Jurnal Konstitusi
Not a member yet
576 research outputs found
Sort by
Refleksi Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Helsinki Dalam Kaitan Makna Otonomi Khusus Di Aceh
Get PDFAfter the implementation of regional autonomy reforms focused on provincial autonomy in establishing their own households. According to the concept of autonomy is divided into three autonomous ordinary, special autonomy and autonomy, which is emphasized in Article 18, 18A and 18B of the 1945 Constitution. Reasons for granting the status of special autonomy in Aceh, one of which was to eliminate the GAM movement which aims to separate itself from the Homeland. Granting autonomy status is determined through of the Helsinki MoU is transformed in Law No. 11 of 2006. The method used is the juridical normative. This research approach statutory (statute approach), approach the case (case approach). Based on the analysis conducted found that the existence of the MoU are set forth in the Law. 11 The year 2006 is a manifestation lifting values into privilege in Aceh, as well as adding some other peculiarities such as local politics. Aceh has a specificity and privileges in Law No. 11 In 2006, the emblem and flag of determining the area
Judicial Preview Sebagai Mekanisme Verifikasi Konstitusionalitas Suatu Rancangan Undang-Undang
Get PDFThe many the petition judicial review of legislation, as legislation product Parliament and the President, at the Constitutional Court, indicates law making as any of the products of law in Indonesia is currently seen by many parties have not succeeded meet the expectations ofsociety. Contrasts, with a consequence has hundreds of articles that was canceled by Constitutional Courtsince its establishment it indicates so bad law making over the years.One of its causes weakness in order to scrutinize the drafts of the legislation in accordance with the constitution and people’s expectations. Therefore, in this research wants examine and develop a mechanism to check list to en sure that it each law making process in accordance with the constitution and people’s expectations. In this research, a method use disnormative juridical by using conceptual approach, historical and regulatory. From the research explores an extra mechanism for Constitutional Court to verify the value of constitutionality a draft law
Rekonseptualisasi Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia
Get PDFElections are the means to implement sovereignty of the people in order to elect members of the House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, Local Legislative Council, the President and Vice President. Election are also meaningful for selecting the leader of the nation and the state (public officials) and as community control over board membership, President and Vice President to come. Election results are manifestation of popular sovereignty, which can lead to a dispute between organizer and election participants either political parties or individuals. The result of which can be challenged legally by election participant. The participant can also request the cancellation of the election result to the agency given with the authority to decide. Conceptually, the right institution to decide on election dispute is a special ad hoc election court. Constitutionally, dispute resolution of election result is intended to protect citizens\u27 constitutional rights
ULTRA PETITA DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG DAN JALAN MENCAPAI KEADILAN KONSTITUSIONAL
Get PDFThe existence of Constitutional Court after the amendment the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesia (1999-2002) brought a fundamental change in the constitutional review of norms. Constitutional review mechanism not just a “review” but the court is also required to search the essence of constitutional review itself and its relation to the constitutional rights. Therefore, the ultra petita decisions issued by the Court should not be viewed as absurd but as a way to uphold justice
Dilema dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengenai Kewenangan Memutus Sengketa Pilkada
Get PDFMK decision to hand back an arbitrary in deciding disputed local election to the MA polemical and disagreement among legal experts. There are those who argue that it was the right decision, and there are also those who argue that the MK decision is wrong. Whatever the views of different opinions, the MK has concluded that it has binding (inkracht) and inviolable. The problem now is how best to anticipate the solution of other legal issues that arise as a result of the MK decision. Thus, in this study the formulation of the issues raised is how the legal effect of the decision of the Constitutional MK No. 1-2/PUU-XII/2014 in the general election in Indonesia. The research method of this law is normative, primary legal materials are UUD NRI of 1945, Act No. 12 of 2008 on Regional Government, Act No. 8 of 2011 on the MK. The approach used in this study is the approach to statutory interpretation and approach. From the research it can be concluded that the MK decision to restore the authority to decide election disputes to the Supreme MA is right, because the local elections are local government regime (local elections). As a result of the decision, the government should establish a local election management bodies on a par with the Commission which may be called the local election commission (KPKD) but only institution based in the provincial and district/city, for an arbitrary level of appeal submitted to the MA
PERAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEWUJUDKAN FAIR EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY DI INDONESIA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 117/PUU-VII/2009)
Get PDFThrough the decision No. 117/PUU-VII/2009, Constitutional Court applies Rawls conception of justice that emphasizes the equality of all people with equality of opportunity by applying fair or equal opportunity principle. Institutional design between the DPR and DPD viewed by Constitutional Court as an inequiality condition, so that to reach a value of justice, equal opportunity principle should take precedence and priority. Stregthening DPD is necessary to uphold the checks and balances mechanisms in Indonesia
Perppu Pengawasan Hakim Mk Versus Putusan Final Mk
Get PDFGovernment Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) No. 1 of 2013 about the Second Amendment to Act No. 24 of 2003 about Constitutional Court (MK) is an appropriate step to recover public trust to MK after the arrest of non-active Head of MK Akil Mochtar by Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Many crucial things are found in Perppu No.1 of 2013 about MK and these are considered as the problem roots but also the efficacious herbs to deter against the replicated corruption practice at MK. One of them is the supervision system of Constitutional Justices. Justices of MK have been once becoming the object of the supervision of Judicial Commission (KY), but the release of the Verdict of Constitutional Court No. 005/PUU-IV/2006 has made the authority of KY to supervise Constitutional Justices degraded into inconstitutional. The verdict of Constitutional Court is final and binding, but it cannot still escape from erga omnes principle, meaning that the verdict is binding in general term and also binding for the object of dispute
Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pseudo Judicial Review dalam Perkara Pemilukada
Get PDFJudicial review is the test act against UUD 1945 that is one authority the constitutional court. In testing legislation affairs, the constitutional court could have cancel or material handling charge article / ayat / part of a statute. But in the legal developments event at the constitutional court, turned in regional head affair how the constitutional court to review (pseudo judicial testing legislation specious) where the constitutional court to do our tests material charge / article ayat / or part of a statute. The research results show that on formil, judicial review the request in the matter of the act of testing and supplication pseudo judicial review in the matter of the results of the upcoming general election strife is different because be set by two types of laws the event under the authority of the different. However, in the context of judicial review of the verdict, construction and construction of pseudo judicial review similarities and differences will be discussed in the article below
Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pidana Nasional (Telaah Kritis Larangan Analogi dalam Hukum Pidana)
Get PDFA paradigm shift in the state of life—especially post the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 amendments—have not been fully understood properly. Up to now—included in the lawless life—is still a gap between the paradigm and its implementation . This paradigmatic gap visible example of the lack of a comprehensive implementation of the basic principles of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 in a national criminal law reform ( draft Code of Criminal Law ) . The draft Code of Criminal Law as one form of national criminal law reform is seen has not fully represent constitution demands. Prohibiting the use of analogy in criminal law is still seen at odds with the provisions of Article 1 ( 3 ) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. The gap is not only paradigmatic potential to cause difficulties in its application, but also potentially the cancellation clause in the legislation concerned
Pola Pelanggaran Pemilukada dan Perluasan Keadilan Substantif
Get PDFThe pattern of direct elections of regional head and the Constitutional Court practices in adjudicate disputes local elections have been developed rapidly. Some of violations color the elections of regional head. They were the mobilization and partiality of Civil Servants, abuse of office, facilities, and state budget by the incumbent candidate, and the practice of money politics. The systematic, structured as well as massive violations generally results reelected vote with a final decision or interlocutory preceded. More than that, various violations of further stages of the General Election was also assessed based on the principle of free and fair election so that the decision of the Court has eigh models based on similar characteristics.The paradigm of substantive justice made procedural rules does not open the opportunity for justice. It drives the role of the Constitutional Court put the final determinant of local democracy which is still colored by piracy and fraud. Constitutional Court justices are not only expand but also strengthen democracy that took place so as not limited to procedural democracy. With this, the examination is very extensive; the free encyclopedias assess weight and sanction violations. Paradigm has evolved to be followed by the ratio decidendi constancy previous decisions and anticipate the variety of sanctions violations by designing the right to justice itself