CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
    32838 research outputs found

    Kansalaispulssi 9/2024

    No full text
    Kansalaispulssi selvittää suomalaisten mielipiteitä ajankohtaisista aiheista, viranomaisten toiminnasta sekä vastaajan mielialasta ja huolenaiheista. Aineisto sisältää kysymyksiä Venäjän hyökkäyksestä Ukrainaan, rasismista, asumisesta maalla, kaupungissa tai saaristossa sekä teemoista, joihin maan hallituksen pitäisi kiinnittää huomiota. Tämän kierroksen kyselyssä kartoitettiin, kuinka paljon vastaajat luottavat toisiin ihmisiin sekä eri instituutioihin. Kysyttiin myös kuinka oikeudenmukaisena he pitävät suomalaista yhteiskuntaa. Edelleen kysyttiin vastaajan mielialasta, luottamuksesta tulevaisuuteen sekä koetusta stressistä ja turvallisuudesta. Vastaajia pyydettiin myös arvioimaan suomalaisten kriisimielialaa tällä hetkellä. Lisäksi vastaajat arvioivat, mihin yhteiskunnallisiin teemoihin, kuten kestävään julkiseen talouteen, yritysten toimintaedellytyksiin, ilmastotoiminen edistämiseen ja toimivaan terveydenhuoltoon, hallituksen pitäisi lähitulevaisuudessa erityisesti kiinnittää huomiota. Kysyttiin myös kuinka huolestuneita vastaajat ovat kotitaloutensa toimeentulosta. Turvallisuustilanteeseen ja Venäjän hyökkäykseen Ukrainaan liittyen kysyttiin, huolestuttavatko sodan mahdollinen laajeneminen tai Venäjän vaikuttamispyrkimykset. Lisäksi tiedusteltiin näkemyksiä EU:n Venäjälle asettamien talouspakotteiden hyväksyttävyydestä sekä vastaajien omakohtaisia havaintoja harhaanjohtavaan tietoon perustuvista vaikuttamisyrityksistä tai tietoturvaongelmista internetissä. Seuraavaksi esitettiin koettua ja havaittua rasismia, eri etnistä taustaa olevien ihmisten yhdenvertaisuuden toteutumista sekä eri väestöryhmien välisiä suhteita suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa käsitteleviä kysymyksiä. Tiedusteltiin myös, onko vastaaja kuullut valtioneuvoston rasisminvastaisesta 'Me puhumme teoin' -kampanjasta. Lopuksi kysyttiin asumisesta eri alueilla Suomessa sekä eri alueiden vetovoimatekijöistä. Tiedusteltiin mieluisinta asuinpaikkaa sekä kuinka kauan vastaaja on asunut maalla, kaupungissa ja saaristossa. Taustamuuttujina olivat vastauskieli, vastaajan sukupuoli, ikäryhmä, maakunta, koulutus sekä tietoja kotitalouden rakenteesta ja taloudellisesta tilanteesta.The Citizens' Pulse surveys examine Finnish attitudes and opinions on current issues. Main themes in the surveys include the activity of authorities, future expectations, trust, and the respondents' own state of mind. This collection round also included questions on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, living in a rural, urban or archipelago area, racism and issues that the Finnish government should address. The ninth collection round of 2024 surveyed the respondents' trust in other people and various institutions (e.g. the Finnish Government, the health care system, the media, and the Finnish Defence Forces). The respondents were asked to evaluate how fair or unfair they thought Finnish society was at present, and their state of mind was examined with questions on various matters relating to health and well-being. The questions covered, for example, the respondents' own mental well-being, whether they were worried about the adequacy of their income, their confidence in their future, and experiences of stress. Additionally, the respondents were asked to evaluate whether an atmosphere of crisis prevailed amongst Finns. The respondents' views were investigated on which societal issues (e.g. promotion of climate action, national defence, poverty reduction, effective healthcare, operating conditions of businesses and investment opportunities) the Finnish government should focus on in the near future. The next set of questions focused on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and national security in Finland. The respondents were asked how concerned they were about the crisis in Ukraine and its effects, and whether they were concerned that the war might expand beyond Ukraine. The respondents were also asked whether they were concerned that Russia might take military action against Finland or try to interfere with the functioning of Finnish society. Opinions on the economic sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU and whether Finland should be ready to receive significant numbers of refugees from Ukraine if necessary were charted. The respondents were also asked whether they had noticed any cyber security issues or instances where purposefully misleading claims based on misinformation were spread on social media or online over the previous month. Questions were also asked about racism, prevention of racism, equality between people of different ethnic backgrounds, and relations between different population groups in Finnish society. It was charted whether the respondents have heard of the Government's 'Action, not only words' campaign against racism. Finally, questions were asked about living in different areas of Finland and the attractiveness of different areas. The respondents were asked about their preferred place of residence and how long they had lived in the the countryside, town and archipelago areas. Background variables included the language responded in, the respondent's gender, age group, NUTS3 region of residence, highest level of education, household composition, and perceived financial situation of household

