ARDC Research Data Australia
Not a member yet
438125 research outputs found
Sort by
HUN AWRA-L Calibration Catchments v01
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThe dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme. This dataset was derived from GEODATA TOPO 250k Series 3 and Geofabric Surface Cartography, v2.1, specifically the Australian Hydrological Geospatial Fabric (AHGF) catchments. You can find a link to the parent datasets in the Lineage Field in this metadata statement. The History Field in this metadata statement describes how this dataset was derived. \n\n\n\nThe data are a shapefile containing fourteen river catchments within and impinging on the Hunter subregion. The dataset was created by aggregating Geofabric AHGF catchments. These catchments are used for AWRA-L model calibration.\n\n## **Purpose** \n\nUsed for AWRA-L model calibration\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThis dataset was created by merging contracted catchments from AHGFCatchment layer, using WatercourseLines in the Hydrology database within the TOPO250K vector data as reference.\n\n\n\nAHGF catchments were selected and aggregated/merged into River Catchments based on their relationships with the 1:250K Hydrogrpaphy watercourse network.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nBioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) HUN AWRA-L Calibration Catchments v01. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 07 June 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/c60e96db-f2a2-4036-9a2e-353de289a715.\n\n## **Dataset Ancestors** \n\n* **Derived From** [Geofabric Surface Catchments - V2.1](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/ea1b6f6c-e8a3-4c78-a463-044c89857fc0)\n\n* **Derived From** [GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/a0650f18-518a-4b99-a553-44f82f28bb5f)\n\nHUN AWRA-L Calibration Catchments v01 - Data File<br/>
Gippsland mean annual rainfall
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThe dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from the national SILO data sets of climate station records. The parent dataset(s) is identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.\n\n\n\nGippsland Product 2-1 Climate Data Geodatabase v01 \n\nThis geodatabase contains the climate data used in the Gippsland Basin bioregion. The geodatabase includes the following datasets (average daily values): climate zones, evaporation, radiation, rainfall, evapotranspiration, maximum temperature and minimum temperature.\n\n## **Purpose** \n\nTo spatially represent interpolated mean annual rainfall (mm/yr) for the period 1957-2012- in Gippsland\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThe data was extracted from the national SILO data sets for 199 climate stations in the Gippsland region (see Lineage). The data was produced using ANUClim software (Hutchinson, 2001), using the interpolation methods discussed in Jeffery et al., 2001.\n\n\n\nFor a given climate station daily climate data is a combination of original measurements and rectified data to remove any gaps in the record using interpolation methods discussed in Jeffery et al. (2001). \n\n\n\nTo account for sparsely located climate stations within Gippsland, mean daily rainfall were scaled to each solution point within the study area according to interpolated mean annual rainfall spatial layer created using the ANUClim software (Hutchinson 2001).\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nBioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) Gippsland mean annual rainfall. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 05 October 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/033319be-8058-48b5-ba2d-23f3931a25d4.\n\n## **Dataset Ancestors** \n\n* **Derived From** [Gippsland Product 2.1 climate data geodatabase v01](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/aa6108b8-a1d8-464c-9562-7d6a69304685)\n\nGippsland mean annual rainfall - Data File<br/>
Cartographic masks for map products GIP 120 v02
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThis dataset and its metadata statement were developed for the Bioregional Assessment Programme and are presented here as originally supplied. \n\n\n\nThe dataset was created by the Bioregional Assessment Programme for use in cartographic outputs in Gippsland Basin bioregion product 1.2. The processes undertaken to produce this dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.\n\n\n\nThis dataset has been superseded by Cartographic masks for map products GIP 120 v03.\n\n## **Purpose** \n\nCartographic masks for map products GIP_120, used for clear annotation and masking unwanted features from report maps.\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nRectangular polygon shapefile masks were created around selected feature labels from the following datasets:\n\nGEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3, File Geodatabase format (.gdb) - GUID: 96ebf889-f726-4967-9964-714fb57d679b\n\nVictoria Mining Licences - 13 May 2015 - GUID: c9c1dff4-01c7-4669-a033-d8a9f674cd5a\n\n\n\nA shapefile was created for the use of masking data to highlight text.\n\n\n\nMethod:\n\n\n\n\\* A new polygon shapefile was created with no content\n\n\\* The shapefile was then populated in an ArcMap editing session by digitizing polygons which surround text.\n\n\\* ArcMAP's Advanced Drawing Option was then used to mask data behind text.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nBioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) Cartographic masks for map products GIP 120 v02. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 05 October 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/39945fcc-d1a7-49c4-a011-ca595c42ec51.\n\n## **Dataset Ancestors** \n\n* **Derived From** [GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/a0650f18-518a-4b99-a553-44f82f28bb5f)\n\n* **Derived From** [GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3, File Geodatabase format (.gdb)](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/96ebf889-f726-4967-9964-714fb57d679b)\n\n* **Derived From** [Victoria Mining Licences - 13 May 2015](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/c9c1dff4-01c7-4669-a033-d8a9f674cd5a)\n\nCartographic masks for map products GIP 120 v02 - Data File<br/>
