Slavistica Vilnensis
Not a member yet
541 research outputs found
Sort by
Галииа Мишкинене (ред.). Ivano Luckevičiaus kitabas – Lietuvos tоtоrių kultūros paminklas = Китаб Ивана Луцкевича – памятник народной культуры литовских татар
Мотивы праздников церковного года в сочинениях митрополита киевского Илариона
The author demonstrates that the composition of three works by Kievan Metropolitan Hilarion – Sermon on Law and Grace, Encomium to Vladimir, and Prayer – contains many citations from different Orthodox liturgical books, where the entire text is usually divided into portions to be read publicly in the church on particular feasts of the ecclesiastical year. The citations used by Hilarion are liturgically connected to a wide range of feasts, such as Easter, Epiphany, the Great Lent, Nativity of John the Baptist, Annunciation, Christmas, Nativity of the Theotokos, Ascension of Jesus, Pentecost, the Palm Week, the New Ecclesiastical Year, etc. It means that Hilarion’s works should not be regarded as specifically connected to a certain ecclesiastical feast, but rather as heortologically all-embracing texts
Письменность Великого княжества Литовского как источник лексических заимствований в других славянских языках
The article examines the history of the following words found in Russian chancery language (diplomatic correspondence) of Muscovite Russia of the first half of the 17th century: voloka ‘lot and land measure (about 16,8-21 hectare) in the Great Duchy of Lithuania and in the West part of Muscovite Russia’, vypustoʃьyti ‘devastate’, vyrazumeti ‘understand, comprehend; clear up, get to know’, naruʃьyvati ‘break’ and naruʃьytisia ‘be/get broken’. The author aims at proving that these intraslavonic derivates are interslavonic lexical loan-words from the written languages of the Great Duchy of Lithuania in the other Slavonic languages: Polish (wypustoszyć, wyrozumieć, naruszyć się) and Russian (voloka, vypustošyti, vyrazumeti, narušyvati, narušytisia) and retraces further fate of these words in all contacting languages
Б.Ю. Норман. Лингвистическая прaзматика (на материале русского и других славянских языков): курс лекций
Miroslaw Dawlewicz (red). Europejskość ojczyzn. Litewsko-роlskiе związki literackie, kulturowe i językowe. Materiały międzynarodowej konferecji naukowej. Wilno, 23–24 października 2009 roku. Pod red. Mirosława Dawlewicza
Текстологические особенности стишного пролога ГИМ, Увар. 56
The article is devoted to the analysis of the oldest preserved copy of the Metrical synaxarion, created and used in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania – the Russian State Museum Uvarov collection’s synaxarion No. 56-1, 1490’s, September – February. The following features are characteristic of this particular synaxarion:1. The Metrical synaxarion of Bulgarian translation is taken as a basis;2. Many similarities with the Novgorod redaction of the Metrical synaxarion are revealed, however, the structures are not alike (there are significant differences in the content of lives, didactic sections do not coincide, the calendar distribution of materials differs);3. While creating the given version of the Metrical synaxarion bibliognosts turned to the Simple synaxarion. The analysis of borrowings makes it possible to conclude that the compilers used both short and expanded redactions.4. It is most likely that the short redaction has been used while compiling didactic sections, whereas some of the lives were most obviously oriented towards the expanded redaction;5. Some life texts are compiled by merging and combining the materials of the Simple and Metrical synaxaria;6. The life section is enriched by texts that are new to the Metrical synaxarion, such as the lives of St. Peter and Alexius, Metropolitans of Moscow, the cycle of 10 lives of the Kievan Caves Monastery monks;7. A small number of new didactic readings are included (3 sermons, 2 stories about the miracles of the saints).The revealed textological features allow to state that we are dealing with a special redaction of the Metrical synaxarion, the content of which differs from those of Tymovo, Lucius, Barlaam, Moscow and Novgorod, as distinguished by G. Petkov. Given redaction was widespread in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, at the moment 13 copies (autumn and spring half of the year) of similar content are known of