CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
32838 research outputs found
Sort by
Current Questions on Migration / Integration (April 2025)
No full textThe short survey on current issues relating to migration/ integration was conducted by the opinion research institute Verian on behalf of the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government. During the survey period from April 2, 2025, to April 8, 2025, the German-speaking population aged 14 and above was interviewed by telephone (CATI) about their attitudes toward migration and integration. The focus was on attitudes toward immigration in general, immigration regulations for various immigrant groups, and perceptions of problems related to refugees in the local area. Respondents were selected using a multi-stage random sample as part of a multi-topic survey that included landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample).Assessment of the impact of immigration on Germany as a whole in recent decades; reasons for the rather positive/rather negative impact of immigration on Germany (open question, coded answers); agreement with statements on the topic of immigration to Germany (the integration of immigrants into German society has been successful overall, there are already so many immigrants living in Germany that no more can be accepted, immigrants are causing a sharp rise in crime in Germany, I think it is good that immigration is making Germany more culturally diverse, Germany needs immigration, I think it is good that Germany describes itself as a country of immigration); concerns about the current number of refugees in Germany; short-term and long-term forecasts regarding the advantages or disadvantages for Germany of accepting refugees; calls for restrictions on the right to asylum; opinion on simplified or more complicated immigration regulations for different immigrant groups (refugees from Ukraine, refugees from Syria or Afghanistan, refugees from other countries, skilled workers from non-European countries); perception of problems related to refugees in the local area. Demography: sex; age; education; employment status; detailed employment status; household size; number of persons in the household aged 14 and over; party preference; voting eligibility; net household income; survey conducted via mobile phone or landline; internet usage. The following were also coded: current respondent number; weighting factor; interview date; location size (BIK location size and political location size); federal state; survey area West/East.Die Kurzumfrage über aktuelle Fragen zu Migration / Integration wurde vom Meinungsforschungsinstitut Verian im Auftrag des Presse- und Informationsamtes der Bundesregierung durchgeführt. Im Erhebungszeitraum 02.04.2025 bis 08.04.2025 wurde die deutschsprachige Bevölkerung ab 14 Jahren in telefonischen Interviews (CATI) zu ihrer Einstellung zu Migration und Integration befragt. Schwerpunkt ist dabei die Haltung zu Einwanderung allgemein, Regelungen der Zuwanderung für verschiedene Zuwanderergruppen sowie die Wahrnehmung von Problemen im Zusammenhang mit Flüchtlingen im räumlichen Umfeld. Die Auswahl der Befragten erfolgte durch eine mehrstufige Zufallsstichprobe im Rahmen einer Mehrthemenbefragung unter Einschluss von Festnetz- und Mobilfunknummern (Dual-Frame Stichprobe).Bewertung des Einflusses von Einwanderung auf Deutschland insgesamt in den letzten Jahrzehnten; Gründe für eher positiven/ eher negativen Einfluss von Einwanderung auf Deutschland (offene Frage, codierte Antworten); Zustimmung zu Aussagen zum Thema Einwanderung nach Deutschland (Integration der Einwanderer in die deutsche Gesellschaft ist bisher alles in allem gut gelungen, in Deutschland leben schon so viele Einwanderer, dass keine weiteren aufgenommen werden können, durch Einwanderer steigt die Kriminalität in Deutschland sehr stark an, ich finde es gut, dass Deutschland durch Einwanderung kulturell vielfältiger wird, Deutschland braucht Einwanderung, ich finde es gut, wenn sich Deutschland als Einwanderungsland bezeichnet); Sorgen über die aktuellen Flüchtlingszahlen in Deutschland; kurzfristige und langfristige Prognose hinsichtlich der Vorteile oder Nachteile für Deutschland durch die Aufnahme von Flüchtlingen; Forderung nach Einschränkung des Asylrechts; Meinung zu eher vereinfachten oder eher erschwerten Regelungen der Zuwanderung für verschiedene Zuwanderergruppen (Flüchtlinge aus der Ukraine, Flüchtlinge aus Syrien oder Afghanistan, Flüchtlinge aus anderen Ländern, Fachkräfte aus dem nicht-europäischen Ausland); Wahrnehmung von Problemen im Zusammenhang mit Flüchtlingen im räumlichen Umfeld. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Bildung; Berufstätigkeit; Berufstätigkeit im Detail; Haushaltsgröße; Anzahl der Personen im Haushalt ab 14 Jahren; Parteipräferenz; Wahlberechtigung; Haushaltsnettoeinkommen; Erhebung per Mobilfunk oder Festnetz; Internetnutzung. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: laufende Befragtennummer; Gewichtungsfaktor; Interviewdatum; Ortsgröße (BIK-Ortsgröße und politische Ortsgröße); Bundesland; Befragungsgebiet West/Ost