An Estuarine Inventory for New South Wales, Australia VIS_ID 2224 20100723
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThis data and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are represented here as originally supplied.\n\n\n\nFisheries oriented inventory that consists of tabular information and an atlas of estuarine wetlands describing 133 estuaries and embayments along the NSW (Australia) coast. (VIS_ID 2224; ANZLIC: ANZNS0364000065)\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThis data and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are represented here as originally supplied.\n\n\n\nLineage: Aerial photographs from the late 1970's and early 1980's of varying scales were used to map mangrove, saltmarsh and seagrass in 133 estuaries along the NSW coast. Vegetation boundaries drawn onto photographs were checked by field surveys undertaken from 1981-1984. The information was then transferred onto base maps produced from CMA 1:25 000 topographic maps using a zoom transferscope. Water area and the area of each vegetation type calculated using the dot grid methods. The maps were reduced for publication.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nNSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (2010) An Estuarine Inventory for New South Wales, Australia VIS_ID 2224 20100723. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 18 June 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/e7d763eb-d6b8-480a-8d9e-3d6e9e0b9bc1.An Estuarine Inventory for New South Wales, Australia VIS_ID 2224 20100723 - Data File<br/>
Victorian Groundwater Management System Dec 2012 (superseded)
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThis dataset and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are presented here as originally supplied. \n\n\n\nA more recent extract of the GMS is now available (Oct 2013). \n\n\n\nIn addition to monitoring data gathered via the State Observation Bore Network, groundwater information is held in relation to approximately 200,000 boreholes throughout Victoria on the Groundwater Management System (GMS). Part 1 in the title refers to the Access database version. This data is also available in csv and xls files. These have not been included. \n\n\n\nThe GMS contains data from a wide variety of sources including the former Rural Water Corporation, the Minerals and Energy Department (now part of the Department of Primary Industries), other Government Departments, industry and the community.\n\n\n\nThe GMS extract has been imported into MS Access database. There are 29 individual tables within the database. For the purpose of IPBA, the most useful tables are "gms_chemistry" tables 2 to 9, and gms_wl_all which contains all of the water level readings. Other relevant information is stored in the National Groundwater Information System.\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nUp until the mid 1980s the bore locations were plotted on mapsheets and the individual bore records kept in hardcopy. From the mid 1980s onwards a digital database, compiled from the existing records of all Government bores and private bores, was progressively assembled on mainframe computers. From 1969, a permit to drill groundwater bores was required, and the information captured by the licensing process was added to the database. This included groundwater investigation or observation bores drilled by other government agencies such as the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission (SRWSC) and the Soil Conservation Authority (SCA) and subsequent equivalents, although these agencies also kept their own bore databases. \n\n\n\nFollowing the split of the groundwater group from the GSV in mid 1988, the State bore database was duplicated. One copy was merged with several Rural Water Corporation (RWC) databases to become the Victorian Groundwater Data Base (VGDB), the precursor to the current Groundwater Management System (GMS) run by the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE). The other copy remained with the GSV and was developed into the Geological Exploration and Development Information System (GEDIS), which included the mineral exploration bores. Data exchange was attempted for a few years following the split, but ultimately the databases grew into quite separate entities. The current GEDIS database is not included in this data.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nVictorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2013) Victorian Groundwater Management System Dec 2012 (superseded). Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 31 May 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/0e144947-4b0c-4c31-b605-9ecabdf2730b.Victorian Groundwater Management System Dec 2012 (superseded) - Data File<br/>
Macalister Irrigation District boundary
