38978 research outputs found
Sort by
Retrieval Success
No full textThe present project is a preregistered replication study examining whether successful retrieval causally enhances long-term retention when item memorability is controlled. Retrieval-practice effects are often interpreted as evidence that successful retrieval strengthens memory more than exposure to feedback alone. However, many paradigms confound retrieval success with item difficulty or memorability, making it difficult to isolate the causal role of retrieval itself.
Participants study novel item–label pairs and undergo repeated learning rounds until retrieval success is achieved. Two learning conditions are compared: successful retrieval and retrieval attempts followed by feedback. Retention is assessed using a productive test. The design closely follows an initial study that observed small, non-significant differences between conditions, motivating the need for a higher-powered replication.
The primary goal of the replication is to obtain a more precise estimate of the effect of learning condition on retention and to evaluate whether any difference between conditions can be ruled out within a prespecified equivalence bound. Data will be analysed using a mixed-effects logistic regression model with random intercepts for participants and items. An equivalence test will be conducted on the condition effect using bounds defined in advance.
The study is designed to be informative regardless of outcome. Evidence for equivalence would suggest that successful retrieval does not confer a meaningful advantage over retrieval followed by feedback when memorability is controlled. Conversely, failure to demonstrate equivalence would indicate that effects of this magnitude cannot yet be ruled out and would motivate further investigation
Cognitive Failures, Affect, and Psychopathological Traits
No full textCognitive failures are errors in attention, memory, and action, that are commonplace in everyday life (e.g., forgetting why you went from one room to another). However, there are substantial individual differences in the frequency with which people experience cognitive failures. Previous research shows that people who report experiencing cognitive failures more frequently in everyday life also report higher levels of negative affective experiences, such as anxiety. Negative affect can be conceptualised within two distinct major theoretical frameworks: (1) negative versus positive affect, and (2) internalising versus externalising psychopathological traits. Here the goal is to elucidate the relationship between cognitive failures and the different components of these frameworks.
Specifically, while there is a strong link between individuals’ cognitive failures and trait negative affective experiences, it remains unknown how cognitive failures relate to trait positive affective experiences – are these also linked? That is, might frequent experiences of any strong emotion tend to be associated with increased cognitive failures, or is the association with cognitive failures selective to negative affective experiences, such that the failures may be a product of processes such as rumination? Second, a major framework of psychopathological traits distinguishes between internalising (e.g., depression, anxiety) and externalising tendencies (e.g., impulsivity, antisociality). In separate studies, cognitive failures have been found to be associated with both internalising and externalising trait tendencies, but the extent to which each explains unique variance in cognitive failures is unknown, and this will be tested here by measuring them in the same participants
Supplementary Materials for Optimising Machine Learning Approach to Feature Weighting and Performance Classification in Automated Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Interpreting Quality
No full textThe supplementary materials include full computational specifications for all 42 features (Appendix B), grid search parameters (Appendix C), cluster validation procedures (Appendix D), the complete feature ranking beyond the top 10 reported in the main text (Appendix F), and assessment criteria (Appendix G). Cross-references to these appendices have been added at the relevant points in the manuscript
Database of studies relevant for revising the HiTOP model
No full textWe are working on building a database through a systematic screening of the literature that aims to capture all core studies that need to be considered when proposing a revision to the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) mode
Investigating the Temporal Distribution of Words in Child-Centered Audio using the Burstiness Metric
No full textanalyses for paper of same name submitted to Infant Behavior and Development Special Issue - From Daily Life to Data: Synergies in Sensing and Computation for Studying Infant Behavior in Contex
Growing communicators: A fine-grained analysis of toddlers’ communicative intentions from requestive and expressive, to information seeking and giving.
