CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
32838 research outputs found
Sort by
Generation Now Study 2023
No full textThe data for the Generation Now Study 2023 was collected by the Data and Research on Society department of the GESIS Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences in Mannheim. During the survey period from December 11, 2023, to December 26, 2023, people aged 18 and older in Germany were interviewed online (CAWI) on the following topics: political participation behavior, questions on political content, and sociodemographic information. The target group was primarily young people aged 18-29 from Germany, although older people were also eligible to participate in the survey. Respondents were selected through a non-random selection of users of the Instagram platform. Respondents were recruited via various advertisements placed by Meta on the Instagram platform.Forms of political participation (e.g., party work; contact with politicians; donations, etc.); participation in other forms of political action (e.g., expressive and everyday actions) in the last 12 months; voting intentions in the next federal election (Sunday question); assessment of the influence of various forms of political participation (voting in a federal election, contact with politicians, signing petitions, participating in a demonstration, participating in a political blockade, boycotting certain products, sharing content related to political posts on social media); most important political issue in Germany (open-ended response); Entity with the greatest ability to solve the problem mentioned (politicians, citizens, companies, others); forecast for the most important problem mentioned in 10 years; forms of political participation in relation to the problem mentioned (e.g., party work, contacting politicians, donating, party membership, action groups, etc.); political interest; satisfaction with democracy; left-right self-classification; political self-efficacy (high understanding of politics, politics cares about my opinion, self-confidence in political discussions, politicians strive for close contact with the population, attention check); trust in institutions (federal government, Bundestag, Federal Constitutional Court, political parties, politicians, police, science, public broadcasting, social media); use of social media (messenger services (e.g., WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal), YouTube, X/Twitter, TikTok, BeReal, Reddit, Discord, Instagram, Facebook, others, do not use social media); social media used for political information; assessment of own economic situation in terms of liquidity, extras, housing, and savings; assessment of the economic situation of the family of origin at the age of 14 in terms of liquidity, extras, housing, and savings; Information about parents: mother figure (biological mother, stepmother, or father´s partner, grandmother, other person, not applicable/no mother figure/mother already deceased); father figure (biological father, stepfather or my mother´s partner, grandfather, other person, not applicable/no father figure/father already deceased); frequency of political discussions with mother and father; voting behavior of mother and father (regular participation in federal, state, and local elections); political interest of mother and father; highest general education qualification of mother and father; frequency of political discussions at school; political interest of school friends; frequency of political discussions with closest friends; political interest of closest friends; attitude toward one´s own future and the future of our society; self-assessment of risk tolerance. Demography: age; sex; education: highest general school qualification; federal state; living situation (family and household); place of residence: city/country; country of birth Germany; country of birth; overall assessment of the survey; willingness to participate in another survey. The following were also coded: Paradata: serial number; start and end of the survey period; web browser used; JavaScript; date and time of survey start; date of last access; disposition code; interview status: proportion of questions completed, proportion of questions completed in percent; interview duration (measured on the respondent side and on the server side); Index of time undercuts; Indices of time undercuts by education group (highly educated, moderately educated, and low educated); number of the last survey page visited by the respondent; Berlin East/West classification; Response time variables: Response times were measured using the Embedded Client Side Paradata (ECSP) script (documentation of respondent activity in the period between receiving and submitting a survey page).Die Daten der Generation Jetzt Studie 2023 wurden von der Abteilung Data and Research on Society des GESIS-Leibniz-Instituts für Sozialwissenschaften in Mannheim erhoben. Im Erhebungszeitraum 11. Dezember 2023 