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThe dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from the Irrigation district administrative boundaries (polygons) mapped by Victorian water authorities based on geographic features. Input scales vary by water authority. The parent dataset(s) is identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.\n\n\n\nThe Macalister Irrigation District boundary.\n\n## **Purpose** \n\nThe Macalister Irrigation District selected from Irrigation district administrative boundaries (polygons) mapped by Victorian water authorities based on geographic features to define the area of interest in the report outputs.\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThe Macalister Irrigation District is part of the Irrigation district administrative boundaries mapped by Victorian water authorities based on geographic features. Input scales vary by water authority. The state wide irrigation districts (Irrigation District Department of Environment and Primary Industries GIP - )was the source dataset and the Gippsland Regional Model Extent (8e56c1ca-3fe9-4eb6-9ac0-75ba3f4058f8) was used to select certain polygons from the original using GIS software.\n\nAll boundaries are 1:100 000\n\nSourced from water authorities and Department of Primary Industries\n\nCurrent boundary as of 21 May 2012\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nBioregional Assessment Programme (2006) Macalister Irrigation District boundary. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 05 October 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/1b0659ab-2e86-4840-89d7-481a83bb44cf.\n\n## **Dataset Ancestors** \n\n* **Derived From** [Irrigation District Department of Environment and Primary Industries GIP](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/880d9042-abe7-4669-be3a-e0fbe096b66a)\n\n* **Derived From** [Gippsland regional model extent](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/8e56c1ca-3fe9-4eb6-9ac0-75ba3f4058f8)\n\nMacalister Irrigation District boundary - Data File<br/>
Lower Hunter Spotted Gum Forest EEC 2010
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThis dataset and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are presented here as originally supplied:\n\n\n\nLower Hunter Spotted Gum Forest (LHSGIF) EEC mapping covering Cessnock, Lake Macquarie, Maitland, Newcastle and Wyong LGAs undertaken by Stephen Bell in 2010. He notes that the layer is incomplete because much of the LHSGIF is on private or coal land where access is restricted. Only if contracts are performed on these lands will updates occur. The layer includes various forms of LHSGIF as per the data analysis done for the Cessnock-Kurri project. VIS_ID 2319\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThere are 6 fields in the attribute table: >Map_Status - draft mapping date >Code - the current working veg community code (this will probably change to a more streamlined order for the final) >Veg_Name - the current working veg community names, some may change to make it more streamlined >LGA - the relevant LGA for each polygon >Source - where the mapping is sourced from, this project or previous projects etc >Accuracy - a 4 class system to provide information on expected accuracy. Class 1 = ground data; Class 2 = previous mapping with modifications; Class 3 = previous mapping with no modifications; Class 4 = no data (ie: predicted). Data capture progress (notes from S. Bell): Maitland LGA - there are several patches that I have not got to yet and hence mapping is based on Lisa Hills LGA mapping from 2006. Most of this area is coded as 17 (undefined) until I can work out the boundaries of the variants - they will probably mostly turn out to be variant 17a(i) in the east, but 18h in the west. Wyong LGA - I also found that the delineation of LHSGIF for much of the Wyong LGA mapping is outdated and confused, so I will need to revisit some of those patches to clarify things - in the 2002 LGA mapping, I had lumped all spotted gum - ironbark forests together, but now I need to extract those areas with affinities to LHSGIF. Much of this is completed, but there are a few patches still remaining. Cessnock LGA - Over in the west of Cessnock LGA, there is this probable new species aff fibrosa, and I have not yet determined where its habitat fits into the LHSGIF Mothership, so it is coded simply as 17 for now. Newcastle and Lake Macquarie LGAs - these are all but completed now, just a couple of small patches left to inspect. A couple of other points: - for this draft I've split up the variants as best I can, but the final cuts will need to await the full data analysis. For example, I've used Wallis Creek as the split between the 'true' LHSGIF and the Hinterland LHSGIF, as it is around here that the grass composition changes from Themeda australis/ Joycea pallida in the east to Entolasia stricta/ Aristida vagans to the west. These species seem to be driving the splits in the data analysis. Further up the valley (NW of Cessnock), Aristida ramosa/ Aristida vagans takes over from Entolasia stricta. - I've included the various forms of LHSGIF as per the data analysis done for the Cessnock-Kurri project a couple of years ago. It is possible that some of these forms will prove themselves to be more closely related to Central Hunter communities, if and when a new analysis is done to include data from the Central-Upper Hunter. I'm not sure, for example, if the form of LHSGIF in the Cessnock report where Euc moluccana is dominant in the canopy over an understorey of essentially LHSGIF species should remain as part of the EEC or not - if you take the EEC definition literally then you would say that it should be excluded because Euc fibrosa and Cor maculata are not the important canopy species. - In addition, I've also added in unit 18h from the Cessnock-Kurri project. This is the one dominated by Euc fibrosa and Cor maculata, and the latest data analyses are showing that this should be considered part of LHSGIF. I know it's now part of the Central Hunter EEC, but it is really just a dryer form of whats present in Cessnock, as the more coastal Lake Macquarie form is a wetter form of what's in Cessnock. It seems confusing, but it all makes sense when you look at rainfall patterns and the data analysis.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nNSW Office of Environment and Heritage (2015) Lower Hunter Spotted Gum Forest EEC 2010. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 13 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/5a8f525b-d602-4120-99a3-900fc05180e7.Lower Hunter Spotted Gum Forest EEC 2010 - Data File<br/>
