38978 research outputs found
Sort by
“El acompañamiento brindado por el personal de enfermería a la mujer durante el trabajo de parto: Una Revisión de Alcance”
No full textObjetivo general
Mapear el alcance y el tipo de evidencia científica en relación con el acompañamiento brindado por enfermería a la mujer durante el trabajo de parto, considerando su impacto en las dimensiones biológica, psicológica y social. Así como los determinantes y consecuencias de la no implementación.
Objetivos específicos
- Identificar y describir cómo se conceptualiza el acompañamiento de enfermería brindado a la mujer durante el trabajo de parto.
- Identificar y describir los efectos reportados en la evidencia científica sobre como el acompañamiento influye en la experiencia de trabajo de parto de las mujeres
- Identificar y describir los recursos presentes y ausentes con los que cuentan los servicios de salas de partos comparados con los recursos ideales para ofrecer el acompañamiento a la mujer durante el trabajo de parto.
- Identificar y describir la comunicación por parte del personal de enfermería y la mujer en trabajo de parto
What drives our trust? Exp 5
No full textIn the current study, we aim to identify which factors influence participants’ final trust ratings of a person (an individual journalist). Participants will be exposed to seven different news reports (all coming from the same person) and, after each one, will be asked to rate the extent to which they perceive the journalist to be trustworthy (“To what extent do you find [Journalist’s name] to be a trustworthy news-source?”). In the end of the experiment, they will be asked to report their final trust rating on the journalist itself (““How likely are you to trust this journalist for future reports?”). Specifically, we aim to determine whether final perceived trust in the journalist is best predicted by:
• the average trustworthiness rating across reports,
• misinformation position/condition: whether misinformation appeared in the beginning, middle, or end,
• the maximum or minimum trustworthiness rating, or
• the final (most recent) rating: drawing on the peak-end rule (Kahneman et al.).
If participants follow the peak-end rule, final truth should be most strongly predicted by the minimum/maximum and final trustworthiness ratings. However, we hypothesize that participants integrate information across all reports. If so, the average rating should be the strongest predictor. Additionally, Misinformation position is expected to influence the average rating, such that average trustworthiness will be lowest when misinformation appears early in the sequence and highest when it appears last.
This is a randomized experiment. The analyses will be performed by Gabriel Braun, who has not worked with the data or seen it prior to analyses
subpopulações de TILs acessados por citometria de fluxo no ca de mama: uma revisão de escopo
No full textPsychosis risk among children and young people entering specialist services for psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders: age-dependent trajectories to first-episode psychosis
No full textCRAT-RUS: A Set of Remote Associates Test Items for Insight Research
No full textThe project contains data and supplementary materials related to the research study: Moroshkina N.V., Oshkanova A.P., Kosyakova A.V., Knyazeva I.S. CRAT-RUS: A set of Remote Associates Test items for insight research – theoretical foundations and validation results / Russian Psychological Journal. 2026. Vol. 23. No. 1.
Introduction. Remote association tasks are a convenient and widely used tool for studying insight and creative thinking. However, numerous versions of these tasks exhibit significant linguistic heterogeneity, both within Russian-language sets and between versions in different languages, which hinders the comparison of research results and further progress in understanding the mechanisms of insight problem-solving.
Methods. In this study, we developed and validated a new bank of 60 tasks in Russian, comprising two types (semantically convergent and divergent triads). We detailed the criteria for their creation, based on the contemporary understanding of the cognitive and metacognitive processes involved in insight. Task selection was guided by metrics derived from the Russian National Corpus (a representative collection of texts in Russian). The validation study involved 71 native Russian speakers (mean age: 23 years).
Results. We found that convergent and divergent triads were balanced in terms of objective difficulty. However, in divergent triads, correct solutions were significantly more likely to elicit an aha! experience (an affective marker of insight) compared to convergent triads. Additionally, the likelihood of successful problem-solving increased with the higher word frequency of the answer and stronger collocational stability between the triad words and the answer. Conversely, the probability of a correct response decreased with the higher frequency of the first word in the triad. Solution time was shorter for triads with higher-frequency answers. Greater semantic distance between triad words predicted a higher incidence of the aha! experience upon correct solution. Low-frequency answers also increased the probability of the aha! experience.
