CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
32838 research outputs found
Sort by
Sosiaalinen media työelämässä: kansallinen työntekijäkysely 2019
No full textAineistossa kartoitetaan suomalaisten työntekijöiden sosiaalisen median käyttöä työelämässä sekä heidän työhyvinvointiaan. Aluksi vastaajilta kysyttiin heidän alkoholin käyttötottumuksiaan, jonka jälkeen siirryttiin kartoittamaan sosiaalisen median käyttöä. Vastaajilta tiedusteltiin, kuinka usein he käyttävät eri sosiaalisen median palveluita ja mihin tarkoituksiin. Lisäksi selvitettiin, kuinka usein ja mihin tarkoituksiin vastaajat käyttävät sosiaalista mediaa työssään sekä millaisia kokemuksia sosiaalisen median työkäyttöön liittyy. Seuraavaksi kyselyssä käsiteltiin vastaajien kokemuksia sosiaalisen median aiheuttamasta stressistä ja kuormituksesta. Tämän jälkeen käsiteltiin työhyvinvointiin liittyviä teemoja, kuten työtyytyväisyyttä, työn imua ja organisaatioon identifioitumista. Lopuksi kartoitettiin vastaajien kokemuksia nettikiusaamisesta työpaikalla sekä heidän yleistä hyvinvointiaan ja työssä jaksamistaan. Kyselyn kokeellisessa osiossa vastaajat jaettiin satunnaisesti kahteen ryhmään. Vastaajien tuli kuvitella hakevansa uutta oman alansa työpaikkaa ja lukea lyhyt kuvaus avoinna olevasta tehtävästä. Tämän jälkeen he arvioivat työpaikkaa ilmoituksen perusteella kuuden väittämän avulla. Koeryhmä sai työpaikkailmoituksen, jossa korostettiin sosiaalisen median merkitystä työpaikan viestinnässä ja kontrolliryhmä sai ilmoituksen ilman viittausta sosiaaliseen mediaan. Kyselyssä on käytetty esimerkiksi seuraavia mittareita: Identity Bubble Reinforcement Scale IBRS (Samanmielisyys ja identiteettikuplat sosiaalisessa mediassa), Utrecht Work Engagement Scale UWES (Työn imu 9 -mittari), Maslach Burnout Indicator MBI-GS (Työuupumuskysely), General Health Questionnaire GHQ-12 (Psyykkinen kuormittuneisuus), Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire CPSQII (Työn vaatimukset ja voimavarat) ja Cyberbullying Questionnaire CBQ (Nettikiusaaminen työpaikalla). Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat muun muassa vastaajien sukupuoli, ikä, suuralue, siviilisääty, toimiala, kotitalouden henkilömäärä, kotitaloudessa asuvien lasten lukumäärä, koulutustaso, ammattiasema, alaisten määrä, työaika ja bruttotulot kuukaudessa.The survey maps Finnish employees' use of social media in working life as well as their occupational well-being. First, respondents were asked about their alcohol consumption habits. After that, the survey moved on to explore their use of social media. Respondents were asked about their general social media usage habits, including how frequently they use various platforms and for what purposes. In addition, the survey examined the frequency and purpose of social media use in the workplace, as well as respondents' experiences related to professional use of social media. Next, the survey addressed respondents' experiences of stress and strain caused by social media. This was followed by topics related to well-being at work, such as job satisfaction, work engagement, and organisational identification. Finally, the survey mapped the respondents' experiences of online bullying in the workplace, as well as their general well-being and coping at work. In the experimental part of the survey, respondents were randomly divided into two groups. They were asked to imagine applying for a new job in their field and to read a brief description of an open position. They then evaluated the position based on six statements. The experimental group received a job advertisement emphasizing the importance of social media in workplace communication, while the control group received an advertisement with no reference to social media. The survey included the following measurement instruments, among others: Identity Bubble Reinforcement Scale IBRS, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale UWES, Maslach Burnout Indicator MBI-GS, General Health Questionnaire GHQ-12, Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire CPSQII, and Cyberbullying Questionnaire CBQ. Background variables include, among others, gender, age, major region, marital status, industry, number of people in the household, number of children living in the household, level of education, occupational status, number of subordinates, working hours, and gross monthly income
Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Finland 2022
No full textTutkimuksessa kartoitettiin suomalaisten näkemyksiä täydentävistä ja vaihtoehtoisista hoidoista. Kyselyn alussa selvitettiin vastaajien kokemuksia eri hoitoammattilaisilla käymisestä kysymällä, ovatko he käyneet yhdellä tai useammalla hoitoammattilaisella (esim. lääkäri, kiropraktikko, homeopaatti, hieroja) viimeisen 12 kuukauden aikana. Tämän jälkeen vastaajilta kysyttiin käyntien määrää, tärkeintä syytä käynnille sekä koettua hyötyä käynnistä. Vastaajilta kysyttiin myös, onko lääkäri suositellut heille jotakin täydentävää tai vaihtoehtoista hoitoa viimeisen 12 kuukauden aikana. Seuraavaksi siirryttiin kartoittamaan vastaajien luontaistuotteiden käyttöä kysymällä, mitä luontaistuotteita vastaaja on käyttänyt tai mitä tuotteita lääkäri on suositellut käytettäväksi viimeisen 12 kuukauden aikana. Vastaajilta kysyttiin myös, ovatko he käyttäneet joitakin täydentäviä tai vaihtoehtoisia itseavun keinoja (esim. meditaatio/mindfulness, jooga, sauna, taide) viimeisen 12 kuukauden aikana. Tämän jälkeen vastaajilta tiedusteltiin itsehoitomenetelmien käytön määrää, tärkeintä syytä käytölle sekä käytöstä koettua hyötyä. Seuraavaksi vastaajilta kysyttiin yleisesti heidän kokemistansa hyödyistä tai haitoista liittyen täydentävien ja vaihtoehtoisten hoitojen käyttöön. Lisäksi vastaajilta tiedusteltiin koronapandemian vaikutuksesta täydentävien hoitojen, luontaistuotteiden sekä itseavun keinojen käyttöön. Tämän jälkeen vastaajille esitettiin erilaisia väitteitä terveydestä ja sairauksien hoitamisesta, joita heidän tuli arvioida. Lisäksi vastaajia pyydettiin arvioimaan omaa terveydentilaansa. Kyselyssä selvitettiin myös, aikooko vastaaja tulevaisuudessa käyttää jotakin täydentävää hoitoa sekä onko täydentävien hoitojen käyttö aiemmin vaikuttanut lääketieteellisen hoidon saamiseen tai viivästyttänyt sitä. Kyselyn lopussa vastaajaa pyydetään vielä arvioimaan, kuinka tärkeitä eri arvot ovat hänelle (esim. valta, mielihyvä, perinteet, turvallisuus). Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat vastaajan ammattiasema, elämänvaihe, ikäryhmä, kotitalouden koko, kotitalouden tulot, koulutusaste, sijoittuminen oikeisto-vasemmisto-akselilla, siviilisääty, sukupuoli, äidinkieli sekä useita eri aluemuuttujia.The study surveyed Finns' views on complementary and alternative medicine. At the beginning of the survey, respondents were asked about their experiences of visiting different healthcare professionals by asking whether they had visited one or more healthcare professionals (e.g., doctor, chiropractor, homeopath, massage therapist) during the past 12 months. Following this, the respondents were asked about the number of visits, the main reason for the visit, and the perceived benefits of the visit. The respondents were also asked whether a doctor had recommended any complementary or alternative medicine to them in the past 12 months. Next, the respondents' use of natural remedies was surveyed by asking what natural remedies they had used or what products their doctor had recommended for use during the past 12 months. The respondents were also asked whether they had used any self-help practices (e.g., meditation/mindfulness, yoga, sauna, art) in the past 12 months. The respondents were then asked about the frequency of using self-help practices, the most important reason for use, and the perceived benefits of use. The respondents were then asked more generally about the benefits or harms they had experienced from using complementary and alternative medicine. In addition, the survey explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of complementary and alternative medicine, natural remedies, and self-help practices. After this, the respondents were presented with various statements about health and the disease treatment, which they were asked to evaluate. They were also asked to assess their own health status. Additionally, the survey asked whether the respondents intended to use complementary medicine in the future and whether their use of complementary medicine had previously affected or delayed their access to medical care. At the end of the survey, the respondents were asked to evaluate how important different values are to them (e.g., power, pleasure, traditions, security). The background variables in the data include the respondent's occupational status, stage of life, age group, household size, household income, level of education, position on the right-left axis, marital status, gender, native language, and several different regional variables
Code/Syntax: Der Zusammenhang zwischen der sozialen Herkunft und der zurückgelegten räumlichen Distanz am Übergang von der Schule in eine Ausbildung oder ein Studium
No full textEs werden Stata-Syntaxdateien (.do) veröffentlicht mit denen die im zitierten Artikel berichteten Ergebnisse repliziert werden können. Zur Replikation der Auswertungen ziehen Sie bitte die unten zitierten Datensätze in heran. Abstract des Artikels Mehrere Studien konstatieren einen Einfluss der sozialen Herkunft auf die räumliche Distanz, die junge Erwachsene am Übergang von der Schule in ein Studium zurücklegen (Lörz 2008, Winkler 2019, Quast et al. 2022). Dieser Beitrag untersucht nun als eine der ersten Studien, inwiefern die soziale Herkunft auch mit der zurückgelegten räumlichen Distanz am Übergang von der Schule in eine Ausbildung zusammenhängt. Darüber hinaus wird analysiert, inwiefern sich der Zusammenhang zwischen sozialer Herkunft und zurückgelegter räumlicher Distanz danach unterscheidet, ob eine Ausbildung, ein Fachhochschulstudium oder ein Universitätsstudium aufgenommen wird, da diese Differenzierung bislang ebenfalls wenig berücksichtigt wurde. Zur Bearbeitung der beiden Forschungsbedarfe werden erstmals im Forschungsfeld die längsschnittlichen Daten der Startkohorten 3 und 4 des nationalen Bildungspanels (NEPS) verwendet und mit diesen multiple lineare Regressionsmodelle berechnet. Als zentrales Ergebnis zeigt sich, dass junge Erwachsene bei allen drei Arten von Übergängen gleichermaßen durch ein akademisches Elternhaus statt eines nicht-akademischen Elternhauses im Durchschnitt eine etwas größere räumliche Distanz zurücklegen. Dies weist angesichts der festgestellten Bedeutung von räumlicher Mobilität im Bildungsverlauf für den späteren Lebensverlauf (Lörz 2008, Netz 2012, Waibel 2019, Wicht et