CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
32838 research outputs found
Sort by
Finnish Youth Survey 2023
No full textNuorisobarometrin 2023 pääteemoja ovat katsomukset ja hengellisyys. Kyselyssä selvitetään nuorten uskomuksia, käyttäytymistä ja sitä, miten nuoret hahmottavat merkityksellisyyden kokemuksia arjessaan. Aluksi vastaajalta kysyttiin hänen arkiseen elämäänsä liittyvistä tuntemuksista sekä yhteiskunnallisista näkemyksistä. Tämän jälkeen tiedusteltiin, kuuluuko vastaaja johonkin kirkkoon tai uskonnolliseen yhteisöön. Lisäksi vastaajalta kysyttiin rukoilusta, lapsuudenkodin uskonnollisuudesta ja omista uskomuksista. Vastaajalta kysyttiin myös, mistä elämän merkityksellisyys syntyy. Seuraavaksi selvitettiin vastaajan maailman- ja elämänkatsomusta erilaisten väittämien kautta sekä hänen käsityksiään tieteestä. Tämän jälkeen vastaajalta kysyttiin epävarmuuden ja turvattomuuden kokemisesta. Seuraavaksi vastaajalle esitettiin kouluun ja oppilaitoksiin liittyviä väittämiä. Näissä tiedusteltiin näkemyksiä esimerkiksi uskonnollisten symbolien käyttämisestä sekä uskonnon ja muiden katsomusten näkymisestä koulussa. Lopuksi kyselyssä kartoitettiin vastaajan kokemuksia omasta hyvinvoinnistaan ja arkisesta elämästään. Kysymykset koskivat muun muassa kuulumista johonkin vähemmistöön sekä kotitalouden toimeentulon tilannetta. Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat mm. vastaajan sukupuoli, ikä, asuinpaikka, äidinkieli, siviilisääty, toimeentulo, pääasiallinen toiminta, koulutustaso sekä kotitalouden muoto.Main themes of the Finnish Youth Survey 2023 included beliefs and spirituality. The survey explores young people's beliefs, behaviour and their perceptions of meaning in everyday life. First, the respondents were asked about their feelings regarding daily life and their views on society. They were also asked whether they are part of a church or religious community. Additionally, respondents were asked about prayer habits, the religiosity of their childhood home and their own beliefs. The questionnaire also explored what participants considered to give life meaning. Next, the respondents' world and life views were explored through various statements, as well as their perceptions of science. Experiences of uncertainty and insecurity were also addressed. Next, respondents were asked to answer questions related to schools and educational institutions. These included topics such as the use of religious symbols and the visibility of religion and other beliefs in the school environment. Finally, the survey concluded with questions about the participants' well-being and daily life. The questions concerned topics such as minority group membership and financial situation of the household. Background variables included, among others, the respondent's gender, age, region of residence, mother tongue, marital status, financial situation, economic activity, education level and household composition
Rural Finland 2020: Citizens
No full textMaaseutubarometri kartoittaa maaseudun merkityksiä ja tulevaisuutta. Tutkimuksen tehtävänä on antaa tietoa suomalaisten maaseutukäsityksistä. Tutkimus on jatkoa Sitran "Maamerkit - maaseudun merkitykset" -ohjelmassa vuosina 2009 ja 2011 toteutetuille maaseutubarometreille. Tutkimuksen tämän osan tarkoituksena on selvittää Suomen kansalaisten käsityksiä Suomen erilaisista alueista. Aluksi vastaajilta tiedusteltiin millaisia mielikuvia maaseutu sekä kaupunki heissä herättää. Kysyttiin myös, miten erilaiset alueet vastaavat käsitystä maaseudusta. Haluttiin myös tietää kuinka voimakkaana vastaaja kokee maaseutu/kaupunki -identiteetin. Tämän jälkeen tiedusteltiin, miten erilaiset ympäristöt liittyvät vastaajan elämään ja miten paljon näissä erilaisissa ympäristöissä ja paikoissa vastaaja viettää aikaa. Edelleen tiedusteltiin hyvän elämän elementeistä ja miten tärkeänä vastaajat kokevat tietyt asiat hyvän elämän näkökulmasta ja miten ne toteutuvat omalla kohdallaan. Seuraavaksi tiedusteltiin mitä maaseutu merkitsee vastaajalle tänä päivänä ja mitä maaseutu todennäköisesti tulee merkitsemään 10 vuoden kuluttua. Pyydettiin myös arvioimaan, miten maaseudun merkitys tulee tulevaisuudessa muuttumaan. Tämän jälkeen vastaajille esitettiin tulevaisuudenkuvia maaseudusta ja kysyttiin, mitkä niistä parhaiten vastaisivat toiveita maaseudun tulevaisuudesta ja miten he uskovat asioiden olevan vuonna 2035. Kysyttiin myös ilmastonmuutoksesta ja sen suhteesta maaseutuun ja maaseudun kehityssuuntiin. Lopuksi esitettiin vielä väittämiä ajankohtaisista maaseutuun liittyvistä aiheista. Lisäksi esitettiin maaseutuun liittyviä yrittäjyyttä koskevia väittämiä ja tiedusteltiin, toimiiko vastaaja tai onko hän ryhtymässä yrittäjäksi maaseudulla. Taustamuuttujina olivat muun muassa maakuntatiedot, syntymävuosi, sukupuoli, koulutus, ammatti/asema, talouden bruttotulot, mitä puoluetta äänestäisi, talouden koko, lasten määrä ja ikä sekä asumismuoto.The Rural Finland survey explores the meaning and future of rural areas. The aim of the survey is to provide information on how Finns perceive the countryside. The study is a continuation of the surveys conducted in the Landmarks Programme of the Finnish Innovation Fund (Sitra) in 2009 and 2011. The aim of this part of the survey is to explore Finnish citizens' perceptions of the different regions of Finland. First, respondents were asked what kind of images they had of the countryside and the city. They were also asked how different areas correspond to their perception of the countryside. In addition, they wanted to know how strong the rural/urban identity was perceived by the respondents. Then, they were asked how different environments are related to their lives and how much time they spend in these different environments