Slavistica Vilnensis
Not a member yet
541 research outputs found
Sort by
Безличные и функционально безличные глаголы со значением атмосферно-метеорологических явлений в литовском, словенском и русском языках
Get PDFThe paper analyzes the lexical-semantic group of verbs that form impersonal sentences expressing environmental condition, by comparing Lithuanian, Slovenian, and Russian. The author points out similarities and distinctions in the three languages with respect to the structure of the verb groups, their internal composition, the features of the semantic structures formed by such verbs, and the morphological features of the verbs. In a number of cases Lithuanian and Slovenian address these issues similarly while in others, Lithuanian is closer to Russian
Разнородность текста Пролога по данным орфографии (проложное Житие Андрея Юродивого на фоне соседних житий)
No full textThis study examines the distribution of several orthographic variants in the Old Church Slavonic Prologue in order to establish textological boundaries within the text. Five East Slavic Prologue manuscripts, dated from the 13th and, primarily, 14th centuries, serve as the corpus. The Prologue is a book of short saints’ lives, which, in the 12th century, included fragments from the Life of St Andrew the Fool. One may conclude that during the history of the text, the orthographic system of the Life became virtually the same as the orthographic system used in adjacent saints’ lives within the Prologue. In four of the five manuscripts under study, however, the distribution of several orthographic variants appears to be textologically bound, even though the text under analysis in each manuscript has been written by a single scribe; i.e., some of these variants occur only in the fragments from the Life of St Andrew the Fool and do not occur in the adjacent lives.It is generally argued that orthography is of no textological significance. However, despite multiple recopyings of manuscripts over the centuries, orthographic distinctions may be preserved between different parts of a single manuscript. Such distinctions enable us to trace the history of compiled texts
Протокол пepвoгo заседания Президиума Международногo славистическогo комитета, состоявшегoся с 9 по 11 сентября 2004 roда в местечке Kaмeнь Шленски, недалеко от г. Ополе в Польше
No full textО богослужебных пометах в славянских агиографических сборниках
Get PDFThe article offers a systematization of liturgical notations that appear in Slavic hagiographic miscellany manuscripts. These notations, which are unconnected with the content of the hagiographic texts, indicate that these texts were read during the liturgy, which may be of importance in two respects. First, together with actual liturgical books, these notations can serve as sources on the history of the Slavic liturgy: in particular, they can cast light on how liturgical instructions for reading saints’ lives during matins were carried out in practice. Second, the liturgical text division of saints’ lives, in those cases where such division is made, must be taken into account in the textological study of individual texts
Hrvatsko-srpski sporovi oko jezika i pisma u Trojednici (1848.–1861. g.)
Get PDFThe goal of this study is to explore the role of language and alphabet in constructing the national identities and ideologies of the Croats and Serbs from the territory of the Triune Kingdom of Dalmatia, Croatia and Slavonia, from the beginning of the Revolution of 1848/1849 to the first session of the Croatian-Slavonian Parliament (Sabor) in Zagreb in 1861, during the period of the Austrian chancellor Alexander Bach, who attempted to centralize the multiethnic and multilinguistic Habsburg Empire administratively.The study reaches the following conclusions:1) The South Slavs within the Habsburg Monarchy had been deeply imbued with linguistic nationalism after the Revolution of 1848/1849 as a reaction against the intolerant minority policy by the leaders of the Hungarian uprising and revolution against the Habsburgs. What the Hungarian liberals required from the Habsburgs as national rights in the Habsburg Monarchy they did not wish to be granted to non-Hungarians within the greater Hungarian Kingdom, which included Croats and Serbs in the Triune Kingdom. The Hungarian liberals intended for only ethnolinguistic Hungarians to enjoy the rights of a “political nation”, and thus, in their view, the Hungarian language had to be the only official/public medium of communication in a greater historical Hungary.2) There are two basic reasons for the expression of linguistic nationalism by Croats and Serbs in the Triune Kingdom after 1849: a) a deep conviction by both that language and script (in addition to confession) were the crucial cornerstones of national identity; and b) a reaction to the decisions by the Hungarian Parliament (Dieta) in 1839–1840 and 1843–1844 to introduce Hungarian as the official language in all provinces of the Hungarian Kingdom.3) Serbian linguistic nationalism was basically aimed against the Croatian attempt to impose Croatian as the sole official language within Dalmatia, Croatia and Slavonia (in 1847 and later) and to proclaim only ethnic Croats as holders of full-scale political rightse. In other words, Serbian linguistic nationalism was a protest against the Croatian policy of ethnolinguistic assimilation of the Serbs in the Triune Kingdom.4) Both the Croats and Serbs understood the Hungarian requirement of the Hungarian (Magyar) language as the sole official language in a greater historical Hungary as an attempt both to Magyarize all non-Hungarians and to homogenize the multiethnolinguistic Hungarian Kingdom.5) Proof that the Central European Romanticist idea of language as a pivotal national determinator was sincerely accepted by the South Slavs within the Habsburg Monarchy is the fact that the Croatian and Serbian national intelligentia neglected the use of the Landsprache, but fought for the using a language or languages named after their own ethnic group(s) (Croatian and Serbian) in public affairs.6) The Serbs in the Triune Kingdom politically struggled for inclusion of the Serbian ethnic name into the compound name for the official language in public use in Dalmatia, Croatia and Slavonia (i.e., the Croato-Serbian language) in order to preserve their national identity within these provinces and to fight against Croatization of their ethnolinguistic identity
К вопросу о происхождении лексем жадность, заочно, заочный, заслуга, злость в русском языке
Get PDFThe article examines the origin and the history of the words жадность, заочно, заочный, заслуга, злость found in diplomatic correspondence from Muscovite Russia of the 17th century. The author argues that these derivatives are Polonisms, and that заочно, заочный, заслуга, and злость were borrowed into the Russian written language of the 16th and 17th centuries through ruthenian language