al. 2024) darauf hin, dass bei allen drei Bildungswegen durch die herkunftsbedingt ungleiche räumliche Mobilität ungleiche bildungs- und arbeitsmarktbezogene Verwertungsmöglichkeiten von Bildungsabschlüssen nach der sozialen Herkunft bestehen.Es werden Stata-Syntaxdateien (.do) veröffentlicht mit denen die im zitierten Artikel berichteten Ergebnisse repliziert werden können. Zur Replikation der Auswertungen ziehen Sie bitte die unten zitierten Datensätze in heran. Abstract des Artikels Mehrere Studien konstatieren einen Einfluss der sozialen Herkunft auf die räumliche Distanz, die junge Erwachsene am Übergang von der Schule in ein Studium zurücklegen (Lörz 2008, Winkler 2019, Quast et al. 2022). Dieser Beitrag untersucht nun als eine der ersten Studien, inwiefern die soziale Herkunft auch mit der zurückgelegten räumlichen Distanz am Übergang von der Schule in eine Ausbildung zusammenhängt. Darüber hinaus wird analysiert, inwiefern sich der Zusammenhang zwischen sozialer Herkunft und zurückgelegter räumlicher Distanz danach unterscheidet, ob eine Ausbildung, ein Fachhochschulstudium oder ein Universitätsstudium aufgenommen wird, da diese Differenzierung bislang ebenfalls wenig berücksichtigt wurde. Zur Bearbeitung der beiden Forschungsbedarfe werden erstmals im Forschungsfeld die längsschnittlichen Daten der Startkohorten 3 und 4 des nationalen Bildungspanels (NEPS) verwendet und mit diesen multiple lineare Regressionsmodelle berechnet. Als zentrales Ergebnis zeigt sich, dass junge Erwachsene bei allen drei Arten von Übergängen gleichermaßen durch ein akademisches Elternhaus statt eines nicht-akademischen Elternhauses im Durchschnitt eine etwas größere räumliche Distanz zurücklegen. Dies weist angesichts der festgestellten Bedeutung von räumlicher Mobilität im Bildungsverlauf für den späteren Lebensverlauf (Lörz 2008, Netz 2012, Waibel 2019, Wicht et al. 2024) darauf hin, dass bei allen drei Bildungswegen durch die herkunftsbedingt ungleiche räumliche Mobilität ungleiche bildungs- und arbeitsmarktbezogene Verwertungsmöglichkeiten von Bildungsabschlüssen nach der sozialen Herkunft bestehen
Understanding Non-compliance with Prevention Measures against COVID-19 Infections in Germany (U-Comply) - Full version
No full textThe U-COMPLY project is a 3-wave panel study funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with the purpose to understand non-compliance to the COVID-19 regulations in Germany. The study was conducted by Bilendi & respondi. In the survey period from April to September 2022, the German population aged between 18 and 75 years was asked about their compliance patterns, their perception of norms and compliance by others in their social network in online interviews (CASI) with a focus on adherence to the COVID-19 regulations. In addition, the survey explored possible antecedents of such behavior (e.g., self-control, perceived susceptibility and severity of infection, expected sanctions in case of non-adherence, vaccination status, immunization status, self-reported knowledge about COVID-19, information frequency, risk-group membership, contact with vulnerable individuals, conspiracy beliefs, political orientation) and conducted several vignette survey experiments. The respondents were selected using a quota sample from an online access panel from Bilendi & respondi.Wave 1: Fear of unemployment or not finding a new job; frequency of reception of information about the current corona situation in the region (via news and social contacts); self-reported knowledge about symptoms and effects of COVID-19; probability of (renewed) corona infection in general or without preventive measures; belonging to a risk group regarding corona infection or severe course; contact with people who belong to a risk group regarding corona infection or of a severe course; perceived threat in connection with the coronavirus (when I think about the coronavirus, I feel threatened, I am afraid of the coronavirus, I am not afraid of the coronavirus, I am worried that I or people I love could get sick from the coronavirus, I am stressed around other people because I am afraid that I could catch the coronavirus); number of personally known people who have died from coronavirus; effectiveness of various measures against the spread of coronavirus (move meetings outside, limit the number of people at private meetings, require coronavirus testing before private meetings, 3G rule: be fully vaccinated or recovered or test negative); frequency of compliance with various recommendations and guidelines against the spread of coronavirus in the last six weeks (keep your distance where this is mandatory, wear mouth and nose protection where mandatory, observe hygiene rules (e.g. hand disinfection), use the official coronavirus warning app, regularly ventilate rooms where others are present, voluntary coronavirus testing, e.g. before meetings with others, reduce social contacts); non-compliance with requirements (not taking a corona test where it was mandatory, using a foreign or falsified or expired corona test result, buying a foreign or falsified vaccination certificate, deliberately trying to infect another person with corona); personal moral standards for rule violations (generally violating the corona measures, not wearing a face mask where it is mandatory, not taking a corona test where it is mandatory); moral standards of the social environment: number of people who have generally violated the corona measures, not worn a face mask or not taken a corona test where it was mandatory; probability of being caught and reported for general violations of the corona measures and for not wearing a face mask or not taking a corona test where it is mandatory; estimated severity of sanctions for general violations of the corona measures and for not wearing a face mask or not taking a corona test where it is mandatory; expected consequences in the event of a corona infection (jeopardizing career/studies, severe health impairments, long-term health problems (e.g. long Covid, death, accusations from others, severe impairment of social relationships); attitude towards corona vaccination; immunization status: vaccination status, infection with the coronavirus, severity of symptoms, validity period of the recovered certificate; social relationships: talked to others about important things in the last six months (waves 1 and 3); up to seven people named with whom important things have been discussed in the last six months; corona infection of the respective person and symptoms (waves 1 and 3); personality: self-control (impulsiveness: I usually don´t put much thought and effort into preparing for my future, I don´t worry much about the future, I often act spontaneously without thinking long, I get bored quickly, willingness to take risks: Sometimes I take risks just for fun, sometimes I find it exciting to do things that could be dangerous, temperament: When I´m really angry, others had better leave me alone, I lose my temper pretty quickly); attitude towards migration in light of the pandemic; accepted amount of immigrants from different groups of people (immigrants who belong to the same ethnic group as the majority of Germans, immigrants who belong to a different ethnic group than the majority of Germans, immigrants who come from the poorer countries within Europe, immigrants who come from the poorer countries outside Europe); political orientation left-right. Additionally in the full version: Wave 1: Attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control and behavior in relation to risk contacts with confirmed infected case: evaluation of precautionary measures after a risk contact (corona test, reduce contacts, voluntary quarantine); expectations of the social environment after a risk contact (corona test, reduce contacts, voluntary quarantine); feeling of being able to do the following after a risk contact: Corona test, reduce contacts, voluntary quarantine); personal behavior after a risk contact; Vignette experiment: respondents were shown pictures of WhatsApp messages with the experimentally varied text (e.g. presence of members of a risk group) to measure reactions towards others in the event of non-compliance with a corona test requested by the host before a private birthday party (threat, impact; arousal, realization and reaction); Vignette experiment on the model of health beliefs: the respondents were shown pictures of WhatsApp messages with the experimentally varied text on the probability of attending a party with different protective measures and infection with corona at this party; ever violated the obligation to isolate during a corona infection; behavior when violating the obligation to isolate (walking, shopping, other (open naming); personal moral standards when violating the obligation to isolate in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; moral standards of the social environment: proportion of people in the social environment who have violated the obligation to isolate in general or the proportion of people in the social environment who have violated the isolation requirement in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; probability of sanctions for violations of the isolation requirement in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; severity of punishment for violations of the isolation requirement in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; willingness to violate the isolation requirement in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; Self-centered measurement method for COVID-related behavior of close persons: Frequency of violation of corona protection measures by said persons; Vignette experiment on the purchase of fake vaccination certificates with different attributes on moral norms, financial costs, trust in the delivery of the vaccination certificate, the level of punishment and the risk of detection; Vignette experiment to assess different attitudes towards rule violations due to discrimination against visible minorities (with different attributes on gender and ethnicity); Vignette experiment on dismissals for operational reasons in a medium-sized company for non-compliance with workplace regulations (different attributes on name, gender, age, employment in the company, formal criteria on work quality and quantity, other characteristics such as social skills, family relationships in the company and other information regarding COVID-19 vaccination (refusal to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or full COVID-19 vaccination). Wave 2: Fear of unemployment or not finding a new job; frequency of reception of information about the current coronavirus situation in the region (via news and social contacts); probability of a (renewed) coronavirus