INZ Open Journal Systems (Institute of Contemporary History)
Not a member yet
    4877 research outputs found

    Odmevi na protisrbske demonstracije 1902 v Zagrebu v slovenskem časopisju

    No full text
    In August 1902, the most important newspaper of the Serbian community in Croatia, The Srbobran, neglecting to keep a stance of professional objectivity, published an article by Nikola Stojanović on the Serbs and the Croats, in which the author denied the existence of the Croatian nationality. This article was the cause of a three-day anti- Serbian demonstration in Zagreb, which turned into a rampage of destruction aimed at Serbian shops and bars. The Slovene newspapers reported extensively on the events, but their commentaries proved that they were badly, or - in some cases - not at all acquainted with the situation. While the liberally-oriented Slovenski Narod ascribed the blame for the conflicts »between brothers of the same blood« to religious differences, the clericallyoriented Slovenec, on the other hand, stressed that the Catholic faith was the soul of the Slavs, and the socialdemocratic Rdeči Prapor remained faithful to the slogan »Proletarians of all countries, unite!«. The Slovene papers in the regions of Gorizia and Trieste, and those in Styria, however, only appealed to the public to uphold and maintain the unity of the South Slavonic peoples.Avgusta 1902 je osrednji medij srbske skupnosti na Hrvaškem Srbobran brez distance objavil članek Nikole Stojanovića o Srbih in Hrvatih v katerem je zanikal hrvaško nacionalnost. Članek je povzročil trodnevne protisrbske demonstracije v Zagrebu, ki so se sprevrgle v nasilno uničevanje srbskih trgovin in lokalov. Slovensko časopisje je dogodke obsežno komentiralo, vendar je pri tem pokazalo, da hrvaške razmere slabo ali sploh ne pozna. Medtem ko je liberalni Slovenski narod krivil za spopade »med brati iste krvi« vero, je klerikalni Slovenec izpostavil katoliško vero kot dušo slovanstva, socialdemokratski Rdeči prapor je ostal zvest krilatici: »proletarci vseh dežel, združite se«, Slovenski časopisi na Goriškem, Tržaškem in štajerskem pa so zgolj pozivali k enotnosti južnoslovanskih narodov

    Po sledeh zgodovinskega Dracule, romunskega kneza Vlada Ţepeşa

    No full text
    On the Trail of the Historical Dracula, Vlad Tepes, Prince of RomaniaPo sledeh zgodovinskega Dracule, romunskega kneza Vlada Ţepeş

    Ljubezen in revolucija: Pisma Slavka Šlandra Dani Ročnikovi

    No full text
    The history of the workers\u27 and revolutionary movement in Slovenia in the first half of the 20th century features Slavko Šlander as one of its most prominent and noteworthy protagonists. A capable and well-educated man and a dedicated revolutionary, Šlander was persecuted and imprisoned several times already before the Second World War. When Slovenia was occupied, Šlander was one of the first and leading organizers of the anti-fascist resistance movement - and also one of the first victims of the Nazi terror. Arrested and tortured by the occupying forces, Slander was shot in Maribor as a hostage on August 23, 1941. Although much is known about Slander the revolutionary, less is known about his private life. The following article contains - for the first time in print - the letters written by Šlander from 1932 to 1940 to his fiancée Dana Ročnik. These letters, many of which were written in prison, reveal to us in the most simple and sincere way possible, the depth and the broad-mindedness of the character of this man.Zgodovina slovenskega delavskega in revolucionarnega gibanja v 1. polovici 20. stoletja omenja Slavka Šlandra kot enega njegovih najpomembnejših in najmarkantnejših osebnosti. Zaradi svojega političnega delovanja je bil ta sposobni, izobraženi in predani revolucionar že v letih pred 2. svetovno vojno pogosto preganjan in zaprt, ob okupaciji pa ga najdemo med prvimi organizatorji protifašističnega odpora. Šlander je tudi ena prvih žrtev nacističnega terorja, saj so ga po aretaciji in mučenju, 24. 8. 1941 v Mariboru ustrelili kot talca. Manj znano je njegovo zasebno življenje, zato v pričujočem prispevku prvič objavljamo njegova pisma, ki jih je med letoma 1932 in 1940 pisal svoji zaročenki Dani Ročnikovi. Ravno pisma, mnoga napisana tudi v zaporu, namreč na najpreprostejši in najpristnejši način odkrivajo večplastnost in širino Šlandrove osebnosti

    "Čemu ti ženski časopisi?": Žensko vprašanje in odnos do ženske v slovaških ženskih časopisih do razpada Habsburške monarhije

