in the household, gender, age, school education, university degree, baptism, religious affiliation.
Migration, residential biography and living environment: original citizenship of respondent, country of origin, country of origin of parents and of grandparents, migration between East and West Germany, distance to last place of residence, duration of residence, self-description of place of residence, type of dwelling, size of dwelling, telephone in household, cat or dog in the household, environmental nuisances in area of residence.
13.) Technical data, paradata and data on the interviewer: Study number, digital object identifier, versioning, respondent ID, sample point ID, split halves, survey mode of the ALLBUS interview, number of attempts to contact the respondent, contact strategy, beginning and end of interview (date and time), length of interview, willingness to participate, taken part in how many interviews, participation in other surveys over the past year, reachability of respondent, presence of respondent at home during the last few weekdays, presence of other persons during interview (spouse, partner or children during, other relatives), interference of other persons in the course of the interview, willingness to cooperate and reliability of information from respondent, respondent followed interview on screen, breaks during completion of questionnaire (survey mode MAIL), percentage of completed questions, frequency of private internet use, willingness to participate in an online survey, willingness to participate in other survey, details about respondent’s residential building and its neighborhood, perceived attractiveness of respondent;
details about the interviewer (identification number, gender, age, school education, length of experience as an interviewer).
14.) Geographical data: region of interview (East / West Germany), federal state, size of municipality, Boustedt-type of municipality, BIK-type of municipality, percentage of non-German residents at county level.
15.) Added value: Body-Mass-Index, Inglehart-index, life forms (Schulz and Mikrozensus Typology), family situation (Schulz), type of household; International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) 1968, 1988 and 2008; occupational prestige (according to Treiman), Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS, according to Ganzeboom), International Socio-economic Index of Occupational Status (ISEI, according to Ganzeboom), magnitude prestige (according to Wegener), International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 1997 and 2011, class position (according to Goldthorpe), European Socio-economic Groups (ESeG), per capita income, equivalized income (OECD-modified scale), percentage of non-German residents at county level, transformation weight for analyses on household level or on individual level, east-west design weight.Die Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS) ist eine Trenderhebung, in der seit 1980 alle zwei Jahre eine Zufallsstichprobe der deutschen Bevölkerung befragt wird. Das primäre Ziel des Umfrageprogramms ist die Beobachtung von Einstellungen, Verhalten und sozialen Wandel in Deutschland. Jede ALLBUS-Querschnittserhebung besteht aus ein oder zwei Schwerpunktmodulen zu wechselnden Themen. Diese werden ergänzt durch weitere inhaltliche Fragen und ein Kernmodul mit detaillierten demografischen Informationen. Zudem werden Zusatzinformation zum Interview und den Interviewern bereitgestellt. Die Schwerpunktmodule folgen in der Regel einem 10-jährigen Replikationszyklus, viele Einzelindikatoren und Itembatterien werden aber auch in kürzeren Abständen repliziert.
Die ALLBUS Kumulation 1980-2021 versammelt alle Zeitreihen aus dem ALLBUS-Frageprogramm, d.h. der Datensatz enthält Daten für alle Fragen, die in wenigstens zwei der bisher 22 ALLBUS-Umfragen erhoben wurden.Trenderhebung zur gesellschaftlichen Dauerbeobachtung von Einstellungen, Verhalten und sozialem Wandel in Deutschland.
Die Schwerpunkte des kumulierten Datensatzes sind:
1.) Wirtschaft
2.) Politik
3.) Soziale Ungleichheit
4.) Ethnozentrismus und Minoritäten
5.) Familie
6.) Lebensstil und Persönlichkeit
7.) Gesundheit
8.) Religion und Weltanschauung
9.) Wertorientierungen
10.) Soziale Netzwerke und soziales Kapital
11.) Abweichendes Verhalten und Sanktion
12.) ALLBUS-Demographie
13.) Technische Daten, Para- und Interviewerdaten
14.) Regionaldaten
15.) Ergänzungen und abgeleitete Variablen
Themen:
1.) Wirtschaft: Wahrnehmung der eigenen Wirtschaftslage und der aktuellen und zukünftigen Wirtschaftslage in der Bundesrepublik und im eigenen Bundesland.
