INZ Open Journal Systems (Institute of Contemporary History)
Not a member yet
4877 research outputs found
Sort by
"Ali naj dame kolesarijo?": Kolesarke in žensko telo na prehodu iz 19. v 20. stoletje
No full textIn his article the author presents multi-layered relations between the two simultaneously emerging phenomena of female emancipation and female cycling (and female sport activities in general) by analysing the opposing views of Anton Aškerc, a famous writer, to female cyclists and the replies to his views. Thus, female cycling as a massive and popular phenomenon at the turn to the 20th century depicts very interesting views on the role of female body in the period of modernisation, when the norms about what is healthy and beautiful were under the pressure of social changes.Avtor v prispevku skozi analizo nasprotovanja ženskemu kolesarjenju znanega literata Antona Aškerca in odgovorov nanj razkriva večplastna razmerja med sočasnim pojavom ženske emancipacije in ženskim kolesarstvom (oziroma ženskimi telesnimi in športnimi praksami nasploh). Žensko kolesarstvo kot masovni popularni fenomen na prehodu v 20. stoletje tako odpira zelo zanimive poglede na vlogo ženskega telesa v času modernizacije, ko so bile norme o zdravem in lepem podvržene družbenim spremembam
Tagblattova obrita in pomalana svinjska glava
No full textThe article discusses the third jury deliberation in Ljubljana, following the re-introduction of jury courts. In 1870, the newspaper of the Carniolan Liberal Germans, the Laibacher Tagblatt (1868-1880) had apparently made libcllious comments aimed at the sexton from Brezje in a contribution it had published on a bewitched innkeeper from Carinthia. In response, the sextan filed a lawsuit against the editor in chief of the Laibachcr Tagblatt, Mr. O. Bamberg. The trial aroused considerable interest in the papers at the time (the Novice, Slovenski narod, Zgodnja dánica, and the Laibachcr Tagblatt), as it was seen as a part of the struggle taking place in Carniola at that time between the Slovenian and the German Party. The plaintiff\u27s counsel occupied a prominent seat in the Slovenian Party, while the defendant\u27s barrister was no less a prominent member of the German Party, which advocated the liberal tendency to reduce the Church\u27s privileges within the Habsburg Monarchy. The trial ended with an acquittal.Prispevek govori o tretji porotni razpravi v Ljubljani po ponovni uvedbi porotnih sodišč, beta 1870 je časnik kranjskih liberalnih Nemcev Laibacher Tagblatt (1868-1880) v nekem dopisu o začaranem krčmarju iz Koroške žalil mežnarja iz Brezij. Ta je tožil odgovornega urednika Laibacher Tagblatta O. Bamberga. Obravnava je zbudila veliko pozornosti v tedanjih časnikih (Novice, Slovenski narod, Zgodnja dánica in Laibacher Tagblatt), saj je bila del boja med slovensko in nemško stranko na Kranjskem. Zastopnik tožnika je imel vidno mesto v slovenski stranki, zagovornik obtoženca pa v nemški stranki, ki je sledila liberalnim tendencam po zmanjševanju cerkvenih privilegijev v habsburški monarhiji. Obravnava se je končala z oprostilno sodbo
Sočno o suhi pašti, bombah in še o čem: Marta Verginella: Suha pašta, pesek in bombe: Vojni dnevnik Bruna Trampuža
No full textJanošikove »pustolovščine«: Jak Koprivc: Generalov let: Spomini generala Ivana Dolničarja
No full textNekaj o žlendranju, plozanju in tračanju: Mojca Ramšak: Žrtvovanje resnice: Opoj zmuzljivih diskretnih nediskretnosti
No full text»Proč s šmarnico«
No full textIn the 1920s a stereotype developed in Slovenia about the poisonous and harmful wine ‘šmarnica’. According to the stereotype ‘šmarnica’, because it contained methyl alcohol, caused madness, blindness, irrational behaviour, and aggressiveness. The stereotype was furthered and maintained particularly by articles in the winegrowing periodicals, and the authorities, too, joined the fight against ‘šmarnica’. In the 1920s the first measures and regulations were adopted to restrict the development and sale of ‘šmarnica’ and other native grapevine varieties and their wines. The authorities continued these activities until the beginning of World War II. Testimony to this are the minutes taken at the Dravska banovina province council meetings, which speak of long quarrels over what measures should be taken and whether they were needed in the first place. The representatives of the districts that produced the most \u27šmarnica\u27 initially opposed the provincial measures; however, they probably realized that the \u27ban\u27, who headed the province, was unrelenting in his decision. They eventually realized it was pointless to oppose the measures, and their opposition to them gradually diminished. The stereotype of the dangerous ‘šmarnica’ had thus successfully found