Progressive Law Review (E-Journal)
Not a member yet
78 research outputs found
Sort by
inggris
No full textThe independence of judicial power is an absolute requirement for law enforcement and justice. The independence of judges is an essential principle in a democratic legal system. Judges should be free from political influence or pressure from any party and only decide cases based on relevant facts and laws. The question is, what is the role of judges in maintaining the independence of the judiciary, and what is the legal basis for guaranteeing judicial power to realize freedom and justice for the community in the judiciary in Indonesia? The role of judges in maintaining judicial independence is urgent in ensuring justice and truth in a case. Judges must have high integrity and not be pressured by any party, including the government or specific interest groups. Judicial independence also means that judges should be free to make decisions without interference from other parties. The legal basis for guaranteeing judicial power to realize freedom and justice is an essential principle in Indonesia's legal system. This principle emphasizes that the court must be free from political interference or pressure from any party to carry out its duties fairly and objectively
MENDESAIN ULANG KEWENANGAN BAWASLU DALAM MENANGANI PELANGGARAN PEMILU
No full textBawaslu's authority in preventing election violations is often constrained by the election process itself. When the election process is completed, all problems that occur during the process must also be considered complete, while Bawaslu's authority cannot be limited as long as the law does not regulate it. This is a problem in the process of resolving election violations by Bawaslu. The purpose of this study is to redescribe Bawaslu's authority in resolving election disputes, while the method used in this research is normative legal research method with the approach of legislation and concepts, the result is that Bawaslu is limited by the determination of election results and the Constitutional Court's decision, the solution is the Strengthening of Bawaslu's Authority in Handling Election Violation Disputes, and the Synchronization of the Dispute Resolution Process, This means that the Election Law requires the settlement of disputes in Bawaslu to be completed first before the process in the Constitutional Court (MK) in order to prevent overlapping decisions between Bawaslu and the Constitutional Court, and the most important thing is to provide sufficient time and authority for Bawaslu to carry out its duties, so that no one interprets any restrictions on Bawaslu's authority in resolving disputes over election violations.Kewenangan Bawaslu dalam mencegah pelanggaran Pemilu sering kali terkendala oleh proses penyelenggaraan Pemilu itu sendiri. Ketika proses Pemilu selesai, maka segala permasalahan yang terjadi selama proses tersebut juga harus dianggap selesai, sementara kewenangan Bawaslu tidak dapat dibatasi selama undang-undang tidak mengaturnya. Hal ini menjadi permasalahan dalam proses penyelesaian pelanggaran Pemilu oleh Bawaslu. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu mendesai ulang kewenangan bawaslu dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pemilu, sedangkan Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konsep, hasilnya yaitu bahwa bawaslu dibatasi dengan penetapan hasil pemilu dan putusan MK, solusinya yaitu adanya Penguatan Kewenangan Bawaslu dalam Menangani Sengketa Pelanggaran Pemilu, dan adanya Sinkronisasi Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa, artinya bahwa undang Undang Pemilu Mewajibkan penyelesaian sengketa di Bawaslu selesai terlebih dahulu sebelum proses di Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) supaya Mencegah adanya tumpang tindih keputusan antara Bawaslu dan MK, dan hal yang paling penting Memberikan ruang waktu dan otoritas yang cukup bagi Bawaslu untuk menjalankan tugasnya , agar tidak ada yang menafsirkan adanya pembatasan kewenangan terhadap bawaslu dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pelanggaran Pemilu
CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVE IN RESOLVING THE CASE THROUGH MEDIATION BY THE VILLAGE HEAD (Study in Catur Swako Village.Bumi Agung District, East Lampung Regency): CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVE IN RESOLVING THE CASE THROUGH MEDIATION BY THE VILLAGE HEAD (Study in Catur Swako Village.Bumi Agung District, East Lampung Regency)
No full textReferring to the regulations currently in force in Indonesia, where in essence criminal law is not capable of resolving problems at the level of court institutions, however, in certain cases, it is possible to resolve a criminal case outside the court. Although usually the resolution of criminal cases outside of court occurs in civil cases, in practice there are also cases where criminal cases are resolved outside of court with the existence of a discretion by Law Enforcement Officials with a deliberation mechanism and accompanied by a mediator between those in conflict.