bis 26. Dezember 2023 wurden Personen ab 18 Jahren in Deutschland in Onlineinterviews (CAWI) zu folgenden Themen befragt: politisches Partizipationsverhalten, Fragen zu politischen Inhalten sowie soziodemographische Angaben. Zielgruppe waren vor allem junge Menschen im Alter von 18-29-Jahren aus Deutschland, wobei die Teilnahme an der Umfrage auch für ältere Personen möglich war. Die Auswahl der Befragungspersonen erfolgte durch eine nicht-zufällige Auswahl von Nutzenden der Plattform Instagram. Die Befragungspersonen wurden mittels verschiedener Werbeanzeigen durch Meta auf der Plattform Instagram rekrutiert.Formen politischer Partizipation (z.B. Parteiarbeit; Kontakt zu Politikern; Spende, etc.); Teilnahme an weiteren politischen Aktionsformen (z.B. ausdrucksstarke und alltägliche Handlungen) in den letzten 12 Monaten; Wahlabsicht bei der nächsten Bundestagswahl (Sonntagsfrage); Bewertung des Einflusses verschiedener Formen politischer Partizipation (bei einer Bundestagswahl wählen gehen, Kontakt zu Politikern, Petition unterzeichnen, Teilnahme an einer Demonstration, Teilnahme an einer politischen Blockadeaktion, Boykott bestimmter Produkte, Inhalte teilen zu politischen Beiträgen in sozialen Medien); wichtigstes politisches Problem in Deutschland (offene Nennung); Instanz mit der größten Lösungskompetenz für das genannte Problem (Politiker, Bürger, Unternehmen, andere); Prognose für das genannte wichtigste Problem in 10 Jahren; Formen politischer Partizipation in Bezug auf das genannte Problem (z.B. Parteiarbeit, Kontakt zu Politikern, Spende, Parteimitgliedschaft, Aktionsgruppe, etc.); politisches Interesse; Demokratiezufriedenheit; Links-Rechts-Selbsteinstufung; politische Selbstwirksamkeit (hohes Politikverständnis, Politik kümmert sich um meine Meinung, Selbstbewusstsein bei politischen Gesprächen, Politiker bemühen sich um engen Kontakt zur Bevölkerung, Attention-Check); Institutionenvertrauen (Bundesregierung, Bundestag, Bundesverfassungsgericht, Parteien, Politiker, Polizei, Wissenschaft, öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunk, soziale Medien); Nutzung sozialer Medien (Messenger (z.B. WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal), Youtube, X/ Twitter, Tik Tok, BeReal, Reddit, Discord, Instagram, Facebook, Sonstige, nutze keine sozialen Medien); genutzte soziale Medien für politische Informationen; Beurteilung der eigenen wirtschaftlichen Lage in Bezug auf Liquidität, Extras, Wohnung und Sparen; Beurteilung der wirtschaftlichen Lage der Herkunftsfamilie im Alter von 14 Jahren in Bezug auf Liquidität, Extras, Wohnung und Sparen ; Angaben zu den Eltern: Mutterfigur (biologische Mutter, Stiefmutter, oder Partnerin/ Partner des Vaters, Großmutter, andere Person, nicht zutreffend/ habe keine Mutterfigur/ Mutter bereits verstorben); Vaterfigur (biologischer Vater, Stiefvater oder den Partner/ die Partnerin meiner Mutter, Großvater, andere Person, nicht zutreffend/ habe keine Vaterfigur/ Vater bereits verstorben); Häufigkeit politischer Diskussionen mit der Mutter und dem Vater; Wahlverhalten der Mutter und des Vaters (regelmäßige Teilnahme an Bundestagswahlen, Landtagswahlen und Kommunalwahlen); politisches Interesse der Mutter und des Vaters; höchster allgemeinbildender Schulabschluss der Mutter und des Vaters; Häufigkeit politischer Diskussionen in der Schule; politisches Interesse der Schulfreunde; Häufigkeit politischer Diskussionen mit den engsten Freunden/ Freundinnen; politisches Interesse der engsten Freunde/ Freundinnen; Einstellung zur eigenen Zukunft und zur Zukunft unserer Gesellschaft; Selbsteinschätzung Risikobereitschaft. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Bildung: höchster allgemeinbildender Schulabschluss; Bundesland; Wohnsituation (Familie und Haushalt); Wohnort: Stadt/ Land; Geburtsland Deutschland; Geburtsland; Bewertung der Umfrage insgesamt; Wiederbefragungsbereitschaft Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Paradaten: lfd. Nr.; Beginn und Ende des Erhebungszeitraums; genutzter Webbrowser; Javascript; Datum und Uhrzeit des Umfragebeginns; Datum des letzten Zugangs; Dispositionscode; Interviewstatus: Anteil der abgeschlossenen Fragen, Anteil der abgeschlossenen Fragen in Prozent; Interviewdauer (befragtenseitig und serverseitig gemessen); Index Zeitunterschreitende; Indices Zeitunterschreitende nach Bildungsgruppen(Hochgebildete, Mittelgebildete und Niedriggebildete); Nummer der letzten durch den Befragten besuchten Umfrageseite; Berlin Zuordnung Ost/West; Antwortzeitvariablen: Die Antwortzeiten wurden mithilfe des Embedded Client Side Paradata (ECSP) Skriptes gemessen (Dokumentation der Befragtenaktivität im Zeitraum zwischen Empfang und Absenden einer Befragungsseite)
Teachers' Writings on Experiencing Violence and Receiving Support 2024-2025