2.) Politik:
Zufriedenheit mit der Bundesregierung, der Landesregierung, der deutschen Demokratie und mit dem Funktionieren des politischen Systems;
Fragen zu politischen Einstellungen: Selbsteinstufung und Einstufung politischer Parteien auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum, politisches Interesse, Parteineigung;
Wahlabsicht (Sonntagsfrage), Wahlberechtigung, Wahlbeteiligung an der letzten Bundestagswahl, Wahlrückerinnerungsfrage, Sympathie-Skalometer für diverse Parteien; Wahrscheinlichkeit, diverse Parteien zu wählen;
Politische Partizipation: Eigene Teilnahme bzw. Beteiligungsbereitschaft an ausgewählten Protestformen, Normen für politische Partizipation, Häufigkeit von Politikgesprächen mit Familie, Freunden, Bekannten, und Fremden;
Politische Sachfragen: Einstellungen zu Kernenergie, Todesstrafe für Terroristen, Privatisierung öffentlicher Betriebe, Freigabe von Abtreibung, Eingriffe der Politik in die Wirtschaft, Umweltschutz, härtere Bestrafung von Straftätern, Wichtigkeit sozialer Sicherung, Umverteilung von Einkommen, positive Auswirkungen von Einwanderern auf die Wirtschaft, Freihandel; Haltung zur Ausweitung oder Kürzung von Sozialleistungen, Einstellung zu einer Kürzung des Verteidigungsetats und perzipierte Haltung der Bundesregierung in solchen Fragen;
Demokratieverständnis;
Politisches Wissensquiz (Parteizugehörigkeit von Spitzenpolitikern, Aufgabe und Funktion von Institutionen usw.);
Politische Selbstwirksamkeit: Wahrnehmung von Einflussmöglichkeiten auf die Politik, bürgerferne Politiker, Selbstvertrauen in Bezug auf politische Gruppenarbeit, Befähigung der Mehrheit zu politischer Arbeit, zu viel Komplexität in der Politik, Bürgerorientierung Politiker;
Perzipierte Stärke von Konflikten zwischen gesellschaftlichen Gruppen;
Vertrauen in diverse Behörden und Institutionen;
Nationale und regionale Verbundenheit: Verbundenheit mit der eigenen Gemeinde, mit dem Bundesland, mit der alten Bundesrepublik bzw. mit der DDR, mit Gesamtdeutschland sowie mit der EU;
Einstellungen zur Wiedervereinigung: Einstellung zur Forderung nach mehr Opferbereitschaft im Westen und mehr Geduld im Osten, Wiedervereinigung ist vorteilhaft für Westen bzw. Osten, Zukunft im Osten hängt von Leistungsbereitschaft der Ostdeutschen ab, wechselseitige Fremdheit der Bürger, Leistungsdruck in den neuen Bundesländern, Einstellung zum Umgang mit individueller Stasi-Vergangenheit, Einschätzung des Sozialismus als Idee;
Beurteilung der Leistungen von Behörden und deren Verhalten gegenüber Bürgern;
Nationalstolz und Rechtsextremismus: Stolz auf nationale Errungenschaften; Stolz, Deutscher zu sein, Extremismusskala.
3.) Soziale Ungleichheit: Gerechter Anteil am Lebensstandard, Selbsteinschätzung der sozialen Schichtzugehörigkeit, Einstufung auf einer Oben-Unten-Skala; Vergleich mit Berufsposition des Vaters, Anzahl arbeitsloser Verwandten und Freunde, Beurteilung des bisherigen Berufserfolgs und berufliche Erwartung für die Zukunft, Einstellungen zum deutschen Wirtschaftssystem und Beurteilungen von wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Maßnahmen, Einschätzung gleicher Ausbildungschancen für alle, Voraussetzungen für Erfolg in der Gesellschaft, Einkommensunterschiede als Leistungsanreiz, Akzeptanz von sozialen Unterschieden, Bewertung der eigenen sozialen Sicherung.