infection in general or without preventive measures; belonging to a risk group with regard to a coronavirus infection or a severe course; contact with people who belong to a risk group with regard to a coronavirus infection or regarding a severe course; perceived threat in connection with the coronavirus (when I think about the coronavirus, I feel threatened, I am afraid of the coronavirus, I am not afraid of the coronavirus, I am worried that I or people I love could get sick from the coronavirus, I am stressed around other people because I am afraid that I could catch the coronavirus); Number of people I know personally who have died from coronavirus; assessment of the effectiveness of various measures against the spread of coronavirus (keeping your distance where this is mandatory, wearing a face mask where this is mandatory, observing hygiene rules (e.g. hand disinfection)). e.g. hand disinfection), use the official corona warning app for contact tracing, regularly ventilate rooms where others are present, voluntary corona test e.g. before meeting others, reduce social contacts); COVID-specific self-efficacy with regard to the aforementioned actions; frequency of compliance with the various recommendations and guidelines against the spread of corona in the last six weeks; overfulfillment of the regulations since various corona measures have been lifted completely or in certain situations (keep your distance even where this is not prescribed, wear mouth and nose protection even where this is not prescribed (e.g. in the supermarket, avoid public transport and airplanes, avoid leisure activities where many people could meet in closed rooms (e.g. in restaurants, cinemas), meet as few other people as possible, take care of my immune system through my diet (e.g. by keeping a strong immune system). in restaurants, cinemas), meet as few other people as possible, ensure a strong immune system through my diet (e.g. by taking vitamin D) to protect myself from corona disease or its effects, to monitor my health to see if I might have signs of corona infection, to use apps on my smartphone, to work/study from home even if this is no longer mandatory); personal morals in case of rule violations (generally violating the corona measures, not wearing a mouth and nose protector where it is mandatory, not taking a corona test where it is mandatory); moral norms of the social environment: Number of people who have generally violated the corona measures, have not worn a mouth-nose cover or have not taken a corona test where it was prescribed); probability of sanctions for general violations of the corona measures and for not wearing a mouth-nose cover or not taking a corona test where it is prescribed; estimated severity of sanctions for general violations of the corona measures and for not wearing a mouth-nose cover or not taking a corona test where it is prescribed; expected consequences in the event of a corona infection (endangering career/study, severe health impairments, long-term health problems (e.g. long expected consequences in the event of a corona infection (jeopardizing career/studies, severe health impairments, long-term health problems (e.g. long Covid), death, reproaches from others, severe impairment of social relationships); attitude towards corona vaccination; immunization status: vaccination status, infection with the coronavirus, severity of symptoms, validity period of the recovered certificate; frequency of participation in protest events against corona measures or the vaccination obligation; self-assessment of empathy (given response option on various items); self-control in conflicts with own moral principles (No matter how tempting a situation is, I remain steadfast and do not react to it, despite a favorable opportunity to get something valuable, I manage to remain true to my principles regardless of what personal benefits I may have, I make decisions according to my moral principles, no matter how much others try to persuade me to do something, I remain steadfast and do not react, even if many people act differently from me, I manage to remain true to my principles, regardless of what others say or do, I make decisions according to my moral principles). Additionally in the full version: Wave 2: Attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control and behavior in relation to risk contacts with confirmed infected case: Frequency of information from one or more persons about risk contacts in the last six weeks; behavior after being informed about risk contacts (one or more corona tests (e.g. (e.g. rapid tests or PCR tests); behavior after being informed about the contact person´s positive test (contacts reduced in the following days, self-isolation in the following days after own positive or negative test); violated the isolation obligation in the last six weeks during own corona infection; violation of the isolation obligation: I went for a walk, I went shopping, other - open); personal morals in case of violations of the isolation obligation in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; moral norms of the social environment: estimated proportion of people in the social environment who have generally violated the isolation obligation or to go for a walk and to go shopping; probability of sanctions for violations of the isolation obligation in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; severity of the punishment for violations of the isolation obligation in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; willingness to violate the isolation obligation in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; Ego-centered measurement method of COVID-related behavior of close people with different opinions on the COVID vaccine: do not know anyone with a different opinion on the corona vaccine; naming of up to seven people whose opinion on the subject of corona vaccination differs from your own; change in contact with the respective person due to the different opinions on the subject of corona vaccination; Vignette experiment on avoiding and breaking off contact in the event of differing opinions on the subject of coronavirus vaccination (avoiding confrontation, canceling meetings or breaking off contact). Vignette experiment on the topic of immigration: Attitude towards a person who fled to Germany and was infected with corona shortly after arrival (different attributes regarding gender, age, country of origin, education and behavior regarding the obligation to isolate) with regard to the right to stay, work permit, equal rights as German citizens and acceptance of this person in the neighborhood. Wave 3: Fear of unemployment or not finding a new job; frequency of reception of information about the current corona situation in the region (via news and social contacts); self-reported knowledge about symptoms and effects of COVID-19; probability of (renewed) corona infection in general or without preventive measures; belonging to a risk group regarding corona infection or severe course; contact with people who belong to a risk group regarding corona infection or severe course; perceived threat in connection with the coronavirus (when I think about the coronavirus, I feel threatened, I am afraid of the coronavirus, I am not afraid of the coronavirus, I am worried that I or people I love could get sick from the coronavirus, I am stressed around other people because I am afraid that I could catch the coronavirus); number of people I know personally who have died from coronavirus; effectiveness of various measures against the spread of corona (keeping distance where prescribed, wearing mouth and nose protection where prescribed, observing hygiene rules (e.g. hand disinfection), using the official corona warning app for contact tracing, regular ventilation of rooms in which others are also present, voluntary corona test e.g. before meeting others, reducing social contacts); COVID-specific self-efficacy with regard to the aforementioned actions; frequency of compliance with the various recommendations and guidelines against the spread of corona; overfulfillment of the regulations since various corona measures have been lifted completely or in certain situations (keep your distance even where it is not prescribed, wear a face mask even where it is not prescribed (e.g. in the supermarket), avoid public transport and airplanes, avoid leisure activities where many people could meet in closed rooms (e.g. in restaurants, cinemas), meet as few other people as possible, ensure a strong immune system through my diet (e.g. by taking vitamin D) to protect myself from corona disease or its effects, to monitor my health to see if I might have signs of a corona infection, use apps on my smartphone, work/study from home, even if this is no longer mandatory); personal morals in case of rule violations (generally violating the corona measures, not wearing a mouth-nose cover or, not taking a corona test where it is mandatory); moral norms of the social environment (number of people who generally violated the corona measures, did not wear a mouth-nose cover where it was mandatory, did not take a corona test where it was mandatory); probability of sanctions for general violations of the corona measures or for not wearing a mouth-nose cover and not taking a corona test where it is prescribed; estimated severity of sanctions for general violations of the corona measures or for not wearing a mouth-nose cover and not taking a corona test where it is prescribed; expected consequences in the event of corona infection (jeopardizing career/studies, severe health impairments, long-term health problems (e.g. long Covid, death, reproaches from others, severe impairment of social relationships); attitude towards corona vaccination; immunization status: vaccination status, infection with coronavirus, severe symptoms, death, reproaches from others, severe impairment of social relationships). expected consequences in case of corona infection (endangering career/study, long-term health problems (e.g. long Covid), death, accusations from others, severe impairment of social relationships); attitude towards corona vaccination; immunization status: vaccination status, infection with the coronavirus, severity of symptoms, validity period of the recovered certificate; social relationships: talked to others about important things in the last 6 months (waves 1 and 3); up to seven people named with whom important things were discussed in the last 6 months; corona infection of the respective person and symptoms; personality: Preference for affect- and cognition-based decision making (Before I make decisions, I usually think carefully first, before I make decisions, I usually think about the goals I want to achieve first, I take