In this case, resolving a case outside of court is often called mediation, which is carried out using a third person as a mediator to help resolve a criminal case. Where in this research there was an act that violated a criminal act, namely vehicle theft, which was resolved using and referring to the perspective of criminal law carried out by the Village Head as a mediator between the two parties involved in the case.
In this research the author uses a method of approaching research that is normative juridical and empirical. By determining the informant, namely the Village Head in Seda Catur Swako, Kec. Great Earth. Regency. East Lampung.Equipped with field data and literature studies to support assistance in this research
THE ROLE OF VILLAGE GOVERNMENT IN IMPROVING PUBLIC WELFARE THROUGH THE VILLAGE FUND PROGRAM
No full textThe village government as a state institution has the right to guarantee the implementation of community rights. Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages states that village governments are tasked with administering government, implementing development, developing communities, and empowering communities to realize the welfare of village communities. Village Funds are a government program that aims to support the creation of welfare for village communities. As a government organization, the village government plays an active role in improving community welfare.The village government as a state institution has the right to guarantee the implementation of community rights. Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages states that village governments are tasked with administering government, implementing development, developing communities, and empowering communities to realize the welfare of village communities. Village Funds are a government program that aims to support the creation of welfare for village communities. As a government organization, the village government plays an active role in improving community welfare
IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERGRATED ASSESSMENT AS A MEASURE TO ANTICIPATE OVERCAPACITY IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Full text linkNarcotics Crime Continues to be a Major Issue in Law Enforcement in Indonesia, Now Facing a Significant Surge in the Trafficking of Illegal Narcotics. The development of handling narcotics cases now involves integrated assessments aimed at providing rehabilitation for users, rather than solely imposing criminal sanctions. Correctional Institutions (Lapas) are also facing overcapacity issues due to the surge in narcotics-related cases. This study aims to identify the effectiveness of the implementation of integrated assessments in addressing overcapacity in Correctional Institutions. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research evaluates the effectiveness of integrated assessments in mitigating overcapacity in correctional institutions caused by the rise in narcotics cases in Indonesia. The qualitative method involves in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and case studies for practical evaluations. The quantitative approach includes surveys and statistical data analysis regarding perceptions and conditions of overcapacity. The integration of results from both methods is expected to provide a comprehensive overview, identify challenges, and formulate strategic steps to improve the law enforcement and rehabilitation system.This study assesses the implementation of integrated assessments in addressing overcapacity in correctional institutions resulting from the surge in narcotics cases in Indonesia. Narcotic addiction, which is progressive and prone to relapse, requires medical and social rehabilitation. The integrated assessment, involving both medical and legal teams, aims to determine rehabilitation needs. The findings show that integrated assessments can reduce overcapacity by offering risk evaluations, alternative sentencing, and more effective rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, increasing correctional facility capacity, regular monitoring, and stakeholder engagement are necessary for long-term solutions.Kejahatan Narkotika Terus Menjadi Masalah Besar dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Kini Menghadapi Lonjakan Signifikan dalam Perdagangan Narkotika Ilegal. Perkembangan dalam penanganan kasus narkotika saat ini melibatkan asesmen terintegrasi yang bertujuan untuk memberikan rehabilitasi bagi pengguna, bukan hanya menjatuhkan sanksi pidana. Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) juga menghadapi masalah over kapasitas akibat lonjakan kasus terkait narkotika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi efektivitas penerapan asesmen terintegrasi dalam mengatasi over kapasitas di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan campuran (mixed-methods), penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas asesmen terintegrasi dalam mengurangi over kapasitas di lembaga pemasyarakatan yang disebabkan oleh meningkatnya kasus narkotika di Indonesia. Metode kualitatif melibatkan wawancara mendalam, diskusi kelompok terarah, dan studi kasus untuk evaluasi praktis. Pendekatan kuantitatif meliputi survei dan analisis data statistik terkait persepsi dan kondisi over kapasitas. Integrasi hasil dari kedua metode ini diharapkan dapat memberikan gambaran yang komprehensif, mengidentifikasi tantangan, dan merumuskan langkah-langkah strategis untuk meningkatkan sistem penegakan hukum dan rehabilitasi. Penelitian ini menilai penerapan asesmen terintegrasi dalam menangani over kapasitas di lembaga pemasyarakatan akibat lonjakan kasus narkotika di Indonesia. Kecanduan narkotika, yang bersifat progresif dan rentan kambuh, memerlukan rehabilitasi medis dan sosial. Asesmen terintegrasi, yang melibatkan tim medis dan hukum, bertujuan untuk menentukan kebutuhan rehabilitasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa asesmen terintegrasi dapat mengurangi over kapasitas dengan menawarkan evaluasi risiko, alternatif hukuman, dan program rehabilitasi yang lebih efektif. Selain itu, peningkatan kapasitas fasilitas pemasyarakatan, pemantauan rutin, dan keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan diperlukan untuk solusi jangka panjang
The Validity of Articles 240 and 241 of Law No.1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code Refers to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 013-022/PUU-IV/200
Full text linkSejak tahun 1918 Indonesia telah menggunakan KUHP sebagai dasar penetapan hukum pidana. Seiring berjalannya waktu, tidak sedikit ahli hukum yang berpendapat bahwa Indonesia memerlukan KUHP baru yang lebih sesuai dengan perkembangan masyarakat saat ini. Dengan diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP, maka Indonesia memiliki KUHP baru yang dinilai sesuai dengan perkembangan masyarakat Indonesia saat ini. Akan tetapi, terdapat pasal-pasal yang unsur-unsurnya sama dengan pasal-pasal yang telah dinyatakan bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 oleh putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, yaitu Pasal 240 dan 241 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dengan Pasal 134, 136 bis, dan 137 KUHP. Berdasarkan uraian tersebut, maka timbul permasalahan mengenai keabsahan pasal tersebut dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan. Dengan memperhatikan teori kepastian hukum dan keabsahan hukum, Pasal 240 dan Pasal 241 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 mempunyai unsur yang sama dengan Pasal 134, Pasal 136 bis dan Pasal 137 KUHP yang telah dinyatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat, sehingga Pasal 240 dan Pasal 241 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dapat pula dinyatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat
THE URGENCY OF WAQF LAND CERTIFICATION AT THE SUNAN AM-PEL SURABAYA FOUNDATION
No full textIn many parts of Indonesia, there is excessive land utilization by religious and communal groups for individual gain. This condition is caused by the lack of registration of land owned by religious and communal organizations in accordance with existing legal regulations. As a result, there is legal ambiguity regarding the ownership and utilization of waqf land. This research aims to provide an understanding of the urgency of waqf land certification at Sunan Ampel Foundation Surabaya. The research method used is a normative legal approach. This thesis research uses descriptive research type. The results found that the status of waqf land in Sunan Ampel Foundation Surabaya was declared valid as waqf land and was not an individual land, but was still in dispute and dualism of management. The Sunan Ampel Foundation filed a lawsuit at the Surabaya Religious Court regarding the Status of the Sunan Ampel Foundation Land and the Sunan Ampel Tomb Area located on Jalan Ampel Masjid No. 53 Surabaya, with case number: 6345/Pdt.G/2021/PA/Sby, because the current management unilaterally changed the name of the foundation without the consent of the old nadzir. The process of waqf land certification at the Sunan Ampel Foundation Surabaya, where the Sunan Ampel Foundation officially had a certificate and was legally recognized in 1973, with the Decree number of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number: A-3508.HT.03.04.TH.1973 Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia, represented by Notary Doerajad Moelyadi, S.H Number 1221 / DM / Not.SBY / V / 1973 dated October 21, 1973. The waqf process at the Sunan Ampel Surabaya Foundation is still not in accordance with the waqf procedures contained in the laws and regulations, because there are still disputes over management.Berbagai daerah di Indonesia, terjadi pemanfaatan lahan secara berlebihan oleh kelompok keagamaan dan komunal untuk keuntungan individu. Kondisi ini disebabkan oleh kurangnya pendaftaran tanah yang dimiliki oleh organisasi keagamaan dan komunal sesuai dengan peraturan hukum yang ada. Akibatnya, terjadi keambiguan hukum berkaitan dengan kepemilikan dan pemanfaatan tanah wakaf. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman tentang urgensi sertifikasi tanah wakaf di Yayasan Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan pendekatan hukum normative. Penelitian tesis ini menggunakan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa status tanah wakaf di Yayasan Sunan Ampel Surabaya dinyatakan sah sebagai tanah wakaf dan bukan merupakan tanah perseorangan, namun masih dalam sengketa dan dualisme kepengurusan. Pihak Yayasan Sunan Ampel melakukan gugatan di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya terkait Status Tanah Yayasan Sunan Ampel dan Area Makam Sunan Ampel yang berada di Jalan Ampel Masjid No. 53 Surabaya, dengan nomor perkara: 6345/Pdt.G/2021/PA/Sby, karena kepengurusan saat ini secara sepihak mengganti nama yayasan tanpa persetujuan nadzir lama. Proses sertifikasi tanah wakaf di Yayasan Sunan Ampel Surabaya, yaitu dimana Yayasan Sunan Ampel resmi memiliki sertifikat dan diakui secara hukum pada tahun 1973, dengan nomor Keputusan Departemen Hakim Republik Indonesia Nomor: A-3508.HT.03.04.TH.1973 Menteri Kehakiman Republik Indonesia, yang diwakilkan oleh Notaris Doerajad Moelyadi, S.H Nomor1221 / DM/Not.SBY/V/1973 tanggal 21 Oktober 1973. Pada proses sertifikasi tanah wakaf di Yayasan Sunan Ampel Surabaya dilakukan dengan tiga tahap yaitu menyertakan persyaratan mulai surat permohonan, surat ukur, sertifikat hak milik atau bukti kepemilikan yang sah, AIW atau APAIW, hingga surat pernyataan dari nazhir perihal tanah tersebut tidak dalam sengketa, perkara, sita dan tidak dijaminkan dalam pelaksanaannya. Proses perwakafan di Yayasan Sunan Ampel Surabaya ini masih belum sesuai dengan prosedur perwakafan yang terdapat di dalam aturan perundang-undangan, karena masih terdapat sengketa atas kepengurusan
The Right to Environmental Health in Regional Legal Policy Towards a Green City
No full textIndonesia is currently experiencing a heavy burden in all aspects of life due to successive crises and disasters. One of the aspects affected is health, including environmental health. Environmental health is a right for the community in an effort to achieve the highest possible level of health, because the level of health is greatly influenced by environmental factors. This paper aims to analyze environmental health in its dimensions as a right and its relevance to regional efforts through green cities. The results of the study show that A healthy environment is not only a right for every community, but also an obligation to maintain environmental quality. Regions based on their autonomy have roles and responsibilities in fulfilling the right to environmental health. The form of regional government authority in carrying out government affairs is through regional legal policies that are able to encourage all parties to maintain a healthy environment. The implementation of a Green City is an alternative policy that can be implemented by regions, with regional regulatory legal instruments as its legitimacy.Indonesia saat ini mengalami beban yang berat di segala aspek kehidupan akibat krisis dan bencana yang silih berganti. Salah satu aspek yang terdampak yaitu kesehatan, termasuk kesehatan lingkungan. Kesehatan lingkungan merupakan hak bagi masyarakat dalam upaya mencapai derajat kesehatan yang setinggi-tingginya, karena derajat kesehatan sangat dipengaruhi oleh faktor lingkungan. This paper aims to menganalisis kesehatan lingkungan dalam dimensi sebagai hak dan relevansinya terhadap upaya daerah melalui kota hijau. The results of the study show that lingkungan yang sehat bukan hanya hak bagi setiap masyarakat, namun juga melekat kewajiban untuk dapat menjaga kualitas lingkungan. Daerah berdasarkan otonomi yang dimilikinya memiliki peran dan tanggung jawab dalam pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan lingkungan. Bentuk kewenangan pemerintah daerah dalam melaksanaan urusan pemerintahan yaitu melalui kebijakan hukum daerah yang mampu mendorong semua pihak untuk menjaga lingkungan agar tetap sehat. Penyelenggaraan Kota Hijau menjadi alternatif kebijakan yang dapat diterapkan oleh daerah, dengan instrumen hukum peraturan daerah sebagai legitimasinya
APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN HOUSEHOLDS
