1741 research outputs found

    Homogenization of Swedish mean monthly temperature series 1860-2021

    No full text

    Convective Mixing Driven by Non-monotonic Density

    No full text
    CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) or for storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs can be a means for disposing of anthropogenic CO2 emissions to mitigate climate change. Fluid flow and mixing of CO2 and hydrocarbons in such systems are governed by the underlying physics and thermodynamics. Gravity effects such as gravity override and convection are mechanisms that can alter fluid flow dynamics, impacting CO2 migration, oil production and eventual CO2 storage at the field scale. This study focuses on convection in a miscible setting caused by non-monotonicity in oil density when mixed with CO2, i.e., a maximum mixture density occurs at an intermediate CO2 concentration. We perform high-resolution simulations to quantify the convective behavior in a simple box system where gravity effects are isolated. We show that convection of CO2 in oil is dependent on whether CO2 originates from above or below the oil zone. From above, convection follows classic convective mixing but is accelerated by viscosity decrease with increasing CO2. From below, convection flows upward due to CO2 buoyancy, but is countered by downward convection due to the heavier mixture density. This convective system is significantly more complex and efficient than from above. We characterize the instabilities in both early- and late-time regimes and quantify mixing rates. For a 100 mD reservoir, convective fingers would be on the order of centimeters in width and mix over a meter length scale within days to a month, depending on the placement of CO2. The simulations are performed in non-dimensional form and thus can be rescaled to a different reservoir parameters. Our results give important insights into field-scale impacts of convective mixing and can guide future work in development of upscaled models and experimental design

    Tailoring circulation type classification outcomes

    No full text
    Efforts to intercompare many existing circulation type classification (CTC) methods have found no consistency in their outcomes. Therefore, when confronted with a task to classify atmospheric circulation types, it is difficult to find clear guidelines. This study explores the ways of increasing consistency between existing methods and obtaining physically meaningful and practically useful results. By applying a range of CTC methods to sea-level pressure fields over a Scandinavian domain, it is shown that CTC methods using the same similarity measure (pattern correlation (CORR) or Euclidean distance (DIST)) have higher consistency. It is further shown that CTC outcomes can be tailored towards specific user requirements by properly manipulating the input data. Using unprocessed input data in DIST-based CTC methods frequently results in classes containing physically inconsistent members because the classification procedure is obfuscated by circulation-irrelevant information in the data. Using spatially standardized data in DIST-based methods leads to considerably improved agreement with CORR-based methods and brings high physical consistency within the individual classes. However, standardizing the input data removes too much of the circulation-relevant information and results in no clear improvement in partitioning dependent variables such as precipitation. Best performance is achieved with DIST-based methods using the input data with the spatial mean removed. This simple procedure focuses the CTC methods to use only the circulation-relevant information and hence results both in physically consistent classes and in optimally performing partitioning of dependent variables. Consequently, the recommended guideline would be to use DIST-based methods with spatial-mean-removed input data as the generally most effective classification approach

    0

    full texts

    1,741

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    SMHI
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