    Inkluderande urbanisering i små städer i Tanzania och Uganda

    No full text
    The dataset is a household survey covering randomly sampled households in 15 purposively selected small towns in Uganda and Tanzania, surveyed in 2022. Our survey was designed to explore multiple dimensions of inclusivity and covered 1) household structure and infrastructure; 2) expenditures/assets; 3) rural–urban links and social networks; 4) socio-economics; 5) work; and 6) voting and participation. The first three sections pertained to the household and the last to the individual. The resulting dataset contains 300 variables, with 1,789 respondents in Uganda (seven towns) and 2,034 in Tanzania (eight towns), totalling 3,823 cases. Our survey is limited by not tracking change over time, but simply offering a snapshot of years 2021–2022.The dataset is a household survey covering randomly sampled households in 15 purposively selected small towns in Uganda and Tanzania, surveyed in 2022. Our survey was designed to explore multiple dimensions of inclusivity and covered 1) household structure and infrastructure; 2) expenditures/assets; 3) rural–urban links and social networks; 4) socio-economics; 5) work; and 6) voting and participation. The first three sections pertained to the household and the last to the individual. The resulting dataset contains 300 variables, with 1,789 respondents in Uganda (seven towns) and 2,034 in Tanzania (eight towns), totalling 3,823 cases. Our survey is limited by not tracking change over time, but simply offering a snapshot of years 2021–2022

    Survey on People in Ireland’s attitude towards diversity, 2023

    No full text
    The survey questionnaire was designed by IPSOS in conjunction with several Government departments and representatives from different civil society groups. These include Pavee Point, NDA, AsIam, Independent Living Movement, the Irish Deaf Society, National Platform of Self Advocates; Voice of Vision, Impairment Physical Impairment Ireland, Disabled Women Ireland; BelongTo, INAR, MRCI, the ESRI. In addition, several civil society groups were shown the survey and asked for feedback. Laurence Bond the former Director of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission provided expert feedback on question formulation. The survey asked a series of questions pertaining to demographics of participant, civil and social engagement and attitudinal questions towards various categories. The demographics questions gathered data regarding gender, age, employment status, socio-economic status, family status, birth country, ethnicity, nationality, size of residential area, renting or owning accommodation, sexual orientation, county of residence and eircode. The civil and social engagement questions concerned voting, volunteering, holidays, life satisfaction and trust in others. The attitudinal questions were: • How comfortable would you be if a ___________ person was living next door/in the nearest house to where you live? • How comfortable would you be if one of your children was in/are in a love relationship with a ___________ person? • How comfortable would you feel if a ___________ child was in the same class as your child? • Would a ___________ person be at a disadvantage when being hired? • A series of questions concerning attitudes towards immigration. • What is the biggest issue facing the world / Ireland

    Healthy Ireland Survey, 2022

    No full text
    The annual Healthy Ireland Survey is a repeated cross-sectional annual study that provides an up-to-date picture of the nation’s health along with a robust and credible baseline set of data on a range of health behaviours which have significant impact on individual health outcomes. These data are being used by the Department of Health to inform current and future policy direction and programme development and implementation. The Survey reports on many lifestyle behaviours such as smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, active travel, weight management, diet and nutrition, health service utilization patterns, dental health, chronic disease incidence, mental health, sleep patterns, dementia awareness, caring responsibilities, women’s health and sexual health. Some modules are repeated every year (e.g. smoking, demographics, chronic conditions), however, the majority of modules are being repeated on a 2-4 year cycle, allowing the Survey to ask a wider variety of questions. The Questionnaire for each year therefore varies substantially (but not completely) from the year before; researchers should be aware of that. Since 2014, the Healthy Ireland Survey has been administered on an annual basis by Ipsos on behalf of the Department of Health