No full textAineisto koostuu kirjoituksista, joissa peruskoulun opettajat ja erityisopettajat kertovat työssään kohtaamistaan henkisen tai fyysisen väkivallan tilanteista sekä tilanteen jälkeen mahdollisesti saamastaan esihenkilötuesta. Aineisto on kerätty alun perin pro gradu -tutkimukseen, jossa selvitettiin, millaisia kokemuksia peruskoulun opettajilla on esihenkilöltä saadusta tuesta väkivaltaisiin tilanteisiin liittyen. Keruun alkuperäinen kohderyhmä oli peruskoulun erityisopettajat, mutta keruun ollessa käynnissä kohderyhmää laajennettiin riittävän vastausmäärän saamiseksi. Näin ollen kirjoituksia kerättiin lopulta kaikilta peruskoulun opettajilta. Kirjoituskutsussa pyydettiin kuvailemaan, minkä tyyppistä väkivaltaa vastaaja on kokenut ja millaisia kokemuksia hänellä on esihenkilön antamasta tuesta. Kirjoitukset saivat olla vapaamuotoisia, mutta kirjoituskutsussa annettiin kuitenkin muutamia apukysymyksiä, joita vastaajan toivottiin käyttävän kirjoittamisen apuna. Vastaajien toivottiin kirjoittavan myös esimerkiksi siitä, millaiseksi hän on kokenut esihenkilöltään saaman tuen väkivaltatilanteiden jälkeen ja onko se ollut vastaajan mielestä riittävää. Lisäksi apukysymyksissä kysyttiin muun muassa sitä, miten saatu tuki tai sen puute on heijastunut vastaajan työhyvinvointiin väkivaltatilanteiden jälkeen, sekä miten vastaajan työpaikalla suhtaudutaan väkivaltatilanteisiin ja opettajien tekemiin väkivaltailmoituksiin. Taustatietona kysyttiin sukupuolta, ikäryhmää, koulutusta sekä työkokemusta vuosina.The data consists of writings in which elementary school teachers and special education teachers describe situations of mental or physical violence they have encountered in their work, as well as any support they may have received from their superiors after the incident. The data was originally collected for a master's thesis that examined the experiences of elementary school teachers regarding the support they received from their superiors in situations involving violence. The original target group for the collection was special education teachers in primary schools, but as the collection was in progress, the target group was expanded in order to obtain a sufficient number of writings. As a result, writings were ultimately collected from all primary school teachers. Background information was asked about gender, age group, education, and work experience in years
Kartläggning av de svenska bostadsrelaterade styrmedlen som påverkar och riktar sig mot unga vuxna (2010-2022)
No full textThe data is a list of legal policy instruments related to housing policy which impacts or directly targets young adults in Sweden for the years 2010 to 2022. The file contains individual policy instruments classified by types, legal reference, data enacted (and end date if relevant), deciding authority, target group, whether the legislation directly targets or affects young adults, students, and young immigrants, whether it focuses on supply or demand, the tenure form targeted, whether the legislation is implemented at the national or local level, what is the instrument's aim, whether that aimed was achieved and sources for this evaluation.Data är en lista över rättsliga styrmedel relaterade till bostadspolitik som påverkar eller riktar sig mot unga vuxna i Sverige för perioden 2010 till 2022. Filen innehåller enskilda styrmedel klassificerade efter typ, laghänvisning, datum för ikraftträdande (och slutdatum om relevant), beslutande myndighet, målgruppen, om lagstiftningen direkt riktar sig mot eller påverkar unga vuxna, studenter och unga invandrare, om den fokuserar på utbud eller efterfrågan, vilken upplåtelseform som avses, om lagstiftningen genomförs på nationell eller lokal nivå, vad som är styrmedlets syfte, om syftet uppnåddes och källor för denna utvärdering
Data for: Urban Food and Nutrition Security Resilience through Urban Farming: A Circular Economy Approach
No full textThis dataset contains household data examining the impact of multi-storey gardens and frass fertilizer on household food insecurity, expenditure on vegetables, food consumption expenditure, consumption per adult equivalent. A cluster randomized trial (CRT) was used, including two treatments: (T1) multi-storey gardens (MSG) for planting vegetables including starter material and training on how to use, and (T2) MSG combined with BSFFF from recycled household waste, including starter material and training on use.This dataset contains household data examining the impact of multi-storey gardens and frass fertilizer on household food insecurity, expenditure on vegetables, food consumption expenditure, consumption per adult equivalent. A cluster randomized trial (CRT) was used, including two treatments: (T1) multi-storey gardens (MSG) for planting vegetables including starter material and training on how to use, and (T2) MSG combined with BSFFF from recycled household waste, including starter material and training on use
European Union Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), 2004