apart the hard facts and details of a problem before I make a decision, I prefer to draw conclusions based on my feelings, knowledge of human nature and life experience, feelings play a big role in my decisions, I am a very intuitive person); self-control in conflicts with my own moral principles (No matter how tempting a situation is, I remain steadfast and do not react to it, despite a favorable opportunity to get something valuable, I manage to remain true to my principles, regardless of what personal benefits I may have, I make decisions according to my moral principles, no matter how much others try to persuade me to do something, I remain steadfast and do not react, even if many people act differently from me, I manage to remain true to my principles, regardless of what others say or do, I make decisions according to my moral principles); conspiracy allegations about Corona (The whole truth about Corona is being withheld from the public, people need to wake up and start asking questions about Corona, legitimate questions about Corona are being suppressed by the government, media and academia, reporters, scientists and government officials are involved in a conspiracy to hide important information about Corona, an impartial, independent investigation into Corona would show once and for all that we have been lied to on a grand scale); Participation in protest events against the Corona measures or the vaccination obligation; participation in counter-events to these Corona demonstrations. Additionally in the full version: Wave 3: Attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control and behavior in relation to risk contacts with confirmed infected case: frequency of information by one or more persons about risk contacts in the last six weeks; behavior after being informed about risk contacts (one or more corona tests (e.g. rapid tests or PCR tests) made; behavior after being informed about the positive test of the contact person (contacts reduced in the following days, self-isolation in the following days after own positive or negative test); violated the isolation requirement in the last six weeks during own corona infection; violation of the isolation requirement: I went for a walk, I went shopping, other - open); personal moral standards for violations of the isolation requirement in general or to go for a walk and to go shopping; moral standards of the social environment: estimated proportion of people in the social environment who generally violated the isolation requirement or to go f
Thüringen-Monitor 2000-2024
No full textThe Thüringen-Monitor is a representative population survey on political culture in the Free State of Thuringia that has been held annually since 2000. It contains fixed and changing questions. The Thuringia Monitor is commissioned by the Thuringian State Chancellery (Erfurt). A particular focus is on research into right-wing extremist attitudes, acceptance of democracy, satisfaction with democracy and the institutional trust of the Thuringian population. The basic population is the electorate of the Free State of Thuringia. By 2022, a total of 22 survey waves with at least 1,000 respondents each were carried out in the trend design by changing survey institutes (CATI, random sampling according to the Gabler-Häder design). No survey took place in 2009. From 2012, the data were weighted according to the Thuringian State Statistical Office with regard to age, gender, education and household size (IPF weighting). From 2000 to 2022, a total of 1,362 different variables were collected in the Thüringen-Monitor, which can be assigned to the following categories: 1 Deprivation/Anomy/Satisfaction 2 Thuringia/Identity/German Unity 3 Politics/Democracy/Institutions/Actors 4 Right-wing extremism/attitude towards migration/minorities 5 GDR/Socialism 6 Social State/Market Economy/Ecology 7 Social problems 8 Values 9 Family/education and education/generational relations 10 Internationalization/Europeanization/Cultural Competence 11 Health and care 12 Covid-19 Pandemic 13 City and country 14 Environment and climate 15 Transformation of the working world The series of measurements on right-wing extremist attitudes is based on ten consent items (with four-step response scales) and begins in 2001. According to the consensus definition of right-wing extremism, it covers the following attitudinal dimensions: xenophobia, nationalism/chauvinism, social Darwinism, trivialisation of National Socialism, anti-Semitism and advocacy of a right-wing dictatorship (vgl. Heinrich Best / Katja Salomo (2014): Güte und Reichweite der Messung des Rechtsextremismus im THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2000 bis 2014. Expertise für die Thüringer Staatskanzlei. Erfurt.)Sociodemography: age (year of birth); sex; occupational status; length of unemployment (in months); unemployment longer than six months since the fall of communism; employment in the public sector; occupation; main occupation; highest educational attainment of respondent; highest educational attainment of parents; education of partner; activity of partner; GDR citizen before October 1989; number of grandchildren; marital status; place of birth; net household income; household composition: number of children under 18 (2000: under 16) years of age in the household; number of persons in the household as a whole; number of persons in the household from 18 years of age; household size (grouped); number of children outside the household; children currently attending day-care centre, school, (technical) college; number of own children in total; number of desired children; number of children in school; number of children under 6 years of age; frequency of church attendance; fixed partnership; living together with partner; denomination; housing situation; job security; socialisation (East/West / abroad); residential status; number of telephone numbers in the household. Additionally coded was: Wave (survey year); interview number; person weight; quota groups gender and age for IPF weighting from 2012 onwards; random variables (2013, 2014); answer open question and question order (2015); average population share district 2005 to 2009; consistency of freedom; class of location; residence size; perceived responsivity of other public right-wing extremist activities (share of district in total number of Thuringia and number of incidents in district); suspected right-wing extremist crimes (share of district in total number of Thuringia and number of incidents in district). Wave 2000: Agreement with various statements: Thuringia need not shy away from comparison with many West German states; the economic situation in Thuringia is better than in other East German states; identity as a Thuringian, as an East German, as a German or as a European; assessment of the economic situation in Thuringia and of one´s own financial situation; fair share of standard of living compared with others in Germany; preponderance of advantages or disadvantages of German unification; personally experienced disadvantage due to East German origin; preference for freedom vs. equality or freedom vs. security. Politics and society: left-right self-ranking; interest in politics; democracy as the best of all state ideas; satisfaction with democracy; trust in institutions (federal government, state government, courts, police, doctors, nurses); overfamiliarity with many foreigners; can understand and assess political issues well; agreement with various statements: foreigners only come here to exploit our welfare state; there are valuable and unvaluable lives; foreigners should in principle choose their spouses from among their own countrymen; our country needs tough and vigorous enforcement of German interests against foreign countries; in the national interest, a dictatorship is the better form of government in certain circumstances; people like me have no influence on what the government does (political efficacy); parties only want the votes of the electorate, they are not interested in their views; today everything is changing so fast that I often don´t know what to stick to (anomie); fear of crime; fear of descent; satisfaction with life; some groups of people are simply superior to others; in order to get ahead in life one has to override others; desire for a return to the socialist order; Jews today try to take advantage of the fact that they were the victims during the Nazi era; open up more to the values and standards of other cultures in the future; most refugees and asylum seekers cannot be integrated into Germany at all because of their culture; immigrants should be allowed to retain their lifestyle; women should once again focus more on the role of wife and mother; associations associated with the concept of home; importance of home; attachment to the community, to the region, to Thuringia, to Germany and to Europe; Region; importance of various aspects for an identity as a Thuringian (being born in Thuringia, having at least one Thuringian parent, feeling Thuringian, participating in political life in Thuringia, having grown up in Thuringia, having lived in Thuringia for a long time, speaking one of the Thuringian dialects, maintaining Thuringian traditions); assessment of the environment with regard to: Job prospects, educational opportunities, leisure and cultural opportunities, environmental conditions, living conditions, shopping opportunities, local public transport, provision of doctors and care facilities, accessibility of authorities, childcare facilities and schools, internet access, public safety; willingness to deal with official matters via the internet; future of own region; Saving the environment only with less consumption; priority for economic growth, unless the environment is damaged in the process; to protect the environment, people should do without their own cars; opinion on measures in the course of a climate-friendly energy policy; generally for or against recruiting workers abroad in a targeted manner; assessment of people of different origins, religions and cultures living together in Thuringia; Personal contact with refugees or asylum seekers; feelings when meeting refugees in person; feeling disturbed by the building of mosques in the neighbourhood; feeling disturbed when Muslim women wear headscarves in public; party affiliation; strength of party affiliation; political participation: approaching a politician, taking part in a signature campaign, working in a political party or citizens´ initiative, fighting for one´s own goals, even with the use of violence; willingness to do voluntary work; being overly alienated by the many foreigners in Thuringia; with the policies that Israel is pursuing, I can well understand that people have something