    National Survey of Public Attitudes to Disability in Ireland, 2006

    No full text
    As part of the National Disability Authority's strategic commitment to raising awareness and promoting positive attitudes to disability, NDA has commissioned a series of National Surveys of Public Attitudes to Disability in Ireland. The survey data is broken down in relation to attitudes towards people with physical, sensory, intellectual and mental health impairments. The survey covered a range of topics on attitudes relating to disability. These included awareness of disability and attitudes towards particular types of disability. Survey questions explored attitudes towards children with disabilities in mainstream education, the employment of people with disabilities as well as relationships, neighbourhood, and the social wellbeing of people with and without disabilities. It also compared people with and without disabilities

    An archive and corpus of Twitter/X's policies for Tweet redistribution 2006-2023

    No full text
    When researchers publish results based on the analysis of Tweets, good practice requires sharing the Tweets (or Tweet IDs) to enable reproducibility of the results. What may or may not be shared depends on the Twitter/X terms for the redistribution of the platform’s content. As a complete archive of these terms is currently not easily accessible, we used The Internet Archive's Wayback Machine to gather all documents from Twitter/X that detail the terms and conditions for content redistribution, in effect between 2006 and November 2023. Based on the relevant conditions for the redistribution of Twitter/X content to third parties a "restriction_score" was assigned to each version of the terms/policies, to express how restrictive the regulations for the redistribution of content are. In addition, to facilitate analyses of the respective documents, a corpus has been created. The included archive of .html files allows researchers who collected Twitter/X content in the past, and who are now considering sharing this content, to determine the regulation in effect at the time of Tweet collection. Python scripts and a list of URLs are provided, which can be used to replicate the creation of the .html files published here. An R script is provided to create the corpus from the .html files.When researchers publish results based on the analysis of Tweets, good practice requires sharing the Tweets (or Tweet IDs) to enable reproducibility of the results. What may or may not be shared depends on the Twitter/X terms for the redistribution of the platform’s content. As a complete archive of these terms is currently not easily accessible, we used The Internet Archive's Wayback Machine to gather all documents from Twitter/X that detail the terms and conditions for content redistribution, in effect between 2006 and November 2023. Based on the relevant conditions for the redistribution of Twitter/X content to third parties a "restriction_score" was assigned to each version of the terms/policies, to express how restrictive the regulations for the redistribution of content are. In addition, to facilitate analyses of the respective documents, a corpus has been created. The included archive of .html files allows researchers who collected Twitter/X content in the past, and who are now considering sharing this content, to determine the regulation in effect at the time of Tweet collection. Python scripts and a list of URLs are provided, which can be used to replicate the creation of the .html files published here. An R script is provided to create the corpus from the .html files

    Replikationsmaterialien: Wirkung askriptiver, kognitiver und non-kognitiver Arbeitsmarktsignale

    No full text
    Mithilfe der Experimentaldaten ist es möglich verschiedene Fragestellungen zur Arbeitsmarktwirkung askriptiver, kognitiver und non-kognitiver Signale zu untersuchen. Das faktorielle Survey (Vignettenexperiment) wurde mit Personalrekrutierenden (n=1.029) durchgeführt, die über Rekrutierungsexpertise in min. einem von 15 Berufen verfügen. Kern der Experimentalstudie ist die Beurteilung fiktiver Bewerber*innenprofile hinsichtlich der Einladungschance auf ein Vorstellungsgespräch zu einer ebenfalls fiktiven Stellenausschreibung. Insgesamt 10 Vignettenmerkmale wurden experimentell variiert. Die Experimentalfaktoren sind: - Geschlecht - Migrationshintergrund - Familienstand - Kinder - Bildungsweg - Note allg. Schulabschluss - Arbeitszeugnis - Weiterbildung - Ehrenamt - HobbyMithilfe der Experimentaldaten ist es möglich verschiedene Fragestellungen zur Arbeitsmarktwirkung askriptiver, kognitiver und non-kognitiver Signale zu untersuchen. Das faktorielle Survey (Vignettenexperiment) wurde mit Personalrekrutierenden (n=1.029) durchgeführt, die über Rekrutierungsexpertise in min. einem von 15 Berufen verfügen. Kern der Experimentalstudie ist die Beurteilung fiktiver Bewerber*innenprofile hinsichtlich der Einladungschance auf ein Vorstellungsgespräch zu einer ebenfalls fiktiven Stellenausschreibung. Insgesamt 10 Vignettenmerkmale wurden experimentell variiert. Die Experimentalfaktoren sind: - Geschlecht - Migrationshintergrund - Familienstand - Kinder - Bildungsweg - Note allg. Schulabschluss - Arbeitszeugnis - Weiterbildung - Ehrenamt - Hobb