Access to Treatment and Waiting Times in Primary Oral Health Care: South-Western Finns 2021
No full textAineisto on osa kyselykokonaisuutta, jonka tavoitteena oli selvittää julkiseen suun perusterveydenhuoltoon pääsyn odotusaikoja. Kyselyt kerättiin kansalaisilta, hammashoitajilta sekä suun terveydenhuollon johtajilta. Tämä aineisto käsittelee kansalaisten kyselyä. Vastaajat ovat Varsinais-Suomesta. Aluksi vastaajia pyydettiin laittamaan tärkeysjärjestykseen hammaslääkärin kiireettömän hoidon valintakriteerit sekä tiedusteltiin, onko kiireettömään hoitoon pääsyn nopeus hammaslääkärin valinnassa vastaajille tärkeää. Tämän jälkeen tiedusteltiin, mistä vastaajat hankkivat tietoa hammaslääkärin valintaa varten. Lisäksi kysyttiin, haluavatko he käydä pääsääntöisesti saman hammaslääkärin vastaanotolla vai menevätkö he kenelle tahansa, mikäli vastaanottoajan saa nopeasti. Seuraavaksi tiedusteltiin, kuinka säännöllisesti vastaajat käyvät hammaslääkärillä sekä käyvätkö he terveyskeskuksessa vai yksityisellä sektorilla. Tämän jälkeen kysyttiin vastaajien käsityksiä hoidon tarpeen arvioinnista, mm. liioittelevatko he oireitaan päästääkseen nopeammin hoitoon. Lisäksi esitettiin kysymyksiä ja väittämiä hoitoon pääsyn odotusaikoihin liittyen, kuten esimerkiksi kuinka pitkään on odottanut kiireettömään hoitoon pääsyä sekä esitettiin väittämiä internetissä julkaistavista odotusajoista. Taustamuuttujia ovat kotikunta, syntymävuosi, sukupuoli, koulutustausta ja koettu suun terveys ja kotihoitotottumukset.The data is part of a set of surveys aimed at determining waiting times for access to public primary oral health care. The surveys were collected from citizens, dental nurses, and oral health care managers. This material covers the citizen survey. The respondents are from Southwest Finland. First, respondents were asked to rank the criteria for choosing a dentist for non-urgent care and were asked whether the quickness of access to non-urgent care was important to them when choosing a dentist. They were then asked where they obtained information for choosing a dentist. In addition, respondents were asked whether they generally preferred to visit the same dentist or whether they would visit any dentist if they could get an appointment quickly. Next, respondents were asked how regularly they visit a dentist and whether they visit a health center or a private clinic. After this, respondents were asked about their views on the assessment of their need for treatment, e.g., whether they exaggerate their symptoms to receive treatment more quickly. In addition, questions and statements were presented regarding waiting times for treatment, such as how long they had waited for non-urgent treatment. Also, statements were presented regarding waiting times published on the internet. Background variables include the municipality of residence, year of birth, gender, educational background, perceived oral health, and personal oral care habits
Kansalaispulssi 8/2024
No full textKansalaispulssi selvittää suomalaisten mielipiteitä ajankohtaisista aiheista, viranomaisten toiminnasta sekä vastaajan mielialasta ja huolenaiheista. Aineisto sisältää kysymyksiä Venäjän hyökkäyksestä Ukrainaan, liikunnasta ja liikkumisesta sekä teemoista, joihin maan hallituksen pitäisi kiinnittää huomiota. Tämän kierroksen kyselyssä kartoitettiin, kuinka paljon vastaajat luottavat toisiin ihmisiin sekä eri instituutioihin. Kysyttiin myös kuinka oikeudenmukaisena he pitävät suomalaista yhteiskuntaa. Edelleen kysyttiin vastaajan mielialasta, luottamuksesta tulevaisuuteen sekä koetusta stressistä ja turvallisuudesta. Vastaajia pyydettiin myös arvioimaan suomalaisten kriisimielialaa tällä hetkellä. Lisäksi vastaajat arvioivat, mihin yhteiskunnallisiin teemoihin, kuten kestävään julkiseen talouteen, yritysten