Slavistica Vilnensis
Not a member yet
541 research outputs found
Sort by
Церковнocлавянский Недельный октoих как функциональная разновидность Общей минеи
The Old Church Slavonic weekly octoechos contains 7 daily services (designed for each day of the week from Sunday through Saturday), usually of different octoechos modes.The author argues that despite its name, this type of octoechos was used in the immovable (calendarian) cycle of the ecclesiastical year as a functional equivalent of the general menaion. This argument is rooted in the fact that in the Orthodox tradition, each day of the week has its own symbolic meaning: Sunday was dedicated to the Lord, Monday to the angels, Thursday to John the Baptist, Wednesday to the Virgin, Thursday to the Apostles, Friday to the Cross, and Saturday to all the saints and all the dead. Thus, the single Sunday service of the weekly octoechos could be used during every immovable Lord’s Day (i.e., holiday commemorating an event in the life of Jesus, such as Christmas), the single Wednesday service could be used for every immovable Day of the Virgin (i.e., holiday commemorating an event in the life of the Virgin Mary, such as the Dormition), etc
Бывшая рукопись белградской Народной библиотеки (сербский октоих 1353 года, No. 213) в Гарварде
Эллипсис в словенском и русском языках
The paper is a contrastive analysis of ellipsis in Slovenian and Russian. The comparison is conducted within the framework of the Russian Grammar 80 syntax theory, which distinguishes between consituationally conditioned and unconditioned structural sentence schemes. Both Slovenian and Russian allow ellipsis of various parts of a sentence.The conditions for ellipsis (congruity of sentence structure and repetition of elements) are also similar in Slovenian and Russian.In consituational dependent incomplete realizations in Slovenian and Russian, differences are observed in the specification of the predictive element. In elision in negation, Slovenian preserves the negative particle, in contrast to Russian. Moreover, in Russian, ellipsis of subject-object determinants expressed as pronouns is common, whereas in Slovenian, determinants generally are retained.Ellipsis within a phrase is characterized in both languages by omission of basic words: the differences are associated with the degree of acceptability in the language of corresponding (equivalent) compound names, or they are usually strengthened. Differences are observable also in ellipsis of a subordinate word from prepositional phrases in which the the preposition is retained. Incomplete ellipse of predicate and subject-object determinants is discussed separately.The variety of Slovenian verb forms allows the preservation within the sentence structure of formal predicate indicators, in contrast to Russian, where this type of construction is much less common. Anaphorization of object-subject determinants in Slovenian demonstrates the importance to the language of a semantically more split sentence structure.The differences in ellipsis between the languages are also based on the interpretation of similar sentences as consituationally unconditioned incomplete realizations in one language, and as full realizations in the other. Similarities and differences are also examined with respect to lexico-semantic groups of verbs that act as predicates in both languages in consituationally unconditional sentence structures
Międzynarodowa konferencja naukowa Polonistica Vilnensis: paradygmaty rozwoju (Wilno 25–26 września 2003 r.)
История одного эвфемизма
The article analyses the history and semantic evolution of the Russian word xep, a Church Slavonic borrowing meaning the Cyrillic letter χ. For several centuries, the word was also used in Russian as an euphemism for a phoneticallysimilar obscene term of abuse. The orthographic reform of 1918 replaced the old name for the letter χ. For this reason, the word xep lost its original meaning in the 20th century, and gradually developed from a euphemism into an obscenity in its own right