    Bundesweite Onlinebefragung zur Erfassung kinder- und jugendrechterelevanter Verfahren in Jugendämtern und Einrichtungen in öffentlicher Trägerschaft

    No full text
    Im Rahmen des vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) geförderten Verbundprojekts „Fokus Jugendamt – Partizipativer Wissenstransfer zu Kooperation, Hilfeplanung und Schutzkonzepten in der öffentlichen Kinder- und Jugendhilfe (FokusJA)“ wurde eine bundesweite Onlinebefragung durchgeführt. Die Zielgruppe der bundesweiten Onlinebefragung waren hauptamtliche Mitarbeitende ab 18 Jahren der 559 Jugendämter in Deutschland sowie der Einrichtungen in öffentlicher Trägerschaft der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe. Ziel der Onlinebefragung war, den aktuellen Kenntnisstand der Fachkräfte im Jugendamt und in Einrichtungen in öffentlicher Trägerschaft bezüglich kinder- und jugendrechtlicher Verfahren sowie (sexualisierter) Gewalt zu erheben.Im Rahmen des vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) geförderten Verbundprojekts „Fokus Jugendamt – Partizipativer Wissenstransfer zu Kooperation, Hilfeplanung und Schutzkonzepten in der öffentlichen Kinder- und Jugendhilfe (FokusJA)“ wurde eine bundesweite Onlinebefragung durchgeführt. Die Zielgruppe der bundesweiten Onlinebefragung waren hauptamtliche Mitarbeitende ab 18 Jahren der 559 Jugendämter in Deutschland sowie der Einrichtungen in öffentlicher Trägerschaft der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe. Ziel der Onlinebefragung war, den aktuellen Kenntnisstand der Fachkräfte im Jugendamt und in Einrichtungen in öffentlicher Trägerschaft bezüglich kinder- und jugendrechtlicher Verfahren sowie (sexualisierter) Gewalt zu erheben

    Internal Security (July 2024)