and places. Further questions were asked about the elements of a good life and how important respondents perceive certain things to be in terms of a good life and how they are implemented in their own case. Next, the respondents were asked what the countryside means to them today and what the countryside is likely to mean in 10 years' time. They were also asked to assess how the meaning of rural areas will change in the future. Then respondents were presented with future scenarios for the countryside and asked which of them best reflected their hopes for the future of the countryside and how they thought things would be in 2035. They were also asked about climate change and its relationship to rural areas and trends in rural development. Finally, statements were made on current issues related to the countryside. In addition, questions were asked about entrepreneurship in rural areas and whether the respondent was or was about to become an entrepreneur in a rural area. Background variables were, among others, regional information, year of birth, gender, education, occupational status, gross household income, which political party they would vote for, household size, number and age of children, and type of residence
Doctoral Graduates of Year 2019: Career and Employment Survey 2022
No full textTohtoreiden uraseurannoilla kerätään vuosittain valtakunnallisesti tietoa yliopistoista tohtoriksi valmistuneiden työllistymisestä ja työelämän osaamistarpeista. Vuoden 2022 tohtoriuraseurannalla kartoitettiin vuonna 2019 suomalaisista yliopistoista valmistuneiden tohtoreiden varhaista työuraa ja työtilannetta kolme vuotta valmistumisen jälkeen. Kyselyn teemoja ovat muun muassa tohtorikoulutuksen vaikutus työllistymiseen, koulutuksen vastaavuus työelämän osaamistarpeisiin nähden ja nykyisen työsuhteen laatu. Ensiksi vastaajilta kysyttiin heidän työmarkkinatilanteestaan tohtorin tutkinnon suorittamisen jälkeen, mukaan lukien mahdolliset työttömyysjaksot. Vastaajan nykyisestä työsuhteesta ja sen laadusta kysyttiin myös tarkentavia kysymyksiä. Seuraavaksi tiedusteltiin tohtorikoulutuksen ja tutkinnon merkitystä. Vastaajan tuli muun muassa arvioida, kuinka tohtorikoulutus kehitti erilaisia työelämävalmiuksia ja kuinka tärkeitä nämä tiedot ja taidot ovat vastaajan nykyisessä työssä. Lopuksi vastaajilta kysyttiin tohtoriopintojen rahoituksesta ja ensisijaisesta suoritustavasta. Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat vastaajan sukupuoli, koulutusala, työnantajasektori, asema organisaatiossa ja ikä valmistuessa kaksiluokkaisena.The survey charted the careers and employment situations of Finnish doctoral graduates three years after they had obtained their degree in 2019. Themes of the survey included impact of a doctoral degree on employment, usefulness of doctoral education in terms of skills needed in occupational life, and job satisfaction. The respondents were first asked what their occupational status was at the time of the survey. Questions covered whether having a doctoral degree had led to an increased salary and better standing in occupational life, and whether a doctoral degree had been a prerequisite for the respondents' current job. The respondents were also asked if they had been unemployed after finishing their degree. Further questions covered how important certain skills and know-how were in the respondents' current job and how well their doctoral studies had developed these skills (e.g. theoretical or practical knowledge of their field, problem solving, managerial skills, negotiation skills, project management, and scientific communication). Opinions were charted on the significance of doctoral and other tertiary education, work experience, contacts and networks, and other skills in occupational life. The respondents were asked how they had financed their doctoral studies (e.g. by being employed by a university or other research institute or with a personal research grant). Finally, it was surveyed whether the respondents had completed their doctoral degree by studying full-time, part-time or during their leisure time while also otherwise employed. Background variables included the respondent's gender, field of study, employer sector, position in the organisation, and age at the time of graduation (dichotomised 35 or under/36 and over)
Finnish University Graduates of Year 2017: Career and Employment Survey 2022
No full textUraseurannoilla kerätään vuosittain valtakunnallisesti tietoa yliopistoista valmistuneiden työllistymisestä ja työelämän osaamistarpeista. Vuoden 2022 uraseurannalla kartoitettiin vuonna 2017 Suomen yliopistoista valmistuneiden varhaista työuraa ja työtilannetta viisi vuotta valmistumisen jälkeen. Kyselyn teemoja ovat muun muassa tyytyväisyys tutkintoon, urapolun vaiheet, tämänhetkinen työtilanne, työllistymisen laatu ja yliopistokoulutuksen merkitys työllistymiseen. Aluksi tiedusteltiin vastaajan osallistumisesta erilaisiin koulutuksiin ja opintoihin yliopistotutkinnon suorittamista ennen tai sen jälkeen sekä tyytyväisyyttä tutkintoon. Tämän jälkeen kysyttiin vastaajan työuran kokonaisuudesta ja mahdollisista valmistumisen jälkeisistä työttömyysjaksoista sekä tyytyväisyydestä työuraan. Seuraavaksi kartoitettiin vastaajan työllisyystilannetta vastaushetkellä. Kysymykset käsittelivät esimerkiksi työnantajaorganisaation tyyppiä ja työtehtävien luonnetta. Vastaajalta tiedusteltiin työn vaatimustason ja yliopistokoulutuksen keskinäistä vastaavuutta sekä mahdollisia syitä koulutustasoa huonosti vastaavan työpaikan vastaanottamiseen. Lopuksi kysyttiin näkemyksiä yliopistokoulutuksen merkityksestä työelämän kannalta. Erityisesti vastaajaa pyydettiin arvioimaan erilaisten taitojen tärkeyttä nykyisessä työssä sekä niiden kehittymistä yliopisto-opintojen aikana. Mainittuja työelämävalmiuksia olivat muun muassa analyyttiset taidot, tiedonhankinta- ja ongelmanratkaisutaidot, sosiaaliset taidot, organisointitaidot, tieto- ja viestintätekniikan osaaminen, viestintä eri kielillä sekä opetus-, koulutus- ja ohjaustaidot. Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat vastaajan sukupuoli, ikä valmistuessa, koulutusala, yliopisto, tutkinnon taso (päättyvä kandidaatintutkinto/maisteri tai lääketieteen lisensiaatti), tutkinnon laajuus opintopisteinä ja maakunta.The survey charted the career and employment situation of individuals who had graduated from Finnish universities with a lower (BA/BSc or equivalent) or higher (MA/MSc or equivalent) degree in 2017. The survey was conducted five years after graduation. Main themes of the survey included the respondents' satisfaction with their degree, career path stages, current employment situation, the quality of employment, and the importance of university education for employment. The first part investigated the respondents' education and work history, and satisfaction with the degree. They were asked whether they had, before or after graduation, participated in job-related training, career guidance or any additional professional qualification or higher education studies. The respondents were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with a set of attitudinal statements regarding their degree and its usefulness for employment. Further questions covered how many employers the respondents had had, whether the respondents had been entrepreneurs, self-employed or freelancers, and whether they had been outside the labour market because of family leave or unemployment. The respondents' satisfaction with their career this far was charted, along with current occupational status, type of employer, and type of current work tasks. The respondents were also asked whether their current job required an academic degree, whether the job was commensurate with their academic qualifications, and if not, why they had accepted the job. The extent to which the respondents had been able to utilize the knowledge and skills gained during their university studies was also examined, and monthly gross income at the time of the survey was charted. Next, the respondents were asked which factors had had an impact on their employment after graduation (e.g. major/minor subjects, internship, work experience, personal networks). Questions also covered how important certain skills and know-how were in the respondents' current job and how well their studies had developed these skills (e.g. theoretical or practical knowledge of their field, problem solving, managerial skills, negotiation skills, project management, and communication in English). Background variables included the respondent's gender, age at the time of graduation, NUTS3 region of residence, the university attended, and information on the degree (field of study, number of credits required for the degree, degree level)
Studentenmonitor 2024
No full textDe Studentenmonitor is een onderzoek, in opdracht van het ministerie van OCW, naar de studie- en levensomstandigheden van studenten in Nederland. Elk jaar wordt landelijk een grootschalige enquête afgenomen met vragen over studievoortgang, motivatie, studiegedrag, tijdbesteding, tevredenheid, inkomsten en uitgaven en internationale mobiliteit. Het doel van de Studentenmonitor is om structureel zicht te houden op de toegankelijkheid van het hoger onderwijs en na te gaan in hoeverre aandacht nodig is voor specifieke doelgroepen
Replication data for: Gratitude in fundraising: Do "thank you in advance" and handwritten thank-you notes impact fundraising success?
No full textWhile almost all charities rely on a set of donor appreciation strategies, their effectiveness for the success of fundraising campaigns is underresearched. Through two preregistered field studies conducted in collaboration with a leading German opera house (N=10,000), we explore the significance of expressing gratitude and examine two different approaches to doing so. Our first study investigates the impact of a "thank you in advance" statement in fundraising letters, a common strategy among fundraisers. In the second study, we explore the effectiveness of handwritten thank-you postcards versus printed postcards, shedding light on the roles of personalization and handwriting in donor appeals. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom, revealing that neither “thank you in advance” nor handwritten thank-you notes significantly affect donor contributions.While almost all charities rely on a set of donor appreciation strategies, their effectiveness for the success of fundraising campaigns is underresearched. Through two preregistered field studies conducted in collaboration with a leading German opera house (N=10,000), we explore the significance of expressing gratitude and examine two different approaches to doing so. Our first study investigates the impact of a "thank you in advance" statement in fundraising letters, a common strategy among fundraisers. In the second study, we explore the effectiveness of handwritten thank-you postcards versus printed postcards, shedding light on the roles of personalization and handwriting in donor appeals. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom, revealing that neither “thank you in advance” nor handwritten thank-you notes significantly affect donor contributions
Replication Data for: Screen resolution and QR Codes in push-to-web surveys: a quick response to survey breakoff? (SUF edition)
No full textThe dataset and do-file allow users to replicate tables and figures in the article "Screen resolution and QR Codes in push-to-web surveys: a quick response to survey breakoff?"