    No full text
    The first Slovakian women\u27s newspaper The Dennica was published in 1898. It can be considered as the first larger independent enterprise of Slovakian women, which had also an all-Slovakian character. Due to repressive relation of Hungarian authorities to the second-rate Slovakian ethnical community, the newspaper also published articles, which were hiding Slovakian national question in the female issues. The Dennica, as well as a few years\u27 younger women\u27s newspaper The Živena strongly restricted the complexity of female question. Both newspapers aimed particularly at spiritual and religious awakening of women so that they could operate more successfully in their families and thus also for their nation. The Dennica and The Živena did not publish any articles about feminism and female emancipation, which were already present in the West at the time; the first articles with such content, although very limited, appeared sporadically as late as in the years before the First World War.leta 1898 je izšel prvi slovaški ženski časopis Dennica, ki ga moremo šteti za prvo večje samostojno podjetje slovaških žensk, ki je imelo vseslovaški karakter. Zaradi represivnega odnosa madžarske oblasti do drugorazredne slovaške etnične skupnosti je časopis v žensko vprašanje skril tudi narodnostno vprašanje. Kompleksnost ženskega vprašanja je bila v okviru Dennice in tudi nekaj let mlajšega ženskega časopisa Živene močno omejena. Časopisa sta delovala predvsem v namen duhovne in duševne prebuje žensk, da bi tako lahko uspešneje delovale v okviru družine in s tem za narod. Pisanja o feminizmu in ženski emancipaciji, kot so se dotedaj že razvila na zahodu, v Dennici in Živeni niso bila objavljena; vsebinsko dokaj okleščena so se tu in tam pojavila šele v letih pred prvo svetovno vojno

    Pijani in zapravljivi: Preklicne zgodbe radovljiškega sodnega okraja iz zadnjega desetletja avstro-ogrske monarhije

    No full text
    In the described period (the last decade of Austria-Hungary and the beginning of the new state) the institution of revocation was the last measure to which the authorities could have resorted with which they could deprive chronically drunk proprietors of the right to do business. Thus they could not squander all their fortune and burden the municipal public purse with the responsibility of maintaining themselves and their families. When determining this business inability, the court circuits issued interesting notes depicting how the drunkenness of proprietors (farmers) was looked upon in the society at the time. The prevailing belief at the time was, that men could drink since this was the habit in the country, and that there was nothing to worry about if they got drunk from time to time. Women, on the contrary, were reprimanded for any kind of drunkenness and had to prove themselves to be good housewives - otherwise they could have been even held responsible for drinking habits of their husbands.Institut preklica je bil v obravnavanem obdobju (zadnjih deset let Avstro-Ogrske in začetek nove države) izhod v sili, s katerim so kronično pijanim posestnikom lahko odvzeli poslovno sposobnost, da niso mogli zapraviti vsega premoženja in tako preživljanje sebe ter svojcev naprtiti občinski blagajni. Pri ugotavljanju te poslovne nesposobnosti pa so na okrajnih sodiščih nastali zanimivi zapisniki, ki nam kažejo, kako je na pijančevanje posestnikov (kmetov) gledala tedanja družba. Za moške se je smatralo, da lahko pijejo, kot je to pač v deželi v navadi in če so se kdaj opili, nič hudega. Nasprotno pa se je ženskam štela vsaka opitost in so morale skrbeti za to, da so bile dobre gospodinje, ker so v nasprotnem primeru lahko celo veljale za vzrok, da so se njihovi možje zapili

    Kopernik med Slovenci

    No full text
    In his text, the author describes the early Copernican ideas noted in the catalogues of Ljubljana libraries and bookstores. The library of the Ljubljana Lords of Auersperg, Mayr’s Sales Catalogue of 1678, and the books of the Ljubljana Jesuits are discussed. Although most of the sources cited belong to the era after the trial of Galileo, they nevertheless prove that Ljubljana scholars indeed participated in the exchange of ideas that took place in those days. Research was conducted in the astronomy section of the Auersperg’s library and the contents and meaning of particular books were analysed. The material gathered from this library became the foundation for the author’s assessment of the Auerspergs’ scientific ideas, and most importantly their opinion on Copernicus. The Ljubljana Jesuits and their library were also supported by the Auerspergs. The narration culminates at the previously unknown fact that the Ljubljana Jesuits owned the famous second edition of Copernicus (1566), which today can be found in the National and University Library of Ljubljana.Avtor opisuje sprejem Kopernikovega nauka med Slovenci. Koperniku sledi skozi popise astronomskih knjig v ljubljanskih knjižnicah in knjigarnah. Obravnava predvsem knjižnico ljubljanskega knežjega dvorca, Mayerjev prodajni katalog iz leta 1678 in knjige ljubljanskih jezuitov. Čeprav večina uporabljenih virov izvira iz obdobja po Galilejevem procesu, z njimi vendarle dokazuje pomembno vpetost naših krajev v filozofske razprave na evropski ravni. Avtor nadalje raziskuje vsebine in pomen posameznih astronomskih knjig turjaške knežje knjižnice. Na ugotovitvah utemelji razmišljanja o filozofskih prepričanjih Turjačanov takoj po njihovi vrnitvi v katoliško vero in še posebej o njihovem odnosu do kopernikanizma. Turjačani so podpirali ljubljanske jezuite in njihovo knjižnico. Pripoved poveže z izjemnim odkritjem, da so že ljubljanski jezuiti imeli znamenito drugo izdajo Kopernika (1566), ki se še danes nahaja v NUK in nemo pripoveduje svojo zgodbo

    1,487

    full texts

    4,877

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    INZ Open Journal Systems (Institute of Contemporary History)
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