4.) Ethnozentrismus und Minoritäten: Einstellungen zum Zuzug verschiedener Personengruppen; Wahrgenommene Konsequenzen der Anwesenheit von Ausländern in Deutschland, Einstellungen zu Geflüchteten, Ausländerbehandlung durch Behörden, Wichtigkeitseinstufung verschiedener Einbürgerungsvoraussetzungen; Einstellungsskala und Kontakte zu Ausländern (Split: Gastarbeiter) in der Familie, am Arbeitsplatz und in der Nachbarschaft oder im Freundeskreis; Einstellung zur doppelten Staatsbürgerschaft und zur Rechtsangleichung von Ausländern, Ausländeranteilsschätzung für Ost- und Westdeutschland sowie für die eigene Wohnumgebung, Wohnen in Wohngebieten mit hohem Ausländeranteil, perzipierte Lebensstildifferenzen, Indikatoren für soziale Distanz zu ethnischen Minderheiten und Ausländern, Befürwortung von Islamunterricht an Schulen, Einstellungen gegenüber dem Islam (Skala Islamophobie),Einstellungen gegenüber Juden (Skala Antisemitismus), Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von diskriminierendem Verhalten gegenüber Ausländern.
5.) Familie: Notwendigkeit von Familie und Heirat, ideale Kinderzahl, Einstellung zur Berufstätigkeit von Frauen und Müttern, Einstellungen zur Rolle von Mann und Frau in der Familie, Aufteilung der
German General Social Survey ALLBUScompact - Cumulation 1980-2021
No full textThe German General Social Survey ALLBUS is a biennial trend survey based on random samples of the German population. Established in 1980, its mission is to monitor attitudes, behavior, and social change in Germany.
ALLBUScompact is offered as an alternative to the structurally more complex full version of ALLBUS. It addresses the needs of newcomers to data analysis by providing a simplified demography module containing an easily manageable group of the most important demographic indicators. All topical question modules not containing sensitive data are retained as in the ALLBUS full version (scientific use file).
ALLBUScompact 1980-2021 compiles all of the time series in the ALLBUScompact series (i.e. it contains data for all questions that have been surveyed in at least two of the so far 22 cross-sectional surveys).The original surveys have been designed to monitor trends in attitudes, behavior, and societal change in the Federal Republic of Germany. The main topics of this cumulative study are:
1.) Economy
2.) Politics
3.) Social inequality
4.) Ethnocentrism and minorities
5.) Family
6.) Lifestyle and personality
7.) Health
8.) Religion and world view
9.) Personal and collective values
10.) Social networks and social capital
11.) Deviant behavior and sanctions
12.) ALLBUScompact-Demography
13.) Technical data and paradata
14.) Geographic data
15.) Added value
Topics:
1.) Economy: assessment of the present and future economic situation in Germany and in one´s own federal state, assessment of present and future personal economic situation.
2.) Politics:
satisfaction with the federal and state government, with German democracy and with the performance of the German political system (political support);
basic political attitudes: self-placement on left-right continuum, placement of political parties on a left-right-continuum, political interest, party inclination;
voting intention (Sonntagsfrage), participation in last federal elections, recall of vote in last federal elections, party-sympathy-scales, likelihood of voting for different political parties;
political participation: personal participation and willingness to participate in selected forms of protest and other political activities, norms for political participation; frequency of discussing politics with friends, acquaintances, strangers, and family;
political issues: attitudes towards nuclear energy, the death penalty for terrorists, towards the privatization of publicly owned companies; support for less government interference in the economy, for stricter environmental protection measures, for harsher punishment of criminals, for making social security government´s top priority, for a redistribution of income in favor of the common people; for the view that immigrants are good for the economy, for access to abortion without legal limitations, for more global free trade; attitude towards expanding or cutting budgets for social services and defense, perceived position of the federal government in these matters;
democracy scale;
political knowledge questions (party affiliation of top-level politicians, functioning of democratic institutions etc.);
political efficacy: perception of individual influence on politics, gap between politicians and citizens, self-assuredness with regard to political group work, too much complexity in politics, perception of politicians´ closeness to constituents, participation in the vote as a civic duty;
perceived strength of conflicts between social groups;
confidence in public institutions and organizations;
Identification with various political entities: identification with own municipality, the federal state, the old Federal Republic or the GDR, unified Germany and the EU;
Attitudes relating to the process of German unification: attitude towards the demand for increased willingness to make sacrifices in the West and more patience in the East, unification is advantageous, for East and West respectively, future of the East depends on the willingness of eastern Germans to make an effort, strangeness of citizens in the other part of Germany, performance pressure in the new states, attitude towards dealing with the Stasi-past of individuals, evaluation of socialism as an idea;
evaluation of administration services and assessment of treatment by the administration;
national pride and right-wing extremism: pride in German institutions and German achievements, pride in being a German, extremism scale.