toimintaedellytyksiin, ilmastotoiminen edistämiseen ja toimivaan terveydenhuoltoon, hallituksen pitäisi lähitulevaisuudessa erityisesti kiinnittää huomiota. Kysyttiin myös kuinka huolestuneita vastaajat ovat kotitaloutensa toimeentulosta sekä julkisen talouden tilanteesta. Turvallisuustilanteeseen ja Venäjän hyökkäykseen Ukrainaan liittyen kysyttiin, huolestuttavatko sodan mahdollinen laajeneminen tai Venäjän vaikuttamispyrkimykset. Lisäksi tiedusteltiin näkemyksiä EU:n Venäjälle asettamien talouspakotteiden hyväksyttävyydestä sekä vastaajien omakohtaisia havaintoja harhaanjohtavaan tietoon perustuvista vaikuttamisyrityksistä tai tietoturvaongelmista internetissä. Lopuksi kysyttiin, ovatko vastaajat liikkuneet kuuden viime kuukauden aikana liikuntasuositusten mukaisesti ja ovatko he muuttaneet liikuntakäyttäytymistään. Kysyttiin myös, onko vastaaja kuullut Suomi liikkeelle -ohjelmasta. Taustamuuttujina olivat vastauskieli, vastaajan sukupuoli, ikäryhmä, maakunta, koulutus sekä tietoja kotitalouden rakenteesta ja taloudellisesta tilanteesta.The Citizens' Pulse surveys examine Finnish attitudes and opinions on current issues. Main themes in the surveys include the activity of authorities, future expectations, trust, and the respondents' own state of mind. This collection round also included questions on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, physical activities and issues that the Finnish government should address. The eigth collection round of 2024 surveyed the respondents' trust in other people and various institutions (e.g. the Finnish Government, the health care system, the media, and the Finnish Defence Forces). The respondents were asked to evaluate how fair or unfair they thought Finnish society was at present, and their state of mind was examined with questions on various matters relating to health and well-being. The questions covered, for example, the respondents' own mental well-being, whether they were worried about the adequacy of their income, their confidence in their future, and experiences of stress. Additionally, the respondents were asked to evaluate whether an atmosphere of crisis prevailed amongst Finns, whether they were worried about the state of general government finances (state and municipalities) and whether Finland's NATO membership had impacted their sense of safety. The respondents' views were investigated on which societal issues (e.g. promotion of climate action, national defence, poverty reduction, effective healthcare, operating conditions of businesses and investment opportunities) the Finnish government should focus on in the near future. Opinions on whether Finland's national debt should be reduced regardless of the resulting cuts in benefits and welfare it would entail for Finnish citizens and whether social security cuts can be considered acceptable if they provide an incentive to take up work and increase employment were surveyed. The respondents' views on the right to seek asylum in Finland were also charted. The next set of questions focused on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and national security in Finland. The respondents were asked how concerned they were about the crisis in Ukraine and its effects, and whether they were concerned that the war might expand beyond Ukraine. The respondents were also asked whether they were concerned that Russia might take military action against Finland or try to interfere with the functioning of Finnish society. Opinions on the economic sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU and whether Finland should be ready to receive significant numbers of refugees from Ukraine if necessary were charted. The respondents were asked whether Finland's actions on the border with Russia had reinforced their sense security, whether Finland's response to Russian interference has been adequate and timely, and whether the respondents were concerned about Russia's recent actions. The respondents were also asked whether they had noticed any cyber security issues or instances where purposefully misleading claims based on misinformation were spread on social media or online over the previous month. Finally, the respondents were asked whether they had been exercising according to the physical activity recommendations in Finland for the past six months and whether they had changed their physical activity behaviour. It was also asked whether the respondents have heard of the 'Get Finland Moving' programme. The cross-governmental, government-level programme is coordinated by the Ministry of Education and Culture. Background variables included the language responded in, the respondent's gender, age group, NUTS3 region of residence, highest level of education, household composition, and perceived financial situation of household