against Jews; most unemployed people make a nice life for themselves at the expense of others; in these times we absolutely need a strong hand; demand obedience and discipline from one´s own children to raise them to be decent citizens; attitude towards Muslims (most Muslims accept our values laid down in the Basic Law, make too many demands, Muslims should be banned from immigrating to Germany); the state should be generous when examining asylum applications; National Socialism also had its good sides; German achievements greater than those of other peoples; right of the strongest also in society; most asylum seekers do not really fear persecution in their home country; in our democracy people´s concerns are no longer effectively represented; more should be done for the majority in the country than worrying about minorities; we should think more about our traditions again; West Germans treat East Germans as second-class people; GDR had more good sides than bad; Jews have something special and peculiar about them and don´t really fit in; social cohesion in Germany is endangered; repatriation of all refugees and asylum seekers to their home countries as soon as war and persecution have ended; compulsory participation in integration and language courses for all refugees and asylum seekers; those who have lived here all their lives should have more rights than those who moved here later; living environment overly alienated by the many foreigners. Demography: age (year of birth); marital status; occupation; socialisation east/west; occupational status; employment in public service; job security; education; household size; total number of children; number of children under 18; religious community; migration background; moving to Thuringia from another federal state or from abroad; intention to move away; net income. Wave 2019: Health: satisfaction with medical care in Germany and in Thuringia; satisfaction with health insurance services; satisfaction with health care in the immediate vicinity with regard to: GPs, specialists, accessibility of the nearest hospital, provision of psychotherapists, pharmacies, outpatient nursing services, health advice facilities, provision of midwives and birthing centres, waiting time for an appointment with specialists; gaps in provision or other problems in the area of health care (open); opinion on the job description of care assistants in GP practices; assessment of the personal financial burden of medical treatment and medication; assessment of measures to maintain and promote health in one´s own workplace; attitude towards organ donation; blood donors. Care: assessment of the personal financial burden of care; assessment of the time burden, the health burden as well as the burden on one´s occupation due to care tasks; acceptance of senior housing community or multi-generation house as a possibility of living in old age; willingness to move into an age-appropriate flat. Health policy measures: Importance of various health policy measures (attracting family doctors to rural areas, setting up medical health centres, recruiting nursing and health professionals from abroad, expanding medical school places, promoting medical care and advice via the internet (video consultation hours), promoting mobile medical practices in rural areas and expanding offers for preventing illness and maintaining health; for vs. against recruiting care workers from abroad; support for higher salaries for care workers; agreement with the demand for all citizens, i.e. also civil servants and self-employed, to be insured in the statutory health insurance funds. Demography: member of a statutory health insurance fund or privately insured; chronic illness or disability; own need for care (care degree); occupation; completed vocational training; highest educational attainment of parents. Wave 2020: Corona crisis: Personally affected by Corona resp. relatives, friends or close acquaintances; demand harsher punishments for people who do not comply with Corona measures; to protect the population from the Corona virus, basic rights must also be restricted if necessary; should be grateful for leaders who tell us how to deal with the Corona crisis; danger from the Corona virus is greatly exaggerated by the media; existence of secret organisations that have great influence on political decisions during the Corona crisis; uncertainty due to changing assessments by experts; Corona virus no worse than flu; Trust own feelings in dealing with Corona more than experts; in dealing with the Corona crisis, the opposition should not criticise the government but support it; assessment of the danger posed by the Corona crisis with regard to the health system, social cohesion, the economy, basic democratic rights, one´s own health and personal economic situation; willingness to be vaccinated; assessment of various measures to contain the Corona pandemic (restriction of personal contacts, compulsory wearing of masks, closure of schools and day-care centres, closure of shops and restaurants; too few vs. too many measures taken by politicians with regard to the following: medical care, restriction of public life, reduction of economic damage; personally most important (open) for coping with the Corona crisis; satisfaction with public communication by politicians during the Corona crisis; changes in personal life during the Corona crisis with regard to family life, personal economic situation, and social contacts; satisfaction with previous policies during the Corona crisis at the federal, district/city, and state level; trust in science; important decisions in a democracy should better be made by independent experts than by elected politicians; it is time for more resistance against current policies. Wave 2021: Corona crisis: Evaluation of the Corona policy of the federal government, the state government, the municipality; perception of dangers posed by the Corona crisis for social cohesion, for basic democratic rights, for one´s own health, for one´s personal economic situation as well as for the educational opportunities of young people; danger posed by the Corona virus is greatly exaggerated by the media; existence of secret organisations that have great influence on political decisions during the Corona crisis; Corona virus no worse than flu; trust own feelings more than experts when dealing with Corona; government has deliberately put population in fear in order to be able to enforce massive restrictions on basic rights; measures to contain the pandemic are greatly exaggerated; politicians are doing enough to explain measures; must be careful not to slide into dictatorship; those who compare Corona restrictions with Nazi period ridicule real victims of Nazi dictatorship; personally affected by Corona in terms of health; willing to take part in a protest demonstration against Corona measures. Understanding of democracy: most important feature of democracy; assessment of relevance of different features of democracy: equality before the law; state cares for the weak; equal life chances for all; freedom of expression; free and secret elections; strong opposition; minority rights; politicians align policies with citizens´ wishes; politicians inform themselves about citizens´ wishes; politicians explain decisions; equal rights for all who live permanently in the country; MPs should be mirrors of society; close dialogue between politics and citizens; active participation of citizens. Wave 2022: Thuringia need not fear comparison with many West German federal states; economic situation in Thuringia is better than in other East German federal states; assessment of economic situation in Thuringia and own financial situation; fair share of standard of living compared with others in Germany; predominance of advantages or disadvantages of German unification; personally experienced disadvantage due to East German origin; interest in politics; democracy is the best of all state ideas; satisfaction with democracy; trust in institutions (federal government, state government, courts, mayors in Thuringia, agreement with various statements: Over-alienation of the Federal Republic by the many foreigners; the foreigners only come here to take advantage of our welfare state; there is valuable and unvaluable life; foreigners should in principle choose their spouses from among their own compatriots; our country needs a tough and vigorous enforcement of German interests vis-à-vis foreign countries; in the national interest, under certain circumstances, a dictatorship is the better form of government; people like me have no influence either way on what the government does (political efficacy); parties only want the votes of the electorate, they are not interested in their views; today everything changes so fast that I often don´t know what to adhere to (anomie); fear of crime; fear of descent; life satisfaction; some groups of people are simply superior to others; in order to get ahead in life, one must override others; desire for a return to the socialist order; feminism systematically disadvantages men in our society; the people should make the most important decisions and not the politicians; politicians are always in agreement when it comes to protecting their privileges; the government deliberately frightened the population in the Corona crisis in order to be able to impose massive restrictions on fundamental rights. Town and country: associations with the terms town and country (open); characterisation of one´s own town or municipality on the basis of pairs of opposites (rural/ urban, traditional/ modern, anonymous/ socially networked, remote/ central, family unfriendly/ family friendly, quiet/ lively, not an attractive place to live/ an attractive place to live); attachment to the town or municipality, the region and to Thuringia; satisfaction with the place of residence with regard to the following aspects: mobile data provision, local public transport, emergency care and provision of GPs; accessibility of: Shopping facilities for everyday needs, specialist doctor, cultural and leisure facilities, childcare facilities and schools as well as offers of care services; satisfaction with the help among neighbours and acquaintances, the activity of associations and the willingness to do voluntary work; assessment of the development of the town/municipality in the last 10 to 15 years; Assessment of the economic situation of the town or municipality compared to the rest of Thuringia and compared to the rest of Germany; expected future development of the town or municipality; perception of problems for the town or municipality due to out-migration of young people, lack of skilled workers among young people and availability of affordable housing; opinion