bepress Legal Repository
Not a member yet
645042 research outputs found
Sort by
Book Talk with Knox Thames
No full textMonday, November 18, 2024 | 12:30–1:45 PM | Biolchini Hall of Law, Room 1310
Join us on November 18 for a Book Talk hosted by Notre Dame Law School’s Lindsay and Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinic and the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies! Hear from Knox Thames as he shares insights on his new book, Ending Persecution: Charting the Path to Global Religious Freedom. All are welcome to attend.
Knox Thames is an international human rights lawyer, advocate, and author who has dedicated his career to promoting human rights, defending religious minorities, and combatting persecution.
Sponsors: Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies Lindsay and Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinichttps://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndls_posters/1962/thumbnail.jp
Kukin Program Newsletter – Spring 2024
No full textThe Kukin Program Newsletter – Spring 2024 highlights recent achievements, events, and developments in Cardozo Law School’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program. Key features include student accomplishments in national ADR competitions, faculty contributions to international conferences, and updates on new courses like Dispute Systems Design and International Investment Arbitration. The issue also covers the Cardozo Divorce Mediation Clinic’s 13th anniversary, faculty spotlights, and the Cardozo Dispute Resolution Society’s inaugural Arbitration Day. This newsletter reflects the Kukin Program\u27s commitment to advancing ADR education and supporting students in impactful, real-world learning experiences.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/kukin-program-newsletters/1001/thumbnail.jp
Bowling with Bumper Rails: How Firearms Examiners Have Duped the Courts and Generated Low Error Rates Only by Avoiding Challenging Comparisons
No full textPrivacy Mismanagement: Privacy Harms, Digital Market Monopolies, and Antitrust Law
No full textPrivacy self-management fails to protect consumer privacy. In the advent of the Internet, individuals had the option to tailor how their personal data was used throughout digital markets. However, since the digital markets are dominated by a few large conglomerates, namely Meta and Google, consumers have little choice to determine how they will use the internet in the face of the blatantly decreasing quality of privacy protection. The lack of adequate privacy protections in the digital markets harms consumers and erodes democratic institutions. Given the societal ramifications of consolidated digital markets on consumers, antitrust laws are the appropriate mechanism to remedy privacy harms and rebuild the guardrails of privacy protections, and the Federal Trade Commission should aggressively enforce these laws. Antitrust and privacy litigation should work in tandem to protect consumers who have had their personal information stolen and misappropriated, and to rebuild trust in democratic institutions
Detangling Knots in the Narratives: A Response to Theunis Roux
No full textThis article is part of a symposium on Theunis Roux\u27s article titled \u27Grand Narratives of Transition and the Quest for Democratic Constitutionalism in India and South Africa\u27, which proposes two dominant narratives about the constitutional transitions in India and South Africa. The author focuses on Indian constitutional praxis to evaluate the claims of both. Part A engages with Roux’s version of the \u27Liberal Progressive Narrative\u27 and demonstrates what post-liberal accounts of the Indian constitutional transition offers that differs from the standard narrative as presented by Roux. Part B turns to the \u27Culturalist Grand Narrative\u27 and teases out the differences between (and stakes of) its decolonial and culturalist strands
The SCOTUS Term Preview & Retrospective
No full textThe Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy invites you to the SCOTUS Term Preview & Retrospective, as part of the Cardozo School of Law’s Constitution Day program. Join Professors Wilfred Codrington, Haiyun Damon-Feng, Elizabeth Goldman, Michael Herz, and Saurabh Vishnubhakat as they discuss recent Supreme Court decisions and preview the upcoming term.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2024/1019/thumbnail.jp
Postcard of Sorin Hall, c1915-1920
No full textEarly law school classes were held in the Main Building. In January 1889, Sorin Hall, pictured above, housed the law department on the first floor.https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/metadata_images/1084/thumbnail.jp
Who Decides: Judges or Experts? Loper Bright, the End of Chevron and Its Impact on Corporate Governance
No full textIn Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. _____ (2024), the Supreme Court overruled the doctrine of Chevron deference, which had previously required courts to defer to reasonable agency guidance instead of reviewing rules and regulations de novo. Now that Chevron deference is no more, numerous regulations, rules, and opinions produced by federal agencies could be in jeopardy as they are newly subject to judicial review. In the corporate context, this could interfere with the implementation of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) principles, potentially leading to a re-tightening of shareholder primacy.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2024/1025/thumbnail.jp