Mökkeily ja energiankäyttö 2023
No full textTutkimuksessa käsitellään mökkeilyyn, mökkeilyn energiankäyttöön ja mökkimatkoihin liittyviä kysymyksiä tarkoituksena selvittää niistä koituvaa hiilijalanjälkeä sekä vuosien 2021-2023 energia- ja taloustilanteen vaikutuksia vapaa-ajan asumiselle. Kysely toteutettiin osana Mökkeilyn hiilijalanjäljen laskenta ja päästövähennyskeinot Suomessa (MöHiLas) -hanketta. Työtä rahoittavat maa- ja metsätalousministeriö (saaristoasiain neuvottelukunta) sekä ympäristöministeriö. Hankkeessa tehtiin myös yhteistyötä Vapaa-ajan asukkaiden Liiton VAAL ry:n ja Suomen Omakotiliitto ry:n kanssa. Kyselyn alussa selvitettiin, millä vuosikymmenellä mökki on rakennettu, millaiseen käyttöön se parhaiten soveltuu, ja kuinka pitkä etäisyys mökin ja vakituisen asunnon välillä on. Mökkimatkoihin tarkennuttiin seuraavaksi kysymällä tavallisesti käytetyistä kulkutavoista, mahdollisesti käytössä olevan henkilöauton käyttövoimasta, ja onko matkojen kulkutavoissa tai määrässä tapahtunut muutoksia viimeksi kuluneen vuoden aikana. Kyselyssä selvitettiin myös mökiltä käsin tehtävien päivämatkojen määrää ja luonnetta. Seuraavaksi kartoitettiin, paljonko ja millaista polttoainetta vapaa-ajan asunnolla olevat laitteet kuluttavat vuodessa. Mökin energiaratkaisuihin liittyen kysyttiin myös, mitä virtalähteitä mökiltä löytyy, ja mikä on mökin pääasiallinen lämmitystapa sekä mahdollisista lisälämmitysmuodoista. Lisäksi kysyttiin, onko lämmitys pysyvästi päällä talvikaudella 2022/2023, ja poikkeaako tämän talvikauden lämmitys edelliseen vuoteen verrattuna. Lopuksi tiedusteltiin, onko mökillä tehty energian käyttöön liittyviä muutoksia tai hankittu uusia virta- tai lämmönlähteitä viimeksi kuluneen vuoden aikana. Kyselyn päätteeksi selvitettiin mökin käyttöön liittyviä kysymyksiä. Vastaajia pyydettiin arvioimaan mökin käyttövuorokausien määrä eri vuodenaikoina, ja kuinka moni henkilö on yöpynyt mökillä viimeksi kuluneen vuoden aikana. Lopuksi kysyttiin vielä, onko mökiltä käsin tehty etätöitä. Taustamuuttujia aineistossa ovat vastaajan ikäryhmä, asema työelämässä, asuinkunta ja mökkikunta.The survey investigated aspects of cottage living, such as energy use in cottages and travel related to cottage visits. The aim was to assess the resulting carbon footprint and examine how the energy and economic situation between 2021 and 2023 affected leisure housing. The survey was conducted as part of the Carbon Footprint of Second Homes project, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (Island Committee) and the Ministry of the Environment. The project also involved collaboration with the Freetime Apartment Owners' Association (VAAL ry) and the Finnish Home Owners' Association (Suomen Omakotiliitto ry). Respondents were first asked about the decade in which their cottage was built, its intended use, and the distance to their permanent residence. Travel-related questions focused on the usual modes of transport, the energy source of any personal vehicle used, and whether there had been changes in travel habits or frequency over the past year. The survey also examined the number and nature of day trips made from the cottage. Further questions addressed the annual fuel consumption of tools, machines, and other equipment used at the cottage. Respondents were asked about available power sources, the main heating method, and any additional heating systems. The survey also inquired whether heating was continuously used during the winter season of 2022/2023 and whether this differed from the previous year. In addition, respondents were asked whether any changes had been made to energy use or whether new power or heating sources had been acquired during the past year. The final section of the survey focused on cottage usage. Respondents estimated the number of overnight stays across different seasons and the number of individuals who had stayed at the cottage during the past year. They were also asked whether they had worked remotely from the cottage. Background variables in the dataset include the respondent's age group, employment status, municipality of residence, and municipality of the cottage
