SICOT-J - Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie
Not a member yet
578 research outputs found
Sort by
Delayed presentation of lower cervical facet dislocations: What to learn from past reports?
Delayed presentation of lower cervical facet dislocations is uncommon, and there is no standardized way to approach these neglected injuries. The literature on neglected lower cervical facet dislocations is limited to case reports and few retrospective studies. This justifies the need for a comprehensive review of this condition. Our purpose was to elaborate a review on the epidemiology, clinical and radiological presentation, and treatment techniques and approach to these neglected injuries. Middle-aged adults from 30 to 50 represent 73.8% of reported cases, and most of them are males (72.0%). The most affected level is C5–C6 (43.0%). While most delays are due to missed injuries (52.1%) and ineffective non-operative treatment (36.2%), the other reason for delay is negligence in seeking medical care (11.7%). Patients present with variable degrees of neurological deficit, persistent neck pain, and neck stiffness. Reported approaches and techniques to reduce and stabilize these injuries are highly variable and depend on the surgeon’s judgment, experience, and preference. Fibrotic tissues and bony fusion around the dislocated facet joint contribute to the reduction challenge, and 77.0% of closed reduction attempts fail. Anterior and posterior approaches to the cervical spine are used selectively or in combination for surgical release, reduction, and stabilization. Despite the lack of standardized treatment guidelines and different approaches, most of the authors reported improvement in pain, balance, and neurology post-surgery. Starting with the posterior surgical approach aims to achieve reduction compared to the anterior approach which largely aims at spinal decompression. Given the existing controversies, the need for quality prospective studies to determine the best treatment approach for lower cervical facet dislocations presenting with delay is evident
Hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy: surveillance to surgery – a current concepts review
This review brings together a multidisciplinary, multinational team of experts to discuss the current state of knowledge in the detection and treatment of hip displacement in cerebral palsy (CP), a global public health problem with a high disease burden. Though common themes are pervasive, different views are also represented, reflecting the confluence of traditional thinking regarding the aetiology and treatment of hip displacement in CP with emerging research that challenges these tried-and-true principles. The development of hip displacement is most closely related to gross motor function, with radiographic surveillance programs based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), the goal being early detection and timely treatment. These treatments may include non-operative methods such as abduction bracing and Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT-A), but outcomes research in this area has been variable in quality. This has contributed to conflicting opinions and limited consensus. Soft tissue lengthening of the hip adductors and flexors has traditionally been employed for younger patients, but population-based studies have shown decreased survivorship for this treatment when performed in isolation. Concerns with the identification of hip displacement in very young children are raised, noting that early reconstructive surgery has a high recurrence rate. This has prompted consideration of viable minimally invasive alternatives that may have better success rates in very young children with CP, or may at least delay the need for osteotomies. Recent reports have implicated the role of abnormal proximal femoral growth and secondary acetabular dysplasia as a primary cause of hip displacement, related to ambulatory status and abductor function. As such, guided growth of the proximal femur has emerged as a possible treatment that addresses this purported aetiology, with promising early results
How to start with hip arthroscopy in a safe and effective manner, using an evidence-based approach
Hip arthroscopy is a rapidly evolving field in orthopedics, offering diagnostic and therapeutic benefits for a range of hip pathologies. This review outlines a comprehensive guide to initiating hip arthroscopy safely and effectively using evidence-based practices. Optimal surgical outcomes depend on correct indications for surgery, in particular in the presence of borderline dysplasia and degenerative joint diseases. Proper patient counseling and setting realistic expectations are crucial for satisfactory outcomes and recovery. Physical examination, radiographs, MRI, and CT scans are essential for accurate diagnosis. In case of diagnostic uncertainty, the use of intra-articular injections can help confirm the diagnosis before surgery. Techniques for hip arthroscopy include central compartment first, peripheral compartment first, and outside-in approaches. Each technique has advantages, and the optimal approach depends on the specific case. Finally, Proper operating room setup, meticulous patient positioning, and precise portal placement are critical for a successful procedure. A thorough understanding of the safe zone anatomy for portal placement is essential to minimize the risk of neurovascular complications. In conclusion, this manuscript provides a detailed, evidence-based framework for starting hip arthroscopy, emphasizing the importance of technical proficiency, patient selection, and a multidisciplinary approach to ensure patient safety and procedure efficacy
Risk factors for peri-megaprosthetic joint infections in tumor surgery: A systematic review
