Zbirka ADP Dataverse
Not a member yet
251 research outputs found
Sort by
Slovensko javno mnenje 2011/1
No full textSlovensko javno mnenje 2011/1 je sklop raziskav, ki so del serije Slovensko javno mnenje. Je prva od dveh izvedb raziskave v letu 2011. Vprašalnik vključuje 4 vsebinske sklope, ki pokrivajo različne nacionalne in mednarodne raziskave: Okolje ISSP 2010, Zdravje in zdravstveno varstvo ISSP 2011, Raziskavo o odnosu delo-družina ter Psihično nasilje na delovnem mestu. Raziskava je bila izvedena na reprezentativnem vzorcu (N=1800, realiziran vzorec: N=1082) polnoletnih prebivalcev Republike Slovenije. Potekala je med marcem in junijem 2011, pri čemer je 52 anketarjev zbiralo podatke v 150 izbranih krajevnih okoljih v Sloveniji.Slovenian Public Opinion 2011/1 is a package of surveys, which belongs to the Slovenian Public Opinion survey series, and it represents the first SJM 2011 round. The questionnaire includes 4 topical sections which cover the following national and international surveys: Environment ISSP 2010, Health ISSP 2011, Survey on the relationship between work and family and psychological violence at workplace. The survey was performed on a representative sample (N=1800; realized sample N=1082) of inhabitants of the Republic of Slovenia, 18 years of age or older. It was conducted between March and June 2011. During that time 52 interviewers collected data in 150 selected local environments in Slovenia
Javnomnenjska raziskava o možnostih izboljšanja prometne ureditve v Ljubljani, 2011
No full textGre za prvo izmed dveh raziskav o možnostih izboljšanja prometne ureditve v Ljubljani prek analize percepcije zgoščevalne takse. Termin zgoščevalna taksa (congestion charging) označuje različne modele razreševanja cestno-prometne preobremenitve, prek katerih se od udeležencev v prometu (navadno predvsem uporabnikov osebnih vozil) zahteva plačevanje finančnega nadomestila za uporabo določenega segmenta cestnega omrežja na danem, navadno urbanem področju. Sam koncept zgoščevalne takse izhaja iz predpostavke, da raba osebnih vozil v prometu v specifičnih okoliščinah lahko proizvaja različne negativne učinke - eksternalije, denarno nadomestilo pa v tem kontekstu deluje kot mehanizem internalizacije teh stroškov oz. kompenzacije zanje. V raziskavi smo poleg merjenja stališč, mnenj in percepcij anketirancev o možnosti uvedbe nadomestila za vstop v mesto z avtomobilom anketirance prevpraševali še po drugih ukrepih , ki naj bi bili implementirani v okviru projekta CIVITAS Elan, zlasti pa o sistemu Parkiraj in se odpelji (P + R) - parkirišča na robu mesta, prvenstveno namenjena dnevnim migrantom v mesto, ki naj bi tam pustili osebni avtomobil in pot nadaljevali s katero od drugih voznih alternativ (mestni avtobus, kolo). Poleg konkretnih vprašanj o obeh tematikah smo v vprašalnik umestili še vprašanja, s katerimi smo merili druge relevantne sociokulturne razsežnosti obeh ukrepov – od posameznih mobilnostnih preferenc (vozne navade, naklonjenost možnim usmeritvam prometne politike in podobno) do demografske strukture (izobrazba, starost, delovni status etc) anketirane populacije.This is the first of two studies that analyze the possibility of improving traffic regulation in Ljubljana based on the public perception of congestion charging. The term congestion charging denotes different models of solving road congestion, in which the road users (especially automobile users) are required to pay financial compensation for the use of a particular segment of the road network in a given, usually urban area. The very concept of congestion charging is based on the assumption that the use of personal vehicles in circulation in specific circumstances can produce different adverse effects – externalities. Monetary compensation for the use of a specific road in this context acts as a mechanism of internalization of these costs i.e. as a form of compensation for externalities. The study not only measured the views, opinions and perceptions of respondents about the possibility of introducing compensation for car entry into specific areas of the city, but also investigated the perception of other measures to be implemented within the CIVITAS Elan project, in particular the concept of park-and-ride (P + R), use of alternative modes of transport (bus, bike) and parking facilities at the edge of a town, primarily intended for the use of commuters. In addition to questions on both topics, the questionnaire also covered other relevant socio-cultural dimensions of project measures – e.g. individual mobility (driving habits, preference on transport policy etc.) and demographics (education, age, working status etc.) of population surveyed
Registrski popis 2011