3.) Social Inequality: fair share in standard of living, self-assessment of social class and classification on a top-bottom-scale, evaluation of personal occupational success, comparison with father´s position and personal occupational expectations for the future, attitudes towards the German economic system and evaluation of policies supporting the welfare state, assessment of access to education, perceived prerequisites for success in society, income differences as incentive to achieve, acceptance of social differences, evaluation of personal social security.
4.) Ethnocentrism and minorities: attitude towards the influx of different groups of immigrants; perceived consequences of presence of foreigners in Germany, attitudes towards refugees, treatment of foreigners by the administration, ranking in terms of importance of different citizenship requirements; scale of attitudes towards foreigners and contacts with foreigners (split: guest-workers) within the family, at work, in the neighborhood or among friends; opinion on dual citizenship and on equal rights for foreigners, support for the teaching of Islam in public schools, estimation of proportion of foreigners in East and West Germany and in the neighborhood where respondent lives, living in neighborhoods with high percentage of foreigners, perceived differences in lifestyle, indicators for social distance to ethnic minorities and foreigners, support for Islam as a school subject; attitudes towards Islam (Islamophobia scale), attitudes towards Jews (Antisemitism scale) items on anti-Semitism, perception and evaluation of discriminatory behavior towards foreigners.
5.) Family: attitude towards marriage and having a family, ideal number of children, attitude towards employment of women and mothers, attitude towards the role of men and women in the family, division of labor regarding house and family work, importance of educational goals, most important educational goals in school, classification of the importance of certain educational aspirations for a child, desired characteristics of children.
6.) Lifestyle and personality: authoritarianism, importance of life aspects, preferred job characteristics (security, income, responsibility, etc.), free time activities, use of media (frequency of watching television over the week, taste in television programs, frequency of watching the news on tv and of reading a daily newspaper per week, musical preferences), mobile phone ownership.
7.) Health: overall health, physical and psychological shape during the last four weeks, health problems’ impact on everyday life, chronic illnesses, been sick in the last four weeks, reason for and frequency of seeing a doctor in the last three months, time spent in hospital during the last 12 months, officially recognized disability level, smoking habits, overall life satisfaction, height and weight, consumption of various foodstuffs and beverages, affectedness by unhealthy working conditions and by mobbing, perception of general environmental pollution and personally experienced environmental pollution, questions on AIDS (knowledge of the disease AIDS, attitudes towards AIDS-infected people, worry about personal AIDS infection, personal protective measures and behavioral changes, AIDS-infected people in one´s own circle of friends).
8.) Religion and world view: present and former religious affiliation, frequency of church attendance, frequency of attending other place of worship, importance of religion in parental home, frequency of prayer, participation in religious activities, frequency of meditation, interest in Christian programs in the media, self-assessment of religiousness and spirituality, religious cosmology and belief in God, religious beliefs, meaning of life, religious indifference, thinking about metaphysical questions, experience with and attitude towards different forms of belief, parabelief and superstition, religion vs. science, funeral by church, marriage in church, baptism of children, attitude towards person with different faiths marrying into the family.
9.) Personal and collective values: materialism/postmaterialism (importance of law and order, fighting rising prices, free expression of opinions and influence on governmental decisions), individual value orientations (Klages), attitudes towards legalizing abortion.
10.) Social networks and social capital: membership in a trade union, membership in a political party, frequency of spending time with colleagues from work, club members or with friends; interpersonal trust, social pessimism and orientation towards the future (anomia); reciprocity.
11.) Deviant behavior and sanctions: fear of crime, personal victimization, moral assessment of different behaviors, desire to sanction different criminal acts, desire to make various behaviors illegal, self-reported deviant behavior (past and future), assessment of probability of being caught committing various crimes, respect of the law, believe in deterrence through punishment, purposes of punishment, assessment of sentencing practices.