    No full text
    The study on internal security was conducted by dimap on behalf of the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government. During the survey period from 15.07.2024 to 28.07.2024, the population aged 16 and over in Germany was surveyed in telephone interviews (CATI) on the following topics: general security situation in Germany, personal perception of security and views on various aspects of security. Respondents were selected using a multi-stage random sample based on the RDD method, including landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample).General security situation in Germany: feeling of security in Germany; development of internal security in Germany in the last ten years; reasons for a perceived deterioration in internal security (open). Personal safety: general feeling of safety in the personal environment at present and in comparison to ten years ago; description of the residential area (houses in good condition, residential environment (e.g. streets, bus stops, green spaces) in good condition, frequent police presence, etc.); feeling of safety during the day in various places (in the apartment or house, in the neighborhood or in the district). ); feeling of safety during the day in various places (in the apartment or house, in the neighborhood or district, in public squares, at train stations, in underpasses and bus stops, on public transport, when traveling by car); feeling of safety in the evening or at night in the aforementioned places; personal experience and Victims among relatives and acquaintances in the last ten years with regard to various crimes (e.g. car/bicycle stolen, cheated during an online purchase, burglary at home, harassed or mobbed on the street, etc.); assessment of the problem in Germany due to youth violence, violence in the family, unjustified police violence, organized crime (e.g. mafia, clans,), crime committed by migrants, left-wing extremism, right-wing extremism, Islamism, cyber attacks, white-collar crime and disinformation campaigns on the Internet; increase or decrease in politically motivated acts of violence in Germany over the last ten years. Views on security: when in doubt, freedom is more important than security vs . In case of doubt, security is more important than freedom; willingness to give up certain freedoms in favor of more security (that the protection of personal data on the Internet is temporarily (split: permanently) suspended, longer waiting times due to stricter controls at airports, the use of security checks at train stations as previously only at the airport, the use of security checks at schools and universities as previously only at the airport, comprehensive video surveillance in public spaces, comprehensive use of facial recognition software, more presence of private security services, e.g. in supermarkets and public buildings, police checks on the street even without concrete suspicion, checks at German borders); opinion on video surveillance in public places in relation to personal sense of security; assessment of various political measures to protect citizens from crime and violence as sensible vs. excessive (Increased police presence on the streets and at train stations, expansion of video surveillance on public streets and squares, consistent and rapid deportation of foreign criminals, deportation of foreign criminals to non-secure countries of origin such as Syria or Afghanistan, recruitment of additional public prosecutors and judges, more state subsidies for private protective measures against burglars, e.g. alarm systems, stricter penalties for burglars, acceleration of criminal proceedings, ban on switchblade knives in pedestrian zones, shopping centers, public transport and around kindergartens and schools (split: ban on switchblades); trust in institutions (police, constitutional protection, public prosecutors, courts); advocating the use of internet surveillance and data retention by state authorities for the following purposes: Fending off cyber attacks, solving crimes, preventing the spread of anti-democratic content, preventing the spread of hate comments; messenger services should be obliged to automatically search private chats for depictions of sexualized violence. Demography: sex; age; federal state; Berlin West/East; size of location; highest level of education; party sympathy; respondent born in Germany; parents born in Germany (migration background). Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; weighting factor.Die Studie zur Inneren Sicherheit wurde von dimap im Auftrag des Presse- und Informationsamtes der Bundesregierung durchgeführt. Im Erhebungszeitraum 15.07.2024 bis 28.07.2024 wurde die Bevölkerung ab 16 Jahren in Deutschland in telefonischen Interviews (CATI) zu folgenden Themen befragt: Allgemeine Sicherheitslage in Deutschland, persönliches Sicherheitsempfinden und Ansichten zu verschiedenen Sicherheitsaspekten. Die Auswahl der Befragten erfolgte durch eine mehrstufige Zufallsstichprobe nach dem RDD-Verfahren unter Einschluss von Festnetz- und Mobilfunknummern (Dual-Frame Stichprobe).Allgemeine Sicherheitslage in Deutschland: Sicherheitsgefühl in Deutschland; Entwicklung der Inneren Sicherheit in Deutschland in den letzten zehn Jahren; Gründe für eine wahrgenommene Verschlechterung der Inneren Sicherheit (offen). Persönliche Sicherheit: allgemeines Sicherheitsgefühl im persönlichen Umfeld derzeit im Vergleich zu vor zehn Jahren; Beschreibung der Wohngegend (Häuser in einem guten Zustand, Wohnumfeld (z.B. Straßen, Haltestellen, Grünflächen) in einem guten Zustand, häufige Polizeipräsenz, etc.); Sicherheitsgefühl tagsüber an verschiedenen Orten (in der Wohnung oder im Haus, in der Nachbarschaft oder im Stadtteil, auf öffentlichen Plätzen, an Bahnhäfen, in Unterführungen und Bushaltestellen, in öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln, bei Fahrten mit dem Auto); Sicherheitsgefühl abends oder nachts an den vorgenannten Orten; persönliche Erfahrung bzw. Geschädigte im Verwandten- und Bekanntenkreis in den letzten zehn Jahren hinsichtlich verschiedener Delikte (z.B. Auto/ Fahrrad wurde gestohlen, bei einem Online-Kauf betrogen worden, zu Hause wurde eingebrochen, auf offener Straße belästigt oder angepöbelt worden, etc.); Einschätzung der Problematik in Deutschland durch Jugendgewalt, Gewalt in der Familie, ungerechtfertigte Polizeigewalt, organisierte Kriminalität (z.B. Mafia, Clans), Kriminalität durch Migranten, Linksextremismus, Rechtsextremismus, Islamismus, Cyberangriffe, Wirtschaftskriminalität und Desinformationskampagnen im Internet; Zunahme oder Abnahme politisch motivierter Gewalttaten in Deutschland in den letzten zehn Jahren. Ansichten zur Sicherheit: Freiheit ist im Zweifel wichtiger als Sicherheit vs .Sicherheit ist im Zweifel wichtiger als Freiheit; Bereitschaft, auf bestimmte Freiheiten zugunsten von mehr Sicherheit zu verzichten (dass der Schutz persönlicher Daten im Internet vorübergehend (Split: auf Dauer) außer Kraft gesetzt wird, längere Wartezeiten durch strengere Kontrollen an Flughäfen, den Einsatz von Sicherheitskontrollen an Bahnhöfen wie bisher nur am Flughafen, den Einsatz von Sicherheitskontrollen an Schulen und Universitäten wie bisher nur am Flughafen, flächendeckende Videoüberwachung im öffentlichen Raum, flächendeckender Einsatz von Gesichtserkennungssoftware, mehr Präsenz privater Sicherheitsdienste, z.B. in Supermärkten und öffentlichen Gebäuden, Polizeikontrollen auf der Straße auch ohne konkreten Verdacht, Kontrollen an den deutschen Grenzen); Meinung zu Videoüberwachung auf öffentlichen Plätzen in Bezug auf das persönliche Sicherheitsgefühl; Bewertung verschiedener politischer Maßnahmen zum Schutz der Bürger vor Kriminalität und Gewalt als sinnvoll vs. übertrieben (Erhöhung der Polizeipräsenz auf den Straßen und Bahnhöfen, Ausbau der Videoüberwachung auf öffentlichen Straßen und Plätzen, konsequente und schnelle Abschiebung von ausländischen Straftätern, Abschiebungen von ausländischen Straftätern auch in nicht-sichere Herkunftsländer wie Syrien oder Afghanistan, Einstellung zusätzlicher Staatsanwälte und Richter, mehr staatliche Zuschüsse für private Schutzvorkehrungen gegen Einbrecher, z.B. Alarmanlagen, strengere Strafen für Einbrecher, Beschleunigung von Strafgerichtsverfahren, Verbot von Springmessern in Fußgängerzonen, Einkaufszentren, öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln sowie rund um Kindergärten und Schulen (Split: Verbot von Springmessern); Institutionenvertrauen (Polizei, Verfassungsschutz, Staatsanwaltschaft, Gerichte); Befürwortung des Einsatzes von Internetüberwachung und Vorratsdatenspeicherung durch staatliche Behörden für folgende Zwecke: Cyberangriffe abwehren, Verbrechen aufklären, Verbreitung demokratiefeindlicher Inhalt unterbinden, Verbreitung von Hasskommentaren unterbinden; Messengerdienste sollten dazu verpflichtet werden, private Chats automatisch nach Darstellungen sexualisierter Gewalt zu durchsuchen. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Bundesland; Berlin West/Ost; Ortsgröße; höchster Bildungsabschluss; Parteisympathie; befragte Person in Deutschland geboren; Eltern in Deutschland geboren (Migrationshintergrund). Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Befragten-ID; Gewichtungsfaktor