Startmonitor studiejaar 2024-2025
No full textDe Startmonitor is een onderzoeksproject van het ministerie van OCW. De Startmonitor is in 2008 door ResearchNed ontwikkeld met als doel om structureel zicht te krijgen op het voorlichtinggebruik en studiekeuzeproces van nieuwe studenten in het hoger onderwijs en om in kaart te brengen hoe studenten ‘landen’ in hun opleiding en of hun eerste jaar naar tevredenheid verloopt. De Startmonitor beoogt om in dat proces van studiekeuze, start en integratie van studenten de determinanten op te sporen van studiesucces en studieuitval in het eerste studiejaar. De Startmonitor wordt jaarlijks uitgevoerd sinds studiejaar 2008-2009. Met ingang van studiejaar 2018-2019 is de Startmonitor een onderzoek van het ministerie van OCW en omvat het onderzoek jaarlijks twee enquêtes, namelijk in september en in juni. De 2e meting uit Startmonitor 2024-2025 wordt later toegevoegd
National Child Development Study: Age 62, Sweep 10 Geographical Identifiers, 2011 Census Boundaries, 2019-2024: Secure Access
No full textAbstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The National Child Development Study (NCDS) is a continuing longitudinal study that seeks to follow the lives of all those living in Great Britain who were born in one particular week in 1958. The aim of the study is to improve understanding of the factors affecting human development over the whole lifespan. The NCDS has its origins in the Perinatal Mortality Survey (PMS) (the original PMS study is held at the UK Data Archive under SN 2137). This study was sponsored by the National Birthday Trust Fund and designed to examine the social and obstetric factors associated with stillbirth and death in early infancy among the 17,000 children born in England, Scotland and Wales in that one week. Selected data from the PMS form NCDS sweep 0, held alongside NCDS sweeps 1-3, under SN 5565. Survey and Biomeasures Data (GN 33004):To date there have been ten attempts to trace all members of the birth cohort in order to monitor their physical, educational and social development. The first three sweeps were carried out by the National Children's Bureau, in 1965, when respondents were aged 7, in 1969, aged 11, and in 1974, aged 16 (these sweeps form NCDS1-3, held together with NCDS0 under SN 5565). The fourth sweep, also carried out by the National Children's Bureau, was conducted in 1981, when respondents were aged 23 (held under SN 5566). In 1985 the NCDS moved to the Social Statistics Research Unit (SSRU) - now known as the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS). The fifth sweep was carried out in 1991, when respondents were aged 33 (held under SN 5567). For the sixth sweep, conducted in 1999-2000, when respondents were aged 42 (NCDS6, held under SN 5578), fieldwork was combined with the 1999-2000 wave of the 1970 Birth Cohort Study (BCS70), which was also conducted by CLS (and held under GN 33229). The seventh sweep was conducted in 2004-2005 when the respondents were aged 46 (held under SN 5579), the eighth sweep was conducted in 2008-2009 when respondents were aged 50 (held under SN 6137), the ninth sweep was conducted in 2013 when respondents were aged 55 (held under SN 7669), and the tenth sweep was conducted in 2020-24 when the respondents were aged 60-64 (held under SN 9412). A Secure Access version of the NCDS is available under SN 9413, containing detailed sensitive variables not available under Safeguarded access (currently only sweep 10 data). Variables include uncommon health conditions (including age at diagnosis), full employment codes and income/finance details, and specific life circumstances (e.g. pregnancy details, year/age of emigration from GB).Four separate datasets covering responses to NCDS over all sweeps are available. National Child Development Deaths Dataset: Special Licence Access (SN 7717) covers deaths; National Child Development Study Response and Outcomes Dataset (SN 5560) covers all other responses and outcomes; National Child Development Study: Partnership Histories (SN 6940) includes data on live-in relationships; and National Child Development Study: Activity Histories (SN 6942) covers work and non-work activities. Users are advised to order these studies alongside the other waves of NCDS.From 2002-2004, a Biomedical Survey was completed and is available under Safeguarded Licence (SN 8731) and Special Licence (SL) (SN 5594). Proteomics analyses of blood samples are available under SL SN 9254.Linked Geographical Data (GN 33497): A number of geographical variables are available, under more restrictive access conditions, which can be linked to the NCDS EUL and SL access studies. Linked Administrative Data (GN 33396):A number of linked administrative datasets are available, under more restrictive access conditions, which can be linked to the NCDS EUL and SL access studies. These include a Deaths dataset (SN 7717) available under SL and the Linked Health Administrative Datasets (SN 8697) available under Secure Access.Multi-omics Data and Risk Scores Data (GN 33592)Proteomics analyses were run on the blood samples collected from NCDS participants in 2002-2004 and are available under SL SN 9254. Metabolomics analyses were conducted on respondents of sweep 10 and are available under SL SN 9411. Polygenic indices are available under SL SN 9439. Derived summary scores have been created that combine the estimated effects of many different genes on a specific trait or characteristic, such as a person's risk of Alzheimer's disease, asthma, substance abuse, or mental health disorders, for example. These scores can be combined with existing survey data to offer a more nuanced understanding of how cohort members' outcomes may be shaped.Additional Sub-Studies (GN 33562):In addition to the main NCDS sweeps, further studies have also been conducted on a range of subjects such as parent migration, unemployment, behavioural studies and respondent essays. The full list of NCDS studies available