African Union (AU) Common Repository
Not a member yet
9861 research outputs found
Sort by
Summary Report Second Regional Senior Course for the Prevention of Violent Extremism (PVE) to the address of Member States of the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS)
Full text linkSwiss FDF
Judgment on Reparations
No full textOn 16 August 2019, the Applicant filed his written submissions, praying the Court to award him reparations based on its findings in the judgment on the merit
Arrêt
Full text linkLes Requérants allèguent la violation des droits suivants :
i. Le droit à la liberté et à la sécurité, protégé par l’article 6 de la Charte ;
ii. Le droit à ce que leur cause soit entendue, protégé par l’article 7(1)(a)(b)(c) et (d) de la Charte, 8 et 10 de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme ;
iii. Le droit de ne pas être condamné pour une action ou une omission qui ne constituait pas au moment où elle a eu lieu, une infraction légalement punissable, protégé par l’article 7(2) de la Charte
Order on Amendment of pleadings in Application 051-2016
No full textThe Applicant filed the Application at this Court alleging that the proceedings in the domestic courts violated his rights as guaranteed in the Charter, namely, the right to a fair trial (Article 7), the right to dignity (Article 5), the right to life (Article 4) and the right to consular assistance (Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Assistance)
Order on procedure
No full textThe Applicant alleges the Decree-Law No. 11 of 2022 to establish a new Provisional Supreme Judicial Council in lieu of the elected Supreme Judiciary Council which was regulated by Law No. 34 of 2016 of 28 April 2016 violates the right of the people to self-determination, the right to participate in the conduct of public affairs beside the violation of the principles of the rule of law
ECOSOCC celebrates African day
Full text linkPress Release 021/2022This press release details events regarding the celebration of the African day at the Kalu kreativez center
EXTENSION OF CALL FOR APPLICATION FOR ELECTION TO THE 4TH ECOSOCC PERMANENT GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Full text linkPress Release: 020/2022The African Union Executive Council Decision 1143(XL) of the 40th Ordinary Session
of the Executive Council, 02-03 February 2022, requested the ECOSOCC Secretariat
in collaboration with the relevant departments of the African Union Commission to
launch the call for applications of the 4th Permanent General Assembly of ECOSOCC
during the second quarter of 2022 and ensure strict compliance with eligibility criteria
of ECOSOCC membership as provided for in the Statutes of the Organ. In furtherance
of the aforementioned Executive Council Decision, the ECOSOCC Secretariat
solicited applications from African Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) for membership
into the ECOSOCC General Assembl
Order (Strike Out )
Full text linkThe Court concludes that Applicant has failed to pursue his case within the meaning of Rule 65 (1) (b) of the Rules and thus, the Court decides to strike out the instant Application from its Cause List
ECOSOCC advocates for continued interaction and partnerships, as well as strengthened solidarity, between Africans and African diasporas
Full text linkPress Release:024/22The African Union Economic, Social, and Cultural Council held a forum with its call to action was a recurring theme during the Global Africa People to People Forum (GAPPF), which was held by ECOSOCC in collaboration with the Caribbean Pan African Network (CPAN), the Emancipation Support Committee of Trinidad and Tobago (ESCTT),and the Africa Transitional Justice Legacy Fund (ATJLF) and African Civil Society Organisations
Ordonnance (Réouverture Des Débats)
Full text linkOrdonnance (Réouverture Des Débats)Il ressort de la procédure dans le cadre de la présente affaire, telle qu’elle a été résumée précédemment, que les deux parties n’ont pas déposé leurs plaidoiries dans les délais accordés. Étant donné que les nouvelles plaidoiries impliquent de nouveaux arguments et de nouvelles demandes sur lesquels la Cour sera rappelée à se prononcer, l’intérêt de la justice exige que l’attention des deux parties soit attirée sur la procédure applicable en vertu de la règle 46(3) lue conjointement avec la règle 44(2) du Règlement.
Au regard de ce qui précède, il convient de procéder dans l’intérêt de la justice à la réouverture des débats afin de mettre en œuvre la procédure prescrite par la règle 46(3) du Règlement à savoir accorder aux deux parties un délai de quarante-cinq (45) jours pour répondre aux nouvelles observations soumises par chacune des deux partie