De Stemming / L'Enquête Nationale 2025
No full textNederlands De Stemming / L’Enquête Nationale 2025 (DSEN2025) is een online enquête die werd uitgevoerd bij een steekproef van N=5,749 volwassen (18 jaar en ouder) inwoners van België: 1,149 inwoners van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, 2,366 van het Vlaams Gewest, en 2,234 van het Waalse Gewest. De enquête werd ontwikkeld door Stefaan Walgrave (Universiteit Antwerpen), Jean-Benoît Pilet (ULB) en Jonas Lefevere (Universiteit Antwerpen) op vraag van VRT NWS, RTBF en De Standaard, met als doel de Belgische publieke opinie te analyseren. De onderwerpen die in de enquête aan bod komen, omvatten de politieke meningen en voorkeuren van de respondenten, hun beleidsvoorkeuren, en algemene houding ten opzichte van de democratie en politiek in het algemeen. Bij de enquête van 2025 lag de nadruk op de beleidsvoorkeuren van de bevolking, de houding tegenover de nieuwe federale regering, de houding tegenover (inter)nationale conflicten en het gevoel van onzekerheid en onveiligheid. Français De Stemming / L’Enquête Nationale 2025 (DSEN2025) est une enquête en ligne menée auprès d'un échantillon de N=5 749 adultes (âgés de 18 ans et plus) résidant en Belgique : 1 149 résidents de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, 2 366 de la Région flamande et 2 234 de la Région wallonne. L'enquête a été élaborée par Stefaan Walgrave (Université D’Anvers), Jean-Benoît Pilet (ULB) et Jonas Lefevere (Université D’Anvers) à la demande de la VRT NWS, de la RTBF et de De Standaard, dans le but d'analyser l'opinion publique belge. Les thèmes abordés dans l'enquête couvrent les opinions et les préférences politiques des répondants, leurs préférences en matière de politiques publiques à mettre en œuvre et leurs attitudes générales à l'égard de la démocratie et de la politique. En plus des questions reprises annuellement dans le questionnaire DSEN2025, des questions spécifiques et plus étendues ont été insérées en lien avec les développements politiques récents, en particulier par rapport au nouveau gouvernement fédéral De Wever I, aux conflits (inter)nationaux en cours, et aux sentiments d'insécurité et de précarité. English De Stemming / L’Enquête Nationale 2025 (DSEN2025) is an online survey conducted among a sample of N=5,749 adult (18 years and older) residents of Belgium: 1,149 residents of the Brussels Capital Region, 2,366 of the Flemish Region, and 2,234 of the Walloon Region. The survey was developed by Stefaan Walgrave (University of Antwerp), Jean-Benoît Pilet (ULB) and Jonas Lefevere (University of Antwerp) at the request of VRT NWS, RTBF and De Standaard, with the aim of analysing Belgian public opinion. Topics covered in the survey include respondents' political opinions and preferences, their policy preferences, and general attitudes towards democracy and politics in general. The 2025 survey focused on people's policy preferences, attitudes towards the new federal government, attitudes towards (inter)national conflicts, and feelings of insecurity and insecurity. Version history Version 2.0: Compared to Version 1.0, Version 2.0 corrects a wrong label for the "education" variable in the English and Dutch labels. Version 1.0: Initial upload of the dataset. References to previous editions of De Stemming De Stemming 2020 De Stemming 2021 De Stemming 2022 De Stemming 2023 De Stemming 2024</li
SEAD Platform Survey
No full textThe SEAD Platform Survey is conducted by the SEAD (Sustainable Employment in the Age of Digitalization) Consortium consisting of partners from VUB (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), KU Leuven, ULiège (University of Liège) and ULB (Université libre de Bruxelles) - funded by Belspo. The SEAD Platform Survey is a cross-sectional internet survey, designed to investigate the socio-demographic characteristics, work- and employment conditions, health and well-being, social protection, income (security) and career prospects of workers in the Belgian platform economy. The target population of the survey was made up of platform workers living in Belgium, regardless of age or type of platform activity. The SEAD Platform Survey surveyed a gross total of 918 platform workers between February 2022 until February 2023. After considering inclusion criteria, duplicate entries, completeness, missing data, minimum valid information on job quality variables, and unrealistic values, the sample was limited to 368 platform workers. Further information about the recruitment process and data quality can be found in the following publication: Gevaert, J., Doms, J., Vandevenne, E. et al. Strategies for surveying platform workers: lessons from a Belgian case study. Qual Quant (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01935-5 Only metadata is deposited because of restricted exploitation specified in the informed consent information sheet for participants