12.) ALLBUScompact-Demography:
Details about the respondent: gender, age, German citizenship, present and former religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, employment status, secondary job, details about current and former occupation respectively, date of termination of full- or part-time employment, fear of unemployment or loss of business, industrial sector, affiliation to public service, fixed-term or permanent employment contract, length of commute, driver’s license, supervisory functions, length of employment, size of workplace, working hours per week (primary and secondary job), length of unemployment, gaps in occupational biography, desire for work, marital status.
Details about personal and household income: respondent’s personal income, household income, per capita income, equivalized income (OECD-modified scale).
Details about respondent’s current spouse: cohabitation before marriage, age, German citizenship, religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, university degree, employment status, details about current and former occupation respectively, affiliation to public service, date of termination of full- or part-time employment, length of unemployment, fear of unemployment or loss of business.
Details about respondent’s former spouse: age, religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, details about current and former occupation respectively.
Details about respondent’s steady partner: length of relationship, common household, age, German citizenship, school education, vocational training, university degree, employment status, details about current and former occupation respectively, affiliation to public service, fear of unemployment or loss of business, date of termination of full- or part-time employment.
Details about respondent’s parents: cohabitation with respondent as adolescent, age of respondent when leaving parental home, religious affiliation, school education, vocational training, university education, details about parents’ occupation.
Description of household: size of household, number of persons older than 17 in household (reduced size of household).
Details about children: desire to have children.
Migration, residential biography and living environment: distance to last place of residence, duration of residence, self-description of place of residence, type of dwelling, size of dwelling, telephone in household, cat or dog in the household, environmental nuisances in area of residence.
13.) Technical data and paradata: Study number, digital object identifier, versioning, respondent ID, split halves, survey mode of the ALLBUS interview, contact strategy, percentage of completed questions.
14.) Geographical data: region of interview (East / West Germany), size of municipality.
15.) Added value: Body-Mass-Index, Inglehart-index, life forms (Schulz and Mikrozensus Typology), family situation (Schulz), type of household; occupational prestige (according to Treiman), Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS, according to Ganzeboom), International Socio-economic Index of Occupational Status (ISEI, according to Ganzeboom), magnitude prestige (according to Wegener), International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 1997 and 2011, class position (according to Goldthorpe), European Socio-economic Groups (ESeG), per capita income, equivalized income (OECD-modified scale), percentage of non-German residents at county level, transformation weight for analyses on household level or on individual level, east-west design weight.Die Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS) ist eine Trenderhebung, in der seit 1980 alle zwei Jahre eine Zufallsstichprobe der deutschen Bevölkerung befragt wird. Das primäre Ziel des Umfrageprogramms ist die Beobachtung von Einstellungen, Verhalten und sozialen Wandel in Deutschland.
ALLBUScompact ist als alternative Einsteigerversion (Public Use File) für die komplexer strukturierte Vollversion im Angebot. Speziell für ALLBUScompact wurde dementsprechend ein vereinfachtes Demografiemodul selektiert, das die wichtigsten demografischen Indikatoren in einer übersichtlichen Gruppe vereint. Die sonstigen inhaltlichen Fragemodule, die keine sensitiven Daten enthalten, entsprechen weiterhin vollständig der ALLBUS Vollversion (Scientific Use File). ALLBUScompact eignet sich daher vor allem für Einsteiger in die Datenanalyse.
Die ALLBUScompact Kumulation 1980-2021 versammelt alle Zeitreihen aus dem ALLBUS-Frageprogramm, d.h. der Datensatz enthält Daten für alle Fragen, die in wenigstens zwei der bisher 22 ALLBUS-Umfragen erhoben wurden.Trenderhebung zur gesellschaftlichen Dauerbeobachtung von Einstellungen, Verhalten und sozialem Wandel in Deutschland.
Die Schwerpunkte des kumulierten Datensatzes sind:
1.) Wirtschaft
2.) Politik
3.) Soziale Ungleichheit
4.) Ethnozentrismus und Minoritäten
5.) Familie
6.) Lebensstil und Persönlichkeit
7.) Gesundheit
8.) Religion und Weltanschauung
9.) Wertorientierungen
10.) Soziale Netzwerke und soziales Kapital
11.) Abweichendes Verhalten und Sanktion
12.) ALLBUScompact-Demographie
13.) Technische Daten und Paradaten
14.) Regionaldaten
15.) Ergänzungen und abgeleitete Variablen
Themen:
1.) Wirtschaft: Wahrnehmung der eigenen Wirtschaftslage und der aktuellen und zukünftigen Wirtschaftslage in der Bundesrepublik und im eigenen Bundesland.