No full textA Comparison of Optimization Algorithms in Structural Equation Modeling
No full textsimulation code. type study1
Redistributive Economics: A Philosophical Examination of Fairness
No full textIn Redistributive Economics: A Philosophical Examination of Fairness, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad, Ph.D., DBA, offers a thought-provoking analysis of the principles and ethics of redistributing wealth and resources within society. This book takes an in-depth look at the philosophical foundations of fairness in economic systems, exploring the tension between individual rights and collective responsibilities. Rachmad critically examines the moral and practical aspects of redistributive policies, asking fundamental questions about the nature of justice, equity, and economic responsibility. The work tackles the ethical dilemmas faced by societies in addressing poverty, inequality, and the distribution of wealth, presenting a comprehensive framework for thinking about these issues. Published by The United Nations and The Education Training Centre in 2008, the book encourages readers to engage with the pressing issues of fairness in economic policy and to consider the broader implications of redistributive justice for sustainable societies.
The creation of Redistributive Economics: A Philosophical Examination of Fairness stems from Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad, Ph.D., DBA’s deep concern about the widening gap between rich and poor in societies around the world. The philosophical underpinnings of redistributive economics focus on justice, fairness, and the moral responsibility of individuals and institutions in addressing inequality. In this book, published in 2008 by The United Nations and The Education Training Centre, Rachmad offers a critical examination of various models of wealth redistribution, looking at both theoretical arguments and practical solutions for achieving social and economic justice. The book addresses the complex challenges that arise when societies attempt to strike a balance between freedom and equality, private property and collective welfare.
At the heart of this work are the definitions of redistributive economics and fairness. Prof. Rachmad defines redistributive economics as the study and practice of allocating wealth and resources from the more affluent members of society to the less fortunate in an effort to reduce economic disparities. Fairness, in this context, is discussed in relation to both equality of opportunity and equality of outcomes, questioning whether economic fairness requires equal distribution or simply the elimination of unjust inequalities. The core concepts explored in this book involve justice, equity, and the moral duty to care for the disadvantaged, all framed within economic systems that shape and influence wealth distribution.
Prof. Rachmad’s analysis is grounded in the widespread phenomenon of economic inequality, which has become a defining feature of global economies. The book examines how capitalist systems, in particular, have contributed to growing disparities in wealth, access to resources, and opportunities. These phenomena have sparked debates over the fairness of current economic policies and the ethical implications of economic inequality. Prof. Rachmad draws attention to the increasing calls for reform in both developed and developing nations, as well as the shifting focus on social responsibility within business practices and government policies.
The operational principles explored in this book revolve around the idea of justice as fairness, a concept popularized by philosopher John Rawls. Prof. Rachmad extends this concept by discussing how the redistribution of wealth must align with broader ethical principles, including the prevention of harm to the most vulnerable and the promotion of equitable opportunities for all members of society. The principles of fairness are also connected to the notion of social solidarity, where communities support one another in the face of economic hardship.
Several indicators are presented to assess the effectiveness of redistributive policies. Prof. Rachmad highlights the role of poverty rates, income inequality indexes, and social mobility as key measures of fairness in economic systems. These indicators serve as benchmarks for evaluating the impact of redistributive economics on societal well-being, providing insight into the extent to which justice and fairness are achieved through wealth redistribution.
Prof. Rachmad identifies several operational variables that influence the success of redistributive economic policies, including government intervention, taxation systems, social welfare programs, and market dynamics. The author argues that these variables must work in tandem to create a system that is both equitable and sustainable. The effectiveness of redistribution also depends on cultural attitudes toward wealth, social responsibility, and the role of government in addressing inequality.
The success of redistributive economics is determined by factors such as political will, public support, economic conditions, and the design of welfare systems. Prof. Rachmad stresses the importance of aligning these factors with ethical considerations in order to craft policies that are both practical and just. Additionally, the book explores the role of international cooperation in addressing global inequalities and ensuring fair economic practices across borders.
In Redistributive Economics: A Philosophical Examination of Fairness, Prof. Rachmad offers strategies for implementing effective redistributive policies, such as progressive taxation, universal healthcare, and education systems that provide equal access for all individuals. The book emphasizes the need for policies that prioritize the well-being of the most disadvantaged, while also promoting economic growth and social cohesion.
The book addresses the challenges that support and hinder the redistribution of wealth. Supporting factors include a growing public awareness of inequality, rising social movements advocating for fairness, and the increasing role of international institutions in promoting justice. However, Prof. Rachmad also discusses the hindrances, such as political resistance, entrenched power structures, and economic forces that perpetuate inequality. These obstacles must be navigated in order to create a fairer and more just society.
