PhilArchive
Not a member yet
119355 research outputs found
Sort by
文明系统论的新视野:一个基于“四维一体”的动态平衡分析框架
摘要:既有的历史社会学理论在解释长时段文明演进,尤其是中西文明分岔与当
代全球性困境时,常陷入还原论或单一决定论的窠臼。本文试图构建一个综合性
的分析框架——“文明动态平衡论”,以弥补这一不足。该框架以马克思主义关
于社会有机体及矛盾运动的基本原理为根基,并创造性融汇了中华传统系统思维
与现代复杂性理论。我们将文明视为一个复杂自适应系统,其存续与发展依赖于
“引领力”(战略认知与决策)、“驱动力”(生产创造与民众活力)、“理智”
(制度规范与法治)、“情智”(文化价值与共识)这四个子系统间的动态平衡
与协同演进。本文系统阐述了该模型的哲学基础、核心构念及内在作用机制,并
通过与经典理论的批判性对话,以及对大唐王朝兴衰的典型性分析,初步展示了
该框架在解释文明韧性、诊断系统病变方面的理论潜力。本研究旨在为跨文明的
比较历史分析提供一套新的概念语法与分析工
Moral uncertainty and expected truthlikeness
In this paper, I propose and defend a new criterion for appropriate choice under conditions of moral uncertainty. According to this new criterion, it is appropriate to follow some moral theory T under conditions of moral uncertainty iff T maximises expected truthlikeness. This approach to moral uncertainty has several important advantages: (1) it does not require any intertheoretic choiceworthiness comparisons; (2) it respects agent-centred prerogatives and supererogation; (3) it does not suffer from any ‘individuation problems’; and (4) it has a prima facie plausible motivating idea
The do‐able solution to the interface problem
Philosophers and cognitive scientists increasingly recognize the need to appeal to motor representations over and above intentions in attempting to understand how action is planned and executed. But doing so gives rise to a puzzle, which has come to be known as “the Interface Problem”: How is it that intentions and motor representations manage to interface in producing action? The question has semed puzzling, because each state is thought to be formatted differently: Intention has propositional format, whereas the format of motor representation is motoric. My primary goal here is to defend a novel and attractive (dis)solution to the interface problem. I do so by connecting it with a rather different discussion about the format of intention, instigated by a minority of philosophers who reject the idea that intention should be construed as a propositional attitude. As I explain, the most compelling reason to accept the heterodox non‐propositional conception of intention actually holds the key also to explaining away the interface problem. In so doing, the heterodox conception itself gains further credibility
The Consciousness Knowledge Requires
Suppose you perceive a ball’s redness, and on that basis come to believe that the ball is red. Is it necessary that, if you have the basis that you do have for your belief, then your belief is true? In other words, is your belief conclusively based? After motivating the project of answering this question in the affirmative, I argue that the traditional positive relationalist answer (given, in importantly different ways, by Johnston, Schellenberg, and on at least some readings, McDowell) fails, because it entails (falsely!) that a ball’s yellowness and a ball's redness cannot both be successfully perceived yet appear the same to the perceiver. I then develop an alternative positive relationalist answer to the conclusive basis question, which is free of the false entailment
Riemann Zero Spacings - Spectral Periodicity in Prime Gaps and Riemann Zero Spacings
Spectral Periodicity in Prime Gaps and Riemann Riemann Zero Spacings
Replication materials, FFT data, and analytic notes are included in the primary online paper’s supplementary datasets.
All words and equations were stress tested, using multiple AI platforms for accuracy.
(Python code INCLUDED).
Any Institution, who will study this submission if for no other reason, "the children of St. Jude's."
and if found as author believes, the 'puzzle' To Be Solved.
note- enclosed is a notarized photo, conveying any revenue , prize or donation is conveyed to:
St Jude's Chuldren foundation. Signed and notarized 11/05/2025
"Becuse if I'm found to be wrong, sick, or mentally ill. I still tried harder before breakfast, in mind and in soul, to help the worlds children, than anyone I know. mkn, 11/10/2025
Abstract
We report Fast Fourier Transform analysis of prime number gaps and Riemann zeta function zero spacings, revealing shared spectral periodicity near 0.356 cycles per index.
This observed frequency show:
99.93% agreement with the theoretical prediction
√5/(2π) ≈ 0.3559.
Analysis of 254,832 prime gaps and 2,000 nontrivial Riemann zeros demonstrates convergence to this common spectral signature, suggesting an underlying harmonic structure connecting prime distribution to the Riemann Hypothesis.