No full textRegistrski popis 2011 je eno od statističnih raziskovanj rednega dela programa statističnih raziskovanj, ki jih izvaja Statistični urad Republike Slovenije (SURS). Registrski popis je način priprave podatkov o prebivalstvu, gospodinjstvih, družinah in stanovanjih, pri katerem statistično povežemo podatke iz obstoječih administrativnih in statističnih virov brez dodatnega zbiranja na terenu. S prehodom na registrski popis se je Slovenija pridružila redkim evropskim državam, ki so tak način zbiranja in obdelave podatkov o prebivalstvu, gospodinjstvih in stanovanjih že izvedle z namenom zmanjšati administrativne ovire in znižati stroške raziskovanja. Za potrebe enostavnejše distribucije mikropodatkov drugim tipom uporabnikom mikropodatkov sta pripravljeni tudi anonimizirani podatkovni datoteki (osebe in stanovanja, brez gospodinjstev in družin), ki predstavljata 5-odstotni vzorec populacije gospodinjstev v Sloveniji.The register-based census 2011 is one of the regular statistical surveys conducted by the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. Registered-based census is a method of producing data on population, households and dwellings by the statistical linking together existent administrative and statistical data sources without using fieldwork enumeration. With the transition to the register-based census, Slovenia joined few European countries that had already implemented this way of collecting and processing data on population, households and dwellings to reduce the administrative burden and lower research expenses. There are two anonymised datasets (persons and dwellings, without households and families) prepared for the purpose of a simpler distribution of microdata to other types of microdata users. They represent a 5-percent sample of all Slovenian households
Slovensko javno mnenje 2011/2
No full textGlavni sklop vprašalnika je sestavljen iz vprašanj Mednarodne raziskave vrednot, in sicer 6. vala izvedbe. Preostali del vprašalnika pa predstavlja Ogledalo javnega mnenja. Združenje Mednarodne raziskave vrednot v obdobju 2010-2013 izvaja nov val raziskav, ki vključuje vsaj 50 držav. Vsebina raziskave je proceduralno ekvivalentna ponovitev Svetovne raziskave vrednot. Zajeta so razna področja vrednot in stališč do sodobnih družbenih problemov, kot so religiozne in moralne vrednote, vloga žensk v družbi. Več vprašanj je namenjenih tudi politični aktivnosti, pogledom na družbo, ter stopnji integracije posameznika v družbo, merjeno skozi sodelovanje v združenjih in društvih, raven zaupanja v družbi in podobno.The main part of the questionnaire is represented by World Value Survey questionnaire, 6th round. The remaining part of the questionnaires includes The Mirror of Public Opinion questions. The World Values Survey Association is carrying out a new wave of surveys during 2010-2013. This wave will cover at least 50 countries. Broad topics covered are: work, the meaning and purpose of life, religious and moral values and the role of women. Several questions are dedicated to political activity, views of society, integration of individuals into society, measured with their membership in various social associations, level of trust in society and similar topics
Uporaba kontracepcije in spolnost pri ženskah v Sloveniji, 2011
No full textIzhodišče raziskave je ugotavljanje prisotnosti prekinjenega spolnega odnosa (PSO) kot oblike kontracepcije v Sloveniji v dveh teoretskih okvirjih, tj. medicinski pogled na telo in spolnost ter feministična kritika medicinskega diskurza kontracepcije. Cilj naloge je bil raziskati in opredeliti vlogo PSO v družbeni konstrukciji ženske in moške seksualnosti, ugotoviti, kakšen je njegov položaj v slovenski seksualni kulturi ter s feministične perspektive oceniti njegov vpliv na spolno reproduktivno zdravje žensk. Cilj je bil še ugotoviti, zakaj je, kljub številnim drugim metodam kontracepcije, PSO še vedno svetovan in zelo pogosto uporabljen ter zakaj ga slovenski ginekologi_nje še vedno propagirajo kot obliko kontracepcije. V ta namen je bilo izvedenih 52 intervjujev z uporabnicami kontracepcije ter 27 intervjujev z ginekologi in ginekologinjami v Sloveniji. Zaradi občutljivosti podatkov v ADP hranimo le intervjuje z uporabnicami kontracepcije.The starting point of the research was to determine the presence of coitus interruptus as a form of contraception in Slovenia in two theoretical frames, ie. a medical view of the body and sexuality and a feminist critique of the medical discourse of contraception. The main objectives of the study were to research and define the role of the coitus interruptus in the construction of female and male sexuality, to find out its position in Slovenian sexual culture and from a feminist perspective assess its impact on the sexual reproductive health of women. The additional objective was to establish why despite many other methods of birth control, coitus interruptus is still advised and very commonly used and find out why Slovenian gynaecologists still promote it as a form of contraception. For this reason, 52 interviews with birth control users and 27 interviews with gynaecologists from Slovenia were conducted. Due to sensitivity of the data, only interviews with birth control users are available at the ADP