    Growing Up in Scotland: Cohort 1: Sweep 9, 2017-2018: Special Licence Access

    No full text
    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The Growing Up in Scotland (GUS) study is a large-scale longitudinal social survey which follows the lives of several groups of Scottish children from infancy through childhood and adolescence. It aims to provide important information on children, young people and their families in Scotland. The study forms a central part of the Scottish Government's strategy for the long-term monitoring and evaluation of its policies for children and young people, with a specific focus on the early years. The study seeks both to describe the characteristics, circumstances and experiences of children in their early years in Scotland and, through its longitudinal design, to generate a better understanding of how children's start in life can shape their longer term prospects and developmentSince 2005 fieldwork has been undertaken by the Scottish Centre for Social Research. The survey design for Birth Cohort 1 consisted of recruiting the parents of an initial total of 5,217 children aged 10 months old in 2005 and interviewing them annually until their child reached age six. Further fieldwork was then undertaken at ages 8, 10, 12, 14 and 17-18 with a sample boost added at age 12.Data for sweeps 1-9 were collected via an in-home, face-to-face interview with self-complete sections. Fieldwork for sweep 10 was disrupted due to the COVID pandemic. As a result, the final portion of the data was collected via web and telephone questionnaires. Sweep 11 data were gathered via web, telephone and face-to-face surveys of cohort members and their parent/carer.Further information about the survey may be found on the&nbsp;Growing Up in Scotland&nbsp;website.In May 20205, data and documentation for Cohort 1, Sweeps 1-11 were released as individual studies (SNs 9373-9383 and 9386-9387). Previously they were held under one study (SN 5760) which has been withdrawn from the data catalogue.Main Topics:The main carer questionnaire covered the following topics:household informationnon-resident parents (NRP)schoolparentingactivitieschild health and developmentemploymenteducation and ethnicityreligion and languagesincome, expenditure and managing financiallyhousing and accommodationThe child self-completion CASI questionnaire covered the following topics:life satisfactionsupport (significant adult)health and wellbeing (health related quality of life and perception of own weight)hyperactivity/inattentionschoolfriendsrelationship with peersgoing online and using technological deviceschild behavioursrelationship with resident parentsaspirationsA self-completion PAPI (Pen and Paper Interview) questionnaire was completed with any resident partner of the main adult respondent.A&nbsp;topic overview&nbsp;covering all sweeps, is available on the GUS website.</div

    0

    full texts

    32,838

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