from the UK Data Service can be found on the NCDS series access data webpage.How to access genetic and/or bio-medical sample data from a range of longitudinal surveys:For information on how to access biomedical data from NCDS that are not held at the UKDS, see the CLS Genetic data and biological samples webpage.Further information about the full NCDS series can be found on the Centre for Longitudinal Studies website.The National Child Development Study: Age 62, Sweep 10 Geographical Identifiers, 2011 Census Boundaries, 2019-2024: Secure Access data include Age 62, Sweep 10 detailed geographical variables that can be linked to the NCDS Safeguarded and Secure Access studies listed on the NCDS series page. The Age 62, Sweep 10 2021 Census Boundaries are available under SN 9410.International Data Access Network (IDAN)These data are now available to researchers based outside the UK. Selected UKDS SecureLab/controlled datasets from the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) and the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) have been made available under the International Data Access Network (IDAN) scheme, via a Safe Room access point at one of the UKDS IDAN partners. Prospective users should read the UKDS SecureLab application guide for non-ONS data for researchers outside of the UK via Safe Room Remote Desktop Access. Further details about the IDAN scheme can be found on the UKDS International Data Access Network webpage and on the IDAN website.Main Topics:The National Child Development Study: Age 62, Sweep 10 Geographical Identifiers, 2011 Census Boundaries, 2019-2024: Secure Access data include the address at interview linked to: CountryDecember 2020 RegionMay 2023 WardJanuary 2003 Census Area Statistics WardApril 2023 Local AuthorityJuly 2024 Westminster Parliamentary ConstituencyIMD Overall Rank England 2019, Scotland 2020, Wales 2019, Northern Ireland 2017IMD Overall Rank Decile2011 Rural-Urban Classification2011 Workplace Zone2011 Output Area2011 Lower Super Output Area2011 Middle Super Output Area2011 Output Area Classification</ul
Eurobarometer 101.1 (2024)
No full textSince the early 1970s the European Commission´s Standard & Special Eurobarometer are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries. Principal investigators are the Directorate-General Communication and on occasion other departments of the European Commission or the European Parliament. Over time, candidate and accession countries were included in the Standard Eurobarometer Series. Selected questions or modules may not have been surveyed in each sample. Please consult the basic questionnaire for more information on country filter instructions or other questionnaire routing filters. In this study the following modules are included: 1. European Parliament Spring 2024 Eurobarometer, 2. Social Europe, 3. Disaster risk awareness and preparedness of the EU population, 4. Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2024.Topics: 1. European Parliament Spring 2024 Eurobarometer: image of the European Parliament; desired importance of the role of the European Parliament; frequency of following news on EU politics; EU image; assessment of the own country’s membership in the EU as a good thing; personal importance of the own country being a member state of the EU; benefits from the EU membership; optimism about the future of the EU; impact of EU actions on personal daily life; satisfaction with the EU’s response to each of the following crises in the last 15 years: COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, economic and financial situation, Russia´s invasion of Ukraine, migration, Brexit; development of the importance of the role of the European Union in the world over the last years; image of the following countries: China, Russia, USA, Turkey; preferred aspects to focus on in order to reinforce the EU‘s position in the world; awareness of the date of the next European elections in the own country; interest in the next European elections; most important topics to be discussed during the electoral campaign for the next European Parliament elections; prioritized values to be defended by the European Parliament in the next five years; importance to vote in European and in national elections; frequency of voting in past elections; reasons for not voting; reasons that prevented from voting in elections or a referendum: health problems, away from home, too busy, no time, involved in family or leisure activity, no knowledge that an election was being held, unexpected problem that prevented from reaching the polling station, no help by getting to the polling station, forgotten, registration or voting card problems, other, always voted; likelihood to vote if the next European Parliament elections would be held next week; attitude towards the following statements: voting is important to keep democracy strong, voting is important to ensure a better future for the next generations, others decide if you do not vote yourself, current international context makes voting even more important; development of personal standard of living in the last five years; expected development of the following issues in the next year: personal living conditions, situation of the national economy; expected development of personal standard of living in the next five years. 