Dataset: Deenz Dark Triad Scale – Poland
No full textThis dataset comes from a study conducted in Poland with 44 participants. The goal of the study was to measure personality traits known as the Dark Triad. The Dark Triad consists of three key traits that influence how people think and behave towards others. These traits are Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy. Machiavellianism refers to a person's tendency to manipulate others and be strategic in their actions. People with high Machiavellianism scores often believe that deception is necessary to achieve their goals. Narcissism is related to self-importance and the need for admiration. Individuals with high narcissism scores may see themselves as special and expect others to recognize their greatness. Psychopathy is linked to impulsive behavior and a lack of empathy. People with high psychopathy scores tend to be less concerned about the feelings of others and may take risks without worrying about consequences. Each participant in the dataset answered 30 questions, divided into three sections, with 10 questions per trait. The answers were recorded using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where: 1 means "Strongly Disagree" 2 means "Disagree" 3 means "Neutral" 4 means "Agree" 5 means "Strongly Agree" This scale helps measure how much a person agrees with statements related to each of the three traits. The dataset also includes basic demographic information. Each participant has a unique ID (such as P001, P002, etc.) to keep their identity anonymous. The dataset records their age, which ranges from 18 to 60 years old, and their gender, which is categorized as "Male," "Female," or "Other." The responses in the dataset are realistic, with small variations to reflect natural differences in personality. On average, participants scored around 3.2 for Machiavellianism, meaning most people showed a moderate tendency to be strategic or manipulative. The average Narcissism score was 3.5, indicating that some participants valued themselves highly and sought admiration. The average Psychopathy score was 2.8, showing that most participants did not strongly exhibit impulsive or reckless behaviors. This dataset can be useful for many purposes. Researchers can use it to analyze personality traits and see how they compare across different groups. The data can also be used for cross-cultural comparisons, allowing researchers to study how personality traits in Poland differ from those in other countries. Additionally, psychologists can use this data to understand how Dark Triad traits influence behavior in everyday life. The dataset is saved in a CSV format, which makes it easy to open in programs like Excel, SPSS, or Python for further analysis. Because the data is structured and anonymized, it can be used safely for research without revealing personal information. In summary, this dataset provides valuable insights into personality traits among people in Poland. It allows researchers to explore how Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy vary among individuals. By studying these traits, psychologists can better understand human behavior and how it affects relationships, decision-making, and personal success
Healthy Ireland Survey, 2018
No full textThe annual Healthy Ireland Survey provides an up-to-date picture of the nation’s health along with a robust and credible baseline set of data on a range of health behaviours which have significant impact on individual health outcomes. These data are being used by the Department of Health to inform current and future policy direction and programme development and implementation. The Survey reports on many lifestyle behaviours such as smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, active travel, weight management, diet and nutrition, health service utilization patterns, dental health, chronic disease incidence, mental health, sleep patterns, dementia awareness, caring responsibilities and sexual health. Some modules are repeated every year (e.g. smoking, demographics, chronic conditions), however, the majority of modules are being repeated on a 2-4 year cycle, allowing the Survey to ask a wider variety of questions. The Questionnaire for each year therefore varies substantially (but not completely) from the year before; researchers should be aware of that. Since 2014, the Healthy Ireland Survey has been administered on an annual basis by Ipsos-MRBI on behalf of the Department of Health