Discussion. Thus, we created the bank comprising two types of problems that are equivalent in difficulty but differ in their likelihood of inducing the aha! experience. We also identified linguistic predictors of objective problems difficulty and the occurrence of aha! experiences
Statistical evidence for golden ratio structure in elementary fermion mass ratios
No full textWe report a statistically signi cant golden ratio (Φ = (1+√5)/2 ≈ 1.618) structure in
the mass ratios of elementary fermions. Starting from the electron mass as the sole seed of
a recursive bootstrap algorithm, 11 Standard Model particle masses are reproduced using
ve Φ-based operators, with a mean error of 2.5%. The operator exponents {3,4,11} are
Lucas numbers (L2,L3,L5; the selection of these three from the innite Lucas sequence is
empirical), and the non-integer operators ΦΦ and Φ1/Φ satisfy ΦΦ/Φ1/Φ = Φ (proven from
Φ2 = Φ+1). A universality test shows no alternative constant K ∈ [1.2, 2.5] describes all
ve core relations simultaneously with integer exponents (p = 0.001). A basis scan over
500 alternatives con rms that among standard mathematical constants, only Φ achieves full
reproduction at 10% tolerance (e: 1/11, π: 1/11, base 2: 9/11); all successful bases in the
scan are powers of Φ. The six independent Φ-ladders de ned by nine fermion masses are
signi cantly uniformly distributed (Greenwood test, p = 0.007). Chain connectivity at 5%
tolerance is highly signi cant (p = 0.006) and strengthens at tighter tolerance. In the hadron
spectrum, Φ-relations manifest exclusively in the QCD-dominated regime (binding energy
>50% of hadron mass): Fisher exact test yields p = 0.008 with perfect separation (4/4 vs.
0/5). A holdout test over 167 PDG hadrons nds no statistically signi cant Φ-grid proximity
(p = 0.055, one-sided; p = 0.91 with conservative 4-seed subset), and gauge bosons show no
Φ-signal (all p > 0.5). Three speci c hadron relations in the light QCD regime survive all
controls (Fisher combined p = 2.2×10−5). All results are reproducible via companion code
A Symptom Network Analysis of Emotion Regulation and Depressive Symptoms in Individuals with Depression and Comorbid Social Anxiety Disorder
No full text
MarcoFLY Framework — Cognitive Forcing: Preregistration of Experimental Protocol for Testing the MarcoFLY-1 Postulate on Human Reasoning Quality in Structured Human-AI Dialogue
No full textPrimary Hypothesis (MarcoFLY-1 Postulate): In human-AI dialogues structured with systematic epistemic labeling (CERTAINTY/INFERENCE/HYPOTHESIS) and cognitive forcing protocols (grounding, contradiction generation, external verification ≥50%), human reasoning quality — measured by task accuracy and bias resilience — increases significantly compared to unstructured AI interaction baseline. Statistical criteria: p<0.05 (bilateral, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons), Cohen's d ≥ 0.5, n ≥ 52 per group (80% power, G*Power calculation). Falsification conditions: (1) No significant improvement at p<0.05, d≥0.5 in RCT with ≥50 participants per group. (2) Goodhart effect confirmed: metric scores increase without corresponding improvement in measured reasoning quality. (3) Blind annotators fail to reach inter-rater reliability r≥0.6. (4) External verification below 50% produces no measurable difference vs control
Thinking aloud to design a dynamic assessment of technology-mediated communication after TBI: Study protocol
No full textThis is a study protocol for a research study focused on dynamic assessment of technology-mediated communication skills in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a think-aloud study that aims to explore the usability of a prototype digital assessment tool to assess online communication skills post-TBI