on state politics and the people in the rest of Thuringia (the politicians in Erfurt have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, the people in the rest of Thuringia do not understand and respect how the people in my region live, the politicians in Erfurt are not interested in the region I live in); opinion about federal politics and about the people in the rest of Germany (the politicians in Berlin have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, the people in the rest of Germany do not understand and respect how the people in my region live, the politicians in Berlin are not interested in the region where I live); agreement with new renewable energy plants in the residential area; sufficient consideration of citizens´ concerns when building renewable energy plants. Party affiliation; political participation (participation in a signature collection, participation in a political party, participation in an authorized or an an unauthorized demonstration, political violence); volunteer work; regular participation in federal elections; agreement with various statements: with the policies Israel is making, I can well understand having something against Jews; it worries me to get more and more on the losing side of life due to social development; in these times we absolutely need a strong hand; whoever wants to raise his children to be decent citizens must demand obedience and discipline from them above all; most Muslims living in Germany accept our values as they are laid down in the Basic Law; National Socialism also had its good sides; other peoples may have accomplished important things, but they do not come close to German achievements; as in nature, the strongest should always prevail in society; politicians generally strive to represent the interests of the people; the ruling and powerful act against the interests of the ordinary people; it is time to show more resistance to current politics; we should think more about our traditions again; West Germans treat East Germans as second-class people; the GDR had more good sides than bad; the Jews have something special and peculiar about them and don´t really fit in with us; the citizens in Germany agree in principle about what must happen politically; what is called compromise in politics is really just a betrayal of principles; there is always talk only about the persecution of the Jews, how the Germans suffered, nobody talks about that; the ruling elites are pursuing the goal of replacing the German people with immigrants; the Western world has conspired against Russia and Putin in order to expand its own power; my living environment has been dangerously alienated by the many foreigners; nowadays, one cannot express one´s opinion freely because otherwise one could
Innovation in agri-food systems – A systematic mapping of the literature (1997-2017)
No full textThis study systematically explores, analyses, reports on and synthesises research on the topic of sectoral innovation systems related to agriculture and agri-food in OECD countries. It is based on systematic mapping of the literature (academic papers published in scientific journals) in the period 1997-2017. The aim is to show the state of current knowledge on sectoral innovation systems in agri-food, in order to identify knowledge gaps and future areas for research and provide methodological and theoretical perspectives. Abstracts for a total of 320 papers were analysed, using a qualitative approach. Key elements of agricultural innovation systems identified were organised into 8 main themes/topics: agents, basic technologies, knowledge and learning processes, mechanisms of interaction, institutions, end-users, system transition and contextual variables. Areas identified as requiring research included making the sector more consumer- and market-oriented, increasing interactions outside conventional system boundaries, including the consumer perspective and societal changes, and determining the role of gender in innovation in agri-food systems. All the items included in the mapping were given a unique identification number. The data file (excel) shows the list of items included in the mapping and items removed in the latest stage of the screening process, together with a note on the reason for exclusion. Items only pertaining to innovation at firm level, without special attention to sectoral systems or AKIS, were excluded from the mapping in the screening process and not given an identification number. The items selected for the mapping were entered into the Excel sheet that constitutes the final database and analysed following a protocol. Based on availability of information in the abstracts, the following characteristics were noted: Period of study; country or countries of study; data type (qualitative, quantitative, mixed); data source (qualitative or quantitative); firm size; number of firms in the study; food product/category (e.g. agriculture, organic food, vegetables, wheat, dairy; food industry); research method (e.g. case study, econometric, survey); key elements and outcomes studied; theory/framework applied; and additional notes (not always applied). Key elements in the items included were recorded, based on the abstracts. The key elements, subject or main findings were then summarised in a qualitative interpretation based on the abstracts, which is presented in the second dataset.Studien är en systematisk kartläggning över litteratur rörande innovation i livsmedelssystemet publicerad i vetenskapliga tidskrifter i perioden 1997-2017 och som rör det agrikulturella kunskaps och innovationssystemet i OECD-länder. Sammanfattningar från 320 artiklar som ingår i studien har analyserats utifrån nyckelord som sedan kategoriserats och beskrivits med syftet att påvisa de nuvarande kunskapsläget och identifiera framtida forskningsområden. Materialet är kategoriserat i åtta huvudteman: agenter, teknologi, kunskaps- och lärandeprocesser, interaktionsmekanismer, institutioner, slutanvändare, systemförändringar och kontextuella variabler. Se den engelska versionen av denna sida för ytterligare information
Folkräkningen 1940 - Yrkesgrupper
No full textThis data collection is divided into two subset. For each municipality and town there is information about total population within the principal occupational groups agriculture and subsidiary industry, industry and craft, transport, storage, communication and commerce, public service and independent professions, domestic work, and unspecified occupation and also about total number of professionally employed. For towns with more than 10 000 inhabitants there is a subset including information about total population and number of professionally employed within the principal occupational groups and also within subgroups of these principal groups.För samtliga kommuner och städer finns uppgifter om totala folkmängden inom huvudgrupperna jordbruk med binäringar, industri och hantverk, samfärdsel och handel, allmän förvaltningstjänst och fria yrken, husligt arbete och ospecificerad verksamhet samt uppgift om antal yrkesverksam befolkning. För städer med mer än 10 000 invånare finns dessutom ett dataset med uppgifter om hela folkmängden och antalet yrkesutövare inom huvudgrupperna samt uppgifter om hela folkmängden och antalet yrkesutövare inom undergrupper till ovannämnda huvudgrupper
Eurobarometer 91.1 (2019)
No full textSince the early 1970s the European Commission´s Standard & Special Eurobarometer are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries. Principal investigators are the Directorate-General Communication and on occasion other departments of the European Commission or the European Parliament. Over time, candidate and accession countries were included in the Standard Eurobarometer Series. Selected questions or modules may not have been surveyed in each sample. Please consult the basic questionnaire for more information on country filter instructions or other questionnaire routing filters. In this study the following modules are included: 1. European Parliament Spring Eurobarometer 2019, 2. Passenger rights.Topics: 1. European Parliament Spring Eurobarometer 2019: current and desired importance of the role of the European Parliament within the EU; voting decision in an assumed referendum on the own country’s membership in the EU; awareness of the date of the next European Parliament elections in the own country; interest in the next European elections; intention to vote in the next European elections; awareness of messages in the media encouraging people to vote; preferred issues to be emphasized in the electoral campaign for the next European Parliament elections; reasons for voting in the next European Parliament elections; reasons for not voting; assessment of the own country’s membership in the EU as a good thing; benefits from the EU membership; rise of political parties protesting against traditional political elites is a matter of concern. 2. Passenger rights: use of the following transport services during the last twelve months: local urban transport, rail transport, air transport, long-distance coach transport, ship or ferry services; awareness and information regarding passenger rights; place of information about passenger rights; sources of information on passenger rights; attitude towards the following statements on the level of being informed about passenger rights regarding air trips taken over the last twelve months: well‐informed by the airline before travel, well‐informed by the airline during travel, well‐informed by the airline after travel; experience of the following disruptions regarding air trips taken over the last twelve months: departure delay of 2 hours or more, arrival delay of 3 hours or more, flight cancellation, denied boarding, delayed / lost / damaged luggage, personal injury, other, no disruptions; compensation received for most significant disruption during the last twelve months: food and drinks, accommodation, alternative flight or other travel arrangements at no extra cost, reimbursement of the cost of the ticket, compensation for the disruption suffered, other, nothing; attitude towards the following statements on the level of being informed about passenger rights regarding rail trips taken over the last twelve months: well‐informed by the rail company before travel, well‐informed by the rail company during travel, well‐informed by the rail company after travel; experienced disruptions regarding rail trips taken over the last twelve months; compensation received for most significant disruption during the last twelve months; attitude towards the following statements on the level of being informed about passenger rights regarding ship or ferry trips taken over the last twelve months: well‐informed