2.) Politik:
Zufriedenheit mit der Bundesregierung, der Landesregierung, der deutschen Demokratie und mit dem Funktionieren des politischen Systems;
Fragen zu politischen Einstellungen: Selbsteinstufung und Einstufung politischer Parteien auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum, politisches Interesse, Parteineigung;
Wahlabsicht (Sonntagsfrage), Wahlberechtigung, Wahlbeteiligung an der letzten Bundestagswahl, Wahlrückerinnerungsfrage, Sympathie-Skalometer für diverse Parteien; Wahrscheinlichkeit, diverse Parteien zu wählen;
Politische Partizipation: Eigene Teilnahme bzw. Beteiligungsbereitschaft an ausgewählten Protestformen, Normen für politische Partizipation, Häufigkeit von Politikgesprächen mit Familie, Freunden, Bekannten, und Fremden;
Politische Sachfragen: Einstellungen zu Kernenergie, Todesstrafe für Terroristen, Privatisierung öffentlicher Betriebe, Freigabe von Abtreibung, Eingriffe der Politik in die Wirtschaft, Umweltschutz, härtere Bestrafung von Straftätern, Wichtigkeit sozialer Sicherung, Umverteilung von Einkommen, positive Auswirkungen von Einwanderern auf die Wirtschaft, Freihandel; Haltung zur Ausweitung oder Kürzung von Sozialleistungen, Einstellung zu einer Kürzung des Verteidigungsetats und perzipierte Haltung der Bundesregierung in solchen Fragen;
Demokratieverständnis;
Politisches Wissensquiz (Parteizugehörigkeit von Spitzenpolitikern, Aufgabe und Funktion von Institutionen usw.);
Politische Selbstwirksamkeit: Wahrnehmung von Einflussmöglichkeiten auf die Politik, bürgerferne Politiker, Selbstvertrauen in Bezug auf politische Gruppenarbeit, Befähigung der Mehrheit zu politischer Arbeit, zu viel Komplexität in der Politik, Bürgerorientierung Politiker;
Perzipierte Stärke von Konflikten zwischen gesellschaftlichen Gruppen;
Vertrauen in diverse Behörden und Institutionen;
Nationale und regionale Verbundenheit: Verbundenheit mit der eigenen Gemeinde, mit dem Bundesland, mit der alten Bundesrepublik bzw. mit der DDR, mit Gesamtdeutschland sowie mit der EU;
Einstellungen zur Wiedervereinigung: Einstellung zur Forderung nach mehr Opferbereitschaft im Westen und mehr Geduld im Osten, Wiedervereinigung ist vorteilhaft für Westen bzw. Osten, Zukunft im Osten hängt von Leistungsbereitschaft der Ostdeutschen ab, wechselseitige Fremdheit der Bürger, Leistungsdruck in den neuen Bundesländern, Einstellung zum Umgang mit individueller Stasi-Vergangenheit, Einschätzung des Sozialismus als Idee;
Beurteilung der Leistungen von Behörden und deren Verhalten gegenüber Bürgern;
Nationalstolz und Rechtsextremismus: Stolz auf nationale Errungenschaften; Stolz, Deutscher zu sein, Extremismusskala.
3.) Soziale Ungleichheit: Gerechter Anteil am Lebensstandard, Selbsteinschätzung der sozialen Schichtzugehörigkeit, Einstufung auf einer Oben-Unten-Skala; Vergleich mit Berufsposition des Vaters, Anzahl arbeitsloser Verwandten und Freunde, Beurteilung des bisherigen Berufserfolgs und berufliche Erwartung für die Zukunft, Einstellungen zum deutschen Wirtschaftssystem und Beurteilungen von wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Maßnahmen, Einschätzung gleicher Ausbildungschancen für alle, Voraussetzungen für Erfolg in der Gesellschaft, Einkommensunterschiede als Leistungsanreiz, Akzeptanz von sozialen Unterschieden, Bewertung der eigenen sozialen Sicherung.