Mladina 2010
No full textOsnovni namen raziskave je bil ustvariti celovito sliko o življenju mladih (med 15. in 29. letom) v Sloveniji. Študija predstavlja konceptualno in metodološko nadaljevanje tradicije raziskovanja mladih v Sloveniji, z nekaterimi dodelavami. Kot osnova za oblikovanje metodološkega pristopa so bile uporabljene že opravljene študije mladih v Nemčiji (Hurrelmann et al., 2002, 2006) ter pristopi in koncepti, ki se pojavljajo v dosedanjem raziskovanju mladih v Sloveniji od leta 1985 naprej. Glavni obravnavani problemski sklopi so naslednji: demografske spremembe in medgeneracijsko sodelovanje, izobraževanje in usposabljanje, ustvarjalnost, kultura, prosti čas, virtualizacija vsakodnevnega življenja, zaposlovanje in podjetništvo, trajnostni način družbenega delovanja, bivanjske in stanovanjske razmere, zdravje in dobro počutje, participacija in socialna vključenost, prostovoljne dejavnosti, mobilnost mladih in globalizacija.The primary purpose of this research was to create a comprehensive picture of the lives of youth (between 15 and 29) in Slovenia. The study represents a conceptual and methodological continuation of the tradition of youth research in Slovenia, with some refinements. Basis for a methodological approach were studies already carried out in Germany (Hurrelmann et al., 2002, 2006), and the approaches and concepts that appear in previous researches of youth in Slovenia since 1985. The main presented problems are: demographic changes and intergenerational cooperation, education and training, creativity, culture, leisure, virtualization of everyday life, employment and entrepreneurship, sustainable way of social action, housing and living conditions, health and well-being, participation and social inclusion, voluntarism, youth mobility and globalization
Javnomnenjska raziskava na 4 obmejnih območjih Slovenije, 2010
No full textRaziskava, izvedena leta 2010 na obmejnem območju Slovenije z Italijo, preučuje različne vidike čezmejne mobilnosti ter prostorske mejne propustnosti in soodvisnosti ter položaj slovenskih obmejnih območij po vstopu Slovenije v EU. Avtorji so želeli tudi spoznati pričakovanja obmejnega prebivalstva glede učinkov vstopa Slovenije v schengenski prostor na nadaljnji razvoj odnosov. Podatki so bili zbrani s pomočjo javnomnenjske telefonske ankete v okviru programske skupine ARRS »Območja kulturnega stika v integracijskih procesih« in sicer na štirih obmejnih območjih Slovenije (območju z Avstrijo, s Hrvaško, z Italijo in z Madžarsko). Podatki iz vseh območij so dostopni v ADP (glej ADP-IDNo JMOOSA10, JMOOSH10 in JMOOSM10).The research, carried out in 2010 in the border area between Slovenia and Italy, examines various aspects of cross-border mobility and spatial border permeability and co-dependency, as well as the situation of Slovenian border areas after Slovenia's entry into the EU. The authors also wanted to find out the expectations of the population in the border areas regarding the effects of Slovenia's entry into the Schengen area on the further development of relations. The data were collected with a public opinion telephone poll within the ARRS program group "Areas of cultural contact in integration processes", in the four border areas of Slovenia (the area with Austria, Croatia, Italy and Hungary). Data from all areas are available in ADP (see ADP-IDNo JMOOSA10, JMOOSH10 and JMOOSM10)
Slovensko javno mnenje 2010
No full textSlovensko javno mnenje (SJM) 2010 je raziskava, ki je bila opravljena kot del Evropske družboslovne raziskave 2010 (ESS 2010). ESS je akademsko vodena mednarodna anketa, ki je bila do sedaj izvedena že v več kot 30-ih državah. Cilji raziskovanja so trije, in sicer: nadzirati in interpretirati spreminjajoče se družbene vrednote in vedenje v Evropi ter raziskati, kako so povezane s spremembami v evropskih inštitucijah. Drugi cilj je združiti izboljšano napredno metodologijo anketnega raziskovanja v posameznih evropskih državah. Tretji cilj je med drugim razviti serijo evropskih družboslovnih kazalcev, vključno z vedenjskimi kazalci. Slovensko javno mnenje 2010 je del petega kroga programa ESS, v katerem je bilo v raziskavo poleg Slovenije zajetih 27 držav, pretežno iz Evropske unije. V tem krogu sta poleg osnovnega vsebinskega modula vključena še dva dodatna rotirajoča vsebinska modula, in sicer: »delo, družina in blaginja: implikacija ekonomske recesije« (vključen tudi v ESS krogu 2) ter »zaupanje v kazensko pravosodje: primerjalna evropska analiza«. Pri raziskovanju se uporablja samo najnatančnejšo