In conclusion, Prof. Rachmad argues that redistributive economics is essential for creating a more just and fair society. He calls for a global rethinking of economic systems to ensure that wealth is distributed in a way that supports the well-being of all individuals. The book highlights the importance of balancing individual freedom with social responsibility and emphasizes the need for systemic change to address the growing inequality in modern economies.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Understanding Redistributive Economics
(Page 1) This opening chapter introduces the concept of redistributive economics, defining its scope and relevance in modern societies. Prof. Rachmad sets the stage for an exploration of the philosophical dimensions of fairness and justice in wealth distribution.
Chapter 2: Philosophical Theories of Justice
(Page 45) In this chapter, Prof. Rachmad examines key philosophical theories of justice, including Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness, and how they apply to the redistribution of wealth. The book explores various ethical frameworks for understanding fairness.
Chapter 3: The Ethics of Wealth Distribution
(Page 91) This chapter delves into the moral considerations of wealth distribution, addressing questions of fairness, entitlement, and the role of the state in ensuring equitable economic systems. Prof. Rachmad reflects on historical perspectives and modern interpretations of wealth justice.
Chapter 4: The Global Context of Inequality
(Page 135) Prof. Rachmad explores the global phenomenon of inequality, focusing on the causes and consequences of wealth disparities. This chapter examines the roles of globalization, economic systems, and political structures in shaping inequality.
Chapter 5: The Role of Government in Wealth Redistribution
(Page 179) A critical analysis of government policies designed to redistribute wealth, including progressive taxation, social welfare programs, and public investment in education and healthcare. Prof. Rachmad discusses the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches.
Chapter 6: Social Solidarity and Economic Justice
(Page 223) This chapter investigates the concept of social solidarity, emphasizing the role of community and collective responsibility in achieving economic justice. Prof. Rachmad discusses the importance of solidarity in fostering social and economic fairness.
Chapter 7: Evaluating Redistributive Policies
(Page 267) Prof. Rachmad provides an overview of how redistributive policies can be evaluated using various indicators such as poverty rates, income inequality, and social mobility. The chapter presents a framework for assessing the effectiveness of redistribution efforts.
Chapter 8: Overcoming Barriers to Redistribution
(Page 311) The challenges to implementing redistributive policies are explored in this chapter, including political resistance, social attitudes, and economic constraints. Prof. Rachmad discusses ways to overcome these obstacles in order to promote fairness and equity.
Chapter 9: International Cooperation in Economic Redistribution
(Page 355) A discussion of the role of international institutions, such as the United Nations and the World Bank, in promoting fair economic practices and addressing global wealth disparities. Prof. Rachmad emphasizes the need for global cooperation in achieving economic justice.
Chapter 10: A Vision for the Future: Achieving Fairness in Wealth Distribution
(Page 399) The final chapter offers a vision for the future of redistributive economics, considering the role of education, technology, and international cooperation in addressing inequality. Prof. Rachmad outlines potential pathways toward a more just and fair economic system
Drivers of social media behaviors during professional experience placements in pre-registration nursing students: A systematic review protocol.
No full textThe History of Play in Early Childhood Education: Emphasizing the Mind-Body Connection and Neurological Confirmation
No full textThis paper explores the historical evolution and contemporary decline of play in early
childhood education, focusing on its developmental role in the mind-body connection.
Drawing from historical figures like Froebel, Montessori, Isaacs, and federally funded
nursery school programs, the study highlights how play was central to emotional, cognitive,
and physical growth. Framed by Somatic Theory of Learning and supported by modern
neuroscience, the paper argues that physical movement and play are biologically necessary
for executive functioning, memory, and emotional regulation. Contemporary education
systems have deprioritized play due to industrial, political, and digital-age pressures,
leading to academic and behavioral setbacks. Countries prioritizing play-based learning
demonstrate better academic and well-being outcomes. Thus, restoring play as a
developmental necessity is both historically justified and scientifically supported