No full textThe Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) in Ireland is a household survey covering a broad range of issues in relation to income and living conditions. It is the official source of data on household and individual income and also provides a number of key national poverty indicators, such as the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate, the consistent poverty rate and rates of enforced deprivation. The primary focus of the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) is the collection of information on the income and living conditions of different types of households in Ireland, in order to derive indicators on poverty, deprivation and social exclusion. It is a voluntary survey of private households. The SILC Anonymised Microdata File (AMF) contains both personal and household level data. Household data is at present duplicated for each member of the household. If performing household level analysis, please be aware of this and subset the data to include a single entry per household (interview_hh = 1). Please note: In 2020 AMF was revised to be more in line with the SILC RMF. Variables were renamed in accordance with Eurostats Doc65, which provides methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables. The target variables within the AMF are data on household and individual income as well as a number of key national poverty indicators, therefore variables identified as being not relevant to SILC were removed from the AMF. Furthermore, additional statistical disclosure controls were also implemented in the revisions so as to adhere to updates of the Legislation, Governance & Data Policies of the CSO. Please note: SILC AMF data is cross-sectional microdata in which household and/or individuals cannot be tracked over time. The household id variables in each cross sectional file are randomly generated and cannot be linked between yearly datasets
CUPID COVID-19 Survey: parents’ experience of seeking healthcare for their children during COVID-19, March to May 2020.
No full textThe CUPID COVID-19 National Parents Survey, with a sample of 1,044 parents living throughout Ireland, was conducted from 5th June to 10th June 2020 to assess parents’ experience of seeking healthcare for their children during the restrictive public health measures or “lockdown” introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey asked if parents needed to access healthcare for their child since the schools closed on 12th March and the lockdown was announced, and if they decided not to access the healthcare needed. They we also asked their level of hesitancy on accessing such healthcare during lockdown and as the country entered Phase One of reopening, the public health stage at the time of the survey. Respondents were asked if they had one or more of the following concerns on accessing healthcare for their child: contracting Covid-19, services would be too busy, the Government advice was to stay away, the service was needed by others, worried about being judged for using a service if it wasn’t an emergency, not having a car and didn’t want to use public transport, or some other reason. Those who did access healthcare for their child indicated the type of healthcare accessed including face-to-face consultation with a GP, video or telephone consultation, attendance at the emergency department, or accessing another service. Further questions included where respondents sought information about healthcare during the public health restrictions, the health status of members of their household, their experience of contracting and isolating due to COVID-19, and usual accessibility of healthcare. The stress scale from the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) was also included in the survey. Demographic information was captured on gender, age, marital status, medical card/GP card ownership, county of resident, level of education, age and number of children, and if the respondent was a healthcare worker
Healthy Ireland Survey 2024
No full textThe annual Healthy Ireland Survey is a repeated cross-sectional annual study that provides an up-to-date picture of the nation’s health along with a robust and credible baseline set of data on a range of health behaviours which have significant impact on individual health outcomes. These data are being used by the Department of Health to inform current and future policy direction and programme development and implementation. The Survey reports on many lifestyle behaviours such as smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, active travel, weight management, diet and nutrition, health service utilization patterns, dental health, chronic disease incidence, mental health, sleep patterns, dementia awareness, caring responsibilities, women’s health and sexual health. Since 2014, the Healthy Ireland Survey has been administered on an annual basis by Ipsos on behalf of the Department of Health. The first 5 Waves, 2015-2019, were conducted via computer aided personal interview (CAPI). Since 2021, the Survey has been conducted by computer aided telephone interview (CATI). There is no survey for 2020 as the in-person field collection was abandoned due to the onset of the pandemic. The Survey Reports are available online at the following link and contain additional details regarding content, results and methodology: <a href="https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/706608-healthy-ireland-policies/#the-healthy-ireland-survey"</a
Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition (SLÁN), 1998
No full textThe 1998 SLÁN survey was conducted by the Centre for Health Promotion Studies at NUI Galway on behalf of the Health Promotion Unit of the Department of Health. One of the main purposes of the survey was to produce baseline information for the ongoing surveillance of health and lifestyle related behaviours in the Irish adult population. A self-administered questionnaire, an adapted version of the semi- quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ) used in the British arm of the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) study (Riboli, 1997) was developed for use in SLAN. The EPIC food frequency instrument has been validated extensively in several populations (Bingham et al., 1997) and used in a survey of diet and lifestyle of Irish women (NNSC, 1998) and validated using food diaries and a protein biomarker in volunteers of the National University of Ireland, Galway (Harrington, 1997 Thesis). There were eight sections in the questionnaire which covered general health (including self-reported height and weight), exercise, tobacco, illegal substances, accidents, household details and dietary habits
National Survey of Public Attitudes to Disability in Ireland, 2017
No full textThe National Disability Authority (NDA) commissioned Behaviour & Attitudes (B&A) to conduct a nationally representative survey on public attitudes to disability in Ireland in 2017. The NDA previously conducted national surveys on attitudes to disability in 2001, 2006 and 2011. The survey used quota sampling and was conducted using computer assisted personal interviews (CAPI) during January and February 2017. Data were weighted on gender, age, region, socio-economic status and disability status. Data from 2017 were compared to 2011 and 2006 data and these datasets were also weighted to their respective census year. Multivariate analysis was carried out to determine what factors influenced the key findings. The survey covered a range of topics on attitudes relating to disability. These included awareness of disability and attitudes towards particular types of disability. Survey questions explored attitudes towards children with disabilities in mainstream education, the employment of people with disabilities as well as relationships, neighbourhood, and the social wellbeing of people with and without disabilities. It also compared people with and without disabilities. A total sample of 1294 respondents aged 18 years and older participated in the survey. The sample was comprised of an initial sample of 1,021 respondents, of whom 166 had a disability, and a booster sample of 273 people with disabilities, giving a total of 439 people with a disability and 855 without. The 2017 NDA national survey data suggests that positive attitudes towards every kind of disability including mental health difficulties are increasing when compared to the 2011 findings, which have largely returned to, or exceeded the 2006 findings. Despite the apparent improvement in positive attitudes it is essential to continue increasing employment opportunities, promoting inclusive education and reducing stigma associated with mental illness
European Union Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), 2019
No full textThe Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) in Ireland is a household survey covering a broad range of issues in relation to income and living conditions. It is the official source of data on household and individual income and also provides a number of key national poverty indicators, such as the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate, the consistent poverty rate and rates of enforced deprivation. The primary focus of the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) is the collection of information on the income and living conditions of different types of households in Ireland, in order to derive indicators on poverty, deprivation and social exclusion. It is a voluntary survey of private households. The SILC Anonymised Microdata File (AMF) contains both personal and household level data. Household data is at present duplicated for each member of the household. If performing household level analysis, please be aware of this and subset the data to include a single entry per household (interview_hh = 1). Break in Series: For SILC there is a full break in series. Data from 2020 onwards is not directly comparable with data from 2004-2019. To make the difference clear, national use variables from 2020 onwards have been re-named