Bioregional Assessment areas v04
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThe dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme. This dataset was derived from multiple datasets. You can find a link to the parent datasets in the Lineage Field in this metadata statement. The History Field in this metadata statement describes how this dataset was derived.\n\n\n\nApproved boundaries of the bioregions and subregions (version 4) for defining the reporting regions for bioregional assessments of impacts of coal seam gas and coal mining development on water resources.\n\n\n\nThis release contains two spatial dataset vector layers:\n\n\n\nba_bioregion_alb_gda94_v04 is a topologically and geometrically correct spatial layer of the approved bioregions for the Bioregional Assessment Programme. This layers' extent outlines the bioregions for the Assessment teams only;\n\n\n\nba_bioregion_and_subregion_alb_gda94_v4 is a topologically and geometrically correct spatial layer of the approved bioregions and subregions for the Bioregional Assessment Programme. This layers' extent outlines the bioregions and subregions for the Assessment teams only.\n\n\n\nThe dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from the "Bioregional Assessment areas v03" (GUID = 96dbf469-5463-4f4d-8fad-4214c97e5aac) and "Gippsland Project Boundary" (GUID = 27413de5-d13a-4231-ac79-fc77f4cbb5f7) datasets provided by the Department of the Environment. The source dataset is identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.\n\n## **Purpose** \n\nProvides authoritative boundaries for defining bioregions and subregions to be reported on for the Bioregional Assessments\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThis dataset contains two spatial shapefiles: "ba_bioregion_alb_gda94_v04.shp" and "ba_subregion_alb_gda94_v04.shp". \n\nThe bioregion shapefile is a copy of the previous version's (Bioregional Assessment Areas v03) bioregions, with the following changes. \n\n\n\nThe three subregions of the previous Southern Sydney bioregion (WOL, HAW & GEO) have been merged to form one bioregion which is now called the 'Sydney Basin bioregion' (SYD). The overall boundary of the bioregion has not changed from version 3. This change is result of programme board meeting decision on 8 October 2014.\n\n\n\nThe Gippsland Basin bioregion boundary changed per instructions from the Gippsland project leader to match the description below. This change was agreed upon in decision entry DEC114 at https://govdex.gov.au/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?title=Decision+Register&spaceKey=BRAT.\n\n\n\nNorthern boundary: The project's Victorian partners have identified in the hydrogeological system conceptualisation that the prevailing control on development impacts to water resources along the northern boundary is geohydrologically constrained, i.e. it is highly unlikely that significant impacts will propagate into the Palaeozoic bedrock that forms the basement to the Gippsland Basin. Surface geology is used to identify the northern bounds of the surficial aquifers of the Haunted Hills Gravel and the Sale Group which overlie and conceal the coal bearing formations of the Gippsland Basin (differentiation of Tertiary-Recent geology from older geology along the proposed redefined bioregion boundary). Topographic elevation along this northern boundary rapidly increases, with subsequent changes in hydraulic gradient and likely significant reductions in flow path lengths. The northern boundary delineates the transition from local scale groundwater flow systems (to the north of this boundary) and intermediate to regional scale flow systems (south of this boundary). This differs from the PAE which accounts for an additional 10 km buffer to the north.\n\n\n\nWestern boundary: is a surface water and groundwater flow divide. Surface water on the western side of this boundary drains towards Western Port, which appears to have little resource potential or exploration interest. Based on this scientific rationale and conceptualisation, the proposed redefined boundary adheres to the conceptual/numerical groundwater model boundaries.\n\n\n\nSouthern/coastal boundary: clips the southern boundary to the coastline as the BAs are investigating impacts from onshore impacts of Coal and CSG development. The WSS/BA model boundary extends offshore to account for petroleum industry abstractions offshore. It is important to note, the proposed redefined bioregion boundary explicitly includes the Gippsland Lakes and is clipped to the national 1.25M national topography coastline.\n\n\n\nEastern boundary: has a similar rationale as the northern boundary, prospectivity for Coal/CSG development geologically diminishes further east of the Gippsland lakes.\n\n\n\nThere has been no changes made to any of the other bioregion or subregion boundaries between version 3 and version 4.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nBioregional Assessment Programme (2014) Bioregional Assessment areas v04. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 13 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/e8a2d577-c5c5-4e2c-b0fa-53e4b2d4a034.