2. Social Europe: personal importance of a social Europe; most important elements for the EU´s economic and social development; awareness of the European Pillar of Social Rights; attitude towards the following statements about the European Pillar of Social Rights: will strengthen employment and social inclusion in the EU as a whole, success will depend on its implementation in the own country; preferred issues to be a main priority in the own country; most important issues for the future of Europe: education (incl. training and lifelong learning), gender equality, employment, wages, social dialogue and involvement of workers, work-life balance, health and safety at work, childcare and support for children, social protection, minimum income, old age income and pensions, health care, inclusion of disabled persons, housing and assistance for the homeless, other; awareness of selected EU initiatives to tackle employment and social challenges: Skills Agenda, Minimum Wage Directive, Child Guarantee, Platform Work Directive, European Social Fund Plus, Work Life Balance Directive; enhancement of personal skills: currently actively looking for information, currently engaging in training; attitude towards the following statement: EU should promote better working conditions and social standards in non-EU countries with which it trades even if this means a small increase in prices for EU citizens; difficulties encountered in the last five years when moving to another EU country for living and working there: does not apply, insufficient awareness on EU rules and personal rights, complex procedures to prove own social security coverage and entitlements, refusal from employment services to prolong the period during which to have exported own unemployment benefits, different qualifying periods in the countries for the establishment of entitlements for unemployment benefits, not able to register with the employment services in country of last job due to unemployment, difficulties with calculation of pension, difficulties with accessing healthcare or other benefits such as long-term care; preferred EU measure to ensure a fair green and digital transition of economy: stronger focus on education to equip people with the right skills for green and digital jobs, more funding to support people in the regions and industries most impacted by the changes, ensure workers´ rights with regard to increasing use of Artificial Intelligence, more funding to support vulnerable households affected by climate change and the green transition, other; likelihood to reach a more social Europe by 2030. 3. Disaster risk awareness and preparedness of the EU population: most important risks with regard to the own country; most important risks with regard to personal life; personally experienced disasters in the last ten years (except COVID-19); preferred sources of information with regard to disaster risks; attitude towards the following statements about information on disaster risks: reception of information on disaster risks in the last twelve months, feel well informed about personal disaster risks, trust in information from public authorities and emergency services on disaster risks in personal residential area, information from public authorities and emergency services on disaster risks in personal residential area is easy to find, awareness where to find information on disaster risks when travelling to another EU country; personal measures taken with regard to a potential disaster or emergency: emergency supply stock of drinks and food, emergency supply of water for cooking and hygiene, flashlight or candles accessible, battery-powered radio accessible, home pharmacy for emergencies, copies of most important personal documents or have stored them safely, grab-bag for quick evacuation, signed up for alerts and warnings from emergency services or authorities, participated in a training on how to react in an emergency, informed on the response plan of city / region / country for disaster or emergency, agreed with family and friends on how to contact each other in case of an emergency, discussed common protective measures in own neighbourhood, invested in protective measures for own home, other; number of days being able to withstand the following situations: disruption of tap water services, interruption of electricity services, disruption of gas services, disruption of food transportation in the area, disruption of medical supply; attitude towards selected statements with regard to personal disaster preparedness: preparing for disasters or emergencies will help to better cope with the situation, well prepared for disasters or emergencies in own residential area, no time or financial resources to prepare for disasters or emergencies, easy to find information on the preparation for disasters or emergencies from public authorities and emergency services in the own country, more information needed to be able to prepare for disasters or emergencies, knowledge on how emergency services will alert in the event of a disaster, knowledge what to do in the event of a disaster, employer or school encourages to take training or prepare for disasters or emergencies, emergency services or authorities encourage to take training or prepare for disasters or emergencies; extent of relying on help from each of the following persons or services in the first days after a disaster (scale): family or friends, neighbourhood, associations or non-profit organisations, emergency services, local authorities or government agencies, employer or education institution, private sector entities or companies; trust in emergency services and authorities in the own country with regard to handling disasters or emergency situations properly; (planned) engagement in voluntary work to support emergency responder organisations or community-based initiatives to increase disaster resilience. 4. Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2024: assessment of corruption in the own country as a widespread problem; development of the extent of corruption in the own country in the last three years; estimated extent of bribery with regard to the following authorities in the own country: police and customs, tax authorities, courts, social security, public prosecution service, politicians, political parties, officials awarding public tenders, officials issuing building permits, officials issuing business permits, healthcare system, education sector, inspectors, private companies, banks and financial institutions; acquainted person involved in bribery; contact with the aforementioned authorities in the last twelve months; expected bribes and amount; awareness of authorities to report cases of corruption to; most trustworthy authorities: police, justice, NGOs, media, national ombudsman, political representative, specialized anti-corruption agency, trade unions, EU institutions, other; personally experienced and reported corruption in the last twelve months; reasons for not reporting; attitude towards selected statements on corruption in the own country: existence in local and regional public institutions, existence in national public institutions, part of business culture, personally affected in daily life, successful prosecutions deter people from corrupt practices, insufficient pursuing of high-level corruption cases, effective governmental efforts, too close links between business and politics lead to corruption, bribery and the use of connections is the easiest way to obtain certain public services, sufficient transparency and supervision of the funding of political parties, only way to succeed in business is to have political connections, favouritism and corruption hamper business competition, measures against corruption are applied impartially and without ulterior motives. Demography: age; nationality; age at end of education; highest completed level of full time education; sex; occupation; professional position; type of community; financial difficulties during the last year; internet use (at home, at work, at school); self-reported belonging to the working class, the middle class or the upper class of society; left-right self-placement; frequency of discussions about political matters on national, European, and local level; general direction things are going in: own country, EU, personal life; satisfaction with democracy in the own country and in the EU; own voice counts in the own country and in the EU; own country’s voice counts in the EU; limited activities due to health problems in the last six months. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; country; mode of interview; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; number of persons present during the interview; respondent cooperation; size of locality; language of the interview; region; weighting factor.Seit den frühen 1970er Jahren beobachten die Standard & Spezial Eurobarometer der Europäischen Kommission regelmäßig die öffentliche Meinung in den Mitgliedsländern der Europäischen Union. Primärforscher sind die Generaldirektion Kommunikation und bei Spezialthemen weitere Direktionen sowie das Europäische Parlament. Im Laufe der Zeit wurden Kandidaten- und Beitrittsländer in die Standard Eurobarometer-Reihe aufgenommen. Ausgewählte Fragen oder Module können in einigen Samples nicht erhoben worden sein. Bitte ziehen Sie für weitere Informationen bezüglich Länderfilter oder anderer Filterführungen den Basisfragebogen heran. In dieser Studie sind folgende Module vorhanden: 1. Frühjahrsbefragung 2024 des Europäischen Parlaments, 2. Soziales Europa, 3. Bewusstsein von und Vorbereitung auf Katastrophenrisiken in der EU, 4. Einstellungen von Europäer*innen zu Korruption in der EU in 2024.Themen: 1. Frühjahrsbefragung 2024 des Europäischen Parlaments: Image des Europäischen Parlaments; gewünschte Bedeutung der Rolle des Europäischen Parlaments; Häufigkeit des Verfolgens von Nachrichten zur EU-Politik; Image der EU; Einschätzung der EU-Mitgliedschaft des eigenen Landes als positiv; persönliche Bedeutung der Mitgliedschaft des eigenen Landes in der EU; Nutzen der EU-Mitgliedschaft; Optimismus bezüglich der Zukunft der EU; Auswirkungen der EU-Maßnahmen auf das eigene tägliche Leben; Zufriedenheit mit der Antwort der EU auf die folgenden Krisen in den letzten 15 Jahren: Coronapandemie, Klimawandel, wirtschaftliche und finanzielle Situation, Russlands Invasion in die Ukraine, Migration, Brexit; Entwicklung der Bedeutung der Rolle der Europäischen Union in der Welt in den letzten Jahren; Image der folgenden Länder: China, Russland, USA, Türkei; präferierte Aspekte im Hinblick auf die Stärkung der Position der EU in der Welt; Kenntnis des Termins der Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament im eigenen Land; Interesse an den nächsten Europawahlen; Themen, die im Wahlkampf für die nächsten Wahlen zum Europäischen Parlament hervorgehoben werden sollen; vom Europäischen Parlament in den nächsten fünf Jahren zu verteidigende wichtigste Werte; Wichtigkeit der Wahlbeteiligung an europäischen und nationalen Wahlen; Wahlbeteiligung in den letzten Wahlen; Gründe, nicht zu wählen; Gründe, aus denen nicht an Wahlen oder Referenden teilgenommen wurde: Gesundheitsprobleme, nicht zu Hause, zu beschäftigt, keine Zeit, in Familien- oder Freizeitaktivitäten eingebunden, keine Kenntnis von der Wahl, unerwartetes Problem verhinderte das Erreichen des Wahllokals, mangelnde Unterstützung verhinderte das Erreichen des Wahllokals, vergessen, Probleme mit Registrierung oder Wahlbenachrichtigung, sonstiges, immer gewählt; Wahrscheinlichkeit der eigenen Wahlbeteiligung an einer in der nächsten Woche stattfindenden Europawahl; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen: Wählen ist wichtig zur Stärkung der Demokratie, Wählen ist wichtig für die Sicherstellung einer besseren Zukunft für künftige Generationen, bei Nichtwahl entscheiden andere, aktuelle internationale Lage macht Wählen noch wichtiger; Entwicklung des persönlichen Lebensstandards in den letzten fünf Jahren; erwartete Entwicklung der folgenden Bereiche im nächsten Jahr: persönliche Lebensbedingungen, nationale wirtschaftliche Lage; erwartete Entwicklung des persönlichen Lebensstandards in den nächsten fünf Jahren. 