support and became widespread. It was only later, when sample analyses showed that the wine ‘šmarnica’ contained only small quantities of methyl alcohol, that it became clear that the true danger in \u27šmarnica\u27 had a different origin. ‘Šmarnica’ was dangerous not because of the methyl alcohol, but because of the competition that this wine type represented for the quality types that found themselves in deep market crisis after the World War I.V dvajsetih letih prejšnjega stoletja se je na Slovenskem razvil stereotip o strupenem in škodljivem šmarničnem vinu, ki naj bi zaradi vsebnosti metilnega alkohola povzročalo norost, slepoto, neracionalno vedenje in agresivnost. Stereotip so razvijali in ohranjali nekateri članki predvsem v vinogradniškem časopisju, v boj proti šmarnici pa je stopila tudi oblast. S številnimi ukrepi in odredbami je že v 20-ih letih začela omejevati pridelavo in prodajo šmarnice in ostalih samorodnih trtnih vrst ter njihovega vina. S temi aktivnostmi je nadaljevala vse do začetka 2. svetovne vojne, o čemer lepo pričajo tudi zapisniki sej banskega sveta Dravske banovine, na katerih so se kresala mnenja o tem, kakšni naj ti ukrepi bodo ter ali so sploh potrebni. Predvsem predstavniki tistih okrajev, kjer je bilo šmarnice največ, so banovinskim ukrepom sprva nasprotovali, nato pa jim je ob banovi nepopustljivosti verjetno postalo jasno, da jim nima več smisla ugovarjati, zato je moč njihovega nasprotovanja postopoma pojenjala. Stereotip o škodljivi šmarnici se je tako v slovenski družbi uspešno razvil in uveljavil, šele kasneje, ko so z analizami vzorcev dokazali, da šmarnično vino pravzaprav vsebuje le majhne količine metilnega alkohola, pa je postalo jasno, da je resnična nevarnost šmarnice pravzaprav izvirala od drugod. Zanjo ni bil odgovoren metilni alkohol, pač pa konkurenca, ki jo je ta vrsta vina predstavljala kvalitetnim vrstam, ki so se v času po prvi svetovni vojni znašla v veliki prodajni krizi
»Od nekdaj lepe so Ljubljanke slovele«: Cigareta Filter 57 v naši zgodovini in izročilu
No full textThe cigarette brand called Filter 57 is both an important and a trivial part of our past. It is cigarette that, after its introduction in 1957, became part of history and part of the “everyday life” of many smokers and non-smokers in Slovenia and Yugoslavia. It is connected with Ljubljana and the Tobacco Company Ljubljana. The latter was among those industrial enterprises that considerably influenced the development of the city and the course of its industrialization. The text that was printed on the edge of each box of these “cult” cigarettes - Prešeren’s verses about how Ljubljana has always been known for its beautiful girls - probably hinted at the tradition and quality of cigarettes made by the Ljubljana tobacco company. Filter 57 was a symbol of the Tobacco Company Ljubljana after the Second World War; it was its only brand that was preserved after the liquidation of the company and its production in the 1990s. Filter 57 became a “phenomenon” for various reasons. It was the first filter cigarette produced in Yugoslavia. Its name breached the Yugoslav tradition that cigarettes (i.e. types of cigarettes with regard to their quality and price) be given geographical names, names of rivers in particular. Filter 57 was the cigarette with which Yugoslavia joined the new trend of making smoking less harmful for the health. Filter 57 thus not only was a product of tobacco history, but also earned itself a place in our history.Delček naše preteklosti je tudi cigareta z imenom Filter 57. Cigareta s tem imenom, številka predstavlja letnico njenega začetka, je postala del zgodovine in del »vsakdana« mnogih kadilcev pa tudi nekadilcev v Sloveniji in Jugoslaviji. Povezana je z Ljubljano, ljubljansko tobačno tovarno kot eno tistih industrijskih podjetij, ki so imela velik vpliv na razvoj mesta in njegovo industrializacijo. Filter 57 je bil simbol ljubljanske tobačne tovarne po drugi svetovni vojni; je edina blagovna znamka nekdanje tovarne Tobačna Ljubljana, ki je ostala po likvidaciji tovarne in ukinitvi proizvodnje v devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja. Napis, ki je bil natisnjen na robu vsake škatlice te »kultne« cigarete – Prešernovi verzi o tem, da so od nekdaj lepe Ljubljanke slovele -, najbrž namiguje prav na tradicijo in kvaliteto cigaret ljubljanske tobačne tovarne. Filter 57 je postal »fenomen« zaradi več razlogov. Bil je prva cigareta s filtrom izdelana v Jugoslaviji. Z imenom izdelka je bila prekinjena jugoslovanska tradicija, ko so bile cigarete imenovane po zemljepisnih imenih, predvsem po rekah. S Filtrom 57 se je tudi v Jugoslaviji vključila tobačna industrija v takrat novo usmeritev glede kajenja, da bi to postalo manj za zdravje škodljivo