Background: Peri-megaprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in tumor surgery are complex and challenging complications that significantly impact the outcomes of the patients. The occurrence of PJI poses a substantial threat to the success of these operations. This review aims to identify and summarize the risk factors associated with PJI in tumor surgery with megaprosthetic reconstruction as well as to determine the overall risk of PJI in limb salvage surgery. Methods: A thorough examination of published literature, scrutinizing the incidence of PJI in tumor prostheses after limb salvage surgery was done. Research studies that documented the incidence of PJI in tumor patients who underwent limb salvage surgery, and explored the risk factors associated with the occurrence of PJI were deemed eligible. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the analysis and underwent comprehensive examination. After the exploration of key parameters, several significant risk factors for PJI concerning the type of implant coating, surgical site characteristics, patient demographics, and procedural factors were recorded. Discussion: The findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach in managing tumor patients undergoing limb salvage surgery and megaprosthetic reconstruction, with emphasis on individualized risk assessments and individualized preventive strategies
What is the best fixation method in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical comparison of common methods for femoral graft attachment
Introduction: A variety of techniques have been described for femoral fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr). The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of the most used methods for graft fixation in the femur using human cadaveric tissue. We wondered what is the best fixation method for femoral fixation in MPFL reconstruction? Hypothesis: A suspensory fixation device provides the best femoral fixation. Material and method: Twenty cadaveric knees were tested. Four femoral fixation methods were compared (5 knees per group): interference fixation with a Biosure© RG 5 mm and a 7 mm, suture anchor (Healicoil Regenesorb 4.75 mm ©) and suspensory fixation with the Ultrabutton©. The testing was divided in preconditioning, cyclic loading and load to failure. Load to failure, elongation, stiffness and mode of failure were recorded and compared. Results: The Ultrabutton© had the highest mean ultimate load (427 ± 215 N (p = 0.5)), followed by Healicoil anchor © (308 ± 44 N (p > 0.05)) and the interference screw of 7 mm (255 ± 170 N (p > 0.05)). Mean stiffness was similar in the Ultrabutton© and 4.75 mm. Healicoil anchor © groups (111 ± 21 N/mm and 119 ± 20 N/mm respectively), and lowest in 7 mm Biosure© screw fixation group (90 ± 5 N/mm). The Biosure© 5 mm RG screw presented 100% of premature rupture because of tendon slippage. The Ultrabutton© presented the lowest premature rupture (40%). Discussion: A suspensory fixation for the femur had the lowest number of graft failures and highest load to failure. This study has implications for surgeons’ choice of graft fixation in MPFLr. It is the first study to test the most commonly femoral used fixation methods, allowing direct comparisons between each method
Isolated posterior stabilization in type B and C thoracolumbar fractures associated with ankylosing spine disorders: A single center experience with clinical and radiological outcomes
Introduction: Fractures in ankylosing spine disorders (ASD) are associated with high complication and mortality rates. During the posterior stabilization of these fractures, reduction is often partial, resulting in the persistence of a significant anterior diastasis. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of isolated posterior stabilization in elderly ASD patients, without direct reduction of the anterior diastasis, in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes, complications, and mortality. Methods: This retrospective study included 46 patients, mean age 79.3 years, with ASD, who underwent isolated posterior stabilization, open or percutaneous, for thoracolumbar fractures. The average follow-up was 21.7 months, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Autonomy (Parker score) and radiological results (lordotic angulation) were analyzed pre-and post-operatively. Results: Autonomy was maintained at the last follow-up, with no significant difference in Parker’s score. The consolidation rate was 94.6%. No implant failure was recorded. Despite the absence of an anterior procedure, lordotic angulation was significantly reduced by 2.6° at 6 months (p = 0.02). The rate of surgical complications following open surgeries was 10.9% (n = 5), of which 6.5% were infections. No surgical complications were reported in percutaneous surgeries. The rate of medical complications was 67.4% (n = 31), with a rate of 88.2% in the open surgery group, compared to 55.2% in the percutaneous surgery group. An open approach was associated with a five-fold higher risk of complications (p = 0.049). Nine patients died during follow-up (19.6%). Conclusions: Isolated posterior stabilization in the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures in elderly ASD patients is a safe technique promoting autonomy preservation, and high radiological bony healing with acceptable complication and mortality rates. The persistent anterior gap is partially reduced when the spine is loaded and does not seem to require an anterior procedure, thus decreasing complications. Percutaneous surgery should be the technique of choice to reduce surgical complications
Evaluation of meniscal injury on magnetic resonance imaging and knee arthroscopy in patient with anterior cruciate ligament tear
Introduction: Meniscal injuries often occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Failure to detect meniscal tears in patients with ACL injuries can lead to more complex tears and make them more difficult to repair. Objective: To determine the degree of correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and knee arthroscopy in diagnosing meniscal injuries in patients with ACL tears. Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 185 patients diagnosed with ACL tears through knee arthroscopy at Thong Nhat Hospital from April 2023 to April 2024. Results: The accuracy of MRI and its correlation with arthroscopy in detecting meniscal injuries is 69.2%, indicating a low degree of agreement between MRI and arthroscopy results. Diagnosis of meniscal injury location has an accuracy of 57.1%, indicating a minimal to low degree of agreement between MRI and arthroscopy results. Diagnosis of the injury region: Accuracy over 85%, with Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.3 to 0.59, p < 0.001. Diagnosis of the morphology of meniscal injuries: Accuracy over 89%, with Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.26 to 0.66, p < 0.001. Conclusion: There is a minimal to moderate correlation between MRI and arthroscopy in detecting, and diagnosing the location, region, and morphology of meniscal injuries in patients with ACL tears. Therefore, caution is advised when diagnosing meniscal injuries based solely on MRI findings in patients with ACL tears