by the ship or ferry transport company before travel, well‐informed by the ship or ferry transport company during travel, well‐informed by the ship or ferry transport company after travel; experienced disruptions regarding ship or ferry trips taken over the last twelve months; compensation received for most significant disruption during the last twelve months; attitude towards the following statements on the level of being informed about passenger rights regarding coach trips taken over the last twelve months: well‐informed by the coach company before travel, well‐informed by the coach company during travel, well‐informed by the coach company after travel; experienced disruptions regarding coach trips taken over the last twelve months; compensation received for most significant disruption during the last twelve months; most likely point of contact to turn to in case of a complaint: transport company, national authority responsible for passenger rights, consumer association, lawyer, out‐of‐court dispute resolution body, claims agency, Europe Direct Contact Centre of the European Union, other, depends on transport means, none; means of transport the most significant disruption was experienced with in the last twelve months; satisfaction with the management of the complaint; satisfaction with the way the transport company informed about complaint procedures; complaint and reasons for not complaining; satisfaction with the management of the complaint by the transport company; use of a single ticket combining different modes of transport in the last twelve months; kind of combinations used; problems when using such a ticket; requested assistance for respondent himself or for another person in case of disability or reduced mobility when travelling with the aforementioned services; satisfaction with the assistance; pre-notification of the assistance needs to the transport company; satisfaction with the assistance received when changing the mode of transport. Demography: age; nationality; frequency of discussions about political matters on national, European, and local level; left-right self-placement; marital status; sex; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community; household composition and household size; financial difficulties during the last year; internet use (at home, at work, at school); self-reported belonging to the working class, the middle class or the upper class of society; own voice counts in the own country and in the EU; general direction things are going in the own country and in the EU; opinion leadership; EU image. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; country; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; number of persons present during the interview; respondent cooperation; size of locality; region; language of the interview; nation group; weighting factor.Seit den frühen 1970er Jahren beobachten die Standard & Spezial Eurobarometer der Europäischen Kommission regelmäßig die öffentliche Meinung in den Mitgliedsländern der Europäischen Union. Primärforscher sind die Generaldirektion Kommunikation und bei Spezialthemen weitere Direktionen sowie das Europäische Parlament. Im Laufe der Zeit wurden Kandidaten- und Beitrittsländer in die Standard Eurobarometer-Reihe aufgenommen. Ausgewählte Fragen oder Module können in einigen Samples nicht erhoben worden sein. Bitte ziehen Sie für weitere Informationen bezüglich Länderfilter oder anderer Filterführungen den Basisfragebogen heran. In dieser Studie sind folgende Module vorhanden: 1. European Parliament Spring Eurobarometer 2019, 2. Passagierrechte.Themen: 1. European Parliament Spring Eurobarometer 2019: aktuelle und gewünschte Bedeutung der Rolle des Europäischen Parlaments in der EU; Stimmverhalten in einem angenommen Referendum über die Mitgliedschaft des eigenen Landes in der EU; Kenntnis des Termins der Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament im eigenen Land; Interesse an den nächsten Europawahlen; Wahrscheinlichkeit der eigenen Wahlbeteiligung an der Europawahl; Wahrnehmung von Aufrufen in den Medien, sich an den Wahlen zu beteiligen; Themen, die im Wahlkampf für die nächsten Wahlen zum Europäischen Parlament hervorgehoben werden sollen; Gründe zur Teilnahme an den nächsten Wahlen zum Europäischen Parlament; Gründe, nicht zu wählen; Einschätzung der EU-Mitgliedschaft des eigenen Landes als positiv; Nutzen der EU-Mitgliedschaft; Aufstieg politischer Protestparteien gibt Anlass zur Sorge. 2. Passagierrechte: Nutzung der folgenden Verkehrsmittel in den letzten zwölf Monaten: städtischer Nahverkehr, Schienenverkehr, Flugreisen, Fernbus, Schiffs- oder Fährverkehr; Bekanntheit der und Informiertheit über die Rechte von Passagieren; Ort der Information über Passagierrechte; Informationsquelle zu den Passagierrechten; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen über die Informiertheit über die Passagierrechte im Hinblick auf Flugreisen in den letzten zwölf Monaten: vor der Reise von der Fluggesellschaft informiert, während der Reise von der Fluggesellschaft informiert, nach der Reise von der Fluggesellschaft informiert; Störung der unternommenen Flugreisen in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten durch: Verzögerung des Abflugs um 2 Stunden oder mehr, Verzögerung der Ankunft um 3 Stunden oder mehr, Annullierung, Nichtbeförderung, verspätetes / verloren gegangenes / beschädigtes Gepäck, Personenschaden, sonstiges, keine Störungen; erhaltene Kompensation für die größte Störung: Speisen und Getränke, Unterkunft, Ersatzflug oder andere Ersatzbeförderung ohne zusätzliche Kosten, Flugpreiserstattung, finanzielle Entschädigung, sonstiges, nichts; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen über die Informiertheit über die Passagierrechte im Hinblick auf Bahnreisen in den letzten zwölf Monaten: vor der Reise von der Eisenbahngesellschaft informiert, während der Reise von der Eisenbahngesellschaft informiert, während der Reise von der Eisenbahngesellschaft informiert; Störung der unternommenen Bahnreisen in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten; erhaltene Kompensation für die größte Störung in den letzten zwölf Monaten; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen über die Informiertheit über die Passagierrechte im Hinblick auf Schiffs- oder Fährreisen in den letzten zwölf Monaten: vor der Reise von dem Schiffs- oder Fährunternehmen informiert, während der Reise von dem Schiffs- oder Fährunternehmen informiert, nach der Reise von dem Schiffs- oder Fährunternehmen informiert; Störung der unternommenen Schiffs- oder Fährreisen in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten; erhaltene Kompensation für die größte Störung in den letzten zwölf Monaten; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen über die Informiertheit über die Passagierrechte im Hinblick auf Fernbusreisen in den letzten zwölf Monaten: vor der Reise von dem Busunternehmen informiert, während der Reise von dem Busunternehmen informiert, nach der Reise von dem Busunternehmen informiert; Störung der unternommenen Fernbusreisen in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten; erhaltene Kompensation für die größte Störung in den letzten zwölf Monaten; präferierte Beschwerdestelle: Beförderungsunternehmen, nationale Behörde für Passagierrechte, Verbrauchervereinigung, Anwalt, Stelle zur außergerichtlichen Streitbeilegung, Entschädigungsagentur, Europe-Direct-Kontaktzentrum der Europäischen Union, sonstige, abhängig vom Verkehrsmittel, keine; Verkehrsmittel, bei dem die größte Störung in den letzten zwölf Monaten erlebt wurde; Zufriedenheit mit dem Beschwerdemanagement; Zufriedenheit mit der Information über das Beschwerdeverfahren durch das Transportunternehmen; Beschwerde in Bezug auf die letzte Reisebehinderung bzw. Gründe, aus denen sich nicht beschwert wurde; Zufriedenheit mit dem Beschwerdemanagement durch das Transportunternehmen; Verwendung einer einzelnen Fahrkarte für die kombinierte Nutzung verschiedener Verkehrsmittel in den letzten zwölf Monaten; genutzte Kombinationen; Schwierigkeiten bei der Benutzung einer solchen Fahrkarte; beantragte Hilfe bei der Nutzung der oben genannten Reisearten für den Befragten selbst oder für eine andere Person mit Behinderung oder eingeschränkter Mobilität; Zufriedenheit mit der Unterstützung; Voranmeldung der benötigten Hilfe beim Transportunternehmen; Zufriedenheit mit der erhaltenen Hilfe beim Wechsel des Verkehrsmittels. Demographie: Alter; Staatsangehörigkeit; Häufigkeit von Diskussionen über nationale, europäische und lokale politische Angelegenheiten; Links-Rechts-Selbsteinstufung; Familienstand; Geschlecht; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Urbanisierungsgrad; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße; finanzielle Schwierigkeiten im letzten Jahr; Internetnutzung (zu Hause, am Arbeitsplatz, in der Schule etc.); Selbsteinstufung zur Arbeiterklasse, Mittelklasse oder der höheren Klasse der Gesellschaft; eigene Stimme zählt im eigenen Land und in der EU (politischer Einfluss); allgemeine Richtung der Dinge im eigenen Land und in der EU; Meinungsführerschaft; Image der EU. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Befragten-ID; Land; Interviewdatum; Interviewdauer (Interviewbeginn und Interviewende); anwesende Personen während des Interviews; Kooperationsbereitschaft des Befragten; Ortsgröße; Region; Interviewsprache; Nationengruppe; Gewichtungsfaktor
Crime Survey for England and Wales, 2023-2024