\n\n## **Dataset Ancestors** \n\n* **Derived From** [Gippsland Project boundary](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/27413de5-d13a-4231-ac79-fc77f4cbb5f7)\n\n* **Derived From** [Natural Resource Management (NRM) Regions 2010](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/1d54e38f-4051-4f0c-a350-c7dbd8eba65b)\n\n* **Derived From** [Bioregional Assessment areas v03](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/96dbf469-5463-4f4d-8fad-4214c97e5aac)\n\n* **Derived From** [Victoria - Seamless Geology 2014](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/2872d02e-66cb-42b6-9e5a-63abc8ad871b)\n\n* **Derived From** [Bioregional Assessment areas v01](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/0fd0d820-30b3-451f-a126-a50040426999)\n\n* **Derived From** [Bioregional Assessment areas v02](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/e414b1b3-c42e-42e9-9cc4-2093054aa35f)\n\n* **Derived From** [GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/a0650f18-518a-4b99-a553-44f82f28bb5f)\n\n* **Derived From** [NSW Catchment Management Authority Boundaries 20130917](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/0dc4272e-c081-4ed4-9645-aa336ffacd85)\n\n* **Derived From** [Geological Provinces - Full Extent](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/0a064b3b-2a1e-4672-80d9-03333be67aad)\n\n* **Derived From** [GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3, File Geodatabase format (.gdb)](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/96ebf889-f726-4967-9964-714fb57d679b)\n\nBioregional Assessment areas v04 - Data File<br/>
Atlas of Living Australia NSW ALA Portal 20140613
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThis dataset and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are presented here as originally supplied:\n\n\n\nThe Atlas of NSW Wildlife, a resource owned by the State of New South Wales that holds data from a number of custodians including OEH, the National Herbarium of NSW, Forests NSW, the Australian Museum and the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme. \n\n\n\n(Accessed through ALA Data Portal, 20140613).\n\n\n\nRecords provided by OZCAM (Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums) Provider, accessed through ALA website.\n\nRecords provided by Australian Museum Mammalogy Collection, accessed through ALA website.\n\nRecords provided by Australian Museum, accessed through ALA website.\n\nBiodiversity occurrence data provided by the Atlas of New South Wales Wildlife, a resource owned by the State of New South Wales which holds data from a number of custodians including the Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet (OEH), the National Herbarium of NSW, Forests NSW, the Australian Museum and the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme. \n\nRecords provided by Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet representing the State of New South Wales, accessed through ALA website.\n\nAustralian Museum, http://australianmuseum.net.au/\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThis dataset and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are presented here as originally supplied:\n\n\n\nThe Atlas of NSW Wildlife (Atlas) is administered by the Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet (OEH). Distribution of Atlas data is governed by OEH's Sensitive Species Data Policy. For species categorised as sensitive, some or all locational information will not be disclosed depending on the species' status under the Policy (refer to the Sensitive Species Data Policy for full details http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/policiesandguidelines/SensitiveSpeciesPolicy.htm)\n\n\n\nIn downloading Data from the Atlas of NSW Wildlife (the Data) via the ALA portal, you, the user, agree to accept the Terms and Conditions below. Your acceptance creates a binding legal agreement between you and the Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet (OEH) that administers the Atlas of NSW Wildlife. If you do not agree with these Terms and Conditions, do not download Atlas of NSW Wildlife Data from the ALA portal.\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nNSW Office of Environment and Heritage (2015) Atlas of Living Australia NSW ALA Portal 20140613. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 13 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/cb420b33-b828-40fe-a844-7fdbe828d4d6.Atlas of Living Australia NSW ALA Portal 20140613 - Data File<br/>
Pedirka Basin Coal Potential - PED
No full text## **Abstract** \n\nThis dataset and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are presented here as originally supplied.\n\nDefines the area in the Pedirka Basin in which coal seams have been intersected during mineral/petroleum exploration drilling.\n\n## **Purpose** \n\nUsed to define the area within the Pedirka Basin in which coal occurrence is most probable.\n\n## **Dataset History** \n\nThe underlying data used to define the coal occurrence polygon was sourced from open file oil/gas/mineral exploration well completion and company reports. These are publically available in the Northern Territory through the Department of Mines and Energy - Northern Territory Geological Survey (http://www.nt.gov.au/d/Minerals_Energy/Geoscience) and the South Australian Resource Information Geoserver (SARIG), (http://www.minerals.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/online_tools/free_data_delivery_and_publication_downloads/sarig).\n\n## **Dataset Citation** \n\nSA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (2015) Pedirka Basin Coal Potential - PED. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 12 October 2016, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/969c1828-82fa-40d5-8ad3-baf5630277bd.Pedirka Basin Coal Potential - PED - Data File<br/>