Comparative biomechanical analysis of tibial posterior slope in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy vs. distal tuberosity osteotomy with and without anterior-posterior screw: a study using porcine tibia
Purpose While increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is a concern post-medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), the ability of distal tuberosity osteotomy (DTO) to maintain postoperative PTS after cyclic loading remains unverified. This study aims to determine whether PTS alterations significantly differ between DTO and MOWHTO following cyclic loading. Methods: Biomechanical evaluations were conducted on thirty porcine tibias using MOWHTO and DTO, with and without an anterior-posterior (AP) screw. To investigate PTS changes, cyclic testing was carried out for MOWHTO and DTO. Displacement along the mechanical axis during cycles 10th, 100th, 500th, 1000th, 1500th and 2000th, variations in anterior and posterior gaps after 2000 cycles and increased PTS after 2000 cycles, were compared across the three groups. The displacement was evaluated by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and changes in AG and PG and increased PTS were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. The sample size for α and β errors were <0.05 and <0.20, and the effect size was 0.60 for one-way ANOVA and 0.46 for repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: There were no significant differences in displacement and anterior gap changes among the groups. A significant difference was observed in the posterior gap changes (P < 0.001) and increased PTS (P = 0.013) among the groups. Post hoc analysis indicated substantial disparities between MOWHTO and DTO without the AP screw (P = 0.035), as well as between MOWHTO and DTO with the AP screw (P = 0.021) concerning the increased PTS. Conclusion: After cyclic loading, MOWHTO exhibited a notably smaller PTS change than DTO regardless of the presence of an AP screw
The clinical and functional outcomes of closed reduction and arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in patients with neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation
Introduction: Posterior shoulder dislocation with a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion is a rare and complex injury, requiring specialized treatment due to the difficulty in diagnosis, reduction, and addressing both sides of the pathology to reduce the potential for recurrent dislocation. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of closed reduction and arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure with posterior labral repair in patients with neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation for less than 12 weeks. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at university hospitals, managing 15 patients with neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation for less than 12 weeks and concomitant engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesions of less than 40% of the humeral articular surface. They were treated with closed reduction and arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure with posterior labral repair. Patients’ assessments included shoulder range of motion, pain levels using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, and functional outcome using the Oxford instability score and the University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scale (UCLA) with at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Results: All 15 patients reported no recurrent dislocation and restored shoulder motion at the final follow-up. External rotation significantly improved from 0° to a mean of 65° in adduction, at 90° of abduction, the respective measurement was 85° (p < 0.01). Active forward flexion increased from 35° to 145° (p < 0.01). UCLA and Oxford instability scores Showed marked improvement (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Closed reduction and arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure with posterior labral repair is a safe and effective way for managing patients with locked neglected posterior shoulder dislocations that have been neglected for less than 12 weeks with engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion defect, less than 40% of the humeral head
Stress shielding in stemmed reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an updated review
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is popular for the treatment of degenerative glenohumeral joint disease. Bone remodeling around the humeral stem related to stress shielding (SS) has been described. This review focuses on the specific radiological characteristics, risk factors, and clinical consequences of SS in RSA. Methods: A meticulous review was conducted of articles published between 2013 and 2023. Data on the definition, risk factors, and clinical impact of stress shielding were recorded. Results: Twenty-eight studies describing 2691 patients who had undergone RSA were included. The mean age of patients ranged from 63 to 80 years with mean follow-up periods of 12 months to 9.6 years. The prevalence of SS reached up to 39% at a 2-year follow-up. Females and elderly are typically at higher risk due to osteopenia. SS was more frequent with the use of long stems(>100 mm) compared to short stems(<100 mm). Stem design, onlay or inlay, and neck-shaft-angle did not influence SS. Frontal misalignment and a high filling ratio are riskfactors for SS. Biological factors also contribute to SS, associated with scapular notching. No correlation was found between SS and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: SS is common in patients with cementless implants after RSA, especially in female and elderly patients. It can be limited by implanting stems with a low diaphyseal filling-ratio, in correct coronal alignment. Risk factors for polyethylene debris, primarily scapular notching, should be avoided. The authors found no clinical consequences of stress shielding, but longer-term follow-up studies are required to confirm these findings