No full textAbstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) asks a sole adult in a random sample of households about their, or their household's, experience of crime victimisation in the previous 12 months. These are recorded in the victim form data file (VF). A wide range of questions are then asked, covering demographics and crime-related subjects such as attitudes to the police and the criminal justice system (CJS). These variables are contained within the non-victim form (NVF) data file. In 2009, the survey was extended to children aged 10-15 years old; one resident of that age range was also selected from the household and asked about their experience of crime and other related topics. The first set of children's data covered January-December 2009 and is held separately under SN 6601. From 2009-2010, the children's data cover the same period as the adult data and are included with the main study.The Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW) became operational on 20 May 2020. It was a replacement for the face-to-face CSEW, which was suspended on 17 March 2020 because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. It was set up with the intention of measuring the level of crime during the pandemic. As the pandemic continued throughout the 2020/21 survey year, questions have been raised as to whether the year ending March 2021 TCSEW is comparable with estimates produced in earlier years by the face-to-face CSEW. The ONS Comparability between the Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales and the face-to-face Crime Survey for England and Wales report explores those factors that may have a bearing on the comparability of estimates between the TCSEW and the former CSEW. These include survey design, sample design, questionnaire changes and modal changes.More general information about the CSEW may be found on the ONS Crime Survey for England and Wales web page and for the previous BCS, from the GOV.UK BCS Methodology web page.History - the British Crime SurveyThe CSEW was formerly known as the British Crime Survey (BCS), and has been in existence since 1981. The 1982 and 1988 BCS waves were also conducted in Scotland (data held separately under SNs 4368 and 4599). Since 1993, separate Scottish Crime and Justice Surveys have been conducted. Up to 2001, the BCS was conducted biennially. From April 2001, the Office for National Statistics took over the survey and it became the CSEW. Interviewing was then carried out continually and reported on in financial year cycles. The crime reference period was altered to accommodate this. Secure Access CSEW dataIn addition to the main survey, a series of questions covering drinking behaviour, drug use, self-offending, gangs and personal security, and intimate personal violence (IPV) (including stalking and sexual victimisation) are asked of adults via a laptop-based self-completion module (questions may vary over the years). Children aged 10-15 years also complete a separate self-completion questionnaire. The questionnaires are included in the main documentation, but the data are only available under Secure Access conditions (see SN 7280), not with the main study. In addition, from 2011 onwards, lower-level geographic variables are also available under Secure Access conditions (see SN 7311).New methodology for capping the number of incidents from 2017-18The CSEW datasets available from 2017-18 onwards are based on a new methodology of capping the number of incidents at the 98th percentile. Incidence variables names have remained consistent with previously supplied data but due to the fact they are based on the new 98th percentile cap, and old datasets are not, comparability has been lost with years prior to 2012-2013. More information can be found in the 2017-18 User Guide (see SN 8464) and the article ‘Improving victimisation estimates derived from the Crime Survey for England and Wales’. No data available for 10-15 year-olds for 2023/24Data for 10-15-year-old respondents is not currently included in the 2023/24 study. The Office for National Statistics is currently assessing these data and deciding whether to include it for this year. The questionnaire for 10-15-year-olds has been included in the documentation and is also available on the ONS Crime and Justice Methodology webpage. At the time of release, the technical report and user guide were not yet available, but will be published in due course on the same webpage.Main Topics: The adult non-victim form questionnaire covers: perceptions of crime and local area; performance of the CJS; mobile phone crime; experiences of the police (Module A); attitudes to the CJS (Module B); crime prevention and security (Module C); financial loss and fraud; anti-social behaviour; demographics and media. The adult victim form contains offence-level data. Up to six different incidents were asked about for each respondent. Each of these constituted a separate victim form and can be matched back to the respondent-level data. Topics covered included: the nature and circumstances of the incident; details of offenders; costs; emotional reactions; and contact with the Police. Fraud victims are now asked an entirely separate set of questions.Self-completion modules for adult respondents covered: drug use and drinking; sources of support and perceptions of safety; interpersonal violence (IPV) (domestic abuse, sexual victimisation and stalking); and experience of abuse during childhood. These data are subject to Secure Access conditions and are available as part of SN 7280.</ul
Labour Force Survey Two-Quarter Longitudinal Dataset, July - December, 2024
No full textAbstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.Background The Labour Force Survey (LFS) is a unique source of information using international definitions of employment and unemployment and economic inactivity, together with a wide range of related topics such as occupation, training, hours of work and personal characteristics of household members aged 16 years and over. It is used to inform social, economic and employment policy. The LFS was first conducted biennially from 1973-1983. Between 1984 and 1991 the survey was carried out annually and consisted of a quarterly survey conducted throughout the year and a 'boost' survey in the spring quarter (data were then collected seasonally). From 1992 quarterly data were made available, with a quarterly sample size approximately equivalent to that of the previous annual data. The survey then became known as the Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS). From December 1994, data gathering for Northern Ireland moved to a full quarterly cycle to match the rest of the country, so the QLFS then covered the whole of the UK (though some additional annual Northern Ireland LFS datasets are also held at the UK Data Archive). Further information on the background to the QLFS may be found in the documentation. Longitudinal data The LFS retains each sample household for five consecutive quarters, with a fifth of the sample replaced each quarter. The main survey was designed to produce cross-sectional data, but the data on each individual have now been linked together to provide longitudinal information. The longitudinal data comprise two types of linked datasets, created using the weighting method to adjust for non-response bias. The two-quarter datasets link data from two consecutive waves, while the five-quarter datasets link across a whole year (for example January 2010 to March 2011 inclusive) and contain data from all five waves. A full series of longitudinal data has been produced, going back to winter 1992. Linking together records to create a longitudinal dimension can, for example, provide information on gross flows over time between different labour force categories (employed, unemployed and economically inactive). This will provide detail about people who have moved between the categories. Also, longitudinal information is useful in monitoring the effects of government policies and can be used to follow the subsequent activities and circumstances of people affected by specific policy initiatives, and to compare them with other groups in the population. There are however methodological problems which could distort the data resulting from this longitudinal linking. The ONS continues to research these issues and advises that the presentation of results should be carefully considered, and warnings should be included with outputs where necessary.New reweighting policyFollowing the new reweighting policy ONS has reviewed the latest population estimates made available during 2019 and have decided not to carry out a 2019 LFS and APS reweighting exercise. Therefore, the next reweighting exercise will take place in 2020. These will incorporate the 2019 Sub-National Population Projection data (published in May 2020) and 2019 Mid-Year Estimates (published in June 2020). It is expected that reweighted Labour Market aggregates and microdata will be published towards the end of 2020/early 2021. LFS Documentation The documentation available from the Archive to accompany LFS datasets largely consists of the latest version of each user guide volume alongside the appropriate questionnaire for the year concerned. However, volumes are updated periodically by ONS, so users are advised to check the latest documents on the ONS Labour Force Survey - User Guidance pages before commencing analysis. This is especially important for users of older QLFS studies, where information and guidance in the user guide documents may have changed over time. Additional data derived from the QLFS The Archive also holds further QLFS series: End User Licence (EUL) quarterly data; Secure Access datasets; household datasets; quarterly, annual and ad hoc module datasets compiled for Eurostat; and some additional annual Northern Ireland datasets. Variables DISEA and LNGLST Dataset A08 (Labour market status of disabled people) which ONS suspended due to an apparent discontinuity between April to June 2017 and July to September 2017 is now available. As a result of this apparent discontinuity and the inconclusive investigations at this stage, comparisons should be made with caution between April to June 2017 and subsequent time periods. However users should note that the estimates are not seasonally adjusted, so some of the change between quarters could be due to seasonality. Further recommendations on historical comparisons of the estimates will be given in November 2018 when ONS are due to publish estimates for July to September 2018. An article explaining the quality assurance investigations that have been conducted so far is available on the ONS Methodology webpage. For any queries about Dataset A08 please email [email protected]. Occupation data for 2021 and 2022 data filesThe ONS has identified an issue with the collection of some occupational data in 2021 and 2022 data files in a number of their surveys. While they estimate any impacts will be small overall, this will affect the accuracy of the breakdowns of some detailed (four-digit Standard Occupational Classification (SOC)) occupations, and data derived from them. Further information can be found in the ONS article published on 11 July 2023: Revision of miscoded occupational data in the ONS Labour Force Survey, UK: January 2021 to September 2022.2022 WeightingThe population totals used for the latest LFS estimates use projected growth rates from Real Time Information (RTI) data for UK, EU and non-EU populations based on 2021 patterns. The total population used for the LFS therefore does not take into account any changes in migration, birth rates, death rates, and so on since June 2021, and hence levels estimates may be under- or over-estimating the true values and should be used with caution. Estimates of rates will, however, be robust. Main Topics:The two-quarter longitudinal datasets include a subset of the most commonly used variables from the Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS), covering the main areas of the survey.<br