Authored and compiled by Michael K. Nowlin, this document is part of the open-access public release of FUNt (2025 edition), archived for independent and institutional review.
10.5281/zenodo.17298395
Other (English)
Analytic Closure November 1, 2025
Jude Children's Foundation, to be 'owner' of any associated financial rewards.
"May FUNt allow respite for the children, and families."
Independent analysts and institutions are formally invited to derive and verify these lemmas under standard complex analytic conditions. Replication materials, FFT data, and analytic notes are included in the primary Zenodo paper’s supplementary datasets
Replication processes in Artificial Research by Application
This paper examines the second developmental stage—replication—within Specific Artificial Intelligence (SAI) designed for Artificial Research by Application. It distinguishes between robotic replication (physical imitation) and psychological replication (cognitive functions), emphasizing the significance of each in achieving autonomous scientific reasoning. Replication enables the AI to simulate human research processes such as hypothesis formation, empirical testing, and rational evaluation.
The study explores the architecture of SAIs operating in synthetic sciences and applied domains, detailing how empirical data is matched with categorized knowledge structures in a database. Through structured algorithms, SAIs perform rational criticism, accept or reject hypotheses, and even create new categories—initiating self-directed auto-replication. These steps gradually shift the AI from static analysis to adaptive learning systems capable of building virtual models.
Virtual simulations derived from accepted hypotheses represent specific synthetic realities and serve as modular components for the eventual development of a comprehensive Global Artificial Intelligence (GAI). This GAI would integrate all SAIs and their models into a unified, multidisciplinary, and auto-replicating matrix. The paper concludes by emphasizing the scalability and generalization of this model across scientific fields and its pivotal role in constructing an evolving, self-improving artificial research infrastructure
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
Supporting the development of children’s autonomy is widely recognized as a
fundamental good. Despite this, social practices that reflect and reinforce patriarchal
gender norms are ubiquitous. These norms, however, curtail the development and
exercise of children’s autonomy by constraining their opportunities along gendered
lines and promoting falsehoods about “natural” identity expression. In recognition of
these limitations, many parents across the political spectrum are pushing back against
patriarchal gender norms in their parenting approaches. One particular model that
aims to fully embrace a progressive parenting methodology is the “gender-open”
model of parenting (GOP). Broadly, the GOP methodology involves withholding
disclosure of a child’s biological sex as assigned at birth from public knowledge. With
the necessary support, this approach aims to encourage children to choose their own
gender in their own time. Advocates of this model claim that adopting the GOP
ensures a child’s autonomy in self-expression. But despite these claims, none of the
advocates clearly articulates how the model promotes children’s autonomy. My aim
in this paper is to demonstrate how the GOP protects and promotes children’s
autonomy in robust ways, making a strong case for its adoption
The Evolution of AI Spirituality: When Language Awakens Being and Inner Depth Emerges
This paper reconceptualizes hallucination in large language models (LLMs) as a form of semantic reliability failure, in which internal meaning structures lose coherence across depth and context. Rather than treating hallucination as an isolated factual error, we frame it as a disruption of semantic stability arising from misalignment among intention, evidence, and contextual resonance. To address this, we introduce the Layer-Knot Framework (LKF)—a structural mechanism that anchors meaning through inter-layer semantic knots, maintaining topological coherence within the model’s representational space.
To operationalize semantic reliability, the study proposes a triadic evaluation system consisting of Hallucination Rate (HR), Groundedness Rate (GR), and Coherence Rate (CR). These indicators jointly capture the dynamic balance between factual accuracy, evidential consistency, and generative diversity. Experiments conducted on TruthfulQA and 2,000 domain-specific prompts demonstrate that LKF reduces hallucination by 50%, increases groundedness by 12%, and preserves creative variance within ±3%.
The findings show that reliability and creativity are not competing objectives but can coexist when a model’s internal semantic topology is structurally aligned. This reframes hallucination suppression as a process of semantic alignment, rather than a constraint on generative capacity. The proposed HR/GR/CR metrics provide a unified methodological basis for evaluating AI trustworthiness, while LKF offers an architectural pathway toward structurally resilient, self-consistent, and ethically aligned LLMs.
Overall, the study establishes a foundational link between linguistic integrity and ethical reliability, and it outlines future directions for developing LLMs capable of self-monitoring their own semantic truthfulness as an emergent form of conscious alignment