metodologijo – dosledno naključno vzorčenje, ciljno stopnjo sodelovanja vsaj 70 odstotkov in natančne protokole prevajanja.Slovenian Public Opinion (SJM) 2010 is a survey, which was conducted as a part of the European Social Survey 2010 (ESS 2010). ESS is an academically-driven multi-country survey, which has been administered in over 30 countries to date. Its three aims are, firstly – to monitor and interpret changing public attitudes and values within Europe and to investigate how they interact with Europe's changing institutions, secondly - to advance and consolidate improved methods of cross-national survey measurement in Europe and beyond, and thirdly - to develop a series of European social indicators, including attitudinal indicators. Slovenian Public Opinion 2010 is a part of the fifth ESS round, which, besides Slovenia, covers 27, mostly EU countries. Round 5 includes a core module and 2 additional rotating modules on the following topics: Work, Family and Well-being: The Implications of Economic Recession (also fielded in ESS round 2) and Trust in Criminal Justice: A Comparative European Analysis. The survey employs the most rigorous methodologies – it involves strict random probability sampling, a minimum target response rate of 70% and rigorous translation protocols
Študijski krožki 2010
No full textŠtudijski krožki so majhne skupine za neformalno učenje, kjer se zbirajo, učijo in družijo radovedni odrasli ter s svojimi rezultati prispevajo k razvoju domačega okolja. Potekajo po preprostih, a stabilnih pravilih že od leta 1993. Sistematično spremljanje je bilo zasnovano z namenom letnih poročil, ki so po desetih letih prešla v raziskovano zasnovane analize. Namen spremljanja in raziskovanja na podlagi teh podatkov je ugotavljanje značilnosti neformalnega učenja v majhnih skupinah, ki poteka po vsej Sloveniji celo leto, financira pa ga MŠŠ pod določenimi pogoji (usposobljenost mentorja, upoštevanje načel ŠK). Raziskovanje poteka v okviru rednih nalog Andragoškega centra Slovenije. Rezultati raziskav služijo financerju za razvoj izobraževanja odraslih (npr. odzivanje na potrebe), za raziskovalno preučevanje specifičnih vprašanj (npr. odzivnosti določenih segmentov družbe, posebnosti skupnostnega učenja), za opazovanje časovne dinamike razvoja (npr. finančna vlaganja občin v izobraževanje odraslih) in za primerjave s tujino, zlasti s Skandinavskimi državami.Study circles are a non-formal way of learning, which gather people who wish to learn something new on certain topics, to keep each other company and to do something useful for their living environment or for other people. Study circles have spread all over Slovenia and present a way of motivating those parts of the population who rarely get engaged in standard forms of education. For small places and places where there is a lack of learning possibilities, study circles present an opportunity for learning, meeting and being active in the community. Their aims are to promote knowledge necessary for the development and preservation of rural areas, and for active citizenship, as well as to stimulate the participants' personal development. The purpose of monitoring and researching study circles is to determine characteristics of informal learning in small groups taking place across Slovenia throughout the year. Learning is financed by Slovene ministry of education under certain conditions (mentor capabilities, the principles of study circles). Exploration takes place in the regular tasks of Slovenian Institute for Adult Education. Research results serve financer for the development of adult education, an exploratory study of specific issues (eg. the response of certain segments of society, the specificities of the Community Learning), to observe the time dynamics (eg. financial investments of municipalities in adult education) and for comparisons with other countries, especially Scandinavian ones
Uspešnost samostojnih inovatorjev v Sloveniji, 2010
No full textNamen raziskave je bil proučiti problematiko samostojnih inovatorjev, ki je tudi v mednarodnem merilu relativno malo raziskana. Informacije so bile zbrane z osebnimi intervjuji posameznih inovatorjev pa tudi z organizacijo fokusne skupine, kjer so poleg inovatorjev sodelovali tudi predstavniki nekaterih pomembnejših državnih institucij, ki so odgovorne ali imajo vpliv na nacionalni inovacijski sistem in razvojne strategije.The purpose of this study was to explore problems of the independent innovators which are also at the international level relatively little studied. Information were gathered by personal interviews with individual innovators and by focus group where, besides innovators, also representatives of some important state institutions which are responsible or have influence on national innovatory system and development strategies collaborated