4.) Ethnozentrismus und Minoritäten: Einstellungen zum Zuzug verschiedener Personengruppen; Wahrgenommene Konsequenzen der Anwesenheit von Ausländern in Deutschland, Einstellungen zu Geflüchteten, Ausländerbehandlung durch Behörden, Wichtigkeitseinstufung verschiedener Einbürgerungsvoraussetzungen; Einstellungsskala und Kontakte zu Ausländern (Split: Gastarbeiter) in der Familie, am Arbeitsplatz und in der Nachbarschaft oder im Freundeskreis; Einstellung zur doppelten Staatsbürgerschaft und zur Rechtsangleichung von Ausländern, Ausländeranteilsschätzung für Ost- und Westdeutschland sowie für die eigene Wohnumgebung, Wohnen in Wohngebieten mit hohem Ausländeranteil, perzipierte Lebensstildifferenzen, Indikatoren für soziale Distanz zu ethnischen Minderheiten und Ausländern, Befürwortung von Islamunterricht an Schulen, Einstellungen gegenüber dem Islam (Skala Islamophobie),Einstellungen gegenüber Juden (Skala Antisemitismus), Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von diskriminierendem Verhalten gegenüber Ausländern.
5.) Familie: Notwendigkeit von Familie und Heirat, ideale Kinderzahl, Einstellung zur Berufstätigkeit von Frauen und Müttern, Einstellungen zur Rolle von Mann und Frau in der Familie, Aufteilung der Haus- und Familienarbeit, Wichtigkeit von Erziehungszielen, wichtigste Erziehungsziele der Schule, Einstufung der Wichtigkeit ausgewählter Lernziele für ein Kind, gewünschte Eigenschaften von Kindern.
6.) Lebensstil und Persönlichkeit: Autoritarismus, Wichtigkeit von verschiedenen Lebensbereichen, Präferenzen bei einer beruflichen Tätigkeit (Sicherheit, Einkommen, Verantwortung etc.), Freizeitaktivitäten, Mediennutzung (Häufigkeit von Fernsehen pro Woche, Nachrichtenkonsum, Interesse an verschiedenen Arten von Fernsehsendungen, Häufigkeit der Lektüre von Tageszeitungen pro Woche, Musikgeschmack), Besitz eines Mobiltelefons.
7.) Gesundheit: Allgemeiner Gesundheitszustand, körperlicher und seelischer Zustand in den letzten vier Wochen, Beeinträchtigung bei körperlicher Belastung, chronische Krankheiten und Beschwerden, akute Krankheit in den letzten vier Wochen; Grund, Häufigkeit und Dauer von Arztbesuchen und Krankenhausaufenthalten; Grad der Erwerbsminderung/Schwerbehinderung, Rauchgewohnheiten, subjektive Lebenszufriedenheit, Körpergröße und Gewicht, Ernährungsgewohnheiten, Belastungen durch Arbeitsbedingungen, Mobbing, Perzeption allgemeiner Umweltbelastungen und persönlich empfundene Umweltbelastungen, Fragen zu AIDS (Informiertheit, Maßnahmen gegenüber Infizierten, Furcht vor Ansteckung, persönliche Verhaltensmaßnahmen, HIV-Infizierte im Bekanntenkreis).
8.) Religion und Weltanschauung: Konfession bzw. Religionszugehörigkeit, frühere Konfession, Kirchgangshäufigkeit, Häufigkeit des Besuchs eines anderen Gotteshauses, religiöse Erziehung im Elternhaus, Gebetshäufigkeit, Teilnahme an kirchlichen Aktivitäten, Häufigkeit von Meditation, Interesse an kirchlichen Sendungen in den Medien, Kosmologien, Selbsteinstufung der Religiosität, Gottesglaube, Glaubensinhalte, Lebenssinn, religiöse Indifferenz, Nachdenken über metaphysische Fragen, Erfahrung mit und Bewertung von außerkirchlicher Religiosität und Paraglaube, Bewertung von Religion vs. Wissenschaft, kirchliche Beerdigung, kirchliche Trauung, Taufe der Kinder, soziale Distanz zu verschiedenen Konfessionen.
9.) Wertorientierungen: Materialismus/Postmaterialismus (Wichtigkeit von Ruhe und Ordnung, von Bürgereinfluss, von Inflationsbekämpfung und von freier Meinungsäußerung), Individuelle Wertorientierungen (Klages), Einstellungen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch bei verschiedene