No full textDomestic Violence is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including a lack of awareness and understanding of psychological violence as a legal violation. Although Law Number 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (PKDRT) regulates forms of violence such as physical, psychological, sexual, and economic neglect, its enforcement still faces numerous challenges. Criminal sanctions against perpetrators of psychological violence, such as imprisonment or fines, often fail to provide a sufficient deterrent effect due to multiple inhibiting factors. This study employs a normative juridical method with a literature review approach to understand the application of criminal sanctions against perpetrators of domestic violence. The results indicate that the main challenges in law enforcement include weak legislation, limited understanding among law enforcement officers, inadequate support facilities, and low public awareness of victims rights. Additionally, patriarchal cultural factors, social stigma, and the perception that domestic violence is a private matter exacerbate the situation. The lack of public education on victims' rights and legal procedures further complicates the law enforcement process. Data show that psychological violence is one of the most frequently reported forms of domestic violence, yet its handling remains suboptimal. Legal reform, improved capacity of law enforcement, and better support services for victims are crucial to ensuring effective protection and recovery. Furthermore, public education and changing mindsets, along with addressing gender-biased cultural norms, are essential to overcoming domestic violence issues.Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga merupakan masalah kompleks yang dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, termasuk kurangnya kesadaran dan pemahaman tentang kekerasan psikologis sebagai pelanggaran hukum. Meskipun Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (PKDRT) mengatur berbagai bentuk kekerasan seperti fisik, psikologis, seksual, dan pengabaian ekonomi, penegakannya masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan. Sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kekerasan psikologis, seperti penjara atau denda, sering kali tidak memberikan efek jera yang memadai karena berbagai faktor penghambat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan tinjauan pustaka untuk memahami penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tantangan utama dalam penegakan hukum meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan yang lemah, pemahaman yang terbatas di kalangan aparat penegak hukum, fasilitas dukungan yang tidak memadai, dan rendahnya kesadaran publik tentang hak-hak korban. Faktor budaya patriarki, stigma sosial, dan persepsi bahwa kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah masalah pribadi memperburuk situasi ini. Kurangnya pendidikan publik mengenai hak-hak korban dan prosedur hukum semakin mempersulit proses penegakan hukum. Data menunjukkan bahwa kekerasan psikologis adalah salah satu bentuk kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang paling sering dilaporkan, namun penanganannya masih belum optimal. Reformasi hukum, peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, dan pelayanan dukungan yang lebih baik untuk korban sangat penting untuk memastikan perlindungan dan pemulihan yang efektif. Selain itu, pendidikan publik dan perubahan pola pikir, serta penanggulangan norma budaya yang bias gender, merupakan hal yang esensial untuk mengatasi masalah kekerasan dalam rumah tangg
English
No full textThe purposes of this research are to analyze the legal review of unauthorized marine scientific research activities in the Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone based on 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea and Indonesian national laws. The research method used by the author is normative juridical research, because the research is referring to the applicable regulations that is related to topics of the research. The type of data used in this research is secondary data that are related to the subject of the research. The data collection method used is library research using qualitative data analysis method with a prescriptive approach in order to get suggestions on what to do to solve the related problems. Based on the analysis of international maritime laws in the UNCLOS and Indonesian national laws, the unauthorized marine scientific research activities cannot be justified in any ways. Therefore, such activities violates the applicable regulations in the UNCLOS and Indonesian national laws. The unauthorized marine research activity also violates Indonesia’s jurisdiction and sovereign rights in the Exclusive Economic Zone, which are generally regulated in the UNCLOS