Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
Not a member yet
3153 research outputs found
Sort by
Od demokracji bezpośredniej do rządów zgromadzenia? Rousseau i problemy republikańskiego konstytucjonalizmu
Get PDFThe following article considers the problems connected with the relationship between the principles of the direct democracy and the gouvernement d’assemblée. The values contemporarily ascribed to these principles are often counted among different, sometimes even opposing, traditions of republican constitutionalism. However, the proposed analysis of Rousseau’s thought suggests that the general intellectual tendencies that are attributedto both systems might originally have had a lot in common. Furthermore, they embody the two different republican ways of implementing the very ideas of popular sovereignty and the accountability of the public authorities to the citizens. The undertaken juxtaposition of the contents of the Social Contract and of the Considerations on the Government of Poland may even point to an evolution of Rousseau’s stance. It can be discerned especiallyin the approval in the second work, which pertained to one of the largest European states of that time, as it conveys the need to shift the responsibility for law-making to the assembly of deputies (the Sejm). The proposition of transferring this responsibility to a quasi-representative body corresponds perfectly with the warnings against the abuses of an unchecked executive, which are equally stringent in the Social Contract. This actuallydenoted that Rousseau was ready to accept some sort of gouvernement d’assemblée in large states. In the end however, it did not mark a departure from the ideals of the direct government, especially after taking into consideration Rousseau’s extraordinary appreciation of the institutions of deputy directives and – treated already as an emergency measure – confederation
Stulecie Kodeksu cywilnego szwajcarskiego
Get PDFThe Swiss Civil Code (Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch – ZGB) came into being on 1 January 1912 culminating the series of so called great civil codifications of continental Europe. The vast experience in the codification work within the Roman legal culture allowed the editors of the ZGB, and its author, Eugen Huber in particular, to create a truly original work that perfectly combined long legal traditions of individual Swiss cantons with the requirements of contemporary expectations, the ideas of individualism with those of social solidarity, the liberal slogans with the policy of interventionism, and the letter of law with the principles of equity and the canons of ethics. The staring point for the Swiss Civil Code was a draft authored by W. Munziger, which referred to the Zurich Code Civil, the German commercial code, the Austrian ABGB of 1861 and the Dresdener law of obligations of 1866. Another important stage was the initiative of the Swiss Juristenverein which in 1884 proposed a comparative study of all cantonal private law systems. The results of that study were to serve as a basis for the future nationwide unification of the legal system. Between 1893 and 1898 Eugen Huber developed three preliminary drafts, covering family law, succession law and rights in property. In 1900 they were published as a government project and put forward for a public discussion carried out by a 31-member expert group, with wide participation of individual citizens and interest groups. Eventually, on 10 December, the project was unanimously adopted as Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, Codice civile svizzero (ZGB) to come into force and be binding as of 1 January 1912. Among the many states drat drew on the Swiss Civil Code when drafting their own codes were Lichtenstein, Austria, Hungary, Greece, Italy and Turkey. In the latter, the ZGB was adopted as part of the reforms under Kamal Atatürk. The Swiss codification was highly valued by the civil lawyers in the Second Polish Republic
Uroczystość odnowienia doktoratów Profesor Katarzyny Sójki-Zielińskiej i Profesora Stanisława Salmonowicza w Uniwersytecie Warszawskim
Get PDFUroczystość odnowienia doktoratów Profesor Katarzyny Sójki-Zielińskiej i Profesora Stanisława Salmonowicza w Uniwersytecie Warszawski
Karl Schlögel, Terror i marzenie. Moskwa 1937, 2012
No full textKarl Schlögel, Terror i marzenie. Moskwa 1937, 201
Trybunał Rewolucyjny jako element systemu Terroru. Autonomizacja i administratywizacja Trybunału Rewolucyjnego
Get PDFArtykuł rozpoczyna krótkie wprowadzenie do historii Trybunału, później zawarto w nim rozważania dotyczące jego roli w systemie Terroru orazwarunki zdobycia przez niego autonomii wobec systemu prawa. Wykorzystana do tego została zaproponowana przez Norberta Eliasa teoria usamodzielniania się instytucji o charakterze politycznym i zdobywania przez nie znaczącej władzy na skutek silnych antagonizmów. Artykuł ma udowodnić, że wzmacnianiu Terroru oraz Trybunału Rewolucyjnego służyła specyficzna sytuacja konfl iktu zewnętrznego, wykorzystywanego do uzasadniania budowy instytucji służących następnie do rozwiązywania sporów wewnątrz elity władzy. Prześledzona została politycznoprawna autonomizacja Trybunału – od momentu, gdy był on silnie zakorzeniony w obrębie systemu prawa, aż do później fazy Terroru, całkowicie administratywizującej proces walki z politycznymi wrogami
Krzysztof Ożóg, Krzysztof Fokt, Maciej Mikuła, Maciej Zdanek, Dagmara Wójcik-Zega, Katarzyna Kuraś, Profesorowie Wydziału Prawa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Tom I: 1364-1780, pod red. Wacława Uruszczaka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2015, ss. 450; Przemysław M. Żukowski, Profesorowie Wydziału Prawa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Tom II: 1780-2012, pod red. Doroty Malec, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2014, ss. 681.
No full textRafał Kania, Myśl polityczno-prawna Franciszka Ksawerego Szaniawskiego (1768-1830), 2012
Get PDFRafał Kania, Myśl polityczno-prawna Franciszka Ksawerego Szaniawskiego (1768-1830), 201