2. Soziales Europa: persönliche Bedeutung eines sozialen Europas; wichtigste Elemente für die wirtschaftliche und soziale Entwicklung der EU; Bekanntheit der Europäischen Säule sozialer Rechte; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen über die Europäische Säule sozialer Rechte: wird Beschäftigung und soziale Inklusion in der EU als ganzem stärken, Erfolg wird von der Implementierung im eigenen Land abhängen; Themen, die Hauptpriorität im eigenen Land haben sollten; wichtigste Themen in Bezug auf die Zukunft Europas: Bildung (inkl. Ausbildung und lebenslanges Lernen), Geschlechtergleichheit, Beschäftigung, Löhne und Gehälter, sozialer Dialog und die Einbeziehung von Beschäftigten, Work-Life-Balance, Gesundheit und Sicherheit am Arbeitsplatz, Kinderbetreuung und Unterstützung für Kinder, Sozialschutz, Mindesteinkommen, Alterseinkommen und -renten, Gesundheitswesen, Inklusion von Menschen mit Behinderungen, Wohnungsbau und Hilfe für Obdachlose, sonstige; Kenntnis ausgewählter EU-Initiativen zur Bewältigung der Herausforderungen im Hinblick auf Beschäftigung und Soziales: Kompetenzagenda, Richtlinie über Mindestlöhne, Garantie für Kinder, Richtlinie über Plattformarbeit, Europäischer Sozialfonds Plus, Richtlinie zur Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben; Erweiterung der persönlichen Qualifikationen: derzeit aktives Suchen nach Informationen, derzeit Teilnahme an einer Weiterbildung; Einstellung zu der folgenden Aussage: die EU sollte in Ländern, mit denen sie Handel treibt, bessere Arbeitsbedingungen und Sozialstandards fördern, selbst wenn dies zu einer geringfügigen Preissteigerung für die EU-Bürger führen würde; Schwierigkeiten in den letzten fünf Jahren bei Umzügen in andere EU-Länder, um dort zu leben und zu arbeiten: trifft nicht zu, ungenügende Kenntnis der EU-Bestimmungen und der persönlichen Rechte, aufwendige Verfahren beim Nachweis des persönlichen Sozialversicherungsschutzes und der damit verbundenen Ansprüche, Ablehnung der Verlängerung des Bezugs von Arbeitslosengeld im Ausland durch das Arbeitsamt, unterschiedliche Anwartschaftszeiten für die Feststellung von Ansprüchen auf Arbeitslosengeld, aufgrund von Arbeitslosigkeit keine Möglichkeit zur Anmeldung bei der Arbeitsverwaltung des Landes der letzten Tätigkeit, Schwierigkeiten bei der Berechnung von Rente bzw. Pension, Schwierigkeiten beim Zugang zu Gesundheits- oder anderen Leistungen wie z. B. Langzeitpflege; präferierte EU-Maßnahme zur Sicherstellung des klimaneutralen und ökologisch nachhaltigen Wirtschaftswandels: stärkerer Fokus auf Aus- und Weiterbildung zur Förderung wichtiger Kompetenzen für grüne und digitale Arbeitsplätze, mehr finanzielle Unterstützung für am stärksten von Veränderungen betroffene Menschen und Unternehmen, Sicherstellung der Arbeitnehmendenrechte im Hinblick auf die zunehmende Nutzung Künstlicher Intelligenz, mehr finanzielle Unterstützung für am stärksten von Klimawandel und grünem Wandel betroffene Haushalte, sonstiges; Wahrscheinlichkeit, bis 2030 ein sozialeres Europa zu schaffen. 3. Bewusstsein von und Vorbereitung auf Katastrophenrisiken in der EU: wichtigste Risiken im Hinblick auf das eigene Land; wichtigste Risiken im Hinblick auf das eigene Leben; persönlich erlebte Katastrophen in den letzten zehn Jahren (mit Ausnahme von Corona); präferierte Informationsquellen im Hinblick auf Katastrophenrisiken; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen zu Informationen über Katastrophenrisiken: Rezeption von Informationen über Katastrophenrisiken in den letzten zwölf Monaten, gut informiert über persönliche Katastrophenrisiken, Vertrauen in Informationen öffentlicher Behörden und von Katastrophenschutzdiensten zu Katastrophenrisiken in der eigenen Umgebung, leicht zu findende Informationen öffentlicher Behörden und von Katastrophenschutzdiensten zu Katastrophenrisiken in der eigenen Umgebung, Kenntnis von Informationsquellen zu Katastrophenrisiken bei Reisen in ein anderes EU-Land; getroffene Maßnahmen im Hinblick auf eine mögliche Katastrophe oder Notsituation: Notvorrat an Lebensmitteln und Getränken, Notvorrat an Wasser für Kochen und Hygiene, Taschenlampe oder Kerzen bereit, batteriebetriebenes Radio, Hausapotheke für Notfälle, Kopien oder sichere Aufbewahrung wichtigster persönlicher Dokumente, Notfallkoffer für schnelle Evakuierung bereit, Registrierung für Alarme und Warnungen von Katastrophenschutzdiensten oder Behörden, Teilnahme an Schulungen zum Verhalten im Notfall, Information über Katastrophennotfallplan von Stadt / Region / Land, Absprache mit Familie und Freunden über Kontaktierung im Notfall, gemeinsame Schutzmaßnahmen in der Nachbarschaft besprochen, in Schutzmaßnahmen des eigenen Hauses investiert, sonstiges; Anzahl der Tage, über die den folgenden Situationen standgehalten werden kann: Unterbrechung der Trinkwasserversorgung, Unterbrechung der Stromversorgung, Unterbrechung der Gasversorgung, Unterbrechung der Lebensmittelversorgung in der eigenen Gegend, Unterbrechung der medizinischen Versorgung; Einstellung zu ausgewählten Aussagen im Hinblick auf die persönliche Katastrophenvorsorge: Vorbereitung auf Katastrophe oder Notsituation hilft beim besseren Umgang mit der Situation, gute Vorbereitung auf Katastrophen oder Notsituationen in der eigenen Wohngegend, keine Zeit oder finanzielle Ressourcen zur Vorbereitung auf Katastrophen oder Notsituationen, Informationen von Behörden oder Katastrophenschutzdiensten zur Vorbereitung auf Katastrophen oder Notsituationen im eigenen Land sind leicht zu finden, mehr Informationen zur Vorbereitung auf Katastrophen oder Notsituationen benötigt, Kenntnis über die Art der Alarmierung durch Katastrophenschutzdienste im Ernstfall, Kenntnis der Verhaltensmaßnahmen im Notfall, Arbeitgeber oder Schule ermuntern zur Teilnahme an Schulungen zur Vorbereitung auf Katastrophen oder Notsituationen, Katastrophenschutzdienste und Behörden ermuntern zur Teilnahme an Schulungen zur Vorbereitung auf Katastrophen oder Notsituationen; Ausmaß des Angewiesenseins auf Hilfe von den folgenden Personen oder Einrichtungen in den ersten Tagen nach einer Katastrophe (Skala): Familie oder Freund*innen, Nachbar*innen, Verbände oder gemeinnützige Organisationen, Katastrophenschutzdienste, lokale Behörden oder staatliche Stellen oder Dienste, Arbeitgeber oder Bildungseinrichtung, Einrichtungen der Privatwirtschaft oder