European Union Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), 2009
No full textThe Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) in Ireland is a household survey covering a broad range of issues in relation to income and living conditions. It is the official source of data on household and individual income and also provides a number of key national poverty indicators, such as the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate, the consistent poverty rate and rates of enforced deprivation. The primary focus of the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) is the collection of information on the income and living conditions of different types of households in Ireland, in order to derive indicators on poverty, deprivation and social exclusion. It is a voluntary survey of private households. The SILC Anonymised Microdata File (AMF) contains both personal and household level data. Household data is at present duplicated for each member of the household. If performing household level analysis, please be aware of this and subset the data to include a single entry per household (interview_hh = 1). Please note: In 2020 AMF was revised to be more in line with the SILC RMF. Variables were renamed in accordance with Eurostats Doc65, which provides methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables. The target variables within the AMF are data on household and individual income as well as a number of key national poverty indicators, therefore variables identified as being not relevant to SILC were removed from the AMF. Furthermore, additional statistical disclosure controls were also implemented in the revisions so as to adhere to updates of the Legislation, Governance & Data Policies of the CSO. Please note: SILC AMF data is cross-sectional microdata in which household and/or individuals cannot be tracked over time. The household id variables in each cross sectional file are randomly generated and cannot be linked between yearly datasets
European Union Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), 2010
No full textThe Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) in Ireland is a household survey covering a broad range of issues in relation to income and living conditions. It is the official source of data on household and individual income and also provides a number of key national poverty indicators, such as the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate, the consistent poverty rate and rates of enforced deprivation. The primary focus of the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) is the collection of information on the income and living conditions of different types of households in Ireland, in order to derive indicators on poverty, deprivation and social exclusion. It is a voluntary survey of private households. The SILC Anonymised Microdata File (AMF) contains both personal and household level data. Household data is at present duplicated for each member of the household. If performing household level analysis, please be aware of this and subset the data to include a single entry per household (interview_hh = 1). Please note: In 2020 AMF was revised to be more in line with the SILC RMF. Variables were renamed in accordance with Eurostats Doc65, which provides methodological guidelines and description of EU-SILC target variables. The target variables within the AMF are data on household and individual income as well as a number of key national poverty indicators, therefore variables identified as being not relevant to SILC were removed from the AMF. Furthermore, additional statistical disclosure controls were also implemented in the revisions so as to adhere to updates of the Legislation, Governance & Data Policies of the CSO. Please note: SILC AMF data is cross-sectional microdata in which household and/or individuals cannot be tracked over time. The household id variables in each cross sectional file are randomly generated and cannot be linked between yearly datasets